Liberalna teoria polityki zagranicznej i jej analityczne zastosowanie

• Autorzy: Edward Haliżak

Warianty tytułu

The Liberal Theory of Foreign Policy and Its Analytical Application

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Celem artykułu jest rekonstrukcja liberalnej teorii polityki zagranicznej poprzez ukazanie jej założeń ontologicznych i epistemologicznych, a następnie jej analitycznego zastosowania. Teorię tę, odwołującą się do idei i wartości liberalnych, zaczęto rozwijać w latach 60. ubiegłego wieku, a po zakończeniu zimnej wojny sformułowano jej założenia, głównie w opozycji do strukturalnego realizmu, zgodnie z którym system międzynarodowy to kluczowa determinanta międzynarodowej aktywności państw. Przedstawiciele szkoły liberalnej, nie negując znaczenia uwarunkowań zewnętrznych, zwracają uwagę, że równie ważną rolę odgrywają te o charakterze wewnętrznym, np. to, czy system wewnątrzpolityczny państwa ma charakter demokratyczny czy autorytarny. Przejawia się to w ujmowaniu w analogiczny sposób obydwu systemowych uwarunkowań. Druga i trzecia część artykułu są poświęcone analizie polityki zagranicznej państw Zachodu i Stanów Zjednoczonych w kategoriach liberalnego modelu polityki zagranicznej, który może być ujmowany jako eksplanans, czyli narzędzie analityczne.(abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The purpose of this article is to reconstruct the liberal theory of foreign policy by showing its ontological and epistemological premises followed by analytical application. The theory, invoking liberal ideas and values, was first developed in the 1970s, and its main principles were formulated after the end of the Cold War, mainly in opposition to structural realism, according to which the international system is the key determinant of the international activity of states. While not negating the significance of external factors, representatives of the liberal school point out that internal factors play an equally important role. For example, it matters whether the internal political system of a given state is democratic or authoritarian. Consequently, the two systemic determinants are approached in an analogous manner. The second and third parts of the article are dedicated to the analysis of the foreign policy of Western countries and the United States in terms of the liberal model of foreign policy, which can be perceived as the explanans - an analytical tool.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Liberalizm; Demokracja; System międzynarodowy; Neoliberalizm; Nowy ład międzynarodowy

EN

Liberalism; Democracy; International system; Neoliberalism; New international order

• Czasopismo: Stosunki Międzynarodowe
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 52
• Numer: nr 2
• Strony: 11--38

