Knowledge Worker Tasks in System Architecture

• Autorzy: Małgorzata Pańkowska

Warianty tytułu

Zadania pracownika wiedzy w architekturze systemowej

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In this paper, knowledge workers are assumed to actively realize knowledge management tasks. They are involved in the gathering, analysis, storage and dissemination of knowledge in a way that is focused on its improvement. Therefore main goal is to present system architecture models for knowledge management in information science domain. In that domain, Design Science Research (DSR) is discussed as being very useful and adopted in this paper for knowledge management. The author applied the ArchiMate modelling language and supplemented it with the process approach and Business Process Model & Notation (BPMN) for knowledge management process presentation, as well as by the case management approach and Case Management Model & Notation (CMMN). These notations are consistent and complementary, although they have different objectives of usage.(original abstract)

W artykule przyjęto, że pracownicy wiedzy aktywnie realizują zadania zarządzania wiedzą. Są oni zaangażowani w gromadzenie, analizę, przechowywanie i dystrybucję wiedzy w sposób zorientowany na ustawiczne jej doskonalenie. Głównym celem artykułu było przedstawienie architektury systemowej dla wspomagania zarządzania wiedzą w dziedzinie systemów informacyjnych. W tej dziedzinie paradygmat Design Science Research traktowany jest jako wysoce użyteczny. W artykule wykorzystano ten paradygmat oraz język ArchiMate, a także notację Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) i notację Case Management Model and Notation (CMMN) do modelowania architektury. Wymienione notacje są zgodne i komplementarne, ale mają różne cele zastosowania.(abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Enterprise architecture; Knowledge management; Management support systems

PL

Architektura korporacyjna; Zarządzanie wiedzą; Systemy wspomagania zarządzania

• Czasopismo: Informatyka Ekonomiczna / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu
• Rocznik: 2019
• Numer: nr 1 (51)
• Strony: 55--71

Twórcy

autor

Małgorzata Pańkowska

• University of Economics in Katowice, Poland

Bibliografia

• Archi - ArchiMate Modelling. (2012). Retrieved 8.04.2017 from http://archi.cetis.ac.uk/download/latest/ Archi User Guide.pdf
• Babik, D., Iyer, L. S., and Ford, E. W. (2012). Towards a comprehensive online peer assessment system. In K. Peffers, M. Rothenberger, and B. Kuechler (Eds.), Design science research in information systems (pp. 1-8). Berlin: Springer.
• Berger, P. L., and Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality, New York: Doubleday and Company, Inc.
• Betz, M., and Wulf, V. (2018). Toward transferability in grounded design, comparing two design case studies in firefighting. In V. Wulf, V. Pipek, D. Randall, M. Rohde, K. Schmidt, and G. Stevens (Eds.), Socio-informatics, a practice-based perspective on the design and use of IT artifacts (pp. 459-488). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Blom, R. (2009). ArchiMate Tutorial. The open standard language for modelling and visualizing enterprise architecture. Retrieved 8.04.2017 from http://archive.opengroup.org/ public/ member/proceedings/ q209/q209a/Presentations/blom_2.pdf
• BPMN. (2016). Business Process Model and Notation. Object Management Group. Retrieved 5.04.2017 from http://www.bpmn.org
• Carlile, P., and Rebentisch, E. (2003). Into the black box: The knowledge transformation cycle. Management Science, 49(9), 1180-1195.
• CMMN. (2016). Case Management Model and Notation. Object Management Group. Retrieved 1.01.2018 from http://www.omg.org/spec/CMMN/1.1
• Dalkir, K. (2017). Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice, Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
• Desfray, P., and Raymond, G. (2014). Modeling enterprise architecture with TOGAF. A practical guide using UML and BPMN. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
• Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., and Lowe, A. (1991). Management Research. An Introduction. London: SAGE Publications.
• Hennink, M., Hutter, I., and Bailey, A. (2011). Qualitative Research Methods. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
• Hevner, A. R., Ram, S., March, S. T., and Park, J. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75-105.
• Hevner, A. R., and Chatterjee, S. (2010). Design research in information systems, theory and practice. New York: Springer.
• Kokkonen, J. (2009). User culture, user-system relation and trust: The case of Finnish Wikipedia. In S. Niiranen, J. Yli-Hietanen, and A. Lugmayr (Eds.), Open information management, applications of interconnectivity and collaboration (pp. 326-243). Hershey, New York: Information Science Reference.
• Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Leymann, F. (2010). BPEL vs. BPMN 2.0: Should you care? In J. Mendling, M. Weidlich, and M. Weske (Eds.), Business process modeling notation (pp. 8-14). Berlin: Springer.
• Lyytinen, K. (1987). A taxonomic perspective of information systems development: Theoretical constructs and recommendations. In R. J. Boland, and R. A. Hirschheim (Eds.), Critical issues in information systems research (pp. 3-42). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
• Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., and Konno, N. (2000). SECI, BA and leadership: Aunified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 5-34.
• Pickard, A. J. (2007). Research methods in information. London: Facet Publishing.
• Randall, D. (2018). Investigation and design, in socio-informatics. In V. Wulf, V. Pipek, D. Randall, M. Rohde, K. Schmidt, and G. Stevens (Eds.), Socio-Informatics. A practice-based perspective on the design and use of it artifacts (pp. 221-242). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Stevens, G., Rohde M., Korn M., and Wulf V. (2018). Grounded design. A research paradigm in practice- based computing. In V. Wulf, V. Pipek, D. Randall, M. Rohde, K. Schmidt, and G. Stevens (Eds.), Socio-informatics. A practice-based perspective on the design and use of IT artifacts (pp. 23-46). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Willcocks, L. P., Sauer, Ch., and Lacity, M.C. (2016). Formulating research methods for information systems, Vol. 1. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15611/ie.2019.1.05