Personality Predispositions and Competences

• Autorzy: Anna Bugalska
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background. People are the determining factor for the effectiveness of an organization. Diagnosing factors affecting the achievement of good work results, is an important issue, not only for the world of science, but above all for people managing organizations. The article presents factors affecting the level of competences expected by the organization and the tools through which they can be measured.
Research aims. The aim of this study was to present the connection between self-esteem of personality preferences in individual scales of the psychometric questionnaire, and the assessment of selected competences made by external observers during the Assessment Center session.
Methodology. References to extensive literature were made, in the field of psychology and management science. Also the diagnosis of indicated persons to perform future managerial roles was made with the use of the Assessment Center session and the questionnaire - Bochumski - Personal Performance Inventory. Thereby, the data showing the relationship of competences with psychological factors were obtained.
Key findings. The presented research indicates that there is a relation between the self-esteem of personality preferences and the assessment of competences, made by external observers. Orientation on the target correlated positively with the Action and Team Orientation. There was a relationship between the Cooperation Competence and Relationships Orientation, and also Team Orientation, Emotional Stability and Self-confidence and Flexibility. Leadership level was influenced by Achievement Power Motivation. Responsibility Competence positively correlated with Conscientiousness, Power Motivation and Team Orientation. There was also a connection between Change Management with Flexibility and Achievement Motivation. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Competences; Employee appraisal; Employees competencies; Labour efficiency; Personal questionnaire

PL

Kompetencje; Ocena pracowników; Kompetencje pracownicze; Wydajność pracy; Kwestionariusz osobowy

• Czasopismo: International Journal of Contemporary Management
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 18
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 7--36

Twórcy

autor

Anna Bugalska

• University of Applied Informatics and Management in Warsaw, under the auspices of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Bibliografia

• Arthur, W., Day, E.A., McNelly, T.L. & Edens, P.S. (2003). A meta-analysis of the criterion-related validity of assessment center dimensions. Personnel Psychology, 56(1), 125-154.
• Barros, E., Kausel, E.E., Cuadra, F. & Diaz, D.A. (2014). Using general mental ability and personality traits to predict job performance in three Chilean organizations. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22, 432-438.
• Bertua, C., Anderson, N. & Salgado, J.F. (2005). The predictive validity of cognitive ability tests: A UK meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 387-409.
• Boyatzis, R.E. & Dubuc, P. (1982). The Competent Manager. A Model for Effective Performance. Québec: École nationale d'administration publique.
• Collins, J.M., Schmidt, F.L., Sanchez-Ku, M., Thomas, L., McDaniel, M.A. & Le, H. (2003). Can basic individual differences shed light on the construct meaning of assessment center evaluations? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 17-29.
• Costa, P.T. & McCrae, R.R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(4), 668-678.
• Chirkowska-Smolak J., Grobelny, T. (2014). Wykorzystanie metod doboru personelu oraz przekonania profesjonalistów na temat och trafności prognostycznej. Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi, 96, 125-142.
• Dilchert, S. & Ones, D.S. (2009). Assessment Center Dimensions: Individual differences correlates and meta-analytic incremental validity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(3), 254-270.
• Ekuma, J.K. (2012). The importance of predictive and face validity in employee selection and ways of maximizing them: An assessment of three selection methods. International Journal of Business and Management, 22, 115-122.
• Furnham, A. & Chamorro-Premuzic, T.T. (2008). Personality and intelligence correlates of assessment center exercises. Individual Differences Research, 6(3), 181-192.
• Gaugler, B.B., Rosenthal, D.B., Thornton, G.C. & Bentson, C. (1987). Meta-analysis of assessment center validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(3), 493-511.
• Goffin, R.D., Rothstein, M.G. & Johnston, N.G. (1996). Personality testing and the assessment center: Incremental validity for managerial selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 746-756.
• GUS (2018). Labour force survey in Poland II, quarter 2018, https://stat.gov.pl/en/topics/labour-market (accessed: 15th March 2019).
• Heckhausen, H. (1991). Motivation and Action. Berlin: Springer.
• Hermelin, E., Lievens, F. & Robertson, I.T. (2007). The validity of assessment centres for the prediction of supervisory performance ratings: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15(4), 405-411.
• Hogan, R. & Kaiser, R.B. (2010). Personality. In: J.C. Scott & D.H. Reynolds (eds.). The Handbook of Workplace Assessment: Evidenced Based Practices for Selecting and Developing Organizational Talent (pp. 81-108). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Jaworowska, A. & Brzezińska, U. (2011). Bochumski Inwentarz Osobowościowych Wyznaczników Pracy. Podręcznik. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP.
• Klimoski, R. & Brickner, M. (1987). Why do assessment centers work? The puzzle of assessment center validity. Personnel Psychology, 40, 243-259.
• Kolk, N.J., Born, M.P. & Flier, H. van der (2004). Three method factors explaining the low correlations between assessment center dimension ratings and scores on personality inventories. European Journal of Personality, 18, 127-141.
• Kuhl, J. (1994). A theory of action and state orientations. In: J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (eds.). Volition and Personality. Action Versus State Orientation (pp. 9-46). Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
• Kuna, J. (1998). Assessment Center metodą oceny potencjału zawodowego kadry kierowniczej. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Psychologica, 2, 45-55.
• Levy-Leboyer, C. (1997). Kierowanie kompetencjami: bilanse doświadczeń zawodowych. Tłum. M. Egeman. Warszawa: Poltext.
• McClelland, D.C. (1987). Human Motivation. CUP Archive.
• Oleksyn, T. (2006). Zarządzanie kompetencjami. Teoria i praktyka. Kraków: Oficyna Ekonomiczna.
• Robertson, I.T. & Kinder, A. (1993). Personality and job competences: The criterion related validity of some personality variables. Journal Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 225-244.
• Rojon, C., McDowall, A. & Saunders, M.N.K. (2015). The relationships between traditional selection assessments and workplace performance criteria specificity: A comparative meta-analysis. Human Performance, 28(1), 1-25.
• Rothmann, S. & Coetzer, E.P. (2003). The big five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29(1), 68-74.
• Sackett, P.R., Shewach, O.R. & Keiser, H.N. (2017). Assessment centers versus cognitive ability tests: Challenging the conventional wisdom on criterion-related validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(10), 1435-1447.
• Sally A. Carless (2009). Psychological testing for selection purposes: A guide to evidence-based practice for human resource professionals. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(12), 2517-2532.
• Sienkiewicz, Ł. (2013). Zarządzanie zasobami ludzkimi w oparciu o kompetencje. Perspektywa uczenia się przez całe życie. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych.
• Van Iddekinge, Ch.H., Aguinis, H., Mackey, J.D. & DeOrtentiis, Ph.S. (2018). A meta-analysis of the interactive, additive, and relative effects of cognitive ability and motivation on performance. Journal of Management, 44(1), 249-279.
• Woodruffe, Ch. (1992). What is meant by a competency? In: R. Boam & P. Sparrow (eds.). Designing and Achieving Competency. London: McGraw-Hill.
• Woodruffe, Ch. (2003). Ośrodki oceny i rozwoju. Narzędzia analizy i doskonalenia kompetencji pracowników. Tłum. W. Biliński. Kraków: Oficyna Ekonomiczna, Dom Wydawniczy ABC.
• Zawadzki, B., Strelau, J., Szczepaniak, P. & Śliwińska, M. (1998). Inwentarz Osobowości Costa and Mccrae. Polska adaptacja. Podręcznik. Warszawa: PTP.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.4467/24498939IJCM.19.001.10734