Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The role of corporate social responsibility is increasingly significant in the life of companies. It can be found in different forms in the competitive sector, from the smallest enterprises to large-scale corporations. The Óbuda University is not only trying to teach how important this is, but it also sets a good example and demonstrates to students that their responsibility may be integrated into their everyday life in multiple areas. BrainBay Centre was established at the Keleti Károly Faculty in 2017. In my case study, I present the operation of the Centre and its potential for the university and students. The objective of our Centre is to carry out research in partnership with other university lecturers. It is our top priority to transfer the results of research projects carried out at the university as quickly as possible and in a meaningful and practical way to the executives working in different areas of corporations. This bilateral relation creates a win-win situation between the university and the corporations. In the last two years, we could see that the joint objectives and thinking together have built up a new type of community with the students as well. With this small venture operating in this special form, we intend to meet market challenges and our responsibility to educate the entrepreneurs, scientists and lecturers of the future.(original abstract)
Rocznik
Strony
149--165
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
- Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary
Bibliografia
- 1. Berkesné Rodek Nóra (2018). CSR EMAT - A vállalatok társadalmi felelősségvállalásának kiválósági menedzsment és értékelési eszköze PhD értekezés, Pannon Egyetem, Veszprém.
- 2. Bocz, J. (2011)/.A nonprofit szektor magyarországi mûködését befolyásoló tényezõk, Statisztikai Szemle 88. évfolyam 4. szám, 353-370.
- 3. Bowen, H.R. (1953). Social Responsibility of the Businessmann. New York: New York University Press.
- 4. Bencsik, A., Eisingerné, B.B. (2013). Intergeneráció-menedzsment és a tudásmegosztás kulturális háttere: mozaikcsaládok "gyerekszobái" kontra munkahelyi együttélés. Humánpolitikai Szemle, 20:(1-2), 10-25.
- 5. Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Boston-New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
- 6. Caroll, A.B. (2016). Carroll's pyramid of CSR: taking another look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6.
- 7. Cone Communications (2015). New cone communications research confirms millennials as America's most ardent CSR supporters. Available at: http://www.conecomm.com/news- blog/new-cone-communications-research-confirms-millennials-as-americas-most-ardent-csr-supporters.
- 8. Csáfor, H. (2009). Vállalatok társadalmi felelősségvállalása, regionális vizsgálat az Északmagyarországi Régióban. PhD értekezés. BudapestL Budapesti Műszaki és Gazdaságtudományi Egyetem.
- 9. Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: an Analysis of 37 Definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 13 (November 2006), 1-13.
- 10. Deák, K., Győri, G., Báron, P., Ágoston, L. (2006). Több, mint üzlet: Vállalati társadalmi felelősségvállalás. Budapest: Demos Magyarország Alapítvány.
- 11. Esfijani, A., Hussain, F.K., & Chang, E. (2012). An approach to university social responsibility ontology development through text analyses. Paper presented at the IEEE 5th International Conference on Human System Interactions, IEEE-HSI-2012.
- 12. European Comission (2001). Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. Green Paper.
- 13. European Comission (2006). Communication from the Comission to the European Parlament, the Council and European Economic and Social Committee, Brussels, COM 2006/136.
- 14. European Comission (2011). Europe 2020 A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth Brussels, COM 2020.
- 15. ISO (2008). 26 000 Guidance on Social Responsibility. www.iso.org.
- 16. Kotler, B., Lee, N. (2207). CSR - Vállalatok társadalmi felelősségvállalása. Budapest: HVG Kiadó Zrt.
- 17. Kozma, Tímea (2018). Szereplők, folyamatok, kapcsolatok az ellátási lánc mentén Logisztikai évkönyv, 23-35, 13.
- 18. Központi Statisztikai Hivatal (2012). Önkéntes munka Magyarországon (A Munkaerő-felmérés, 2011. III. negyedévi kiegészítő felvétele). https://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xftp/ idoszaki/pdf/onkentesmunka.pdf.
- 19. Központi Statisztikai Hivatal (2017a). https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_evkozi_9_7.
- 20. Központi Statisztikai Hivatal (2017b). A kis-és középvállalkozások jellemzői, http://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xftp/idoszaki/pdf/kkv17.pdf.
- 21. Málovics, Gy. (2011). A vállalati fenntarthatóság értelmezéséről. Szeged: JATEPress.
- 22. Putzer, P.E. (2011). CSR - Merre tovább? Marketing & Menedzsment, 4, 45-52.
- 23. Reicher, R.Z. (2018). Corporate social responsibility among small and medium-sized enterprises in Hungary. Globalization and its socio-economic consequences: 18th International Scientific Conference Proceedings, Zilina, 1300-1307, 8 p.
- 24. Shu-Hsiang (Ava), Chen Jaitip Nasongkhla, J., Ana Donaldson (2015). University Social Responsibility (USR): Identifying an Ethical Foundation within Higher Education Institutions. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - October 2015, 14, 4, 165-172.
- 25. Stonkute, E., Vveinhardt, J., Sroka, W. (2018). Training the CSR Sensitive Mind-Set: The Integration of CSR into the Training of Business Administration Professionals Sustainability 2018, 10(3), 754; p. 14, doi:10.3390/su10030754.
- 26. Thao, Le Ha Nhu; Anh, Doan Ngoc Phi; Velencei, Jolan (2018). Measuring corporate social performance. Serbian Journal Of Management, 14(1), 193-204. doi:10.5937/sjm14-18009.
- 27. Tóth, G. (2007). A valóban felelős vállalat. Budapest: KÖVET, Crew Kiadó.
- 28. UNESCO (2007). A human right-based approach to education for all. https://www.unicef.org/publications/files/A_Human_Rights_Based_Approach_to_Education_for_All.pdf.
- 29. Vallaeys, F. (2013). Defining social responsibility: A matter of philosophical urgency for university. Global university network for innovation. http://www.guninetwork.org/ articles/defining-social-responsibility-matter-philosophical-urgency-universities.
- 30. Vanmeter, R.A., Grisaffe, D.B., Chonko, L.B., & Roberts, J.A. (2012). Generation Y's Ethical Ideology and Its Potential Workplace Implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(1), 93-109. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1505-1.
- 31. Velencei, J., Baracskai, Z. (2016) Decision Maker in the Global Village: Thinking Together. In A. Bencsik (Ed.), Knowledge Management Initiatives and Strategies in Small and Medium Enterprises (pp. 25-41). IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-1642-2.ch002.
- 32. http://brainbay.uni-obuda.hu/.
- 33. https://csr.cw.com.tw/.
- 34. https://csr.cw.com.tw/article/40587.
- 35. https://www.insead.edu/news/2014-first-global-research-from-insead-confirms-millennials-are-misunderstood.
- 36. http://www.usrnetwork.org.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171583530