PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2019 | 7 | nr 4 | 25--36
Tytuł artykułu

Evaluation of sustainable tourism potential of the principle Giant Mountains resorts in the Czech Republic

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This paper proposes a new methodology for assessing the potential of sustainable tourism. It examines the overall potential of the landscape when faced with the negative impacts of tourism. Our assessment combines components of tourism and environmental sustainability. The methodology involved consultation with experts, and verification by tourists before being applied to the study area. The methodology was then applied to selected tourism centres in the Giant Mountains. The Giant Mountains are a popular tourist destination thanks to their outstanding natural beauty, and represent significant potential for tourism development. They are also one of the most over-burdened regions from tourism in the Czech Republic. However, many negative impacts of tourism exist, reducing the overall tourism potential of the region. Comparative results from the individual tourist centres in the study reveal the significant impact of potentially reducing attributes. Our assessment of the potential for sustainable tourism development in the area thus combines the environmental aspect of sustainable forms of tourism, with the identification of the most serious threats that need to be avoided to maintain the environment in the long-term. The results reveal the significant impact of excessive and inappropriate infrastructure and housing, as well as insufficient environmental education and legislation(original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
7
Numer
Strony
25--36
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Michoacán's College, Zamora, Mexico
  • Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
Bibliografia
  • Alcívar I., Bravo O. 2017. Turismo sostenible: una alternativa de desarrollo comunitario desde un componente cultural. "Espirales Revista Multidisciplinaria de investigación", 9: 31-44.
  • Alvarez-Sousa A. 2018. The Problems of Tourist Sustainability in Cultural Cities: Socio-Political Perceptions and Interests Management. "Sustainability", 10: 503-516.
  • Barreno C. 2011. Zygmunt Bauman y la sociedad líquida, Esfinge apuntes para un pensamiento diferente. Retrieved from https://www.revistaesfinge.com/filosofia/corrientes-de-pensamiento/item/757-56zygmunt-bauman-y-la-sociedad-liquida [16.11.2019].
  • Bauman Z. 2013. Vida líquida. Paidos.
  • Bína J. 2002. Evaluation of tourism potential in the municipalities of the Czech Republic - in Czech. "Journal Urbanismus a územní rozvoj", 5, 1: 2-11.
  • Bizzarri C. 2016. Opportunities and Costs of Tourism for a new Humanism. "Miscellanea Geographica", 20: 13-18.
  • Bujalský L., Březina S., Matějíček, L., Frouz, J. 2014. Light pollution caused by artificial lighting of slopes in the Giant Mountains National Park - in Czech. "Opera Corcontica", 51: 109-124.
  • Cardoso C., Castillo M., Hernández C. 2014. Sosteniendo al turismo o turismo sostenible. "Estudios y Perspectivas en Turismo", 23, 2: 376-395.
  • Chhetri P., Arrowsmith C. 2008. GIS-based Modelling of Recreational Potential of Nature-Based Tourist Destinations. Tourism Geographies, 10, 2: 233-257.
  • Corte V.D., Gaudio G.D., Iavazzi A. 2014. Managerial Approaches to Sustainable Tourism and Destination Development. [in:] Proceedings of the International Conference on Tourism (ICOT 2013). Trends, Impacts and Policies on Sustainable Tourism Development. Cyprus University of Technology, Editors: Konstantinos Andriotis: 147-159.
  • Cortez S.L. 2010. Strategies for the Development of Sustainable Tourism in the Amazon Rainforest of Bolivia. "Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes", 2, 136-143.
  • Cottrell S.P., Cutumisu N. 2006. Sustainable Tourism Development Strategy in WWFPan Parks: Case of a Swedish and Romanian National Park. Scand. "Journal of Hospitality and Tourism", 6: 150-167.
  • European Commission 2007. Agenda for a sustainable and competitive European tourism, Brussels.
  • European Commission 2014. Using Natural and Cultural Heritage for the Development of Sustainable Tourism in Non Traditional Tourism Destinations, Brussels.
  • European Commission 2018. EDEN - European Destinations of Excellence, Brussels.
