Czasopismo
Tytuł artykułu
Autorzy
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Across Europe, the current system of waste management is responsible for environmental pollution, leading to the need of a transition towards a circular economy model, and towards systemic approaches for achieving sustainable objectives. Interpreting waste as resource - through the development of eco-innovative solutions - can play a positive impact on the quality of life and of the environment. REPAiR1 research project proposes eco-innovative strategies, in order to co-design and assess solutions, involving a series of decisional problems that require the development of Spatial Decision Support System, described in their general structure and with a focus on the REPAiR project. (original abstract)
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Strony
23--40
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
- University of Naples Federico II, Italy
autor
- University of Naples Federico II, Italy
autor
- University of Naples Federico II, Italy; Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
autor
- University of Naples Federico II, Italy
autor
- University of Naples Federico II, Italy
autor
- University of Naples Federico II, Italy
Bibliografia
- Afonso O., Montiero S., 2011. A growth model for the quadruple helix. Journal of Business Economics and Management, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 849-865.
- Allen A., Broto V.C., Rapport E., 2012. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Urban Metabolism. A review of the literature. Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 851-861.
- Amenta L., Attademo A., 2016. CIRCULAR WASTESCAPES. Waste as a resource for peri-urban landscapes planning. CRIOS Critica degli Ordinamenti Spaziali, vol. 12, pp. 79-88.
- Arnkil R., Järvensivu A., Koski P., Piirainen T., 2010. Exploring Quadruple Helix. Outlining user-oriented innovation models. Final Report on Quadruple Helix Research for the CLIQ project, Yhteiskuntatutkimuksen instituutti.
- Bilgram V., Brem A., Voigt K.-I., 2008. User-centric innovations in new product development - systematic identification of lead users harnessing interactive and collaborative online-tools. International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 419-458.
- Campagna M., 2014. Geodesign: dai contenuti metodologici all'innovazione nelle pratiche. Proceedings of the XVII National Conference SIU, Societ? Italiana degli urbanisti, L'urbanistica italiana nel mondo. Milan, Italy, pp. 71-76.
- Carayannis E., Campbell D.F.J., 2006. "Mode 3" and "Quadruple Helix": towards a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 46, no. 3-4, pp. 201-234.
- Carone P., De Toro P., Franciosa A., 2017. Evaluation of urban processes on health in historic urban landscape approach: Experimentation in the metropolitan area of Naples (Italy). Quality Innovation Prosperity, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 202-222.
- Conke L.S., Ferreira T.L., 2015. Urban metabolism: Measuring the city's contribution to sustainable development. Environmental Pollution, vol. 202, pp. 146-152.
- Cowen D., 1988. GIS versus CAD versus DBMS: what are the differences? Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, vol. 54, pp. 1551-1555.
- De Toro P., Iodice S., 2016. Evaluation in Urban Planning: a multi-criteria approach for the choice of alternative Operational Plans in Cava De' Tirreni. Aestimum, vol. 69, pp. 93-112.
- EC, 2011. A resource-efficient Europe - Flagship initiative under the Europe 2020 Strategy. Communication COM(2011)21.
- EC, 2013. Life +Programme, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/about/index.htm
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171576550