Międzynarodowe studia bezpieczeństwa - subdyscyplina nauki o stosunkach międzynarodowych

• Autorzy: Edward Haliżak

Warianty tytułu

International Security Studies as a Sub-discipline of International Relations

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Celem artykułu jest identyfikacja obszaru badawczego oraz teorii międzynarodowych studiów bezpieczeństwa jako subdyscypliny nauki o stosunkach międzynarodowych. Myślą przewodnią artykułu jest twierdzenie mówiące, że badanie bezpieczeństwa jakichkolwiek podmiotów jest możliwe efektywnie pod względem poznawczym tylko na gruncie nauki o stosunkach międzynarodowych oferującej teorie i modele eksplanacyjne. Mając to na względzie, w artykule zostaną podjęte następujące kwestie. Po pierwsze, strukturyzacja obszaru badawczego międzynarodowych studiów bezpieczeństwa z uwzględnieniem kryterium poziomu analizy podmiot-struktura. Po drugie, procesualne ujęcie problemu bezpieczeństwa. Po trzecie, ukazanie przestrzennego wymiaru bezpieczeństwa. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The article aims to define the scope and theory of international security studies as a sub-discipline of international relations. The main idea is that studying the security of an entity, whatever it may be, is only possible within the framework of international relations as a science offering explanatory theories and models. In light of this, the article discusses the following issues: firstly, the structure of international security studies as a research field, taking into account the relevant level of analysis, i.e. entity/structure; secondly, a processual approach to the issue of security; and thirdly, spatial aspects of security. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Bezpieczeństwo międzynarodowe; Badania naukowe; Bezpieczeństwo; Bezpieczeństwo narodowe; Bezpieczeństwo wewnętrzne; Stosunki międzynarodowe

EN

International security; Scientific research; Security; National security; Internal security; International relations

• Czasopismo: Stosunki Międzynarodowe
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: 53
• Numer: nr 3
• Strony: 9--33