  • Flousek J., Vaněk J. 2012. Fauna Krkonoš. Správa Krkonošského národního parku, Vrchlabí.
  • Frank S. 2016. Dwelling-in-motion: Indian Bollywood tourists and their hosts in the Swiss Alps. Cultural Studies, 30, 3: 506-531.
  • Glavan V. 1996. Tourist potential and its capitalization. Fundației România de Mâine, Bukurest [in Romanian].
  • Chlapek J., Hušek J., Jaskula F., Lehký J. 2009. Lyžování ve světle ochrany přírody. "Ochrana přírody", 1: 22-24.
  • Iatu C., Bulai M. 2010. A critical analysis on the evaluation of tourism attractiveness in Romania. Case study: the region of Moldavia. Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS International Conference on Economy and Management Transformation Timisiora (Romania). West University of Romania: 145-150.
  • Jaros H. 2014. The public and economic aspects of the functioning of protected areas within a commune. Miscellanea Geographica, 19, 1: 24-28.
  • Joo D., Tasci A., Woosnam K., Maruyama N., Hollas Ch., Aleshinloye K. 2018. Residents' attitude towards domestic tourists explained by contact, emotional solidarity and social distance. Tourism Management, 64: 245-257.
  • KČT/Club of Czech tourists 2014. Krkonoše, turistická mapa 1:50 000. Praha: TRASA.
  • Kisi N. 2019. A Strategic Approach to Sustainable Tourism Development Using the A'WOT Hybrid Method: A Case Study of Zonguldak, Turkey. "Sustainability", 11: 964.
  • Klapka P. 2008. Krkonoše a udržitelný turismus. "Krkonoše a Jizerské hory", 41, 3: 24-25.
  • Kliskey A.D. 2000. Recreation terrain suitability mapping: a spatially explicit methodology for determining recreation potential for resource use assessment. "Landscape and Urban Planning", 52, 1: 33-43.
  • Krippendorf J. 1980. Marketing im Fremdenverkehr. Verlag Peter Lang, Bern and Frankfurt am Main.
  • Kučera T. 2017. Krkonoše jsou podle sčítačů navštěvovanější než americký Yellowstone, Statement of Jan Hřebačka, Director of the GMNAP Administration, Retrieved from https://hradec.idnes.cz/navstevnost-krkonos-v-roce-2016-dkq-/hradec-zpravy.aspx?c=A170221_2307294_hradec-zpravy_the [16.11.2019].
  • Mamun A.A., Mitra S. 2012. A Methodology for Assessing Tourism Potential: Case Study Murshidabad District, West Bengal, India. "International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications", 2, 9: 1-8.
  • Mikulec J., Antoušková M. 2010. Use of GIS to analyse tourism burden - case study of protected landscape area Kokorinsko. [in:] UCLIO 2010: University conference in life sciences - proceedings: 278-286.
  • Muntele I., Iațu C. 2003. Geography of tourism: concepts, methods and forms of spatio-temporal manifestation. Editura Sedcom Libris, Iași. [in Rumanien].
  • Nestoroska I. 2012. Identifying tourism potentials in Republic of Macedonia through regional approach. "Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences", 44: 95-103.
  • Novotná M. 2007. Methodology of the evaluation of the geographic potential for tourism in the Plzeň region. Moravian Geographical Reports, 15, 2: 32-39.
  • Nowacki M., Kowalczyk-Aniol J., Krolikowska K., Pstrocka-Rak M., Awedyk M. 2018. Strategic Planning for Sustainable Tourism Development in Poland. "International Journal of Sustainable Development World Ecology", 25, 562-567.
  • Oprea-Gancevici D., Cheia G. 2011. Touristic potential, management and development in the Rarău Massif. "Journal of Tourism", 11: 76-85.
  • Pásková M. 2008. Environmentalistika cestovního ruchu. "Czech Journal of Tourism", 1, 2: 77-113.
  • Paunovic I., Jovanovic V. 2017. Implementation of Sustainable Tourism in the German Alps: A Case Study. "Sustainability", 9, 226.
