Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2019 | nr 4 | 7--22
Tytuł artykułu

Patterns of Digitalisation in Machinery-Building Industries: Evidence from Russia

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Digitalisation in machinery-building is expected to enhance productivity and drive the digital transformation of other industries. The extant literature sparsely describes pathways of different sectors in digitalisation, considering the heterogeneous characteristics of firms and sectors. Emerging economies with important state participation represent a particular interest in this area of research. To this end, a multiple case study method was used to describe a set of determinants revealed from the literature on Russian technological development and innovation in manufacturing. Two different patterns were identified. The first one was typical for large leading firms with state participation, which have a global market presence and a substantial level of interoperability, currently turning into a service business model. Private firms that follow the second pattern focus on physical and digital infrastructure upgrading targeted at particular issues to secure connectivity across departments. The state participation does not have a decisive role in digitalisation decisions; however, it affects the participation of companies in national digital initiatives. This study is a preliminary analysis of the determinants associated with corporate digitalisation from the sectoral perspective. Since both national and corporate strategies are ongoing, it seems premature to make generalised conclusions. Instead, the paper provides useful insights for management and policy that refer to digital technology uptake by machinery-building industries. (original abstract)
Opis fizyczny
  • National Research University Higher School of Economics, Russia
  • National Research University Higher School of Economics, Russia
  • Akerman A. Gaarder I. & Mogstad M. (2015). The Skill Complementarity of Broadband Internet. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 130(4) 1781-1824. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjv028
  • Alaeddin O. Altounjy R. Zainudin Z. & Kamarudin F. (2018). From physical to digital: investigating consumer behaviour of switching to mobile wallet. Polish Journal of Management Studies 17(2) 18-30.
  • Andrews D. Nicoletti G. & Timiliotis C. (2018). Digital technology diffusion: A matter of capabilities incentives or both? OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1476. Paris France: OECD Publishing.
  • Arens M. (2019). Policy support for and R&D activities on digitising the European steel industry. Resources Conservation and Recycling 143 244-250.
  • Aristei D. Vecchi M. & Venturini F. (2016). University and inter-firm R&D collaborations: propensity and intensity of cooperation in Europe. The Journal of Technology Transfer 41(4) 841-871. doi: 10.1007/s10961-015-9403-1
  • van Ark O'Mahoney M. & Timmer M. (2008). The Productivity Gap between Europe and the United States: Trends and Causes. Journal of Economic Perspectives 22(1) 25-44. doi: 10.1257/jep.22.1.25
  • Balagurova E.A. Borisov V.N. Orlova T.G. Pochukaev K.G. & Pochukaeva O.V. (2017). Evaluation of the competitiveness of machinery production as a cumulative effect of the innovative investment saturation dynamics. Scientific works of the Institute of economic forecasting Russian Academy of Sciences 294-315.
  • Blind K. & Mangelsdorf A. (2013). Alliance Formation of SMEs: Empirical Evidence From Standardization Committees. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 60(1) 148-156. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2012.2192935
  • Bloom N. Sadun R. & van Reenen J. (2012). The Organization of Firms Across Countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 127(4) 1663-1705. doi: 10.1093/qje/qje029
  • BMWi. (2018). Monitoring-Report Wirtshchaft DIGITAL 2018 Retrieved from
  • Bresnahan T.F. Brynjolfsson E. & Hitt L.M. (2002). Information Technology Workplace Organization and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-Level Evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 339-376.
