Debata wokół dydaktyki stosunków międzynarodowych

• Autorzy: Tomasz Pawłuszko

Warianty tytułu

Debate on the Didactics of International Relations

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Problemy kierunków rozwoju badań oraz opartej na teorii dydaktyki stosunków międzynarodowych to rzadkie tematy w debacie nad stanem i perspektywami tej dziedziny wiedzy. Artykuł analizuje angloamerykański dyskurs nad metodami uczenia i nauczania stosunków międzynarodowych, a także skupia się na nowych kierunkach zastosowania wiedzy z tego przedmiotu. Dydaktyka stosunków międzynarodowych jest bardzo ważna, z co najmniej kilku powodów. Pozwala określić kluczowe kwestie i treści w danej nauce, porządkuje materiał badawczy, tworzy inspiracje i testuje teorie, popularyzuje wiedzę i kreuje wizerunek badań i badaczy. Ciekawe jest, że ogromne zainteresowanie naukami o polityce w Polsce nie zaowocowało rozwojem dyskursu poświęconego dydaktyce, jej metodom i technikom. Zaniedbania w sferze naukowo-dydaktycznej są problemem w samym rdzeniu uprawiania nauki (której częścią jest przecież dydaktyka), nie wspominając o zaniedbaniach współpracy nauki z innymi obszarami wiedzy i praktyki. Niniejszy tekst prezentuje wątki rozwoju teorii, dydaktyki, nauczania oparte także na doświadczeniach własnych autora.(abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The problems of the directions of research development and theory-based didactics of international relations are rarely addressed in the debate on the state and prospects of this field of knowledge. The article analyses the English and American discourse on the methods of learning and teaching international relations and focuses on the new directions in the application of knowledge in this field. Didactics is very important for a number of reasons. It allows us to determine the key issues and content in a given discipline of science, organises the research material, provides inspirations and tests theories, promotes knowledge and creates the image of research and researchers. It is a puzzling fact that the interest in political science in Poland has not brought about the development of the discourse concerning didactics, its methods and techniques. Negligence in the scientific-didactic sphere is a problem concerning the very core of scientific practice (of which didactics is a part), not to mention negligence concerning the cooperation of this science with other fields of knowledge and practice. This text presents the development of the theory, didactics, teaching, based also on the author's own experience.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Dydaktyka; Stosunki międzynarodowe; Wiedza; Metody dydaktyczne

EN

Didactics; International relations; Knowledge; Didactic methods

• Czasopismo: Stosunki Międzynarodowe
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 52
• Numer: nr 3
• Strony: 231--246

