Moving Beyond Effectiveness: On Evidence Based Health Information (EBHI) as a Complex Intervention

• Autorzy: Andrew Booth
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Over twenty years evidence based practice has become established as a dominant frame of evaluation within health services management and public health. Its influence extends to all aspects of information and communication. Evidence Based Health Information (EBHI) seeks to get the best available evidence used by patients, clinicians, managers and policy makers and to use evidence based methods to communicate them. Increasingly the public health community is shifting its collective attention to so-called complex interventions, from 'what works' to 'what works for whom under what circumstances'. The author briefly reviews the background to these developments before giving examples of the practical value of this wide lens approach. The author uses a recent case study to illustrate how health service managers and public health decision makers can benefit practically from recommendations produced as a result of using a complex interventions based approach. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Public health; Management of health services; Medical services

PL

Zdrowie publiczne; Zarządzanie służbą zdrowia; Usługi medyczne

• Czasopismo: Zdrowie Publiczne i Zarządzanie
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 14
• Numer: nr 2
• Strony: 74--85

Twórcy

autor

Andrew Booth

• University of Sheffield

Bibliografia

• Milne R., Thorogood M., Hand searching the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health as part of the Cochrane Collaboration, "J. Epidemiol. Community Health" 1996; 50 (2): 178-181.
• Sackett D.L., Cook R.J., Understanding clinical trials, "BMJ" 1994; 309 (6957): 755-756.
• Burls A., Sandercock J., How to make a compelling submission to NICE: tips for sponsoring organisations, "BMJ" 2003; 327 (7429): 1446-1448.
• Guyatt G., Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: a Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice, 2nd ed., American Medical Association. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group, McGraw-Hill Medical, New York, London 2008.
• Roberts I., Evidence Based Public Health, "BMJ" 1994; 309: 1659.
• Rychetnik L., Frommer M., Hawe P. et al., Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions, "J. Epidemiol. Community Health" 2002; 56 (2): 119-127.
• The Theory and Practice of Evidence-based Information Work - One World. 4th International Evidence Based Library and Information Practice Conference, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Durham, NC Retrieved, 2007, http://www.eblip4.unc.edu/papers/Hun sucker pdf; accessed: 10.01.2016.
• Formoso G., Marata A.M., Magrini N., Social marketing: should it be used to promote evidence-based health information?, "Soc. Sci. Med." 2007; 64 (4): 949-953.
• Tennison B., Understanding data, information, and knowledge, "Oxford Handbook of Public Health Practice" 2006: 74-83.
• Lewin S., Glenton C., Munthe-Kaas H. et al., Using qualitative evidence in decision making for health and social interventions: an approach to assess confidence in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses (GRADE-CERQual), "PLoS Med" 2015; 12 (10): e1001895.
• Glenton C., Colvin C.J., Carlsen B. et al., Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis, "Cochrane Database Syst. Rev." 2013; 10: CD010414.
• Jordan J., Rose L., Dainty K.N. et al., Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis, "Cochrane Database Syst. Rev." 2012; 5: CD009851. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009851.
• Brownson R.C., Colditz G.A., Proctor E.K., Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012.
• Last J., Spasoff R., Harris S. et al., International Epidemiological Association. A Dictionary of Epidemiology, Oxford University Press, New York 2001.
• Systematic Reviews: CRD's Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 2009.
• Pfadenhauer L.M., Mozygemba K., Gerhardus A. et al., Context and implementation: A concept analysis towards conceptual maturity, "Z. Evid. Fortbild Qual. Gesundhwes" 2015; 109 (2): 103-114.
• Tsafnat G., Dunn A., Glasziou P. et al., The automation of systematic reviews, "BMJ" 2013; 346: f139.
• Shojania K.G., Sampson M., Ansari M.T. et al., How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis, "Ann. Intern. Med." 2007; 147 (4): 224-233.
• Morrell C.J., Walters S.J., Dixon S. et al., Cost effectiveness of community leg ulcer clinics: randomised controlled trial, "BMJ" 1998; 316 (7143): 1487-1491.