  • Bundesregierung. (2018). Forschung und Innovation für die Menschen. Die Hightech-Strategie 2025 Retrieved from
  • Cenamor J. Sjödin D.R. & Parida V. (2017). Adopting a platform approach in servitization: Leveraging the value of digitalization. International Journal of Production Economics 192 54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.12.033
  • Chen J.L. (2018). The Cases Study of "One Belt and One Road" and "Made in China 2025" Impact on the Development of Taiwan's Machine Tool Industry. International Business Research 11(2) 189. doi: 10.5539/ibr.v11n2p189
  • Coreynen W. Matthyssens P. & Van Bockhaven W. (2017). Boosting servitization through digitization: Pathways and dynamic resource configurations for manufacturers. Industrial Marketing Management 60 p. 42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.04.012
  • Corrado C. Haskel J. & Jona-Lasinio C. (2014). Knowledge Spillovers ICT and Productivity Growth Discussion Paper No. 8274. Retrieved from
  • Dezhina I. (2018). Innovation policy in Russia and the development of university-industry linkages. Industry and Higher Education 32(4) 245-252. doi: 10.1177/0950422218774974
  • Dezhina I.G. (2017). Science and innovation policy of Russian Government: a variety of instruments with uncertain outcome? Public Administration Issues 7-26. doi: 10.17323/1999-5431-2017-0-5-7-26
  • Dezhina I. & Etzkowitz H. (2016). Path dependence and novelties in Russian innovation. Triple Helix 3(11). doi: 10.1186/s40604-016-0042-9
  • Dezhina I. Ponomarev A. & Frolov A. (2015). Advanced Manufacturing Technologies in Russia: Outlines of a New Policy. Foresight-Russia 9(1) 20-31. doi: 10.17323/1995-459X.2015.1.20.31
  • Dhyne E. Konings J. Konings J. & Vanormelingen S. (2018). IT and productivity: A firm level analysis. Working Paper Research No. 346 National Bank of Belgium. Retrieved from
  • Digital McKinsey. (2017). Cifrovaya Rossiya: novaya real'nost' [Digital Russia: a new reality]. Retrieved from
  • Digital Transformation Monitor. (2017). Germany Industrie 4.0 Retrieved from
  • Dul J. & Hak T. (2008). Case Study Methodology in Business Research Oxford Great Britain: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Eloranta V. & Turunen T. (2016). Platforms in service-driven manufacturing: Leveraging complexity by connecting sharing and integrating. Industrial Marketing Management 55 178-186. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.10.003
  • Eloranta V. Orkoneva L. Hakanen E. & Turunen T. (2016). Using platforms to pursue strategic opportunities in service-driven manufacturing. Service Science 8(3) 344-357. doi: 10.1287/serv.2016.0155
  • Esmaeilian B. Behdad S. & Wang B. (2016). The evolution and future of manufacturing: A review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 39 79-100. doi: 10.13140/ RG.2.1.2720.0402
  • European Union. (2018). Digital Transformation Scoreboard 2018: EU businesses go digital: Opportunities outcomes and uptake Retrieved from
  • Fagerberg J. & Srholec M. (2016). Explaining regional economic performance: The role of competitiveness specialization and capabilities. In R. Huggins (Ed.) Handbook of Regions and Competitiveness (pp. 117-135). Northampton Great Britain: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Federal Customs Service. (2018). Tamozhennaya statistika vneshnej torgovli [Customs statistics of the foreign trade]. Retrieved from
  • Ferris S. & Gawande K. (1998). Coordination Failures and Government Policy: Evidence from Emerging Countries. Carleton Economic Papers 98-03.
  • Fuchs C. (2018). Industry 4.0: The Digital German Ideology. Triple C: Communication Capitalism & Critique. Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society 16(1) 280-289. doi: 10.31269/triplec.v16i1.1010
  • Gal P. Nicoletti G. Renault T. Sorbe S. & Timiliotis C. (2019). Digitalization and Productivity: In Search of The Holy Grail - Firm-Level Empirical Evidence From European Countries Economics. Department Working Papers No. 1533. Paris France: OECD Publishing.
  • Gauthier C. Bastianutti J. & Hagg?ge M. (2018). Managerial capabilities to address digital business models: The case of digital health. Strategic Change 27(2) 173-180. doi: 10.1002/jsc.2192
  • Gershman M. & Thurner T. (2018). New development: Reinventing industrial policy - a Russian study in engineering and design. Public Money and Management 38(2) 157-160. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2018.1407166
  • Gershman M. Bredikhin S.V. & Vishnevskiy K. (2016) The Role of Corporate Foresight and Technology Roadmapping in Companies' Innovation Development: the Case of Russian State-Owned Enterprises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 110 187-195. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.018
  • Ghobakhloo M. (2018). The future of manufacturing industry: a strategic roadmap toward Industry 4.0. Manufacturing Technology Management 29(6) 910-936. doi: 10.1108/JMTM-02-2018-0057
  • Gobble M.M. (2018). Digitalization Digitization and Innovation. Research-Technology Management 61(4) 56-59. doi: 10.1080/08956308.2018.1471280
  • GOV.UK. (2017). UK Digital Strategy 2017 Retrieved from
  • Gstraunthaler T. & Proskuryakova L. (2012). Enabling innovation in extractive industries in commodity-based economies Innovation 14(1) 19-32. doi: 10.5172/impp.2012.14.1.19
