PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2019 | z. 137 Modernity of Industry and Sciences | 63--79
Tytuł artykułu

Life Cycle-based Classification as a Simplified Approach for Improving the Environmental Impact of Products

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The present article touches upon the topic of LCA simplifications within the scope of data inventory for the purposes of life cycle analysis of selected products. The paper's main objective was to define the features of products for which the calculation of the simplified environmental indicators may be recommended. The selected products differed in many aspects, and they could be generally classified into two separate groups: active products, which require energy to fulfil their function, and passive products, which do not need an energy supply. On the basis of the presented active products, it has been established that the key issue during their classification should be mass per unit and operational mode. The features of the analysed active use-intensive products include: low mass per unit, relatively short life cycle related to intensive use, possibility for fulfilment of functions without additional material flows and operation with constant AC power supply. A simplified LCA should be recommended at the first stage of project planning, when there are many versions/conceptions of a given product and when a full LCA is virtually impossible. In light of the above-mentioned, simplified environmental indicators would be the first filter for the versions of a new product being considered. Thanks to the proposed approach, the designer is able to categorise the tested product and will be aware of any potential critical points of its life cycle (hot spots).(original abstract)
Twórcy
  • Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland
  • Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland
  • Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. Agarwal, S., Tanger, K., Linich, D. (2012). Enhancing the value of life cycle assessment Deloitte. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/ process-and-operations/us-consulting-enhancingthevalueoflifecycleassessment-112514.pdf, 10.02.2019.
  • 2. Arana-Landin, G., and Heras-Saizarbitoria, I. (2011). Paving the way for the ISO 14006 ecodesign standard: an exploratory study in Spanish companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 1007- 1015.
  • 3. Arzoumanidis, I., Zamagni, A., Raggi, A., Petti, L., and Magazzeni, D. (2013). A model of simplified LCA for agri-food SMEs. In R. Salomone, M.T. Clasadonte, M. Proto, and A. Raggi (Eds.), Product-Oriented Environmental Management System (POEMS) - Improving Sustainability and Competitiveness in the agri-food chain with innovative environmental management tools (pp. 123-150). Netherlands: Springer.
  • 4. Baran, J., Janik, A. (2013). Zastosowanie wybranych metod analizy i oceny wpływu cyklu życia na środowisko w procesie ekoprojektowania. In R. Knosala (Ed.), Innowacje w zarządzaniu i inżynierii produkcji (pp. 22-33). Opole: Oficyna Wydawnicza Polskiego Towarzystwa Zarządzania Produkcją.
  • 5. Baran, J., Janik, A., Ryszko, A. (2014). Knowledge based eco-innovative product design and development -conceptual model built on life cycle approach. Conference: International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM2014, Book 4, 1. doi: 10.5593/sgemsocial2014/B41/S15.094.
  • 6. Burchart-Korol, D. (2012). Life cycle and sustainable supply chain assessment based on exergy analysis. Logistyka, 2, 425-432.
  • 7. Burchart-Korol, D., Czaplicka-Kolarz, K., Kruczek, M (2012). Eco-efficiency and eco-effectiveness concepts in supply chain Management. Congress Proceedings Carpathian Logistics Congress CLC Jesenik, Czech Republic.
  • 8. Buttol, P., Buonamici, R., Naldesi, L., Rinaldi, C., Zamagni, A., and Masoni, P. (2012). Integrating services and tools in an ICT platform to support eco-innovation in SMEs. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 14, 211-221.
  • 9. Chevalier, J.P. (2009). Product Life Cycle Design: Integrating environmental aspects into SMEs product design and development process. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/ viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.477.3073&rep=rep1&type=pdf, 30.11.2018.
  • 10. Commission Recommendation of 9 April 2013 on the use of common methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations, 2013/179/EU. Official Journal of the European Union (2013).
  • 11. Environmental Performance Indicators Guideline for Organizations. Available online https://www.env.go.jp/policy/j-hiroba/PRG/pdfs/e_p_guide.pdf, 10.02.2019.
  • 12. European Commission (2011). GPP Handbook, Buying green! A handbook on green public procurement. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/handbook, 30.11.2018.
  • 13. Frankl, P., and Rubik, F. (2000). Life Cycle Assessment in Industry and Business. Adoption Patterns, Applications and Implications. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
  • 14. Joachimiak-Lechman, K. (2016). Modyfikacja metodyki środowiskowej oceny cyklu żyia na przykładzie małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw [The Modification of the Life Cycle Assessment Methodology in the context of small and medium-sized enterprises] (Doctoral Dissertation). Poznań: University of Economics in Poznań, Faculty of Commodity Science.