Twórcy

autor

Edward Haliżak

• Uniwersytet Warszawski

Bibliografia

• E. Haliżak, Ontologia i epistemologia badania polityki zagranicznej państwa, "Stosunki Międzynarodowe - International Relations" 2015, t. 51, nr 4, s. 9-37.
• M. Doyle, Ways of War and Peace, W.W. Norton, New York 1997
• B. Russett, J. Oneal, Triangulating Peace: Democracy Interdependence and International Organization, W.W. Norton, New York 2001.
• S. Hoffman, The crisis of liberal institutionalism, "Foreign Policy" 1995, t. 98, s. 167.
• Ch. Brown, "Really existing liberalism" and international order, "Millenium" 1992, nr 3, s. 313-328.
• S. Sałajczyk, Wizje rzeczywistości międzynarodowej, w: E. Haliżak, R. Kuźniar (red.), Stosunki międzynarodowe. Geneza. Struktura. Dynamika, Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa 2004, s. 160.
• J. Rosenau, The Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy, The Free Press, New York 1967
• J. Rosenau, The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy, The Free Press, New York 1971
• W. Hanrieder, Compatibility and consensus: A proposal for the conceptual linkage of external and internal dimensions of foreign policy, "American Political Science Review" 1967, t. 61, nr 4, s. 971-982.
• G. Allison, M. Halperin, Bureaucratic politics: A paradigm and some policy implications, "World Politics" 1972, nr 1, s. 40-79.
• R. Jones, Principles of Foreign Policy: The Civil State in Its World Setting, Martin Robertson, Oxford 1979
• M. Ninic, Democracy and Foreign Policy: The Fallacy of Political Realism, Columbia University Press, New York 1992
• H. Muller, T. Risse-Kappen, From the outside in and the inside out: International relations, domestic politics and foreign policy, w: V. Hudson, D. Skidmore (red.), The Limits of State Autonomy: Societal Groups and Foreign Policy Formulation, Westview, Boulder 1993
• T. Risse-Kappen, Public opinion: Domestic structure and foreign policy in liberal democracies, "World Politics" 1991, nr 4, s. 479-512.
• M. Doyle, Liberalism and world politics, "American Political Science Review" 1986, t. 80, nr 4, s. 1151-1169.
• M. Doyle ,Kant, liberal legacies and foreign affairs: Parts I and II, "Philosophy and Public Affairs" 1983, nr 1, s. 205-235, 323-353
• S. Chan, Mirror, mirror on the wall...: Are the free countries more pacific, "Journal of Conflict Resolution" 1984, nr 4, s. 617-648
• B. Russett, Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1993.
• E. Morse, Modernization and the Transformation of International Relations, The Free Press, New York 1976
• R. Keohane, J. Nye, Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, Little Brown, Boston 1977
• E. Morse, The transformation of foreign policies: Modernization, externalization and interdependence, "World Politics" 1970, nr 3, s. 371-392.
• R. Keohane, J. Nye, Globalization: What's new? What's not? (And so what), "Foreign Policy" 2000, nr 118, s. 104-119.
• M. Doyle, Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism and Socialism, W.W. Norton, New York 1997.
• R.O. Keohane, J. Nye (red.), Transnational Relations and World Politics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1971, s. XII-XVI
• S. Huntington, Transnational organization in world politics, "World Politics 1973, nr 3, s. 333-368.
• P. Haas, Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination, "International Organization" 1992, nr 1, s. 1-36.
• R. Mansbach, Y. Ferguson, D. Lampert, The Web of World Politics: Non-state Actors in the Global System, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs 1976
• T. Risse-Kappen (red.), Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1995
• D. Josselin, W. Wallace (red.), Non-State Actors in World Politics, Palgrave, London 2001.
• S. Krasner, Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1999.
• M. Rochester, The paradigm debate in international relations and its implication for foreign policy making: Toward a redefinition of the "National Interest", "Western Political Quarterly" 1978, nr 1, s. 49-63.
• J. Viner, Power vs plenty as objectives foreign policy in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, "World Politics" 1948, nr 1, s. 2-20.
• Ch. Kindleberger, Group behaviour and international trade, "Journal of Political Economy" 1951, t. 59, nr 1, s. 30-46.
