PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2019 | 27 | nr 4 | 48--70
Tytuł artykułu

Interdependence Among Creativity, Education, and Job Experience : a Municipal Company in Poland

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Purpose: The technological progress of production processes causes changes in the social structure of work, i.e. modifies the content of most, if not all, workplaces. In that respect, the identification of changes in the intensity of creativeness, the level of education, and the experience of employees in production processes and occupational tasks is a particularly important issue. The article investigates the interdependence among work creativity, education, and job experience of employees of one of the municipal companies operating in Poland.

Methodology: The study employs firm-level data covering over 2,200 observations. The study gathered data from three major internal sources of information: the scopes of responsibilities of organizational positions, personnel documentation regarding the individual level of education and professional experience, and the results of interviews with executive staff and employees on particular posts. The research proceedings base on document analysis, structured interviews, teamwork methods, and a classification technique.

Results: Research revealed that the complexity of work increased in the company. Jobs requiring higher levels of creativity are occupied by employees with relatively higher education. However, their average level of education in the analyzed period decreased as opposed to jobs that require relatively lower levels of creativity. The analysis of interdependence between creativity and job experience identified that there emerged a relatively shorter average job experience for employees who perform cognitive work. Moreover, the average job experience increased in the group of employees who perform routine manual and non-routine cognitive work.

Implications: In the case of entry, non-trivial policy implications arise. Due to increased competition, the welfare of consumers improves (lower prices for the goods). However, the entry of a polluting firm increases emissions. Higher emissions damage consumers and lower the overall social welfare of an environmentally concerned government. Thus, a complete welfare analysis is required prior to the design of a government's regulatory intervention.

Implications: The study refers to the job polarization issue by confirming the tendencies of labor markets. It also addresses issues concerned with technological progress, although they are not confirmed by research in this paper.

