Some Remarks on the Relationship between the Jus Ad Bellum Regulations under the un Charter and Customary International Law - Why Does It Matter So Much?

• Autorzy: Michał Kowalski
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

One of the key issues for conveying the modern normative structure of jus ad bellum, i.e. the international law norms governing the use of force, is the mutual relations of the treaty regulation under the United Nations Charter (the UN Charter) regime and the relevant customary law. Contrary to as it may seem prima facie, this relationship remains highly ambiguous. Obviously, it is strictly and inextricably linked with all the dilemmas and challenges of jus ad bellum regulation under the UN Charter regime in all its ambiguity. Thus, addressing the character of this relationship firstly demands referring to the mentioned dilemmas and challenges. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Charter of the United Nations; Common law; International law

PL

Karta Narodów Zjednoczonych; Prawo zwyczajowe; Prawo międzynarodowe

• Czasopismo: Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 8
• Numer: nr 2
• Strony: 112--126

Twórcy

autor

Michał Kowalski

• Jagiellonian University Cracow

Bibliografia

• Bernhardt R., Customary International Law, in R. Bernhardt (ed), Encyclopedia of Public International Law (1992) 901.
• Bowett D.W., Self-defence in International Law (1958).
• Corten O., The Law Against War: The Prohibition on the Use of Force in Contemporary International Law (2012).
• Czapliński W., Reforma ONZ - zasady użycia siły zbrojnej w stosunkach międzynarodowych [The Reform of the UN - Principles of the Use of Force in International Relations], in J. Symonides (ed), Organizacja Narodów Zjednoczonych - bilans i perspektywy [The United Nations - The Balance and Perspectives] (2006) 677.
• Delahunty R.J., Paper Charter: Self-Defense and the Failure of the United Nations Collective Security System, (2006-2007) 56, "Catholic University Law Review", 871.
• Delahunty R.J., Yoo J., Great Power Security, (2009-2010) 10 "Chicago Journal of International Law" 35.
• Dinstein Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence (4th ed 2005).
• Franck T.M., Who Killed Art. 2(4)? Or: The Changing Norms Governing the Use of Force by States' (1970) 64 "American Journal of International Law", 809.
• Frowein J.A., Is Public International Law Dead?, (2003) 43 "German Yearbook of International Law", 10.
• Glennon M.J., How International Rules Die, (2005) 93 "Georgetown Law Journal" 939.
• Glennon M.J., The Emerging Use-of-Force Paradigm, (2006) 11 "Journal of Conflict and Security Law" 309.
• Glennon M.J., The Fog of Law: Self-Defense, Inherence and Incoherence in Article 51 of the United Nations Charter, (2002) 25 "Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy" 539.
• Glennon M.J., The Rise and Fall of the U.N. Charter's Use of Force Rules, (2003-2004) 27 "Hastings International and Comparative Law Review" 497.
• Goodwin-Gill G.S., McAdam J., The Refugee in International Law (3rd ed 2007)
• Green J.A., The International Court of Justice and Self-Defence in International Law (2009).
• Green J.A., Questioning the Peremptory Status of the Prohibition of the Use of Force, (2011) 32 "Michigan Journal of International Law" 215.
• Henkin L., The Reports of The Death of Article 2(4) Are Greatly Exaggerated, (1971) 65 "American Journal of International Law" 809.
• Higgins R., A Just World Order Under Law. Plenary Address, in P. Rogers (ed) Themes and Theories (2009) 1292.
• Jasudowicz T., Zakaz użycia lub groźby użycia siły "w jakikolwiek inny sposób niezgodny z celami Narodów Zjednoczonych"' [The prohibition of the threat or use of force "against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations"] in T. Jasudowicz, M. Balcerzak, J. Kapelańska-Pręgowska (eds) Współczesne problemy praw człowieka i międzynarodowego prawa humanitarnego [Modern Problems of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law] (2009) 115.
• Kowalski M., Armed Attack, Non-State Actors and a Quest for the Attribution Standard, (2010) XXX Polish Yearbook of International Law 118.
• Kowalski M., Ius ad bellum a systemowy charakter prawa międzynarodowego' [Jus ad Bellum and the Systemic Nature of International Law] in R. Kwiecień (ed), Państwo a prawo międzynarodowe jako system prawa [The State and International Law as the System of Law (2015) 167.
• Kowalski M., Prawo do samoobrony jako środek zwalczania terroryzmu międzynarodowego [Right to Self-Defence as a Means of Counter-terrorism] (2013).
• Mik C., Ius cogens we współczesnym prawie międzynarodowym' [Jus Cogens in Modern International Law] in A. Wnukiewicz-Kozłowska (ed), Aksjologia współczesnego prawa międzynarodowego [Axiology of Modern International Law] (2011) 219.
• Randelzhofer A., Article 2(4)' in B. Simma (ed), Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (2nd ed 2002) 117.
• Ruys T., Armed Attack' and Article 51 of the UN Charter: Evolutions in Customary Law and Practice (2010).
• Sands Ph., 'Operationalizing the UN Charter Rules on the Use of Force' in A. Cassese (ed), Realizing Utopia: The Future of International Law (2012) 343.
• Sturchler N., The Threat of Force in International Law (2006).
• Tams Ch.J., Tzanakopoulos A., Contemporary Positivism and the Jus ad bellum in J. d'Aspremont, J. Kammerhofer (eds), International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World (2013).
• Thirlway H., The Sources of International Law, in M.D. Evans (ed), International Law (2003) 128.

Identyfikatory

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1515/wrlae-2018-0038