• R. Bauer, A. Dexter, American Business and Public Policy: The Politics of Foreign Trade, Atherton Press, New York 1963.
• R. Gilpin, US Power and the Multinational Corporations: The Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment, Basic Books, New York 1975.
• R. Rogowski, Trade and the variety of democratic institutions, "International Organization" 1987, nr 2, s. 203-223
• R. Rogowski, Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1989.
• H. Milner, Interests, Institutions and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1997.
• T. Risse-Kappen, Public opinion, domestic structure and foreign policy in liberal democracies, "World Politics" 1991, t. 43, nr 4, s. 479-512.
• J. Checkel, Ideas and International Political Change: Soviet/Russian Behaviour at the End of the Cold War, Yale University Press, New Haven 1997
• V. Hudson, Culture and Foreign Policy, Lynne Rienner, Boulder 1997
• R. Hinnebusch, A. Ehteshami (red.), The Foreign Policy of the Middle East States, Lynne Rienner, London 2004.
• M. East, Ch. Herman, Do nation-types account for foreign policy behavior?, w: J. Rosenau (red.), Comparing Foreign Policy: Theories, Findings and Methods, Wiley, New York 1974
• R. Rummel, National Attributes and Behaviour, Sage, Beverly Hills 1979
• S. Krasner, Approaches to the state: Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics, "Comparative Politics" 1984, t. 16, s. 223-246.
• A. Cooper, R. Higgott, K. Nossal, Relocating Middle Powers: Australia and Canada in Changing World Order, University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver 1993
• D. Lee, J. Hamill, A middle power paradox? South African diplomacy in the post-apartheid era, "International Relations" 2001, nr 4, s. 33-59
• J. Ping, Middle Power Statecraft: Indonesia, Malaysia and the Asia Pacific, Ashgate, Aldershot 2005.
• O. Holsti, Public opinion and foreign policy, "International Studies Quarterly" 1992, t. 36, nr 4, s. 439-466.
• D. Foyle, Public opinion and foreign policy: Elite beliefs as a mediating variable, "International Studies Quarterly" 1997, t. 41, nr 1, s. 141-170.
• P. Robinson, Theorising the influence of media on world politics, "European Journal of Communication" 2001, nr 4, s. 523-544.
• E. Haliżak (red.), Polityka zagraniczna i wewnętrzna państwa w procesie integracji europejskiej, Oficyna Wydawnicza Brandta, Bydgoszcz 2004.
• H. Bull, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, Macmillan, Basingstoke 1977.
• R. Cooper, The Economics of Interdependence, McGraw-Hill, New York 1968, s. 1.
• R. Cooper, Economic Policy in an Interdependent World, MIT Press, Cambridge 1986.
• K. Ohmae, The End of Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies, The Free Press, New York 1995.
• R. Keohane, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Prince ton University Press, Princeton 1984.
• A. Wendt, Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics, "International Organization" 1992, nr 2, s. 381-425.
• B. Bueno de Mesquita, Domestic politics and international relations, "International Studies Quar terly" 2002, t. 46, nr 1, s. 1-9
• J. Fearon, Domestic politics, foreign policy, and theories of international relations, "An nual Review of Political Science" 1998, nr 1, s. 289-313.
• P. Gourevitch, The second image reversed: The international sources of domestic politics, "International Organization" 1978, nr 4, s. 881-912.
• R. Putnam, Diplomacy and domestic policy: The logic of two-level games, "International Organization" 1988, nr 3, s. 427-460.
• A. Moravcsik, Introduction: Integrating international and domestic theories of international bargaining, w: P. Evans, H. Jacobson, R. Putnam (red.), Double-edged Diplomacy, University of California Press, Berkeley 1993, s. 3-42.
• A. Moravcsik, A liberal theory of international politics, "International Organization" 1997, nr 4, s. 513.
• A. Moravcsik, Negotiating the Single European Act, w: R. Keohane, S. Hoffmann (red.), The New European Community, Westview Press, Boulder 1991
• A. Moravcsik, Preferences and power in the European Community: A liberal intergovernmentalist approach, "Journal of Common Market Studies" 1993, nr 4, s. 473-524