Originality/Value: The main contribution of the paper is the interesting dataset gathered. Furthermore, the paper addresses an interesting question where empirical research at the firm level is lacking, particularly municipal company. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
27
Numer
Strony
48--70
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Cracow University of Economics, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Acemoglu, D. and Autor, D. (2011). Chapter 12 - Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings. In: D. Card and O. Ashenfelter (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(11)02410-5.
  • Acemoglu, D. and Restrepo, P. (2016). The Race Between Machine and Man: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares and Employment. NBER Working Paper, NBER working paper series, 22252, https://doi.org/10.3386/w22252.
  • Altenburg, L. (1987). Production Possibilities with a Public Intermediate Good. The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue Canadienne d'Economique, 20(4), 715-34, https://doi.org/10.2307/135412.
  • Amabile, T.M. (2012). Componential Theory of Creativity. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 12-096 (April), https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=42469.
  • Andersson, Åke E. (2011). Creative People Need Creative Cities. In: D.E. Andersson, Å.E. Andersson and Ch. Mellander (eds.). Handbook of Creative Cities. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Autor, D.H. and Handel M.J. (2013). Putting Tasks to the Test. Human Capital, Job Tasks and Wages. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(2), 559-596.
  • Autor, D.H, Katz, L.F. and Kearney, M.S. (2006). The Polarization of the U.S. Labor Market. American Economic Review, 96(2), 189-194.
  • Autor, D., Levy, F. and Murnane, J. (2003). The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279-1333.
  • Autor, D.H. (2015). Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3-30, https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.3.3.
  • Baarspul, H.C. and Wilderom, C.P. (2011). Do employees behave differently in public - vs private-sector organizations? Public Management Review, 7(13).
  • Barbot, B., Besancon, M. and Todd, I.L. (2011). Assessing Creativity in the Classroom. The Open Education Journal, 4(1), 58-66, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874920801104010058.
  • Batey, M. (2012). The Measurement of Creativity: From Definitional Consensus to the Introduction of a New Heuristic Framework. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 55-65, https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.649181.
  • Berman, E.M., Bowman, J.S., West, J.P. and Van Wart, M.R. (2015). Human resource management in public service - paradoxes, processes and problems. London: Sage Publications.
  • Berge van den, W. and Weelter, W. (2015). Baanpolarisatie in Nederland. CPB Policy Brief. CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, The Hague.
  • Blaschke, M., Cigaina, M., Riss, U.V. and Shoshan, I. (2017). Designing Business Models for the Digital Economy. In: G. Oswald and M. Kleinemeier (eds.), Shaping the Digital Enterprise: Trends and Use Cases in Digital Innovation and Transformation. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40967-2_6.
  • Blau, F.D. and Kahn, L.M. (2001). Do Cognitive Test Scores Explain Higher US Wage Inequality? NBER Working Paper No. 8210. Cambridge.
  • Bode, E. and Villar, L.P. (2017). Creativity, Education or What? On the Measurement of Regional Human Capital. Papers in Regional Science, 96(S1), S51-67, https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12180.
  • Boschma, R.A. and Fritsch, M. (2009). Creative Class and Regional Growth: Empirical Evidence from Seven European Countries. Economic Geography, 85(4), 391-423, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01048.x.
  • Boyne, G.A. (2002). Public and private management: what's the difference? Journal of Management Studies, 1(39).
  • Bravermann, H. (1998). Labor and monopoly capita. The degradation or work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
  • Brown, A.W., Fishenden, J. and Thompson, M. (2014). Digitizing Government. Understanding and Implementing New Digital Business Models. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137443649.
  • Brynjolfsson, E. and McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. WW Norton & Company.
  • Cawley, J., Heckman, J. and Vytlacil, E. (2001). Three Observations on Wages and Measured Cognitive Ability. Labour Economics, 8(4), 419-42, https://doi.org/10.101/S0927-5371(01)00039-2.
  • Clifton, J., Comín, F. and Fuentes, D.D. (2005). Empowering Europe's Citizens'? Public Management Review, 7(3), 417-443, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030500181052.
  • Coelli, M. and Borland, J. (2016). Job Polarisation and Earnings Inequality in Australia. Economic Record, 92(296), 1-27.
  • Deming, D.J. (2017). The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(4), 1593-1640, https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx022.
  • Devroye, D. and Freeman, R.B. (2001). Does Inequality in Skills Explain Inequality of Earnings Across Advanced Countries?, NBER Working Paper No. 8140. Cambridge.
  • Donegan, M., Drucker, J., Goldstein, H., Lowe, N. and Malizia, E. (2008). Which Indicators Explain Metropolitan Economic Performance Best? Traditional or Creative Class. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(2), 180-95, https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360801944948.
  • Dustmann, C., Ludsteck, J. and Schonberg, U. (2009). Revisiting the German Wage Structure. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(2), 843-881
  • Florida, R. (2002). The Economic Geography of Talent. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(4), 743-55, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.00314.
  • Florida, R. (2014). The Creative Class and Economic Development. Economic Development Quarterly, 28(3), 196-205, https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242414541693.
  • Frączkiewicz-Wronka, A. (ed.) (2009). Zarządzanie publiczne - element teorii i praktyki. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Katowicach.
  • Funke, J. (2009). On the Psychology of Creativity. In: P. Meusburger, J. Funke and E. Wunder (eds.), Milieus of Creativity: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Spatiality of Creativity. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9877-2_2.
  • Gabe, T.M. and Abel, J.R. (2011). Human Capital and Economic Activity in Urban America. Regional Studies, 45(8), 1079-1090.
  • Glaeser, E.L., Kolko, J. and Saiz, A. (2001). Consumer City. Journal of Economic Geography, 1(1), 27-50, https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/1.1.27.
  • Godin, B. (2006). The Knowledge-Based Economy: Conceptual Framework or Buzzword? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1): 17-30, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-5010-x.