Twórcy

autor

Tomasz Pawłuszko

• Uniwersytet Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcach

Bibliografia

• K. A. Wojtaszczyk, Ł. Zamęcki, Integracja europejska. Ćwiczenia, Poltext, Warszawa 2012.
• M. Boyer, M. Caprioli, R. Denemark, E. Hanson, S. Lamy, Visions of international studies in a new millenium, "International Studies Perspectives" 2000, nr 1, s. 1-9.
• http://isp. oxfordjournals.org/.
• R. Blanton, Surveying international studies programs: Where do we stand?, "International Studies Perspectives" 2009, nr 10, s. 224-240.
• P. Kristensen, Dividing discipline: Structures of communication in international relations, "International Studies Review" 2012, nr 14, s. 32-50.
• P. James, Symposium on interdisciplinary approaches to international studies: History, psychology, technology studies, and neuroeconomics, "International Studies Perspectives" 2011, nr 12, s. 89-93.
• R. Kuźniar, Przewartościowania w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych, "Sprawy Międzynarodowe" 1991, nr 1, s. 83-84
• T. Klementewicz, Status metodologiczny nauki o stosunkach międzynarodowych, "Studia Polityczne" 1994, nr 3, s. 73-82
• J. Czaputowicz, Theory of practice? The state of international relations in Poland, "European Political Science" 2012, t. 11, nr 2, s. 1-17.
• T. Pawłuszko, Anglosaskie źródła nauki o stosunkach międzynarodowych, "Stosunki Międzynarodowe - International Relations" 2011, t. 44, nr 3-4, s. 91-114.
• S. Hoffman, An American social science: International relations, "Daedalus", t. 106, nr 3, Discoveries and Interpretations: Studies in Contemporary Scholarship, t. I, 1977, s. 41-60.
• A. Sillanpaa, T. Koivula, Mapping conflict research: A bibliometric study of contemporary scientific discourses, "International Studies Perspectives" 2010, nr 11, s. 148-171.
• T. Medvetz, Think tanks in America, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2012.
• T. Pawłuszko, Bezpieczeństwo międzynarodowe w badaniach polskich think tanks, "Rocznik Bezpieczeństwa Międzynarodowego" 2014, t. 2, s. 198-214.
• P. Avey, M. Desch, What do policymakers want from us? Results of a survey of current and former senior national security decision makers, "International Studies Quarterly" 2014, nr 58, s. 227-246.
• J. Eriksson, On the policy relevance of grand theory, "International Studies Perspectives" 2014, nr 15, s. 94-108.
• H. Kelman, The role of the scholar-practitioner in international conflict resolution, "International Studies Perspectives" 2000, nr 1, s. 273-288
• P. Schrodt, D. Gerner, O. Yilmaz, Methods meet policy: Transnational monitoring of the Israel-Palestine conflict, "International Studies Perspectives" 2005, nr 6, s. 235-251.
• A. Mintz, Applied decision analysis: Utilizing poliheuristic theory to explain and predict foreign policy and national security decisions, "International Studies Perspectives" 2005, nr 6, s. 94-98.
• I. Neumann, E. Overland, International relations and policy planning: The method of perspectivist scenario building, "International Studies Perspectives" 2004, nr 5, s. 258-277.
• J. Lantis, Ethics and foreign policy: Structured debates for the international studies classroom, "International Studies Perspectives" 2004, nr 5, s. 117-133.
• S. Rosow, Toward an anti-disciplinary global studies, "International Studies Perspectives" 2003, nr 4, s. 1-14.
• M. Kostera, Metody badawcze w zarządzaniu humanistycznym, Sedno. Wydawnictwo Akademickie, Warszawa 2015.
• T. Deibel, Teaching foreign policy with memoirs, "International Studies Perspectives" 2002, nr 3, s. 128-138.
• J. Hey, Can international studies research be the basis for an undergraduate international studies curriculum? A response to Ishiyama and Breuning, "International Studies Perspectives" 2004, nr 5, s. 395-399
• M. Breuning, International studies programs: For what purpose and for whom? A rejoinder to hey, "International Studies Perspectives" 2004, nr 5, s. 400-402.
• M. Kaplan, Is international relations a discipline?, "The Journal of Politics" 1961, t. 23, nr 3, s. 462-476
• H. Bull, International theory: The case for a classical approach, "World Politics" 1966, t. 18, nr 3, s. 361-377.
• A. Enterline, Balancing theory versus fact, stasis versus change: A look at some introductions to international relations, "International Studies Perspectives" 2004, nr 5, s. 23-39.
• J. De Matos-Ala, J. Hornsby, Introducing international studies: Student engagement in large classes, "International Studies Perspectives" 2015, nr 16, s. 156-172.
• L. Powner, M. Allendoerfer, Evaluating hypotheses about active learning, "International Studies Perspectives" 2008, nr 9, s. 75-89.
• M. Omelicheva, Global politics on trial: Using educational debate for teaching controversies of world affairs, "International Studies Perspectives" 2006, nr 7, s. 172-186.
• S. Brown, F. King, Constructivist pedagogy and how we learn: Educational psychology meets international studies, "International Studies Perspectives" 2000, nr 1, s. 245-254.
• K. Burch, A primer on problem-based learning for international relations courses, "International Studies Perspectives" 2000, nr 1, s. 31-44.
• J. Youde, Crushing their dreams? Simulations and student idealism, "International Studies Perspectives" 2008, nr 9, s. 348-356
• V. Asal, Playing games with international relations, "International Studies Perspectives" 2005, nr 6, s. 359-373.
• B. Sasley, Teaching students how to fail: Simulations as tools of explanation, "International Studies Perspectives" 2010, nr 11, s. 61-74.
• V. Golich, The ABCs of case teaching, "International Studies Perspectives" 2000, nr 1, s. 11-29;
• R. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage, Los Angeles 2014.
• J. Odell, Case study methods in international political economy, "International Studies Perspectives" 2001, nr 2, s. 161-176.
• 413-427.
• B. Ripley, Causation, counterfactuals, and critical reading in the active classroom, "International Studies Perspectives" 2007, nr 8, s. 303-314.
• A. Simpson, B. Kaussler, IR teaching reloaded: Using films and simulations in the teaching of international relations, "International Studies Perspectives" 2009, nr 10, s. 413-427.
• J. DiCicco, National security council: Simulating decision-making dilemmas in real time, "International Studies Perspectives" 2014, nr 15, s. 438-358.
• A. Simpson, B. Kaussler, IR teaching reloaded: Using films and simulations in the teaching of international relations, "International Studies Perspectives" 2009, nr 10, s. 413-427.
• J. DiCicco, National security council: Simulating decision-making dilemmas in real time, "International Studies Perspectives" 2014, nr 15, s. 438-358.
• B. Ripley, Causation, counterfactuals, and critical reading in the active classroom, "International Studies Perspectives" 2007, nr 8, s. 303-314.
• J. McGann, 2015 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report, TTCSP Global Go To Think Tank Index Reports, 2016, Paper 10, http://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/10/?utm_source=repository. upenn.edu think_tanks 10&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages (data dostępu:luty-wrzesień 2016).
• J. Baylis et al., Strategia we współczesnym świecie, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków 2009.