Czasopismo
Tytuł artykułu
Warianty tytułu
Dojrzałość zarządzania łańcuchem dostaw: przegląd literatury w kontekście modeli, wymiarów oraz ujęcia tematyki
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Background: In recent years, organizational maturity has disseminated its concepts to various management domains, for instance, Supply Chain Management (SCM). The present paper is an attempt to review the developments in the realm of SCM over the past two decades. In the domain of SCM maturity, different models, dimensions (areas) and approaches are advanced for maturity measurements. Methods: Research studies conducted and presented in the literature, including papers on conference proceedings, articles in journals and technical reports, are reviewed; the review covers a time span from the early 1990s to the present time (2019). Also provided in this review are the previous models, dimensions (areas/ elements), and approaches for measuring SCM maturity techniques. Additionally, research gaps are identified, analysed and discussed. Results: After reviewing, the research studies in the field and the dimensions found in the works are placed into different categories. The current study aims to present a review of the literature, ultimately providing help to researchers in realizing gaps and opportunities in the field of SCM maturity. There are also different approaches to supply chain maturity models. For example, one approach may solely focus on integration while another might concentrate on SC visibility and traceability. In more recent research studies, more attention is paid to such specific areas of supply chain as flexibility and sustainability. The results of the present paper point to gaps, which indicate that more research works are required. In addition, it is assumed that the materials presented here may help establish more comprehensive SCM maturity models. Conclusions: It is seen that supply chain management is rapidly shifting toward e-SCM, and some other technologies like blockchain. Also, supply chain sustainability comes to the fore as a significant approach. It should be reminded that other strategic features of supply chains like leanness, agility, resilience, sustainability, integration, green and reverse logistics etc., also play their own role in the field. Combining these strategic features can be an effective idea for developing more comprehensive models for SCM maturity. To sum up, the results of the present survey indicate that the published works need more adequacy and treatment research, and that more research is called for to bridge the gaps in the realm of SCM maturity. (original abstract)
Wstęp: Ostatnio zagadnienie dojrzałości organizacji pojawia się jako koncepcja w wielu różnych obszarach tematycznych, np. w obszarze zarządzania łańcuchem dostaw (SCM). Prezentowana praca jest próbą przeglądu rozwiązań w zakresie zarządzania łańcuchem dostaw w okresie ostatnich dwudziestu lat. W obszarze dojrzałości SCM istnieje wiele modeli, wymiarów oraz podejść stosowanych dla pomiary tej dojrzałości. Metody: W prezentowanej pracy poddano analizie różne materiały naukowe, obejmujące artykuły z konferencji naukowych, artykuły publikowane w czasopismach naukowych jak i raporty techniczne. Dokumenty, które poddano analizie, pochodzą z okresu od wczesnych lat 90-tych zeszłego stulecia do chwili obecnej (2019). W pracy zaprezentowano również metody, wymiary oraz podejścia stosowane wcześniej dla pomiaru dojrzałości SCM. Zidentyfikowano luki w prowadzonych wcześniej badaniach, poddano je analizie i dyskusji. Wyniki: W wyniku przeprowadzone analizy, uszeregowano różne wymiary w odpowiednie kategorie. Praca ma na celu zaprezentowanie przeglądu literatury w celu wykrycia luk badawczych i dostarczenie w ten sposób pomocy naukowcom dla dalszych badań w obszarze dojrzałości SCM. Istnieje wiele różnych podejść do modeli dojrzałości łańcucha dostaw. Jedne modele koncentrują się na jego spójności, podczas gdy inne na przejrzystości łańcucha dostaw i możliwości śledzenia poszczególnych operacji. W najnowszych badaniach, więcej uwagi jest poświęcone takim obszarom łańcucha dostaw jak elastyczność i zrównoważony rozwój. Wyniki pracy wskazują na luki badawcze w określonych obszarach, które wymagają dalszych badań. Dodatkowo, materiały prezentowane w pracy pozwalają na stworzenie bardziej wszechstronnych modeli dojrzałości SCM. Wnioski: Na podstawie uzyskanych wyników można wyraźnie zaobserwować trend w zarządzaniu łańcuchem dostaw w kierunku e-SCM oraz innych technologii jak blockchain. Równie istotny jest zrównoważony rozwój organizacji. Należy też wspomnieć, że także inne strategiczne cechy łańcuchów dostaw, jak szczupłość, zwinność, odporność, zintegrowanie, zielona logistyka, itd., odgrywają istotną rolę w tym obszarze. Połączenie tych strategicznych cech może być efektywną ideą stworzenia bardziej wszechstronnych modeli dojrzałości SCM. Uzyskane wyniki wskazują, że pożądane są dalsze badania w celu pokrycia istniejących luk w obszarze dojrzałości SCM. (abstrakt oryginalny)
Twórcy
autor
- Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
autor
- Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
Bibliografia
- Asdecker B., Felch V., 2018. Development of an Industry 4.0 maturity model for the delivery process in supply chains, Journal of Modelling in Management, 13, 4, 840883, http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67383-710
- Azzi R., Chamouna R.K., Sokhn M. 2019. The power of a blockchain-based supply chain, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135, 582-592, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.06.042
- Baraniecka A., Jajko-Siwek A., Szuster M., Szymczak M., Wieteska G. 2017. Relativism in the Approach to Managing Supply Chain Maturity, Procedia Engineering, 182, 50-57, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.113
- Bowersox D.J., Closs D.J., Stank T.P., 2000. Ten mega trends that will revolutionize supply chain logistics, Journal of business logistics, 21, 2, 1-16.
