PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2019 | 8(4) | 1--9
Tytuł artykułu

Biomedical Moral Enhancement for Human Space Missions

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Biomedical moral enhancement is an idea which states that human moral intuitions and patterns may be artificially improved by biomedical means. The rationale which lies behind moral bioenhancement is rooted in the idea that humans - in a moral and behavioral sense - are not evolutionally adapted to current ecological challenges. This idea is discussed in the paper in relation to human space missions to Mars and beyond. Because the space environment is a hazardous environment, there are some reasons to consider the idea of moral bioenhancement for the purposes of mission success and the safety of astronauts/space settlers. This paper discusses that idea in the context of a broader discussion on moral enhancement, moral bioenhancement related to earthly issues, and the idea of moral progress.(original abstract)
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
1--9
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Buchanan, A., R. Powell. The Evolution of Moral Progress. A Biocultural Theory, Oxford University Press, 2018.
  • Cowley, R. Yes, We Earthlings Should Colonize Mars if Martian Rights Can Be Upheld, Theology and Science 17:3, 2019, pp. 332-340,
  • Gilbert, S., A. Alba (eds.). Holocaust memory and racism in the postwar world, Detroit, Michigan: Wayne State University Press, 2019.
  • NASA. 5 hazards of human spaceflight videos, 2018, available from: https://www.nasa.gov/hrp/hazards.
  • Persson, I., J. Savulescu. Unfit for the future: the need for moral enhancement, Oxford University Press, 2014.
  • Schwartz, J. S. J. The Accessible Universe. On the Choice to Require Bodily Modification for Space Exploration, In K. Szocik (ed.), Human Enhancements for Space Missions. Lunar, Martian, and Future Missions to the Outer Planets, Cham: Springer 2020 (in press).
  • Szocik, K. What is right and what is wrong in the Darwinian approach to the study of religion, Social Evolution and History 18 (2), 2019, pp. 210-228.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171577812

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.