Twórcy

autor

Edward Haliżak

• Uniwersytet Warszawski

Bibliografia

• G. Rydlewski, Megasystem bezpieczeństwa narodowego w Polsce. Ujęcie procesowe i funkcjonalno-decyzyjne, Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek, Toruń 2017.
• G. King, Replication, "PS: Political Science and Politics" 2010, nr 2, s. 453-464.
• R. Zięba, Wspólna Polityka Zagraniczna i Bezpieczeństwa Unii Europejskiej, Wydawnictwo Sejmowe, Warszawa 2005.
• J. Ciechański, Deutschland gegen Deutsch? - Karl W. Deutsch na sześćdziesięciolecie Unii Europejskiej, "Stosunki Międzynarodowe - International Relations" 2017, nr 1, s. 53-74.
• S. Smith, The increasing insecurity of security studies: Conceptualizing security in the last twenty years, "Contemporary Security Policy" 1999, nr 3, s. 72-101.
• R. Kuźniar et al. (red.), Bezpieczeństwo międzynarodowe, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa 2012.
• J. Herz, Idealist internationalism and security dilemma, "World Politics" 1950, nr 2, s. 157-180.
• A. Wolfers, National security as an ambiguous symbol, "Political Science Quarterly" 1952, nr 4, s. 481-502.
• K. Booth, Security and emancipation, "Review of International Studies" 1991, nr 2, s. 313-362.
• R. Keohane, J. Nye, Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, Little Brown, Boston 1977.
• Foreword, "International Security" 1976, nr 1, s. 2.
• R. Ullman, Redefining security, "International Security" 1981, nr 1, s. 129-153.
• B. Buzan, People, States and Fear: The National Security Problem in International Relations, Harvester Wheatsheat, London 1983.
• B. Buzan, Peace, power and security: Contending concepts in the study of International Relations, "Journal of Peace Research" 1984, nr 2, s. 109-125.
• J. Nye, S. Lynn-Jones, International Security Studies: A report of a conference on the state of the field, "International Security" 1988, nr 4, s. 5-27.
• H. Haftendorn, The security puzzle: Theory - building and discipline building in International Security, "International Studies Quarterly" 1991, nr 1, s. 17.
• B. Buzan, L. Hansen, The Evolution of International Security Studies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2008.
• L. Erlich, Wstęp do nauki o stosunkach międzynarodowych, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków 1947, s. 2.
• E. Haliżak, Poziom analizy w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych, [w:] E. Haliżak, M. Pietraś (red.), Poziomy analizy stosunków międzynarodowych, Rambler, Warszawa 2012, s. 19-33.
• K. Waltz, Man, the State and War. A Theorethical Analysis, Columbia University Press, New York 1959.
• D. Singer, The level of analysis problem in International Relations, "World Politics" 1961, nr 1, s. 77-92.
• L. Neck, National International and Human Security: A Comparative Introduction, Rowman and Littlefield, Blue Ridge 2017.
• R. Cox, The international in evolution, "Journal of International Studies" 2007, nr 3, s. 513-527.
• A. Callinicos, J. Rosenberg, Uneven and combined development: The social-relational substratum of "the international?" An exchange of letters, "Cambridge Review of International Affairs" 2008, nr 1, s. 77-112.
• A. Gałganek, Genealogia międzynarodowości, "Przegląd Politologiczny" 2010, nr 3, s. 7-22.
• P. Bilgin, International in Security, Security in the International, Routledge, London 2017.
• 1994 Human Development Report UNDP, Oxford University Press, New York 1994
• Human Security in Theory and Practice, UNOCHA, Human Security Unit, New York 2009.
• E. Haliżak, Przewartościowania koncepcji rozwoju przez ONZ,[ w:] J. Symonides (red.), Organizacja Narodów Zjednoczonych. Bilans i perspektywy, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa 2010, s. 262-276.
• S. Ogata, J. Cels, Human Security - Protecting and empowering people, "Global Governance" 2003, nr 3, s. 273-282.
• D. Gasper, O. Gomes, Human Security thinking in practice: Personal security, citizen security and comprehensive mapping, "Contemporary Politics" 2015, nr 1, s. 100-116.
• R. Paris, Human Security paradigm shift or hot air, "International Security" 2001, nr 2, s. 87-102.
• M. McDonald, Human Security and the construction of security, "Global Society" 2002, nr 3, s. 277-295.
• J. Galtung, Human Needs, Humanitarian Intervention, Human Security and the War in Iraq, 25.02.2004, www.oldside.transnational.org (data dostępu: 23.08.2017).
• S. Miller, International Security at twenty five: From one world to another, "International Security" 2001, nr 1, s. 5-39.
• A. Wimmer, N. Schiller, Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation state building, migration and the social sciences, "Global Network" 2002, nr 4, s. 301-334.
• A. Wimmer, N. Schiller, Methodological nationalism, the social sciences and the study of migration: An essay in historical epistemology, "International Migration Review" 2003, nr 3, s. 576-610.
• A. Wolfers, "National Security" as an ambiguous symbol, "Political Science Quarterly" 1952, nr 4, s. 481-502.
• J. Jervis, Cooperation under the security dilemma, "World Politics" 1978, nr 2, s. 167-214.
• G. Snyder, The security dilemma in alliance politics, "Security Studies" 1996, nr 3, s. 90-121.
