Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2019 | 7 | nr 4 | 62--68
Tytuł artykułu

The spatial correlation between social capital and crime: A case study of the new town of Pardis, Iran

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
The crime rate can vary in different geographical areas, and several studies have tried to explain the crime rate by concentrating on the socio-economic characteristics of an environment. The literature on the subject shows a lack of attention to spatial analysis and its relationship which this research attempts to address. The main aim of this study was to investigate the spatial correlation between social capital and crime in the city of Pardis in Iran. A five-point Likert questionnaire survey was conducted among 297 citizens of the new town of Pardis. The survey included 27 questions about the social capital component (trust, attention, awareness) and crime hotspots collected from the police office. A mapping raster layer of both crime and social capital and Band Collection Statistics Tools in ArcGIS were used to show the spatial correlation between crime and social capital. The main findings of this study revealed that there was a statistically significant reverse correlation between social capital and crime in the correlation matrix. The study also illustrated that some of the crime subsets such as fighting (r = -0.74), family conflicts (r = -0.72), and moral crime (r = - 0.62) were more related to social capital than other social capital components in a neighborhood. (original abstract)
Opis fizyczny
  • Islamic Azad University, Pardis, Iran
  • Akçomak İ.S., Ter Weel B. 2012. The impact of social capital on crime: Evidence from the Netherlands." Regional Science and Urban Economics", 42, 1: 323-340.
  • Anselin L. 1999. The Future of Spatial Analysis in the Social Sciences. "Geographic Information Sciences", 5, 2: 67-76.
  • Ball K., Cleland V.J., Timperio A.F., Salmon J., Giles-Corti B., Crawford D.A. 2010. Love thy neighbour? Associations of social capital and crime with physical activity amongst women. "Social Science & Medicine", 71, 4: 807-814.
  • Barnett C., Mencken F. C. 2002. Social Disorganization Theory and the Contextual Nature of Crime in Nonmetropolitan Counties. "Rural Sociology", 67, 3: 372-393.
  • Beyerlein K., Hipp J.R. 2005. Social capital, too much of a good thing? American religious traditions and community crime. "Social Forces", 84, 2: 995-1013.
  • Buonanno P., Montolio D., Vanin P. 2009. Does social capital reduce crime? The "Journal of Law and Economics", 52, 1: 145-170.
  • Chainey S., Ratcliffe J. 2013. GIS and crime mapping. John Wiley & Sons, London.
  • Chainey S., Tompson L., Uhlig S. 2008. The utility of hotspot mapping for predicting spatial patterns of crime." Security Journal", 21, 1-2: 4-28.
  • Cochran W.G. 2007. Sampling techniques. John Wiley & Sons, London.
  • Coleman J.S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. "American Journal of Sociology", 94: S95-S120.
  • Erdey-Heydorn M.D. 2008. An ArcGIS seabed characterization toolbox developed for investigating benthic habitats. "Marine Geodesy", 31, 4: 318-358.
  • Goodchild M.F., Janelle D.G. 2004. Spatially integrated social science. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Grootaert C., Bastelaer T. 2001. Understanding and Measuring Social Capital: Social Capital Initiative. Working Paper. 24. World Bank, Washington, DC.
  • Grootaert C., Bastelaer T.V. 2001. Understanding and measuring social capital: a synthesis of findings and recommendations from the social capital initiative. Washington, DC.
  • Hart T., Zandbergen P. 2014. Kernel density estimation and hotspot mapping: examining the influence of interpolation method, grid cell size, and bandwidth on crime forecasting. "Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management", 37, 2: 305-323.
  • Kamber T., Mollenkopf J.H., Ross T. 2000. Crime, space, and place: An analysis of crime patterns in Brooklyn. "Analyzing crime patterns: Frontiers of practice": 107-120.
  • Kawachi I., Subramanian S.V., Kim D. 2008. Social capital and health. [in:] I. Kawachi , S. Subramanian, D. Kim (eds) Social Capital and Health. Springer, New York: 1-26.
  • Lederman D., Loayza N., Menendez A.M. 2002. Violent crime: does social capital matter? Economic Development and Cultural Change, 50, 3: 509-539.
  • Lin N., Cook K.S., Burt R.S. 2001. Social capital: Theory and research, Transaction Publishers, New York.
  • Martin D. 2002. Spatial Patterns in Residential Burglary: Assessing the Effect of Neighborhood Social Capital. "Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice", 18, 2: 132-146.
  • Morenoff J.D., Sampson R.J., Raudenbush S.W. 2001. Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. "Criminology", 39, 3: 517-558.
  • Nicol A.A., Pexman P.M. 1999. Presenting Your Findings: A Practical Guide for Creating Tables. American Psychology Association Publications, Washington, DC.
  • Okabe A. 2016. GIS-based Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences, CRC Press, London, New York.
  • Putnam R.D. 1995. Bowling alone: America's declining social capital." Journal of Democracy", 6, 1: 65-78.
  • Putnam R.D. 2002. Democracies in flux: The evolution of social capital in contemporary society: Oxford University Press, Oxford
  • Saegert S., Winkel G. 2004. Crime, social capital, and community participation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 3-4: 219-233.
  • Saegert S., Winkel G., Swartz C. 2002. Social capital and crime in New York City's low-income housing. "Housing Policy Debate", 13, 1: 189-226.
  • Takagi D., Ikeda K.I., Kawachi I. 2012. Neighborhood social capital and crime victimization: Comparison of spatial regression analysis and hierarchical regression analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 75, 10: 1895-1902.
  • Van der Gaag M. 2005. Measurement of individual social capital. (PhD), Groningen.
  • Van der Gaag M., Snijders T.A. 2003. A comparison of measures for individual social capital. Paper presented at the conference 'Creation and returns of Social Capital'.
  • Weisburd D., Davis M., Gill C. 2015. Increasing collective efficacy and social capital at crime hot spots: New crime control tools for police. "Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice", 9, 3: 265-274.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.