Abuse of the Constitution as a Means of Political Change : Sociological Reflections on the Crisis of Constitutionalism in Poland

• Autorzy: Grażyna Skąpska
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This article aims to analyze abuse of a country's constitution as a unique means by which fundamental changes can be introduced to the country's political system. The term "abusive constitutionalism" is used to discuss the shift of the political system toward decreased democracy by means of changes to the constitution, as in the case of Hungary. In contemporary Poland, abuse of the constitution has entailed the creation of a parallel system via ordinary legislation passed rapidly by a simple parliamentary majority. The thesis of this paper is that "abusive constitutionalism" and an "abused constitutionalism" stem from a crisis in liberal democratic constitutionalism as a motivating force and moral signpost in the public sphere. In the place of democratic constitutionalism, there has been a return to emotion-laden conceptualizations of the political community. Primordial bonds, unquestioned traditional values, and founding myths are perceived as more meaningful than the law and the constitution. This sort of return to the past has its historical validation, but it is also a reaction to the growing complexities of the contemporary world and its risks. Another important empirical context for abusive constitutionalism is the negative constitutional consensus of a passive electorate. One indicator of a negative constitutional consensus is the population's lack of interest in the democratic functioning of the public sphere. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Constitution; Abuse of law

PL

Konstytucja; Nadużycie prawa

• Czasopismo: Polish Sociological Review
• Rocznik: 2019
• Numer: nr 4 (208)
• Strony: 421--438

Twórcy

autor

Grażyna Skąpska

• Jagiellonian University

Bibliografia

• Agamben, G. 2008. Wspólnota, która nachodzi .Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sic!
• Agamben, G. 2013. Legal, Political and Philosophical Perspectives. Tom Frost (ed.). New York: Routledge.
• Blokker, P. 2017. Politics and the political in sociological constitutionalism, in: P. Blokker, C. Thornhill (ed.), Sociological Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Brewer-Carias, A. R. 2010. Dismantling Democracy in Venezuela: The Chavez Authoritarian Experiment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Bugaric, B. 2015. The rule of law derailed: Lessons from the postcommunist world, Hague Journal for the Rule of Law 7 (2): 175-197.
• Coppedge, M. 2003. Venezuela: popular sovereignty versus Liberal Democracy, in: J. I. Dominguez, M. Shifter (ed.), Constructing Democratic Government in Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Dahrendorf, R. 1983. Die Chancen der Krize. Ueber die Zukunft des Liberalismus. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt.
• Duda, A. 2018a. www.prezydent.pl/aktualnosci/wypowiedzi-prezydenta-rp/wystapienia/art.143; https://wpolityce.pl/polityka/338212-polska-potzrebuje-konstytucji-ktora-chroni-interes-narodowy, accessed 5 Jul 2018.
• Duda, A. 2018b. htpps://www.Wiadomości.gazeta.pl/wiadomości/7,114884,23139252,duda-w-kamiennej-gorze-porownal-ue-do-zaborcow, accessed 5 Jul 2018.
• Fakty.interia.pl/news-polska-decyzja-sadu-w sprawie--blokujących--marsz-smolenski.nld.25, accessed 5 Jul 2018.
• Grimm, D. 2005. Integration by Constitution, International Journal of Constitutional Law 3: 193, 194, 204.
• Grimm, D. 2004. Die Verfassung im Prozess der Entstaatlichung, in: M. Brenner, P. M. Hubert, M. Moestl, Der Staat des Grundgesetzes. Festschrift fuer Peter Badura zum siebzigsten Geburtstag. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
• Habermas, J. 1985. Die neue Unuebersichtlichkeit. Kleine politische Schriften. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.
• Holmes, S. 1995. Passions and Constraints: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Ignatieff, M. 2014. Are the Authoritarians Winning?, The New York Review of Books, July 10.
• Kis, J. 1998. Between Reform and Revolution, East European Politics and Societies 12 (2).
• Kotwas, M., Kubik, J. 2019. Symbolic Thickening of Public Culture and the Rise of Right-Wing Populism in Poland, East Central European Politics and Society, and Cultures 33 (2): 435-471.
• Landau, D. 2013. Abusive Constitutionalism, University of California Davies Law Review 47: 189 ff.
• Magyar, B. 2016. Postcommunist Mafia State. The Case of Hungary, quoted after Hungarian Spectrum, February 19, 2016 http://hungarianspectrum.org/2016/02/19/balint-magyars-latest-book-post-communinstmafia-state-the-case-of-hungary/
• Nino, C.S. 1996. The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
• Orban, V. 2014. Prime Minister Victor Orban, Speech at the 25th Balvanyos Summer Free University and Student Camp (26 July 2014), Freedom House Report, Chapter 5: Illiberal Democracies, https://freedomhouse.org/report/modern-authoritarianism-illiberal-democracies, accessed 5 Jul 2018.
• Orban, V. 2018, https://wiadomosci/dziennik.pl/swiat/artykuly/573734,wegry-orban-konstytucja-uchodzcy, accessed 5 Jul 2018.
• Puddington, A. 2017. Breaking Down Democracy: Goals, Strategies, and Methods of Modern Authoritarians. Freedom House.
• Pitkin, H. 1987. The Idea of a Constitution, Journal of Legal Education 37: 167-169.
• Proctor, R. N. 2008. Preface to Agnotology. The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance, edited by R. N. Proctor, L. Schiebinger. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. I-VIII.
• Putnam, R. 1995. Democracy in Action, Polish Edition, Demokracja w działaniu. Tradycje obywatelskie we współczesnych Włoszech. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak.
• Repeta, L. 2013. Get Ready for New Battles over Japan's Constitution, Int'L J.for Constitutional Law Blog (Feb. 7, 2013). http://www.incomentblog.com/2013/get-ready-for-new-battles-over-japan's-constitution.
• Sadurski, W. 2006.Transitional Constitutionalism. Simplistic and Fancy Theories, in: M. Krygier, A. Czarnota, W. Sadurski (eds.), Rethinking the Rule of Law after Communism. Budapest: CEU Press, pp. 9-24.
• Sajo, A. 2011.Constitutional Sentiments. New Haven: Yale University Press.
• Schutz, A. 1985. Światły obywatel. Esej o społecznym zróżnicowaniu wiedzy, Literatura na świecie 2: 269-284.
• Skąpska, G. 2011. From "Civil Society" to "Europe." A Sociological Study on Constitutionalism after Communism. Leiden: Brill.
• Skąpska, G. 2005. Społeczeństwo w społeczeństwie: Socjologiczne koncepcje konstytucjonalizmu po komuniźmie, Studia Socjologiczne 4: 195 ff.
• Solym, L. 2003. The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Transition to Democracy with Special Reference to Hungary, International Sociology 18 (1): 133-161.
• Sunstein, C.R. 1996. On the Expressive Function of Law, Eastern European Constitutional Review 5 (1): 66-72.
• Szacki, J. 1999. O języku debaty europejskiej, in: L. Kolarska-Bobińska (ed.), Polska eurodebata. Warszawa: Instytut Spraw Publicznych, pp. 17-21.
• Szczęśniak, A. 2018. Dziś już wiemy "Polska powstała gdzieś między 1968 a 1972 rokiem", https://oko.press/dzis-juz-wiemy-polska-powstala-gdzies-miedzy-1968-a-1972-rokiem/.
• Tismaneanu, V., Luber, J. 2019. The Poverty of Utopia Revisite, New Eastern Europe 3-4.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.26412/psr208.03