The Octograph and the Delight of Understanding Organizational Artistry : How to Enjoy Social Interaction and Stimulate Job Performance?

• Autorzy: Abdel Magid Al-Araki
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper proposes the Octograph, a cube-like model of leadership and organizational performance. Eight concepts, placed on eight corners of the cube, create eight triangular models and four processes of Decision-making, Communication, Production and Innovation. The eight concepts are nested together through one-arrowed dependency lines. Saying ≪Leadership≫ depends more on ≪employees≫ than vice versa, presupposes causal explanations of the how and why of the dependency.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Organizational modeling; Social interaction; Labour efficiency; Leadership

PL

Modelowanie organizacyjne; Interakcje społeczne; Wydajność pracy; Przywództwo

• Czasopismo: Open Economics
• Rocznik: 2019
• Numer: vol. 2, iss. 1
• Strony: 92--108

Twórcy

autor

Abdel Magid Al-Araki

• Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway

Bibliografia

• Adams, M. 2006. Hybridizing Habitus and Reflexivity: Towards an Understanding of Contemporary Identity? Sociology, Volume 40(3): 511-528.
• Al-Araki, A. M. 2005a. The Octograph and E-Learning by Labyrinth-Cases. International Journal on E-Learning, 4(3): 281-298.
• Al-Araki, A. M. 2015. Models of Intercultural Communication: Identities, Styles of Acculturation, and Premises for Enjoying the Company of One Another-Empirical Data From the Public Sector in Norway. Sage Open: 1-13.
• Al-Araki, M. 2005b. The Octograph and E-Learning by Labyrinth-Cases. International Journal on E-Learning, 4(3): 281-298.
• al-Araki, M. 2006a. The octograph with cases in organization development and project management, leadership and human resource management. [Oslo]: Oslo University College, Faculty of Business.
• al-Araki, M. 2006b. Oktografen en modell for forstaelse av organisasjonens ansvarsomrader og virksomhetsprosesser. Oslo: Hogskolen i Oslo.
• Al-Araki, M. 2011. Oktografen: prosesser, ansvar, etikk og endringslogikk. [Oslo]: Hogskolen i Oslo.
• Anderson, P. 1999. Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science. Organization Science, 10(3): 216-232.
• Andrew, G. 1965. An Analytic System Model for Organization Theory. The Academy of Management Journal, 8(3): 190-198.
• Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. 1974. Theory in practice: increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Beer, M. 1980. Organization change and development: a systems view. Santa Monica, Calif.
• Beer, M., & Nohria, N. (2000). Cracking the Code of Change. Harvard Business Review, 78(3), 133-141.
• Benson, S. G., & Dundis, S. P. D. J. 2003. Understanding and motivating health care employees: integrating Maslow's hierarchy of needs, training and technology. Journal of Nursing Management(11): 315-320.
• Bergsma, H. a. K. p., Tomáš. 2013. The Octograph in the Triangular perspective Organisational Development and Project Management, Term-Paper 2013: 22.
• Berson, Y., Nemanich, L. A., Waldman, D. A., Galvin, B. M., & Keller, R. T. 2006. Leadership and organizational learning: A multiple levels perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6): 577-594.
• Bertalanffy, L. v. 1950. An outline of general system theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science(1): 134-165.
• Bion, W. R. 1961. Experiences in Groups and other papers. London: Tavistock Publications Ltd.
• Burke, W. W., & Litwin, G. H. 1992. A Causal Model of Organizational Performance and Change. Journal of Management, 18(3): 523.
• Burnes, B., & Cooke, B. 2013. Kurt Lewin's Field Theory: A Review and Re-evaluation. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(4): 408-425.
• Burns, P. 2007. Entrepreneurship and small business (2nd ed.). Basingstoke England ; New York: Palgrave.
• Burns, T., & Stalker, G. 1961. The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
• Camarinha-Matos, L. M., & Afsarmanesh, H. 2008. On reference models for collaborative networked organizations. International Journal of Production Research, 46(9): 2453-2469.
• Clarke, N. 2005. Workplace Learning Environment and its Relationship with Learning Outcomes in Healthcare Organizations. Human Resource Development International, 8(2): 185 - 205.
• Cummings, T. G. 1980. Systems theory for organization development. Chichester: Wiley.
• Cunha, K. M., & Sholl-Franco, A. 2016. COGNITION AND LOGIC: ADAPTATION AND APPLICATION OF INCLUSIVE TEACHING MATERIALS FOR HANDS-ON WORKSHOPS. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 16: 696-700.
• Davis, P. S., & Peri, T. L. 2002. Measuring Organizational Efficiency and Effectiveness. Journal of Management Research (09725814), 2(2): 87.
• Dennis, M. C. 2014. Organizational Change Model in a Geometric Framework. International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences (IJSDS), 5(4): 51-78.
• Dolson, M. S. 2005. The Role of Dialogue, Otherness and the Construction of Insight in Psychosis: Toward a Socio-Dialogic Model. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 36(1): 75-112.
• Gilbert, A. H. 1928. Notes on the Influence of the Secretum Secretorum. Speculum, 3(1): 84-98.
• Giltinane, C. L. 2013. Leadership styles and theories. Nursing Standard, 27(41): 35-39.
