Changes of Political Theories in the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe

• Autorzy: Jarosław Nocoń
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In the countries of Middle and Eastern Europe the collapse of "real socialism" was followed by the annulment of political and ideological supervision over scientific researches. Since then the political theory has been developing in an unembarrassed way, drawing investigative patterns with the tradition of western political sciences. Form this perspective, the expression "westernization" used with regard to political theory signifies the process of going away from Marxism and historical materialism. The article focuses on two essential trends of this process. The main consequence is the pluralization of theoretical bases of investigations, which signifies not only differentation, but also the lack of predominant theory. The international program for monitoring the development since 1990, shows that new investigative trends disclose a division between the traditional and current model of politology, which demonstrates the topicality of arguments raised in western academic debatesover the theoretical condition and status of political science discipline(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Political science

PL

Politologia

• Czasopismo: Journal of Geography, Politics and Society
• Rocznik: 2019
• Numer: nr 9(4)
• Strony: 35--41

Twórcy

autor

Jarosław Nocoń

• Institute of Political Sciences, University of Gdansk

Bibliografia

• Almond G., 1990, A Discipline Divided Schools and Sects in Political Science, Sage Publications, New York.
• Benton T., Craib I., 2003, Filozofia Nauk Społecznych. Od pozytywizmu do postmodernizmu (Eng. Philospohy of Social Sciences. From Positivism to Postmodernism), Wydawnictwo Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej Edukacji TWP, Wrocław.
• Cohen G.A., 2003, Reply to Elster on "Marxism, functionalism and Game theory", [in:] D. Matavers, J.E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy, Routledge, New York, 40-53.
• Condren C., 1997, Political Theory and the Problem of Anachronism, [in:] A. Vincent (ed.), Political Theory: Tradition and Diversity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 45-66.
• Elster J., 2003, Marxism, Functionalism, and Game Theory: A Case for Methodological Individualism, [in:] D. Matavers, J.E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy, Routledge, New York, 20-39.
• Freeman D.M., 1991, The Making of a Discipline, [in:] W.J. Crotty (ed.), Political Science: Looking to the Future, Northwestern University Press, Illinois, 15-44.
• Gebethner S., Markowski R. 2002, Poland, [in:] M. Kaase, V. Sparschuh (eds.), Three Social Science Disciplines in Central and Eastern Europe: Handbook of Economics, Political Science and Sociology (1989-2001), Social Science Information Centre - Collegium Budapest, Berlin-Bonn-Budapest, 317-325.
• Gunnell J.G. 1991, The Historiography of American Political Science, [in:] J.G. Gunnell, D. Easton, L. Graziano (eds.), The Development of Political Science. A Comparative Survey, Routledge, New York, 13-33.
• Gunnell J.G., Easton D., 1991, Introduction, [in:] J.G. Gunnell, D. Easton, L. Graziano (eds.), The Development of Political Science. A Comparative Survey, Routledge, New York, 1-11.
• Klementewicz T., 1991, Spór o model metodologiczny nauki o polityce (Eng. Dispute About Metodological Model of Political Science), Instytut Studiów Politycznych Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Warszawa.
• Klingemann H.D., 2002, Political Science in Central and Eastern Europe: National Development and International Integration, [in:] M. Kaase, V. Sparschuh (eds.), Three Social Science Disciplines in Central and Eastern Europe: Handbook of Economics, Political Science and Sociology (1989- 2001), Social Science Information Centre - Collegium Budapest, Berlin-Bonn-Budapest, 206-212.
• Krauz-Mozer B., 2007, Teorie polityki. Założenia metodologiczne (Eng. Theories of Politics. Metodological Assumptions) , PWN, Warszawa.
• Latin D., 2003, The Political Science Discipline, [in:] E.D. Mansfield, R. Sisson (eds.), The Evolution of Political Knowledge: Theory and Inquiry in American Politics, The Ohio State University Press, Ohio, 31-36.
• LeCompte M. D., 1990 Emergent Paradigms: How New? How Necessary, [in:] E.G. Guba (ed.), The Paradigm Dialog, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, 246-254.
• Levy M. B.,1998, Political Theory and the Emergence of Policy Science, [in:] E.D. Portis, M.B. Levy (eds.), Handbook of Political Theory and the Emergence of Policy Science, Greenwood, Westport, 3-16.
• Łoziński J., 2005, Translator's Notes, [in:] K. von Beyme (ed.), Współczesne teorie polityczne (Eng. Contemporary Political Theories), Scholar, Warszawa, 9-13.
• Marsh D., 2002, Marxism, [in:] G. Stoker, D. Marsh (eds.), Theory and Methods in Political Science, Macmillan, New York, 170-178.
• McKinley W., 2003, From Subjectivity to Objectivity: A Constructivist Account of Objectivity in Organization Theory, [in:] R.I. Westwood., S. Clegg (eds.), Debating Organization. Point-Counterpoint in Organization Studies, Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, 142-155
• Nocoń, J., 2010, Między tradycją a modernizacją. Przeobrażenia badań politologicznych w świetle neofunkcjonalizmu J. C. Alexandra (Eng. Between Tradition and Modernisation. Transformations of Political Science Research in the Light of J. C. Alexander Neofunctionalism), Wydawnictwo UKW, Bydgoszcz.
• Oren I., 2006, Political Science as History: A Reflexive Approach, [in:] D. Yanow, P. Schwartz-Shea, M. E. Sharpe (eds.), Interpretation and Method. Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretative Turn, Routledge, New York, 216-218.
• Ryszka F., 1981, Wstęp do nauki o polityce. Uwagi metodologiczne (Eng. Introduction to Political Science), PWN, Warszawa.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.26881/jpgs.2019.4.04