  • Hasselblatt M. Huikkola T. Kohtamäki M. & Nickell D. (2018). Modeling manufacturer's capabilities for the Internet of Things. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 33(6) 822-836. doi: 10.1108/JBIM-11-2015-0225
  • Hofman A. Aravena C. & Aliaga V. (2016). Information and communication technologies and their impact in the economic growth of Latin America 1990-2013. Telecommunications Policy 40(5) 485-501. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2016.02.002
  • Hong J. (2017). Causal relationship between ICT R&D investment and economic growth in Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 116(C) 70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.005
  • Hong J.P. Byun J.E. & Kim P.R. (2016). Structural changes and growth factors of the ICT industry in Korea: 1995-2009. Telecommunications Policy 40(5) 502-513. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2015.08.001
  • ISSEK NRU HSE. (2018a). Delovye tendencii i cifrovaya aktivnost' predpriyatij obrabatyvayushchej promyshlennosti [Business trends and digital activity of manufacturing enterprises]. Retrieved from'..abatyvayushchej_promyshlennosti.pdf
  • ISSEK NRU HSE. (2018b). Faktory Ogranichivayushchie Deyatel'nost'organizacij Bazovyh otraslejehkonomiki V 2017 godu [Limiting factors the activities of organizations of the basic sectors of the economy in 2017]. Retrieved from
  • ISSEK NRU HSE. (2018c). Vklad cifrovizacii v rost rossijskoj ehkonomiki [Contribution of digitalization to the growth of the Russian economy]. Retrieved from
  • ISSEK NRU HSE. (2019a). Cifrovaya aktivnost' predpriyatij obrabatyvayushchej promyshlennosti v 2018 godu [Digital enterprise activity manufacturing industry in 2018]. Retrieved from
  • ISSEK NRU HSE. (2019b). Indeks cifrovizacii biznesa [The index of the digitalization of business]. Retrieved from
  • ITIF. (2017). The Competitive Edge: A Policymaker's Guide to Developing a National Strategy Retrieved from
  • ITIF. (2018). Why Manufacturing Digitalization Matters and How Countries Are Supporting It. Retrieved from
  • Kang H.S. Lee J.Y. Choi S.S. Park J.H. Son J.Y. Kim H. & Noh S.D. (2016). Smart Manufacturing: Past Research Present Findings and Future Directions. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology 3(1) 111-128. doi: 10.1007/s40684-016-0015-5
  • Kim Y.-Z. & Lee K. (2008). Sectoral Innovation System and a Technological Catch-up: The Case of the Capital Goods Industry in Korea. Global Economic Review 37(2) 135-155. doi: 10.1080/12265080802021151
  • Kohnová L. Papula J. Salajová N. (2019). Internal factors supporting business and technological transformation in the context of Industry 4.0. Business: Theory and Practice 20 137-145. doi: 10.3846/btp.2019.13
  • Krykavskyy Y. Pokhylchenko O. & Hayvanovych N. (2019). Supply chain development drivers in industry 4.0 in Ukrainian enterprises. Oeconomia Copernicana 10(2) 273-290. doi: 10.24136/oc.2019.014
  • Kudryavtseva T.J. Skhvediani A.E. & Bondarev A.A. (2018). Digitalization of banking in Russia: Overview. 2018 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN) IEEE.
  • Kuzminov I. Gokhberg L. Thurner T. & Khabirova E. (2018). The Current State of the Russian Agricultural Sector. EuroChoices 17(1) 52-57. doi: 10.1111/1746-692X.12184
  • Kuznetsov B.V. & Simachev Yu.V. (2015). Evolution of the state industrial policy in Russia. Journal of the New Economic Association 2(22) 152-178.
  • Kwak K. & Kim W. (2014). Productivity growth of newly industrializing economies in heterogeneous capital goods markets: the case of the Korean machinery and equipment industry. Journal Applied Economics 47(7) 654-668.
  • Kwak K. & Kim W. (2015). Productivity growth of newly industrializing economies in heterogeneous capital goods markets: the case of the Korean machinery and equipment industry. Applied Economics 47(7) 654-668. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2014.978075
  • Kwak K. & Kim W. Kim K. (2018). Latecomer Firms' Combination of Strategies in a Specialized Suppliers Sector: A Comparative Case Study of the Korean Plastic Injection Molding Machine Industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 133 190-205. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.004
  • Lacasa I.D. Jindrab B. Radosevic S. & Shubbak M. (2019). Paths of technology upgrading in the BRICS economies. Research Policy 48 262-280. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.016
  • Lee K. & Malerba F. (2017). Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership: Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems. Research Policy 46(2) 338-351. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.09.006
  • Lee J.J. & Yoon H. (2015). A comparative study of technological learning and organizational capability development in complex products systems: Distinctive paths of three latecomers in military aircraft industry. Research Policy 44(7) 1296-1313. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.03.007
  • Lenka S. Parida V. & Wincent J. (2017). Digitalization capabilities as enablers of value co-creation in servitizing. Psychology and Marketing 34(1) 92-100. doi: 10.1002/mar.20975
  • Lisovskii A.L. Belovitskii K.B. & Skomoroshchenko A.A. (2018). Consequences of digitalization of the Russian Economy for human capital. Quality-Access to Success 19 15-19.
