The Russian Federation, the United States, and International Order as a Social Construct
To what extent are we justified in speaking of Soviet/Russian and US political leaders, qua sentient beings, as 'conscious of certain common interests and common values, [thereby] form[ing] [international] society in the sense that they conceive themselves to be bound by a common set of [principles, norms and] rules in their relations with one another, and share in the workings of common institutions'? To what extent have the respective political leaderships conceived of their states as great powers encumbered with the burden of maintaining international order and the very existence of the international society? Building on English School theorizing and constructivist methodology, I answer these questions by advance two principal claims: first, the historical record demonstrates that the two states' political leaderships are presently - and were in the past - 'conscious of certain common interests[,] common values', common principles, norms and rules, and 'share in the workings of common institutions' so as to maintain the 'pattern or disposition of international activity that sustains [the] goals of the society of states'. And second, the political leaderships have conceived of their respective states as great powers indispensable to the maintenance of international order, stability, and the very existence of international society.(original abstract)
- A. Jankovski, 'Ideas y normas como determinantes de la política exterior: el caso de Guerra Aérea durante la Segunda Guerra Mundial', in M. Sera Vázquez and A. Lozano (eds.), La SegundaGuerra Mundial: A 70 años, Huatulco, Mexico: Universidad del Mar, 2015, pp. 523-554.
- A. Wendt, 'Constructing International Politics', International Security, 1995, Vol. 20, No. 1, p. 75.
- Aftermath: Uncertainty and Opportunity', The New York Times, 12 November, 1982, Section A; Page 1, Column 5
- B. Buzan, 'From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School'," International Organisation", 1993, Vol. 47, No. 3, p. 319.
- B. Buzan, 'The English School: An Unexploited Resource in IR', "Review of International Studies", 2001, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 471-488, p. 476.
- B. Buzan, From international to world society? English school theory and the social structure of globalisation, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004, p. 161.
- B. Gwertzman, 'U.S. Welcomes Moscow Interest in Easing Stress', The New York Times, 24 November 1982, Section A; Page 1, Column 5; Foreign
- C. Brown, 'World Society and the English School: An "International Society" Perspective on World Society', "European Journal on International Relations", 2001, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 423-441.
- C. Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, New York: Basic Books, 1973, p. 5;
- E. Adler, Communitarian International Relations: The Epistemic Foundations of International Relations, New York: Routledge, 2005, p. 11;
- E. Adler, 'Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics "European Journal of International Relations", 1997, Vol. 3, No. 3, p. 325.
- G. Schmemann, 'Bush Meets with Andropov in Brief, "Substantive" Talks', The New York Times, November 16, 1982: Section A; Page 10, Column 1; Foreign Desk.
- H. Boekle, V. Rittberger, and W. Wagner, 'Norms and Foreign Policy: Constructivist Foreign Policy Theory', Tübinger Arbeitspapiere zur Internationalen Politik und Friedensforschung, 1999, p. 5.
- H. Bull, 'Martin Wight and the Theory of International Relations: The Second Martin Wight Memorial Lecture, "Journal of International Studies", 1976, Vol. 2, No. 2, p. 114.
- H. Bull, 'The Great Irresponsibles? The United States, the Soviet Union, and World Order'," International Journal", 1980, Vol. 35, No. 3, Superpower Diplomacy, pp. 437-438.
- H. Bull, Anarchical Society, New York, NY: Palgrave, 1977, p. 13.
- http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1961-63v06/d7; accessed on 27 July 2015;
- J. Checkel, 'The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory "World Politics", 1998, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 325-326
- J. Gerard Ruggie, 'What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Socian Con structivist Challenge', "International Organisation", 1998, Vol. 54, No. 2, p. 856
- M. Finnemore and K. Sikkink, 'Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics', "Annual Review of Political Science", 2001, Vol. 4, p. 392.
- M. Pietrzyk, 'Explaining the Post-Cold War Order: An International Society Approach', "International Journal of World Peace", 2001, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 31-54.
- T. Dunne, 'Society and Hierarchy in International Relations'," International Relations", 2003, Vol. 17, No. 3, p. 305.