• Ch. Glaser, The security dilemma revisited, "World Politics" 1997, nr 1, s. 171-201.
• E. Kirshner, J. Sperling, The new security threats in Europe: Theory and evidence, "European Foreign Affairs Rewiev" 2002, nr 4, s. 423-452.
• E. Haliżak, Polityka i strategia Chin w kształtowaniu bezpieczeństwa międzynarodowego, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa 2008 (seria Żurawia Papers, z. 10).
• R. Bierzanek, Bezpieczeństwo regionalne w systemie ONZ, Wydawnictwo MON, Warszawa 1977.
• P. Kobza, Układy regionalne w systemie bezpieczeństwa Narodów Zjednoczonych, ASPRA, Warszawa 2006.
• K. Deutsch et al., Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the light of Historical Experience, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1957.
• L. Binder, The Middle East as a subordinated international system, "World Politics" 1958, nr 3, s. 408-429.
• B. Russett, International Regions and the International System, Greenwood, Chicago 1967.
• W. Thompson, The regional subsystem. A conceptual explication and a propositional inventory, "International Studies Quarterly" 1973, nr 1, s. 89-117.
• R. Vayrynen, Regional conflict formations: An intractable problem of International Relations Theory, "Journal of Peace Research" 1983, vol. 21, s. 359.
• R. Vayrynen, Collective violence in a discontinuous World: Regional realities and global fallacies, "International Social Science Journal" 1986, vol. 110, s. 513-528.
• E. Haliżak, Regionalizm w stosunkach międzynarodowych po zimnej wojnie, "Sprawy Międzynarodowe" 1996, nr 2, s. 31-47.
• E. Mansfield, H. Milner, The new ware of regionalism, "International Organization" 1999, nr 3, s. 589-627.
• D. Lake, P. Morgan (red.), Regional Orders: Building Security in a New World, Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park 1997.
• J. McMillan, R. Sokolsky, A. Winner, Toward new regional security architecture, "Washington Quarterly" 2003, nr 3, s. 161-175.
• B. Buzan, A framework for regional security analysis, [w:] B. Buzan, G. Rivzi (red.), Asian Insecurity and the Great Power, MacMillan, London 1986.
• B. Buzan, The logic of regional security in the Post-Cold War World, [w:] B. Hettne et al. (red.), The New Regionalism and the Future of Security and Development, St. Martin Press, New York 2000.
• B. Buzan, O. Waever, Regions and Powers, Cambridge University Press, New York 2003.
• D. Lake, Regional security complexes: A system approach, [w:] D. Lake, P. Morgan (red.), Regional Orders: Building Security in a New World, Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park 1997.
• E. Haliżak, Regionalny kompleks bezpieczeństwa Azji Północno-Wschodniej, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa 2007 (seria Żurawia Papers, z. 3).
• Ł. Fijałkowski, Regionalny wymiar bezpieczeństwa Azji Południowo-Wschodniej, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław 2010.
• M. Kaplan, System and Process in International Politics, Krieger, New York 1957.
• Introduction, "Journal of Global Security Studies" 2016, nr 1, s. 1.
• K. Waltz, The stability of bipolar World, "Daedalus" 1964, nr 3, s. 881-909.
• K. Deutsch, D. Singer, Multipolar power system and international stability, "World Politics" 1964, nr 2, s. 390-406.
• S. Brooks, W. Wohlforth, The rise and fall of the great powers in the twenty-first century: China rise and the fate of American's global position, "International Security" 2015, nr 3, s. 7-53.
• E. Haliżak, Stosunki USA-Chiny. Falsyfikacja hipotezy "pułapki Tukidydesa", "Sprawy Międzynarodowe - International Relations" 2016 nr 4, s. 9-32.
• Ch. Krauthammer, The unipolar moment, "Foreign Affairs" 1990-1991, nr 1, s. 23-33.
• J. Mearsheimer, Imperial by design, "The National Interest" 2011, nr 1, s. 16-34.
• N. Monteiro, Theory of Unipolar Politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2014.
• J. Ruggie (red.), Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form, Columbia University Press, New York 1993.
• R. Haas, The age of nonpolarity: What will follow U.S. dominance, "Foregin Affairs" 2008, nr 3, s. 44-56.
• Ch. Lane, The unipolar illusion: Why new great powers will rise, "International Security" 1993, nr 4, s. 5-51.
• M. Cox, Power shifts. Economic change and the decline of the West, "International Relations" 2012, nr 4, s. 369-388.
• Ch. Kupchan, Concerts. Collective security, and the future of Europe, "International Security" 1991, nr 1, s. 114-161.
• Ch. Kupchan, The promise of collective security, "International Security" 1994, nr 1, s. 52-61.
• D. Dewitt, Common, comprehensive and cooperative security, "Pacific Review" 1994, nr 1, s. 1-15.
• E. Adler, M. Barnett (red.), Security Communities, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1998.
• R. Jervis, Security regimes, [w:] S. Krasner (red.), International Regimes, Cornell University Press, New York 1983, s. 173-194.
• M. Dillon, J. Reid, Global liberal governance: Biopolitics, security and war, "Millennium" 2001, nr 1, s. 41-66.
• E. Krahman, Conceptualizing security governance, "Cooperation and Conflict" 2003, nr 1, s. 5-26.
• E. Kirchner, J. Sperling (red.), Global Security Governance. Competing Perceptions of Security in the 21st Century, Routledge, New York 2007.