  • Pechlaner H., Tschurtschenthaler P. 2003. Tourism Policy, Tourism Organisations and Change Management in Alpine Regions and Destinations: A European Perspective. Current Issues in Tourism, 6, 6: 508-539.
  • Plšková L. 2014. Hodnocení potenciálu řeky Orlice a okolí pro udržitelný rozvoj cestovního ruchu. [in:] Dobrá praxe a udržitelnost v cestovním ruchu. Univerzita Hradec Králové: 12-18.
  • Potocki J. 2010. Pressure on natural environment in major tourist locations of the Karkonosze Mts in light of demographic trends and expansion of the tourist function of the region. "Opera Corcontica", 47: 277-282.
  • Prinskin J. 2001. Assessment of natural resources for nature-based tourism: the case of the Central Coast Region of Western Australia. "Tourism Management", 22, 6: 637-648.
  • Reichel A., Uriely N. 2003. Sustainable Tourism Development in the Israeli Negev Desert: An Integrative Approach. "Journal of Park and Recreation Administration", 21, 14-29.
  • Ruda A. 2016. Exploring Tourism Possibilities Using GIS-Based Spatial Association Methods. "Geophia Technica", 11, 6: 87-101.
  • Saarinen J. 2003. The Regional Economics of Tourism in Northern Finland: The Socio-economic Implications of Recent Tourism Development and Future Possibilities for Regional Development. "Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism", 3, 2: 91-113.
  • Saiz-Álvarez J. 2018. Turismo sostenible y emprendimiento social. El pueblo mágico de Tequila, México. "Revista de Ciencias de la Administración y Economía", 5, 8: 51-67.
  • Špatenková I. 1996. Sledování vlivu sjezdového lyžování na vegetaci v subalpínském stupni Krkonoš. [in:] Monitoring, výzkum a management ekosystémů na území Krkonošského národního parku. Proceedings of the International Conference held on the occasion of the 45th Anniversary of Opočno Research Centers, VÚLHM, Opočno: 335-337.
  • Štursa J. 2011. Velké kauzy: Labská a Luční bouda - Novodobé osudy bud na krkonošských hřebenech." Časopis Krkonoše - Jizerské hory", 5: 22-24 [in Czech].
  • Štursa J. 2012. Flora Krkonoš. Správa Krkonošského národního parku, Vrchlabí.
  • Telfer D. 2002. Tourism and regional development issues. [in:] D. Telfer, R. Sharpley (eds.) Tourism and Development: Concepts and Issues. Channel View, Toronto: 112-148.
  • Timčák G.M., Vizi L. 2006. Tourism potential mapping and a dedicated GIS. [in:] Trends, impacts and policies on tourism development, International conference, Heraklion.
  • Truhlička I. 2007. Krkonoše: příroda, nebo obří sídliště? [Giant Mountains: Nature, or giant housing estate?] Retrieved from http://cestovani.idnes.cz/krkonose-priroda-nebo-obri-sidliste-d7f-/pocesku.aspx?c=A071104_130052_ig igcechy_tom [16.11.2019].
  • Tsaur S.H., Wang C.H. 2007. The Evaluation of Sustainable Tourism Development by Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Set Theory: An Empirical Study on the Green Island in Taiwan. "Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research", 12: 127-144.
  • Vystoupil J., Holešinská A., Kunc J., Šauer M. 2008. Teoreticko-metodologické a praktické přístupy k regionalizaci cestovního ruchu. "Ekonomická revue cestovného ruchu", 41, 2: 105-117.
  • Vystoupil J., Šauer M. 2011. Geografie cestovního ruchu České republiky. Aleš Čeněk, Plzeň.
  • Vystoupil, J., Šauer M., Repik O. 2017. Quantitative Analysis of Tourism Potential in the Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 65, 3: 1085-1098.
  • Wall G., Mathieson A. 2006. Tourism: change, impacts, and opportunities. Pearson Education.
  • Yan L., Bo W., Zang M. 2017. Mathematical model for tourism potential assessment. "Tourism Management", 63: 355-365.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171577372

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.