Significance of Uncertainty in Explaining Institutional Change in Douglass C. North's Approach

• Autorzy: Gabriela Przesławska
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Motivation: Studies on nature and effects of uncertainty in a non-ergodic world became in Douglass Cecil North's concept a starting point for explanation of economic changes mechanism. The origin of North's studies on uncertainty is related to one of key research problems relevant to the emergence of New Institutional Economics (NIE) approach, that is answering the question why some countries are rich and others poor. This problem, according to NIE representatives, cannot be satisfactorily explained in the framework of neoclassical paradigm based on assumptions of perfect information, ideal rationality of market actors and zero transaction costs. Aim: The purpose of the article is to present D.C. North's concept of uncertainty as a source of beliefs and creating institutions ('rules of the game') which place human environment in order. Results: North's breakthrough legacy is in emphasizing the role of human intentionality, growth in the stock of knowledge, as a result of human learning, and common cultural heritage in determining the direction and dynamics of economic changes. Considerations included in the article will enable proving the significance given by North to institutions in reducing uncertainty resulting from the nature of non-ergodic world and thus creating basic incentives for growth and evolutionary economic changes. Finally, the analysis conducted for that purpose in this article will show the original contribution of D.C. North's institutional-cognitive approach to the development of NIE (and economic theory in general) in explaining institutional conditions of development. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Uncertainty; Institutions; Institutional changes

PL

Niepewność; Instytucje; Zmiany instytucjonalne

• Czasopismo: Ekonomia i Prawo
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 18
• Numer: nr 3
• Strony: 331--346

Twórcy

autor

Gabriela Przesławska

• University of Wroclaw

Bibliografia

• Arrow, K.J. (1970). Eseje z teorii ryzyka. Warszawa: PWN.
• Blaug, M. (2000). Teoria ekonomii: ujęcie retrospektywne. Warszawa: PWN.
• Bochenek, M. (2012). Ryzyko i niepewność w naukach ekonomicznych: rozważania semantyczne. Ekonomia. Economics, 4(21).
• Campbell, J.L. (2010). Institutional reproduction and change. In G. Morgan, J.L. Campbell, C. Crouch, O.K. Pedersen, & R. Whitley (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199233762.003.0005.
• Chang, H.J. (2011). Reply to the comments on 'Institutions and economic development: theory, policy and history'. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(4). doi:10.1017/S174413741100035X.
• Coase, R.H. (1998). The new institutional economics. American Economic Review, 88(2).
• Coase, R.H. (1999). The task of the society: opening address to the annual conference of ISNIE. Newsletter of the International Society for New Institutional Economics, 2(2).
• Denzau, A.T., & North, D.C. (1994). Shared mental models: ideologies and institutions. Kyklos, 47(1). doi:10.1111/j.1467-6435.1994.tb02246.x.
• Dequech, D. (2006). The new institutional economics and the theory of behaviour under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 59(1). doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2004.03.012.
• Fukuyama, F. (2016). Governance: why do we know, and how do we know it? Annual Review of Political Science, 19(1). doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-042214-044240.
• Godłów-Legiędź, J. (2010). Współczesna ekonomia. Ku nowemu paradygmatowi. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
• Greif, A., & Mokyr, J. (2017). Cognitive rules, institutions, and economic growth: Douglass North and beyond. Journal of Institutional Economics, 13(1). doi:10.1017/s1744137416000370.
• Hardt, Ł. (2005). Instytucje a koszty transakcyjne w nowej ekonomii instytucjonalnej. Gospodarka Narodowa, 197(1-2). doi:10.33119/gn/101504.
• Hayek, F.A. (1960). The constitution of liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Heiner, R. (1983). The origin of predictable behavior. American Economic Review, 73(4).
• Hodgson, G.M. (2011). The eclipse of the uncertainty concept in mainstream economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 45(1). doi:10.2753/jei0021-3624450109.
• Hume, D. (1969). A treatise of human nature. E.C. Mossner (ed.), Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
• Hutchins, E., & Hazelhurst, B. (1992). Learning in the cultural process. In: C.G. Langston (ed.), Artificial life II. Redwood City: Addison-Wesley.
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). On the Study of Statistical Intuitions. Cognition, 11(2). doi:10.1016/0010-0277(82)90022-1.
• Keynes, J.M. (1921). A treatise on probability. London: Macmillan.
• Knight, F.H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
• Mantzavinos, C., North, D.C., & Shariq, S. (2004). Learning, institutions, and economic performance. Perspectives on Politics, 2(1). doi:10.1017/S1537592704000635.
• McCloskey, D. (2016). Bourgeois equality: how ideas, not capital or institutions enriched the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Menard, C., & Shirley, M.M. (2014). The contribution of Douglass North to new institutional economics. In S. Galani, & I. Sened (eds.), Institutions property rights and economic growth: the legacy of Douglass North. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• North, D.C. (1994). Economic performance through time: the limits to knowledge. American Economic Review, 84(3).
• North, D.C. (2003). Understanding the process of economic change. Retrieved 31.07.2019 from http://pdf.usaid.gov.
• North, D.C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Popper, K. (1957). The poverty of historicism. London: Routlede.
• Przesławska, G. (2006a). Ekonomiczna rola państwa w ujęciu nowej ekonomii politycznej. Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law, 2(1). doi:10.12775/EiP. 2006.001.
• Przesławska, G. (2006b). Konstytucyjne ograniczenia działań politycznych w sferze finansów publicznych w koncepcji Jamesa M. Buchanana. Polityka Gospodarcza, 13.
• Richter, R. (2012). Efficiency of institutions: from the perspective of new institutional economics with emphasis on Knightian Uncertainty. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2105604.
• Shirley, M.M. (2011). What should be the standards for scholarly criticism? Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(4) doi:10.1017/S1744137410000469.
• Simon, H. (1985). Human nature in politics: the dialogue of psychology and political science. American Political Science Review, 79(2). doi:10.2307/1956650.
• Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: Printed for W. Strahan and T. Cadell.
• Stankiewicz, W. (2005). Ekonomika instytucjonalna: zarys wykładu. Warszawa: Prywatna Wyższa Szkoła Biznesu i Administracji.
• Sukiennik, J., Dokurno, Z., & Fiedor, B. (2017). System instytucjonalnej równowagi a proces zmian instytucjonalnych z perspektywy zrównoważonego rozwoju. Ekonomista, 2.
• Weingast, B.R. (2016). Exposing the neoclassical fallacy: McCloskey on ideas and the great enrichment. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 64(3). doi:10.1080/03585522.2016.1233134.
• Weingast, B.R., & Levi, M. (2019). Douglass North's theory of politics. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(2). doi:10.1017/s1049096518002111.
• Wilkin, J. (2016). Instytucjonalne i kulturowe podstawy gospodarowania: humanistyczna perspektywa ekonomii. Warszawa: Scholar.
• Williamson, O.E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.
• Williamson, O.E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.
• Williamson, O.E. (1998). The institutions of governance. American Economic Review, 88(2).
• World Economic Forum. (2015). The global competitiveness report 2015-2016. Retrieved 01.01.2016 from http://www3.weforum.org.
• Ząbkowicz, A. (1998). Państwo a źródła niepewności instytucjonalnej. Ekonomista, 5-6.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12775/EiP.2019.023