  • Martín-Peña M.L. Díaz-Garrido E. & Sánchez-López J.M. (2018). The digitalization and servitization of manufacturing: A review on digital business models. Strategic Change 27(2) 91-99. doi 10.1108/ JBIM-12-2018-0400
  • Min Y. Lee S. & Aoshima Y. (2019). A comparative study on industrial spillover effects among Korea China the USA Germany and Japan. Industrial Management & Data Systems 119(3) 454-472. doi: 10.1108/IMDS-05-2018-0215
  • Mitra A. Sharma C. & Veganzones-Varoudakis M.A. (2016). Infrastructure ICT and Firms' Productivity and Efficiency: An Application to the Indian Manufacturing Singapore: Springer Singapore.
  • Nelson R.R. & Winter S.G. (1982). The Schumpeterian tradeoff revisited. The American Economic Review 72(1) 114-132.
  • NRU HSE. (2018a). Cifrovaya ehkonomika: global'nye trendy i praktika rossijskogo biznesa [Digital economy: global trends and practice of Russian business]. Retrieved from
  • NRU HSE. (2018b). Indikatory innovacionnoj deyatel'nosti: 2018. Statisticheskij sbornik [Indicators of innovation activities; 2018. Statistical compendium]. Retrieved from
  • NRU HSE. (2018b). Indikatory innovacionnoj deyatel'nosti: 2018. Statisticheskij sbornik [Indicators of innovation activities; 2018. Statistical compendium]. Retrieved from
  • NRU HSE. (2019). Indikatory cifrovoj ekonomiki: 2019: statisticheskij sbornik [Digital Economy Indicators in the Russian Federation: 2019: Data Book]. Retrieved from
  • NTI. (2018). Technologies. Description of the Technet Retrieved from
  • OECD. (2017). The next Production Revolution - A report for the G20 Retrieved from
  • OECD. (2019). Vectors of Digital Transformation. OECD Digital Economy Papers 273 26-27. Retrieved from
  • OECD/IEA. (2017). Digitalization and Energy. Retrieved from
  • Parida V. Sjödin D. & Reim W. (2019). Reviewing Literature on Digitalization Business Model Innovation and Sustainable Industry. Past Achievements and Future Promises. Sustainability 11(2) 391. doi: 10.3390/su11020391
  • Pilat D. (2004). The ICT Productivity Paradox: Insights from Micro Data. OECD Economic Studies 1 37-65.
  • Porter M.E. & Heppelmann J.E. (2015). How smart connected products are transforming companies. Harvard Business Review 93 96-114.
  • Production management. (2017a). Cifrovoe Proizvodstvo: Segodnya I Zavtra Rossijskoj Promyshlennosti [Special issue of the almanac "Digital production: today and tomorrow of the Russian industry"]. Retrieved from
  • Production management. (2017b). Cifrovoe Proizvodstvo: Segodnya I Zavtra Rossijskoj Promyshlennosti 2 "Digital production: today and tomorrow of the Russian industry" 2]. Retrieved from
  • Rabetino R. Harmsen W. Kohtamäki M. & Sihvonen J. (2018). Structuring servitization-related research. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 38(2) 350-371. doi: 10.1108/ IJOPM-03-2017-0175
  • Rachinger M. Rauter R. Müller C. Vorraber W. & Schirgi E. (2018). Digitalization and its influence on business model innovation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. doi: 10.1108/JMTM-01-2018-0020
  • Rodrik D. (1996). Understanding Economic Policy Reform. Journal of Economic Literature 34(1) 9-41.