• A. Moravcsik, Why the European Community Strengthens the State: Domestic Politics and International Cooperation, Working Paper Series, 52, Cambridge Mass. Center for European Studies, Harvard University
• A. Moravcsik, Explaining international human rights regime: Liberal theory and Western Europe, "European Journal of International Relations" 1995, nr 1, s. 157-189
• A. Moravcsik, Liberal intergovernmentalism and integration: A rejoinder, "Journal of Common Market Studies" 1995, nr 4, s. 611-628.
• D. Wincott, Institutional interaction and European integration: Toward and everyday critique of liberal intergovernmentalism, "Journal of Common Market Studies" 1995, nr 4, s. 597-609.
• R. Trzaskowski, Dynamika reformy systemu podejmowania decyzji w Unii Europejskiej, Wydawnictwo Prawo i Praktyka Gospodarcza, Warszawa 2005.
• A. Moravcsik, Liberal international relations theory: A scientific assessment, w: C. Elman, M. Elman (red.), Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field, MIT Press, Cambridge 2003, s. 159-205.
• H. Milner, A. Moravcsik (red.), Power, Interdependence, and Nonstate Actors in World Politics, Princeton University Press, Princeton 2009
• A. Moravcsik, Liberal theories of international law, w: J.L. Dunaff, M. Pollock (red.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of Art, Princeton University Press, Princeton 2012.
• J. Legro, A. Moravcsik, Is anybody still a realist?, "International Security" 1999, nr 2, s. 5-55.
• D. Long, The Harvard School of liberal international theory: A case for closure, "Millennium - Journal of International Studies" 1995, t. 24, nr 3, s. 489-505
• A. Moravcsik, The new liberalism, w: C. Reus-Smit, D. Snidal (red.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008, s. 234-254.
• B. Jahn, Kant, Mill and illiberal legacies in international affairs, "International Organization" 2005, nr 1, s. 177-207
• B. Jahn,The tragedy of liberal diplomacy: Democratization, intervention, statebuilding II, "Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding" 2007, nr 1, s. 211-229
• B. Jahn, Liberal internationalism: From ideology to empirical theory - and back again, "International Theory" 2009, nr 3, s. 409-438.
• E. Haliżak, Północ w stosunkach międzynarodowych, w: E. Haliżak, R. Kuźniar (red.), Stosunki międzynarodowe. Geneza. Kultura. Dynamika, Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa 2006, s. 435-451.
• E. Adler, Seizing the middle ground: Constructivism in world politics, "European Journal of International Relations" 1997, nr 3, s. 319-363
• A. Wendt, Społeczna teoria stosunków międzynarodowych, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa 2008, s. 11-46.
• J. Goldstein, R. Keohane (red.), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Believes, Institutions and Political Change, Cornell University Press, Ithaca 1993, s. 8-11.
• T. Risse-Kappen, Ideas do not float freely: Transnational coalition, domestic structures and the end of cold war, "International Organization" 1994, t. 48, nr 2, s. 185-214
• H. Woods, Economic ideas and international relations: Beyond rational neglect, "International Studies Quarterly" 1995, t. 39, nr 2, s. 161-180
• A. Yee, The casual effects of ideas on polices, "International Organization" 1996, t. 50, nr 1, s. 69-108
• J. Legro, The transformation of policy ideas, "American Journal of Political Science" 2000, t. 44, nr 3, s. 419-432.
• F. Fukuyama, The end of history, "The National Interest" 1989, nr 1, s. 3-18.
• S. Huntington, The clash of civilizations, "Foreign Affairs" 1993, nr 3, s. 22-49.
• S. Huntington, The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Oklahoma University Press, Oklahoma 1991.
• Ch. Kegley, The neoidealist moment in international studies? Neorealist myths and the new international realities, "International Studies Quarterly" 1993, nr 2, s. 44-76.
• R. Latham, The Liberal Moment: Modernity, Security and the Making of Postwar International Order, Columbia University Press, New York 1997.
• M. Kahler, Liberalization and foreign policy, w: idem (red.), Liberalization and Foreign Policy, Columbia University Press, New York 1997, s. 1-25.
• E. Haliżak, Współzależności polityki i ekonomii w stosunkach międzynarodowych, w: E. Haliżak et al. (red.), Stosunki międzynarodowe w XXI wieku. Księga Jubileuszowa z okazji 30-lecia Instytutu Stosunków Międzynarodowych UW, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa 2006, s. 23-47