• Greenhalgh T., Outside the box: Why are Cochrane reviews so boring?, "Br. J. Gen. Pract." 2012; 62 (600): 371.
• Langendam M.W., Akl E.A., Dahm P. et al., Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews, "Syst. Rev." 2013; 2: 81.
• Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J. et al., Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement, "BMJ" 2009; 339: b2535.
• Tong A., Flemming K., McInnes E. et al., Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ, "BMC Med. Res. Methodol." 2012; 12: 181.
• Moher D., Shamseer L., Clarke M. et al., Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement, "Syst. Rev." 2015; 4: 1.
• DiCenso A., Bayley L., Haynes R.B., ACP Journal Club. Editorial: Accessing preappraised evidence: fine-tuning the 5S model into a 6S model, "Ann. Intern. Med." 2009; 151 (6): JC3-2, JC3-3.
• Keller A., Bucher Della Torre S., Sugar-sweetened beverages and obesity among children and adolescents: a review of systematic literature reviews, "Child Obes." 2015; 11 (4): 338-346.
• Cabrera Escobar M.A., Veerman J.L., Tollman S.M. et al., Evidence that a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages reduces the obesity rate: a meta-analysis, "BMC Public Health" 2013; 13: 1072.
• O'Mara L., Children who consumed sugar-sweetened beverages between meals > or = 4-6 times/week at 2.5-4.5 years of age were more likely to be overweight at 4.5 years of age, "Evid. Based. Nurs." 2008; 11 (1): 24.
• Kenney E.L., Gortmaker S.L., Carter J.E. et al., Grab a cup, fill it up! an intervention to promote the convenience of drinking water and increase student water consumption during school lunch, "Am. J. Public Health" 2015; 105 (9): 1777-1783.
• MRC Medical Research Council, A Framework for Development and Evaluation of RCTs for Complex Interventions to Improve Health, London 2000.
• MRC Medical Research Council, Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance, London 2008.
• Kelly M., Morgan A., Ellis S. et al., Evidence based public health: a review of the experience of the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) of developing public health guidance in England, "Soc. Sci. Med." 2010; 71 (6): 1056-1062.
• Craig P., Dieppe P., Macintyre S. et al., Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance, "BMJ" 2008; 337: a1655.
• Booth A., Implementing EBLIP: if it works in Edmonton will it work in Newcastle?, "Health Information & Libraries Journal" 2008; 25 (2): 154-157.
• Squires J.E., Valentine J.C., Grimshaw J.M., Systematic reviews of complex interventions: framing the review question, "J. Clin. Epidemiol." 2013; 66 (11): 1215-1222.
• Baxter S., Killoran A., Kelly M.P. et al., Synthesizing diverse evidence: the use of primary qualitative data analysis methods and logic models in public health reviews, "Public Health" 2010; 124 (2): 99-106.
• Anderson L.M., Petticrew M., Rehfuess E. et al., Using logic models to capture complexity in systematic reviews, "Res. Synth. Methods" 2011; 2 (1): 33-42.
• Petticrew M., Rehfuess E., Noyes J. et al., Synthesizing evidence on complex interventions: how meta-analytical, qualitative, and mixed-method approaches can contribute, "J. Clin. Epidemiol" 2013; 66 (11): 1230-1243.
• Shelton J.D., Evidence-based public health: not only whether it works, but how it can be made to work practicably at scale, "Glob. Health Sci. Pract." 2014; 2 (3): 253-258.
• Petticrew M., Tugwell P., Welch V. et al., Better evidence about wicked issues in tackling health inequities, "J. Public Health (Oxf.)" 2009; 31 (3): 453-456.
• Petticrew M., Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from 'what works' to 'what happens', "Syst. Rev." 2015; 4: 36.
• Davidoff F., Dixon-Woods M., Leviton L. et al., Demystifying theory and its use in improvement, "BMJ Qual. Saf." 2015; 24 (3): 228-238.
• Millar A., Simeone R.S., Carnevale J.T., Logic models: a systems tool for performance management, "Evaluation and Program Planning" 2001; 24 (1): 73-81.
• Noyes J., Hendry M., Booth A. et al., Current use and Cochrane guidance on selection of social theories for systematic reviews of complex interventions, "J. Clin. Epidemiol." 2016; 75: 78-92.
• Carroll C., Booth A., Cooper K., A worked example of "best fit" framework synthesis: a systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents, "BMC Med. Res. Methodol." 2011; 11: 29.
• Carroll C., Booth A., Leaviss J. et al., "Best fit" framework synthesis: refining the method, "BMC Med. Res. Methodol." 2013; 13: 37.