  • Rowley J. (1987). Using Case Studies in Research. Management Research News 25(1). doi: 10.1108/01409170210782990
  • Russian Government. (2019). Nacional'naya programma "Cifrovaya ekonomika Rossijskoj Federacii" [The National Program "Digital economy of the Russian Federation"]. Retrieved from
  • Simachev Yu. Kuzyk M. Kuznetsov B. & Pogrebnyak E. (2014). Russia on the Path Towards a New Technology: Industrial Policy: Exciting Prospects and Fatal Traps. Foresight-Russia 8(4) 6-23.
  • Ślusarczyk B. Haseeb M. & Hussain H.I. (2019). Fourth industrial revolution: a way forward to attain better performance in the textile industry. Engineering Management in Production and Services 11(2) 52-69. doi: 10.2478/emj-2019-0011
  • Sommarberg M. & Mäkinen S. (2019). A method for anticipating the disruptive nature of digitalization in the machine-building industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 146 808-819. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.044
  • Stiroh K.J. (2002). Are ICT Spillovers Driving the New Economy? The Review of Income and Wealth 48(1) 33-57. doi: 10.1111/1475-4991.00039
  • Strange R. & Zucchella A. (2017). Industry 4.0 global value chains and international business. Multinational Business Review 25(3) 174-184. doi: 10.1108/MBR-05-2017-0028
  • Strobel Th. (2016). ICT intermediates and productivity spillovers - Evidence from German and US manufacturing sectors. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 37(C) 147-163. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2016.04.003
  • Szalavetz A. (2018). Industry 4.0 and capability development in manufacturing subsidiaries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 145 384-395. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.027
  • Szirmai A. (2012). Industrialisation as an engine of growth in developing countries 1950-2005. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 23 406-420. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2011.01.005
  • Tao F. & Qi Q. (2017). Data-driven smart manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 48(part C) 157-169. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.156
  • Tether B.S. & Hipp C. (2002). Knowledge intensive technical and other services: patterns of competitiveness and innovation compared. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 14(2) 163-182. doi: 10.1080/09537320220133848
  • The Government of the Republic of Korea. (2017). People-Centered "Plan for the Fourth Industrial Revolution" to Promote Innovative Growth Retrieved from
  • Thurner T.W. & Zaichenko S. (2016) Sectoral differences in technology transfer. International Journal of Innovation Management 20(02). doi: 10.1142/S1363919616500201
  • Thurner T. & Proskuryakova L.N. (2014). Out of the cold - the rising importance of environmental management in the corporate governance of Russian oil and gas producers Business Strategy and the Environment 23(5) 318-332. doi: 10.1002/bse.1787
  • Turovets J. Vishnevskiy K. Tokareva M.S. & Kukushkin K. (2019). Technology foresight for digital manufacturing: Russian case 2nd International Scientific Conference on Digital Transformation on Manufacturing Infrastructure and Service Institute of Physics Publishing (IOP) 012062 1-6. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/497/1/012062
  • Turovets Yu.V. & Vishnevskiy K.O. (2019) Standardization in digital manufacturing: implications for Russia and the EAEU. Business Informatics 13(3) 78-96. doi: 10.17323/1998-0663.2019.3.78.96
  • Vishnevskiy K. & Yaroslavtsev A.B. (2017). Russian S&T Foresight 2030: case of nanotechnologies and new materials. Foresight 19(2) 198-217. doi: 10.1108/FS-08-2016-0041
  • Vishnevskiy K. Calof J.L. & Meissner D. (2019). Corporate Foresight and Roadmapping for Innovation in Russia: A Joint University Corporate Experience. In D.A. Schreiber Z.L. Berge (Eds.) Futures Thinking and Organizational Policy: Case Studies for Managing Rapid Change in Technology Globalization and Workforce Diversity Cham Swtizerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Voskoboynikov. I. (2017). Sources of long run economic growth in Russia before and after the global financial crisis. Russian Journal of Economics 3(4) 348-365. doi: 10.1016/j.ruje.2017.12.003
  • De Vries H. Blind K. Mangelsdorf A. Verheul H. & Van der Zwan J. (2009) SME access to European standardization. Enabling small and medium-sized enterprises to achieve greater benefit from standards and from involvement in standardization Retrieved from
  • Vu K. (2013). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and Singapore's Economic Growth. Information Economics and Policy 25(4) 284-300. doi: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2013.08.002
  • Wang Y. (2017). Industry 4.0: a way from mass customization to mass personalization production. Advances in Manufacturing 4 311-320. doi: 10.1007/s40436-017-0204-7
  • Witkowski J. Cheba K. & Kiba-Janiak M. (2017). The macro-and micro-environmental factors of decisions of production facility location by Japanese companies in Poland. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia 5 43-56.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.