- T. Hobbes, Leviathan, ch. XIII, New York: P.F. Collier & Son, 1909; available at: http://www.bartleby.com/34/5/13.html; accessed on 30 December, 2015)
- The New York Times, "News Summary" (November 13, 1982: Section 1; Page 25, Column 1; Metropolitan Desk).
- United States Department of State, Office of the Historian,http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1964-68v14/d21; accessed on 23 July 2015;
- V. Pouilot, '"Sobjectivism": Toward a Constructivist Methodology', "International Studies Quarterly", 2007, Vol. 51, p. 364
- L. Gelb, 'February Attempt by Reagan to Assure Soviet is Disclosed', The New York Times, 1 April 1983, Section A; Page 1, Column 3; Foreign Desk.
- L. Gelb, 'Two Readings of the Climate Governing Relations between the Superpowers', The New York Times, 17 June, 1983, Section A; Page 8, Column 1; Foreign Desk.
- M. Kalb, 'Foreign Policy: Where Consensus Ends', The New York Times, 27 October 1985, Section Page 103, Column 1; Magazine Desk.
- L. Gelb, 'Policy Struggles by U.S. and Soviet on Verge of Shift', The New York Times, 5 April 1986, Section 1, Page 1, Column 6; Foreign Desk.
- A. Shleifer and D. Treisman, 'The US and Russia: They Don't Need Us', http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/shleifer/files/shleifertreismansept282010fa.pdf; accessed on 24 October, 2015, p. 3.
- J. Goldgeier and M. McFaul, 'George W. Bush and Russia', Current History,2002, p. 313.
- C. Rice, 'Promoting the National Interest', Foreign Affairs, 2000, Vol 79, No. 1, pp. 46-47.
- C. Rice, 'Rethinking the National Interest: American Realism for a New World', Foreign Affairs, 2008, Vol. 87, No. 4, p. 2.
- V. Putin, 'Speech and the Following Discussion at the Munich Conference on Security Policy,http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/statements/24034; accessed on 24 October 2015.
- V. Putin, 'Interview to American TV Channel[s] CBS and PBS,http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/interviews/50380; accessed on 24 October 2015.
- B. Gwertzman, 'Reagan Can Foresee Summit Meeting', The New York Times, 21 March 1983, Section A; Page 3, Column 1; Foreign Desk).
- B. Obama, 'Remarks by President Barack Obama at Town Hall Meeting with Future Chinese Leaders', November 2009,https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-barack-obama-townhall-meeting-with-future-chinese-leaders; accessed on 24 October 2015.
- S. Rice, 'Remarks by National Security Advisor Susan Rice on the 2015 National Security Strategy', 6 February 2015;https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/02/06/remarks-national-security-advisor-susan-rice-2015-national-security-stra; accessed on 24 October 2015.
- J. Biden, 'Commencement Address by the Vice President at the United States Naval Academy',22 May 2015; https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/05/22/commencement-address-vice-president-united-states-naval-academy; accessed on 24 October 2015.
- The Telegraph, 'Anatoly Dobrynin'', 8 April 2010; http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/politics-obituaries/7568616/Anatoly-Dobrynin.html; accessed on 21 January 2016.
- L. Gelb, 'February Attempt by Reagan to Assure Soviet is Disclosed', The New York Times, 1 April 1983, Section A, Page 1, Column 3; Foreign Desk.
- B. Gwertzman, 'U.S. Welcomes Moscow Interest in Easing Stress', The New York Times, 24 November 1982, Section A, Page 1, Column 5; Foreign Desk.
- B. Gwertzman, 'Shultz Discusses Policy on Soviet with Key Experts', The New York Times, 22 August 1982, Section 1, Page 1, Column 1; Foreign Desk.
- United States Department of Defence, 'Dr. Robert M. Gates - Former Secretary of Defence'; http://www.defense.gov/About-DoD/Biographies/Biography-View/Article/602797; accessed on 21 January 2016.
- M. Weisskopf, 'Soviet Testifies on Capitol Hill; Thrustand-Parry Reveals Few New Details of Accident', The Washington Post, 2 May 1986, First Section, A1).