• Booth A., Carroll C., How to build up the actionable knowledge base: the role of 'best fit' framework synthesis for studies of improvement in healthcare, "BMJ Qual. Saf." 2015; 24 (11): 700-708.
• Rycroft-Malone J., McCormack B., Hutchinson A.M. et al., Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research, "Implement. Sci." 2012; 7: 33.
• Greenhalgh T., Kristjansson E., Robinson V., Realist review to understand the efficacy of school feeding programmes, "BMJ" 2007; 335 (7625): 858-861.
• Booth A., Harris J., Croot E. et al., Towards a methodology for cluster searching to provide conceptual and contextual "richness" for systematic reviews of complex interventions: case study (CLUSTER), "BMC Med. Res. Methodol." 2013; 13: 118.
• Pawson R., Evidence-based Policy: A Realist Perspective, Sage Publications, New York 2006.
• Pawson R., Greenhalgh T., Harvey G. et al., Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions, "J. Health Serv. Res. Policy" 2005; 10 (Suppl. 1): 21-34.
• Booth A., Carroll C., Systematic searching for theory to inform systematic reviews: is it feasible? Is it desirable?, "Health Info. Libr. J." 2015; 32 (3): 220-235.
• McLean S., Gee M., Booth A. et al., Targeting the use of reminders and notifications for uptake by populations (TURNUP): A systematic review and evidence synthesis, "Health Serv. Deliv. Res." 2014; 2 (34).
• Martin S.J., Bassi S., Dunbar-Rees R., Commitments, norms and custard creams - a social influence approach to reducing did not attends (DNAs), "J. R. Soc. Med." 2012; 105 (3): 101-104.
• Marchal B., Van Belle S., De Brouwere V. et al., Complexity in Health. Consequences for Research & Evaluation, February 2014.
• Harlos K., Tetroe J., Graham I.D. et al., Mining the management literature for insights into implementing evidence-based change in healthcare, "Health Policy" 2012; 8 (1): 33-48.
• Petticrew M., Anderson L., Elder R. et al., Complex interventions and their implications for systematic reviews: a pragmatic approach, "J. Clin. Epidemiol." 2013; 66 (11): 1209-1214.
• Christensen A.A., Lugo R.A., Yamashiro D.K., The effect of confirmation calls on appointment-keeping behavior of patients in a children's hospital dental clinic, "Pediatr. Dent." 2001; 23 (6): 495-498.
• Greenhalgh T., Potts H.W., Wong G. et al., Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: a systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method, "Milbank Q." 2009; 87 (4): 729-788.
• Swinglehurst D., Greenhalgh T., Russell J. et al., Receptionist input to quality and safety in repeat prescribing in UK general practice: ethnographic case study, "BMJ" 2011; 343: d6788.
• Petticrew M., What Counts as Evidence? (Some Reflections on) Trials and Other Sources of Evidence in Public Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield 2009.
• Booth A., Research or evaluation? Does it matter?, "Health Information and Libraries Journal" 2009; 26 (3): 255-258.
• Whitaker R., Hendry M., Booth A. et al., Intervention now to eliminate repeat unintended pregnancy in teenagers (INTERUPT): a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, qualitative and realist synthesis of implementation factors and user engagement, "BMJ Open" 2014; 4 (4): e004733.
• Booth A., Cantrell A., Preston L. et al., What is the evidence for the effectiveness, appropriateness and feasibility of group clinics for patients with chronic conditions? A systematic review, "Health Serv. Deliv. Res." 2015; 3 (46).
• Egan M., Bambra C., Petticrew M. et al., Reviewing evidence on complex social interventions: appraising implementation in systematic reviews of the health effects of organisational-level workplace interventions, "J. Epidemiol. Community Health" 2009; 63 (1): 4-11.
• Shepperd S., Lewin S., Straus S. et al., Can we systematically review studies that evaluate complex interventions?, "PLoS Med." 2009; 6 (8): e1000086.
• Macdonald J., Bath P.A., Booth A., Healthcare managers' decision making: findings of a small scale exploratory study, "Health Informatics J." 2008; 14 (4): 247-258.
• MacDonald J., Bath P.A., Booth A., Reaching health service managers with research, "Information Research" 2014; 19 (4).
• Niedźwiedzka B.M., Barriers to evidence-based decision making among Polish healthcare managers, "Health Serv. Manage Res." 2003; 16 (2): 106-115.
• Webb S., Evidence-based practice and decision analysis in social work: an implementation model, "Journal of Social Work" 2002; 2 (1): 45-63.
• Webb S.A., Some considerations on the validity of evidence-based practice in social work, "British Journal of Social Work" 2001; 31 (1): 57-79.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.4467/20842627OZ.16.011.5573