• J. Revenhill (red.), Globalna ekonomia polityczna, tłum. A. Gąsior-Niemiec, M. Dera, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jabiellońskiego, Kraków 2011
• J. Caporaso, D. Levine, Theories of Political Economy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1992; R. Gilpin, Global Political Economy: Understanding International Economic Order, Princeton University Press, Princeton 2001.
• S. Strange, States and Markets, Printer, London 1999.
• B. Buzan, O. Wæver, Liberalism and Security: The Contradictions of the Liberal Leviathan, Working Papers, 23, Copenhagen Peace Research Institute, København 1998.
• H. Muller, J. Wolf, Democratic peace: Many data, little explanation, w: L. Brock, A. Geis, H. Muller (red.), Democratic Wars: Looking at the Dark Side of Democratic Peace, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndsmills 2006, s. 41-73.
• Ch. Streit, Union Now: A Proposal for a Federal Union of the Leading Democracies, Harper and Brothers, New York 1983
• J. Rummel, Libertarianism and international violence, "Journal of Conflict Resolution" 1983, t. 27, nr 1, s. 27-71
• B. Russett, Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1993.
• J. Dunn, The concept of trust in the politics of John Locke, w: R. Rorty, J.B. Schneewind, Q. Skinner (red.), Philosophy in History: Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, New York 1984
• R. Dahl, Controlling Nuclear Weapons: Democracy versus Guardianship, Syracuse University Press, Syracuse 1985.
• R. Cobden, The political writings of Richard Cobden, w: M.G. Forsyth, H.M.A. Keens-Soper, P. Savigear (red.), The Theory of International Relations: Selected Texts from Gentili to Treitschke, Allen & Unwin, London 1970.
• R. Rosecrance, The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World, Little Brown, New York 1986.
• J. Schumpeter, Imperialism and Social Classes, Meridian, New York 1955.
• K. Barbieri, The Liberal Illusion: Does Trade Promote Peace?, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 2003.
• J. Joffe, Tocqueville revisited: Are good democracies bad players in the game of nations, "Washington Quarterly" 1988, nr 1, s. 161-189.
• D. Hume, Essays: Moral, Political and Literary, Oxford University Press, London 1963.
• W. Clemence, The superpowers and the Third World, w: Ch. Kegley, P. McGowan (red.), Foreign Policy US/USRR, Sage, Beverly Hills 1992.
• B. Buzan, Economic structure and international security: The limits of the liberal case, "International Organization" 1984, nr 4, s. 597-624.
• J. Muravchik, Exporting Democracy: Fulfilling America's Destiny, AEI Press, Washington 1991;
• T. Smith, America's Mission, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1994.
• J. Purdy, Liberal empire: Assessing the arguments "Ethics and International Affairs" 2003, t. 17, nr 2, s. 35-47.
• E. Haliżak, Liberalna wizja porządku międzynarodowego, w: R. Kuźniar (red.), Porządek międzynarodowy u progu XXI wieku, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa 2005, s. 59-84.
• C. Dueck, Reluctant Crusaders: Power, Culture and Change in American Grand Strategy, Princeton University Press, Princeton 2006
• D. Hughes, Liberal warfare: A crusade twice removed, "International Studies Review" 2013, t. 15, nr 3, s. 351-373.
• J. Nye, Public diplomacy and soft power, "The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science" 2008, t. 616, nr 1, s. 94-109.
• R. Falk, Humanitarian Intervention and Legitimacy Wars, Routledge, London 2014.
• M. Doyle, International ethics and the responsibility to protect, "International Studies Review" 2011, t. 13, nr 1, s. 72-84
• T. Reinold, Sovereignty and the Responsibility to Protect: The Power of Norms and the Norms of the Powerful, Routledge, London 2014.
• S. Beth, E. Zachay, The globalization of liberalization: Policy diffusion in the international political economy, "American Political Science Review" 2004, nr 1, s. 171-189
• S. Bath, F. Dobbin, Introduction: The international diffusion of liberalism, "International Organization" 2006, nr 4, s. 781-810.
• S. Hook, Ideas and change in US foreign aid: Inventing the millennium challenge corporation, "Foreign Policy Analysis" 2008, nr 4, s. 147-167.