• Hebert, M. 2014. Growing Yourself: Enlightened Leadership Through Personal Transformation. IDEA Fitness Journal, 11(5): 76-79.
• Ibn, K., & al-Araki, M. 2012a. Al-muqaddimah : boken om lardommene, med en introduksjon til verdens historie. Oslo: Pax.
• Ibn, K., & al-Araki, M. 2012b. Al-Muqaddimah : boken om lardommene, med en introduksjon til verdens historie : I : I. Oslo: Bokklubben.
• Jonathan, R. B., Halbesleben, M., Ronald, B., Harvey, M. G., & Novicevic, M. M. 2006. Promoting Ethical Corporate Behavior in a Global Context. Journal of the North American Management Society, 1(1): 31-39.
• Kennedy, C. W. 1987. A Suggested Model for Simplifying the Increasing Complexity of Organization and Management Theory.
• Kornmeier, J., Worner, R., Riedel, A., & Tebartz van Elst, L. 2017. A different view on the Necker cube-Differences in multistable perception dynamics between Asperger and non-Asperger observers. PLoS ONE, 12(12): 1-14.
• Korunka, C., & Vitouch, O. 1999. Effects of the implementation of information technology on employees' strain and job satisfaction : a context-dependent approach. Work & Stress, 34(4): 341-363.
• Lawrence. P. R., L. J. W. 1969. Developing organizations: Diagnosis and action. MA.: Addison-Westey.
• Leavitt, H. J. 1964. Applied organization change in industry: structural, technical, and human approaches: S. 55-71. New York: John Wiley.
• Luhmann, N. 1985. Social systems (J. J. Bednarz, & D. Baecker., Trans.). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
• Luhmann, N. 1990. Essays on self-reference. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Mathisen, G. E., & Einarsen, S. 2004. A Review of Instruments Assessing Creative and Innovative Environments Within Organizations. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1): 119-140.
• Mintzberg, H. 1973. The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.
• Morel, B., & Ramanujam, R. 1999. Through the Looking Glass of Complexity: The Dynamics of Organizations as Adaptive and Evolving Systems. Organization Science, 10(3): 278-293.
• Morton, K. L., Barling, J., Rhodes, R. E., Masse, L. C., Zumbo, B. D., & Beauchamp, M. R. 2011. The Application of Transformational Leadership Theory to Parenting: Questionnaire Development and Implications for Adolescent Self- Regulatory Efficacy and Life Satisfaction. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 33(5): 688-709.
• Ostroff, C., & Rothausen, T. J. 1997. The moderating effect of tenure in person-environment fit: A field study in educational organizations. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology(70): 173-188.
• Pascale, R. A. 1981. The art of Japanese management. New York: Warner Books.
• Pillow, W. S. 2003. Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2): 175-196.
• Plowman, D. A., Solansky, S., Beck, T. E., Baker, L., Kulkarni, M., & Travis, D. V. 2007. The role of leadership in emergent, self-organization. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4): 341-356.
• Price, M. S., & Weiss, M. R. 2013. Relationships among Coach Leadership, Peer Leadership, and Adolescent Athletes Psychosocial and Team Outcomes: A Test of Transformational Leadership Theory. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 25(2): 265-279.
• Probst, B., & Berenson, L. 2013. The double arrow: How qualitative social work researchers use reflexivity. Qualitative Social Work.
• Reddin, W. J. 1967. The 3-D Management Style Theory. Training & Development Journal, 21(4): 8.
• Rockart, J. F., & Short, J. E. 1991. The Networked Organization and the Management of Interdependence: 212-215. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Sheng-Min, L. I. U., & Jian-Qiao, L. 2013. TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND SPEAKING UP: POWER DISTANCE AND STRUCTURAL DISTANCE AS MODERATORS. Social Behavior & Personality: an international journal, 41(10): 1747-1756.
• Steel, R. 2000. Culture and Complexity: New Insights on Organisational Change. Organisations & People, 7(2): 2-9.
• Steel, R. 2001. Anxiety and incompetence in the large group: A psychodynamic perspective. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 14(5): 493-504.
• Sternberg, R. J. 2003. WICS: A Model of Leadership in Organizations. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2(4): 386-401.
• Tichy, N. M. D. M. A. 1986. The rransfonnational leader. New York: Wiley.
• Trevino, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. 2006. Behavioral Ethics in Organizations: A Review. Journal of Management(32): 951-990.
• Tulloch, D. L., & Epstein, E. 2002. Benefits of Community MPLIS: Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Equity. Transactions in GIS, 6(2): 195.
• Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W. 1973. Leadership and decision-making. Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press.
• Wallner, J. 2008. Legitimacy and Public Policy: Seeing Beyond Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Performance. Policy Studies Journal, 36(3): 421-443.
• Yukl, G. A. 2006. Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.
• Zhu, W., Avolio, B. J., Riggio, R. E., & Sosik, J. J. 2011. The effect of authentic transformational leadership on follower and group ethics. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5): 801-817.

Identyfikatory

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1515/openec-2019-0009