  • 15. Joachimiak-Lechman, K., Lewandowska, A., Strózik, T., and Strózik, D. (2017). Environmental classification of products in the context of ecodesign in small and medium enterprises. Economic and Environmental Studies, 17(3), 491-513.
  • 16. Kronenberg, J., and Bergier, T. (2012). Sustainable development in a transition economy: business case studies from Poland. Journal of Cleaner Production, 26, 18-27.
  • 17. Kurczewski, P. (2014). Life Cycle Thinking in Small and Medium Enterprises: the Results of Research on the Implementation of Life Cycle Tools in Polish SMEs-Part 1: Background and Framework. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19(3), 593-600.
  • 18. LCA to go (2010). Boosting Life Cycle Assessment Use in European Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: Serving Needs of Innovative Key Sectors with Smart Methods and Tools. Available online https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/97146_en.html, 10.11.2018.
  • 19. Le Pochat, S., Bertoluci, G., and Froelich, D. (2007). Integrating ecodesign by conducting changes in SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 671-680.
  • 20. Lewandowska, A., and Matuszak-Flejszman, A. (2014). Eco-design as a Normative Element of Environmental Management Systems-the Context of the Revised ISO 14001:2015. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19, 1794-1798.
  • 21. Masoni, P., Sara, B., Scimia, E., and Raggi, A. (2004). VerdEE: a tool for adoption of life cycle assessment in small and medium sized enterprises in Italy. Progress in Industrial Ecology, 1, 203-228.
  • 22. Matuštík, J., and Kočí, V. (2019). Environmental impact of personal consumption from life cycle perspective - A Czech Republic case study. Science of The Total Environment, 646, 177-186.
  • 23. Mesaric, J., Šebalj, D., and Franjkovic, J. (2016). Supply Chains in the context of Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainability. In Z. Segetlija, J. Mesarić, D. Dujak, M. Karić, K. Vojvodić V. Potočan, B. Rosi, B. Jereb, V. Trauzettel, P. Cyplik (Eds.), 16th International Scientific Conference Business Logistics in Modern Management (pp. 53-70). Osijek.
  • 24. Okrasinski, T., Malian, J., Arnold, J.,Tsuriya, M., and Fu, H. (2013). Simplified Approach for Estimating Life Cycle Eco-Impact for Information and Communications Technology Products. In M. Matsumoto, Y. Umeda, K. Masui, and S. Fukushige (Eds.), Proceedings of 7th International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Design for Innovative Value Towards a Sustainable Society (pp. 750-755). Kyoto.
  • 25. Pamminger, R., Krautzer, F., Wimmer, W., Schischke K. (2013). LCA to Go - Environmental Assessment of Machine Tools According to Requirements of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) - Development of the Methodological Concept. In A. Nee, B. Song, S.-K. Ong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Re-engineering Manufacturing for Sustainability (pp. 481-486). Singapore.
  • 26. PN-EN ISO 14001:2009 Environmental management systems - Requirements with guidance for use.
  • 27. PN-EN ISO 14040:2009 Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework.
  • 28. PN-EN ISO 14044:2009 Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Requirements and guidelines.
  • 29. Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS), repealing Regulation (EC) no 761/2001 and Commission Decisions 2001/681/EC and 2006/193/EC. Official Journal of the European Union (2009).
  • 30. Ritzén, S., Hakelius, C., Norell, M. (1996). Life-Cycle Assessment, implementation and use in Swedish industry. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/48c0/pdf, 10.11.2018.
  • 31. Soriano, V. (2001). A Simplified Assessment Approach for Environmentally Sound Product Systems (Doctoral Dissertation). Sydney: University of NSW.
  • 32. Soriano, V. (2004). Simplified Assessment Methodology to Environmentally Sound Product Design. Retrieved from http://www.apiems.net/archive/apiems2004/pdf/apiems 2004_9.1.pdf, 10.11.2018.
  • 33. Sousa, I., and Wallace, D. (2006). Product Classification to Support Approximate Life-Cycle Assessment of Design Concepts. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 73, 228-249.
  • 34. Sun, M. (2004). Integrated Environmental Assessment of Industrial Products (Doctoral Dissertation). Sydney: The University of New South Wales, School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering. Retrieved from http://documents.mx/documents/sun-2005-integrated-environmental-assessment-of-industrial.html, 15.11.2018.
  • 35. Todd, J.A., and Curran, M.A. (1999). Streamlined Life-Cycle Assessment: A Final Report from SETAC North America. Streamlined LCA Workshop, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry and SETAC Foundation for Environmental Education. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8ca0/ac01b77b5f68a96df0de7b4d59cfc82 7b125.pdf, 12.09.2019.
  • 36. Van Hemel, C., and Cramer, J. (2002). Barriers and stimuli for ecodesign in SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10, 439- 453.
  • 37. Wimmer, W., Zust, R., and Lee, K.M. (2004). Ecodesign implementation: a systematic guidance on integrating environmental considerations into product development. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171583304

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.