- Daozhi Z., Liang Z., Xin L., Jianyong S., 2006. A New Supply Chain Maturity Model With 3-Dimension Perspective. Information Technology and Innovation Conference, Hangzhou, http://doi.org/10.1049/cp:20061046
- Fischer J., Thomé A., Scavarda L.F., Hellingrath B., Martins R. 2016. Development and application of a maturity measurement framework for supply chain flexibility. Fischera J., Thoméb A., Scavardab L.F., Hellingratha B., Martinsc R., Procedia CIRP, 41, 514-519, http://doi.org/10.1108/14637159510798220
- Garcia H., 2008. A Capability Maturity Model to Assess Supply Chain Performance, Florida Int. University (Dissertation).
- Garcia H., 2008. A Capability Maturity Model to Assess Supply Chain Performance. FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations.191 http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/191
- Goblet Ch., 2012. How to understand and use the key drivers and trends in today's pharmaceutical market? Accenture Management Consulting.
- Aberdeen Group, 2006. The supply chain visibility roadmap - Moving from vision true business value.
- Gustafsson E., Jonsson P., Holmström J. 2019. Digital product fitting in retail supply chains: maturity levels and potential outcomes, Supply Chain Management: An Int. Journal, http://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-07-2018-0247
- Hameri A.P., McKay K.N., Wiers V.C., 2013. A maturity model for industrial supply chains, Supply Chain Forum: An Int. Journal, l, 14, 3, 2-15, http://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2013.1151 7317
- Hanson P., Voss C., 1995. Benchmarking best practice in Euopean manufacturing sites, Business Process Re-Engineering & Mangament journal, 1, 1, http://doi.org/10.1108/14637159510798220
- Ho D., Kumar A., Shiwakoti N. 2016. Maturity model for supply chain collaboration: CMMI approach, Int. Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, http://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2016.7797996
- Huang Y., Handfield Robert. 2015. Measuring the benefits of ERP on supply management maturity model: a big data method, Int. Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35, 2 - 25, http://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-07-20130341
- Jaklic J., Trkman P., Groznik A. 2006. Enhancing lean supply chain maturity with business process management, Journal of information and organizational sciences, 30, 2
- Kamilaris A., Fonts A., Prenafeta-Boldύ F.X., 2019. The Rise of Blockchain Technology in Agriculture and Food Supply Chains, Trends in Food Science & Technology, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.034
- Lahti M., Shamsuzzoha A.H.M., Helo P., 2009. Developing a maturity model for Supply Chain Management, Int. J. Logistics Systems and Management, 5, 6, 654-678, http://doi.org/10.1504/IJLSM.2009.024796
- Lambert D.M., Cooper M.C., 2000. Issues in supply chain management, Industrial Marketing Management, 29, http://doi.org/10.1016/S00198501(99)00113-3
- Leem C., Yoon Y., 2004. A maturity model and an evaluation system of software customer, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 104, 4, 347-354, http://doi.org/10.1108/02635570410530757
- Lockamy A., McCormack K., 2004. The Development of a Supply Chain Management Process Maturity Model Using the Concepts of Business Process Orientation, Supply Chain Management: An Int. Journal, 9, 4, http://doi.org/10.1108/13598540410550019
- Lockamy A., McCormack K., 2013. The Effect of on Supply Chain Performance: An Empirical Study, 1st Annual Int. Interdisciplinary Conference (Aiic), Azores, Portugal.
- Netland T.H., Alfnes A., Fauske H., 2007. How Mature Is Your Supply Chain?- A Supply Chain Maturity Assessment Test, EurOMA Conference, Ankara, Turkey.
- Pache G., Spalanzani A., 2007. La gestion des chaines logistiques multi-acteurs: perspectives strategiques, Ed. PUG. [Management of logistics chains by multistakeholders, strategic perspective].
- Radosavljevic M., Barac N., Jankovic-Milic V. 2016. Supply chain management maturity assessment: challenges of the enterprises in Serbia, Journal of Business Economics and Management, http://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2016.1191 038
- Reefke H., Sundaram D., 2018. Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Decision Models for Transformation and Maturity, Decision Support Systems, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2018.07.002
- Sarkar B., Ganguly B., Sarkar M., Sarla P., 2016. Effect of variable transportation and carbon emission in a three-echelon supply chain model, Transportation Research Part E, 91, 112-128, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.03.018
- Sartori J., Frederico G., 2017. Maturity and Conceptual Dimensions of Supply Chain Management: Establishing a Structural Model, Global Journal of Management and Business Research.
- Schmidt C.G., Wagner S.M.. 2019. Blockchain and supply chain relations: A transaction cost theory perspective, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2019.10055 2
- Schniederjans D.G., Curado C., Khalajhedayati M., 2019. Supply chain digitisation trends: An integration of knowledge management, Int. Journal of Production Economics, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.012
- IBM Business Consulting. 2005. Follow the leaders - Scoring high on the supply chain maturity model, IBM.
- Sun H., Ren Y., Yeo K., 2005. Capability Maturity Model for Supply Chain Management, Int. conference on Management Science and Applications, Chengdu, China.
- Supply Chain Council (SCC), 2012. The Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR)-Ver.11, Texas.
- Van Landeghem R., Persoons K., 2001. Benchmarking of logistical operations based on a causal model, Int. Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21, 1/2, 254-267, http://doi.org/10.1108/01443570110358576
- Varoutsa E., Scapens R.W., 2015. The governance of inter-organisational relationships during different supply chain maturity phases, Industrial Marketing Management, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.01 .006
- Wendler R., 2012. The maturity of maturity model research: A systematic mapping study, Information and Software Technology, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2012.07.007
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171580604