PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo

---

427--445
Tytuł artykułu

Common Baltic-Nordic Business Cycles : Correlation- versus Markov-switching Approaches

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
With strong historical ties, and economic linkages that have continued to grow after the fall of the Soviet Union, the Baltic and Nordic regions form a unique economic space. How interconnected are these regions, both to each other and to the rest of the world? Greater connections can help forecast future economic linkages-and also help assess the strength of the Euro as a common currency. This study applies two methods of business-cycle analysis (cross-correlations and Markovswitching approaches) to seven countries in these regions. Both methods find evidence of a single Baltic common cycle for both output and consumption, while a Nordic cycle exists only for output, and there is no single common Baltic-Nordic cycle. Tests of correlation and concordance show there to be relatively strong connections with Germany, the U.S., and Russia-with Nordic-Baltic linkages also quire strong-but that the specific results vary by the method used. (original abstract)
Słowa kluczowe
Czasopismo
---
Strony
427--445
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago, USA
Bibliografia
  • Aastveit, K. A., Jore, A. S., & Ravazzolo, F. (2016). Identification and real-time forecasting of Norwegian Business Cycles. International Journal of Forecasting, 32(2), 283-292.
  • Artis, M. J., Fidrmuc, J., & Scharler, J. (2008). The transmission of business cycles: Implications for EMU enlargement. Economics of Transition, 16(3), 559-582.
  • Babetskii, I. (2005). Trade integration and synchronization of shocks. Economics of Transition, 13(1), 105-138.
  • Backus, D. K., Kehoe, P. J., & Kydland F. E. (1994). Dynamics of the trade balance and the terms of trade: The J-curve?, American Economic Review, 84(1), 84-103.
  • Baxter, M., & King, R. G. (1999). Measuring business cycles: Approximate band-pass filters for economic time series. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(4), 575-593.
  • Bayoumi, T., & Swiston, A. (2009). Foreign entanglements: Estimating the source and size of spillovers across industrial countries (Working Papers No. 07/182). International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/~/media/Websites/IMF/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2007/_wp07182.ashx
  • Benczúr, P., & Rátfai, A. (2005, January). Economic fluctuations in Central and Eastern Europe: The facts (Discussion Papers No. 4846). Centre for Economic Policy Research. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=717682
  • Buch, C. M., Doepke, J., & Pierdzioch, C. (2005). Financial openness and business cycle volatility. Journal of International Money and Finance, 24(5), 744-765.
  • Christiano, L. J., & Fitzgerald, T. J. (1999, July). The band pass filter (Working Paper No. 7257). National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/w7257.pdf
  • Darvas, Z. & Szapáry, G. (2008). Business cycle synchronization in the enlarged EU. Open Economies Review, 19(1), 1-19.
  • Di Giorgio, C. (2016). Business cycle synchronization of CEECs with the Euro Area: Regime switching approach. Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(2), 284-300.
  • Fadejeva, L., & Melihovs, A. (2008). The Baltic States and Europe: Common factors of economic activity. Baltic Journal of Economics 8(1), 75-96.
  • Fidrmuc, J. & Korhonen, I. (2006). Meta-analysis of the business cycle correlation between the Euro Area and the CEECs. Journal of Comparative Economics, 34(3), 518-537.
  • Frankel, J. A., & Rose A. K. (1999). The endogeneity of the optimum currency area criteria. Economic Journal, 108, 1009-1025.
  • Furceri, D., & Karras, G. (2008). Business-cycle synchronization in the EMU. Applied Economics, 40(12), 1491-1501.
  • Hakura, D. S. (2009). Output volatility in emerging market and developing countries: What explains the Great Moderation of 1970-2003? Czech Journal of Economics and Finance 59(3), 229-254.
  • Hamilton, J. D. (1989). A new approach to the economic analysis of non-stationary time series and the business cycle. Econometrica, 57(2), 357-384.
  • Hamilton, J. D. (2017). Why you should never use the Hodrick-Prescott filter (Working Paper No. No 23429). National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/w23429.pdf
  • Hegerty, S. W. (2010). Central European business cycles: Might global (and local) linkages dominate regional ones? Eastern European Economics, 48(2), 56-73.
  • Hodrick, R., & Prescott, E. C. (1997). Postwar U.S. business cycles: An empirical investigation. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 29(1), 1-16.
  • Horvath, J., & Ratfai, A. (2004). Supply and Demand shocks in accession countries to the Economic and Monetary Union. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(2), 202-211.
  • Imbs, J. (2004). Trade, finance, specialization and synchronization. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(3), 723-734.
  • Inagaki, K. (2006). Output correlation and EMU: Evidence from European countries. Journal of Economic Integration, 21(3), 458-473.
  • Jiménez-Rodríguez, R., Morales-Zumaquero, A. & Égert, B. (2013). Business cycle synchronization between Euro Area and Central and Eastern European countries. Review of Development Economics, 17(2), 379-395.
  • Mundell, R. A. (1961). A theory of optimum currency areas. American Economic Review, 51(4), 657-665.
  • Rafiq, M. S. (2011). Understanding the interaction between international and Euro area output volatility. Bulletin of Economic Research, 63(1), 0307-3378.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171579926

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.