• E. Haliżak, Ideowe problemy globalnego ładu liberalnego w gospodarce światowej - role i znaczenie Washington Consensus, w: E. Haliżak, R. Kuźniar, J. Symonides (red.), Globalizacja a stosunki międzynarodowe, Oficyna Wydawnicza "Branta", Bydgoszcz - Warszawa 2003.
• N. Gleditsch, The liberal moment fifteen years on, "International Studies Quarterly" 2008, t. 52, nr 4, s. 691-712.
• B. Jahn, Rethinking democracy promotion, "Review of International Studies" 2012, t. 38, nr 4, s. 685-705.
• K. Mahbubani, Wielka konwergencja. Azja, Zachód i logika jednego świata, tłum. H. Bińczak, M. Halaba, Kurhaus, Warszawa 2013.
• D. Chandler (red.), International Statebuilding: The Rise of Post-Liberal Governance, Routledge, London 2010
• O. Richmond, A Post-Liberal Peace, Routledge, London 2011.
• L. Hartz, The Liberal Tradition in America, Harcourt Brace, San Diego 1991.
• M. Lipset, American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword, W.W. Norton, New York 1996;
• S. Huntington, Who Are We? The Challenge to America's National Identity, Simon and Schuster, New York 2004.
• W.R. Mead, Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How It Changed the World, Routledge, New York 2001.
• W. LaFeber, The New Empire: An Interpretation of American Expansion 1860-1898, Cornell University Press, Ithaca 1963.
• E. Carr, The Twenty Years Crisis 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, Harper and Row, New York 1939 (1964).
• J. Ikenberry, Liberal hegemony and empire? American power in the age of unipolarity, w: D. Held, M. Koenig-Archibugi (red.), American Power in the 21st Century, Polity, Cambridge 2004.
• G. Hellman, R. Wolf, Neorealism, neoliberal institutionalism and the future of NATO, "Security Studies" 1993, nr 1, s. 3-43.
• M. Leffler, The American conception of national security and the beginnings of the Cold War, 1945-1948, "The American Historical Review" 1984, t. 89, nr 2, s. 346-381.
• H. Lasswell, National Security and Individual Freedom, McGraw-Hill Book, New York 1950.
• S. Huntington, The Soldier and the State: The Theory of Civil-Military Relations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1985.
• R. Latham, Liberalism's order/liberalism's other: A genealogy of threat, "Alternatives" 1995, t. 20, nr 1, s. 111-146.
• K. Holmes, American internationalism: Promoting freedom, democracy, and development, "U.S. Foreign Policy Agenda - An Electronic Journal of the U.S. Department of State" 2003, t. 8, nr 1, s. 5-7.
• J. Purdy, Liberal empire: Assessing the arguments, "Ethics and International Affairs" 2003, t. 17, nr 2, s. 35-47.
• The National Security Strategy of the United America, September 2002, https://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/html.
• A. Valladeo, Democratic hegemony and American hegemony, "Cambridge Review of International Affairs" 2006, t. 19, nr 2, s. 243-260.
• B. Obama, Renewing American Leadership, "Foreign Affairs" 2007, nr 4, https://www.foreignaffairs. com/articles/2007-07-01/renewing-american-leadership.
• C. Prestowitz, Rogue Nation: American Unilateralism and the Failure of Good Intentions, Basic Books, New York 2003
• D. Cooper, Neoconservatism and American Foreign Policy: New Approaches, Routledge, New York 2013.
• P. Katzenstein, R. Keohane, Anti-Americanisms in World Politics, Cornell University Press, Ithaca 2007
• S. Brooks, Anti-Americanism and the Limits of Public Diplomacy, Routledge, New York 2015.
• J. Nye, The Paradox of American Power: Why the World's Only Superpower Can't Go It Alone, New York 2002
• J. Nye, Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, Public Affairs, New York 2004.
• J. Gow, Liberal Warsaw, Routledge, New York 2015.
• J. Mearsheimer, Imperial by design, "The National Interest" 2010, nr 111, s. 16-34
• J. Mearsheimer, Why the Ukraine crisis is the West's fault, "Foreign Affairs" 2014, nr 5, s. 1-12.
• N. Boucher, Democracy Promotion as US Foreign Policy, Routledge, New York 2015
• R. Pee, Democracy Promotions: National Security and Strategy, Routledge, New York 2015
• J. Huber, Democracy Promotion and Foreign Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, New York 2015
• M. Green, D. Twining, Democracy and American grand strategy in Asia: The realist principle behind an enduring idealism, "Contemporary Southeast Asia" 2008, nr 1, s. 1-28.