• J. Mearsheimer, The false promise of international institutions, "International Security" 1994-1995, nr 4, s. 5-49.
• M. Olson, The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1965.
• E. Ostrom, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1990.
• A. Wandt, The agent - Structure problem in International Relations Theory, "Internation al Organization" 1987, nr 3, s. 339.
• A. Wendt, The state as a person in international theory, "Review of International Studies" 2004, nr 2, s. 289-316.
• C. Wight, State agency: Social action without human activity?, "Review of International Studies" 2004, nr 2, s. 269-280.
• P. Lomas, Anthropomorfism, personification and ethics: A reply to Alexander Wendt, "Review of International Studies" 2005, nr 2, s. 349-355.
• C. Michael, Special issue in honor of John Burton, "International Journal of Peace Studies" 2001, nr 1.
• A. Burke, Caught between national and human security: Knowledge and power in post-crisis Asia, "Pacifica Review" 2001, nr 3, s. 215-232.
• E. Fakiolas, Human and national security: A relations of contradiction or commonality?, "Southeast Europe an and Black Sea Studies" 2011, nr 4, s. 369-384.
• J. Mitzen, Ontological security in World politics: State identity and the security dilemma, "Europeen Journal of International Relations" 2006, nr 3, s. 341-370.
• A. Królikowski, State personhood in ontological security. Theories of International Relations and Chinese nationalism: A sceptical view, "Chinese Journal of International Politics" 2008, nr 1, s. 109-133.
• S. Brent, Ontological Security in International Relations. Self-identity and the IR State, Routledge, New York 2008.
• A. Wendt, Anarchy is what states make of it, "International Organization" 1992, nr 3, s. 391-425.
• K. Weber, Hierarchy amidst anarchy: A transaction costs approach to international security cooperation, "International Studies Quarterly" 1997, nr 3, s. 321-340.
• J. Taliafero, Security seeking under anarchy: Defensive realism revisited, "International Security" 2000-2001, nr 3, s. 128-161.
• D. Lake, Hierarchy in International Relations, Cornell University Press, Ithaca 2009.
• D. Lake, Beyond anarchy: The importance of security institutions, "International Security" 2001, nr 1, s. 129-160.
• A. Acharya, The emerging regional architecture of world politics, "World Politics" 2007, nr 4, s. 629-652.
• K. Waltz, International Politics is not Foreign Policy, "Security Studies" 1996, nr 6, s. 54-57.
• E.A. Kolodziej, Renaissance in Security Studies? Caveat Lector!, "International Studies Quarterly" 1992, nr 4, s. 421-438.
• S. Goddart, D. Nexon, The dynamics of global power politics: A framework for analysis, "Journal of Global Security Studies" 2016, nr 1, s. 4-18.
• D. Chandler, Neither International nor Global: Rethinking the problematic subject of security, "Journal of Critical Globalization Studies" 2010, nr 3, s. 93-95.
• M. Smith, International Security: Politics, Policy, Prospects, Palgrave Macmillan, London 2010, s. 39-50.
• J. Huysman, Revisiting Copenhagen, or about the creative development of a Security Studies in Europe, "European Journal of International Relations" 1997, nr 4, s. 488-506.
• O. Waever, Securitization and desecuritization, [w:] R. Lipchutz (red.), On Security, Columbia University Press, Columbia 1995, s. 46-86.
• B. Buzan, O. Waever, J. de Wilde, Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Lynne Rienner, Boulder 1998.
• Ł. Fijałkowski, Teoria sekurytyzacji konstruowania bezpieczeństwa, "Przegląd Strategiczny" 2012, nr 1, s. 149-161.
• J. Herz, The rise and demise of the territorial state, "World Politics" 1957, nr 2, s. 473-493.
• F. Kratochvil, Of system, boundaries and territoriality. An inquiry into the formation of the state system, "World Politics" 1986, nr 1, s. 27-51.
• G. Ruggie, Territoriality and beyond: Problematizing modernity in international relations, "Internatio nal Organization" 1993, nr 1, s. 139-174.
• J. Agnew, The territorial trap. The geographical assumption of International Relations theory, "Review of International Political Economy" 1994, nr 1, s. 53-80.
• M. Sparke, On the double vision of geopolitics and geoeconomics: Connecting contradictory geostrategic discources to the contradiction of uneven global development, http://faculty.Washington.edu/sparke (data dostępu: 5.07.2016).
• H. Lefebvre, Space and the State, [w:] N. Brenner, B. Jessop, M. Jones, G. MacLeod (red.), State/ Space. A Reader, Blackwell Publishing, Bodmin, Cornwall 2003, s. 84.
• H. Choucri, Cyberpolitics in International Relations, MiT Press, Cambridge 2012.
• M. Myauo, The US Department of Defence Cyber Strategy: A call to action for partnership, "Geogetown Journal of International Affairs" 2016, nr 3, s. 21-30.
• N. Inkster, China's Cyber Power, Routledge, London 2016.
• J. Saunders, Tackling cybercrime - The UK response, "Journal of Cyber Policy" 2017, nr 1, s. 4-15.
• J. Nye, Deterrence and dissuasion in cyberspace, "International Security" 2016/2017, nr 3, s. 44-72.
• R. Slayton, What is the cyber offense-defense balance? Conceptions. Causes and assessment, "International Security" 2016/2017, nr 3, s. 72-110.