  • Goos, M. and Manning, A. (2007). Lousy and Lovely Jobs. The Rising Polarization of Work in Britain, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(1), 118-133
  • Goos, M., Manning, A. and Salomons, A. (2009). Job Polarization in Europe. American Economic Review, 99(2), 58-63.
  • Green, D.A. and Sand, B.M. (2015). Has the Canadian Labor Market Polarised? Canadian Journal of Economics, 48(2).
  • Guilford, J.P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444-454, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487.
  • Hanushek, E. and Woessmann, L. (2009). Do Better Schools Lead to More Growth? Cognitive Skills, Economic Outcomes, and Causation. NBER Working Papers No. 14633. Cambridge.
  • Heckman, J.J., Humphries, J.E., Veramendi, G. and Urzua, S.S. (2014). Education, Health and Wages. 19971. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Heckman, J.J., Stixrud, J. and Urzua, S. (2006). The Effects of Cognitive and Noncognitive Abilities on Labor Market Outcomes and Social Behavior. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3), 411-482, https://doi.org/10.1086/504455.
  • Heyman, F. (2016). Job Polarization, Job Tasks and the Role of Firms. IFN Working Paper 1123. Stockholm: Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN), http://hdl.handle.net/10419/175060.
  • Hondeghem, A., Horton, S. and Scheepers, S. (2005). Modèles de gestion des competences en Europe. Revue française d'administration publique, 16, 561-576.
  • Kremer, M. and Maskin, E. (1996). Wage Inequality and Segregation by Skill. Working Paper no. 5718, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.
  • Kupczyk, T. (2014). Competencies of Management Staff in the knowledge-based economy. Wrocław: Wyższa Szkoła Handlowa.
  • Lemons, G. (2011). Diverse Perspectives of Creativity Testing: Controversial Issues When Used for Inclusion Into Gifted Programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(5), 742-772, https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353211417221.
  • Leuven, E., Oosterbeek, H. and van Ophem, H. (2004). Explaining International Differences in Male Skill Wage Differentials by Differences in Demand and Supply of Skill. Economic Journal, 114(495), 466-486.
  • Machin, S. and Van Reenan, J. (1998). Technology Changes in Skill Structure: A Review of Recent Trends and Proposed Explanations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 1215-1279.
  • Manyika, J., Chui, M., Miremadi, M., Bughin, J., George, K., Willmott, P. and Dewhurst, M. (2017). A Future That Works: Automation, Employment, and Productivity, McKinsey Global Institute, www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/digital-disruption/mgi.
  • Markusen, A. (2004). Targeting Occupations in Regional and Community Economic Development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(3), 253-268, https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360408976377.
  • Marlet, G. and van Woerkens, C. (2004). Skills and Creativity in a Cross-Section of Dutch Cities. Discussion Paper Series/Tjalling C. Koopmans Research Institute 04 (29), http://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/7392.
  • Marques, R.C. (2010). Regulation of Water and Wastewater Services. An International Comparison. London, UK: IWA Publishing.
  • Marrocu, E. and Paci, R. (2012). Education or Creativity: What Matters Most for Economic Performance? Economic Geography, 88(4), 369-401, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01161.x.
  • Mcgranahan, D. and Wojan, T. (2007). Recasting the Creative Class to Examine Growth Processes in Rural and Urban Counties. Regional Studies, 41(2), 197-216, https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400600928285.
  • Mellander, Ch. and Florida, R. (2011). Creativity, Talent, and Regional Wages in Sweden. The Annals of Regional Science, 46(3), 637-660, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-009-0354-z.
  • Michaels, G., Natraj, A. and Van Reenen, J. (2010). Has ICT polarized skill demand? Evidence from eleven countries over 25 years, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 16138, Cambridge.
  • Michaels, G., Natraj, Ash. and van Reenen, J. (2014). Has ICT polarized skill demand? Evidence from eleven countries over twenty - five years. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(1), 60-77.
  • Narmania, D. (2018). Efficient Management of Municipal Enterprises. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 7(2).
  • OECD (2016). Meeting the policy challenges of tomorrow's digital economy, www.oecd.org/internet/ ministerial.
  • OECD (2017). Getting Skills Right: Skills for Jobs Indicators. Getting Skills Right. Paris: OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264277878-en.
  • Pi, J. and Zhang, P. (2018). Skill-Biased Technological Change and Wage Inequality in Developing Countries. International Review of Economics & Finance, 56, 347-362, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2017.11.004.
  • Runco, M.A. and Jaeger, G.J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92-96, https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092.
  • Said-Metwaly, S., Van den Noortgate, W. and Kyndt, E. (2017). Approaches to Measuring Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review. Creativity. Theories - Research - Applications, 4(2), https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2017-0013.
  • Shapiro, J.M. (2006). Smart Cities: Quality of Life, Productivity, and the Growth Effects of Human Capital. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(2), 324-335, https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.88.2.324.
  • Simon, H.A. (1997). Administrative behavior-a study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. New York: Macmillan.
  • Snow, Ch.C., Fjeldstad, Ø.D. and Langer, A.M. (2017). Designing the Digital Organization. Journal of Organization Design, 6(1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-017-0017-y.
  • Stake, R.E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
  • Stiglitz, J.E. and Rosengard, J.K. (2015). Economics of the Public Sector. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Suga, N. and Tawada, M. (2007). International Trade with a Public Intermediate Good and the Gains from Trade. Review of International Economics, 15(2), 284-93, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2007.00648.x.
  • Tawada, M. and Abe, K. (1984). Production Possibilities and International Trade with a Public Intermediate Good. The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue Canadienne d'Economique, 17(2), 232-48, https://doi.org/10.2307/134955.
  • Terzidis, N., van Maarseveen, R., Ortega-Argiles, R. (2017). Employment polarization in local labor markets: The Dutch case, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, CPB Discussion Paper No. 358, November.
  • Tomczyk-Horyń, K. and Knosala, R. (2014). Evaluation of employee creativity in the context of production accounting system. Technical Transaction Mechanics, 2-M, 65-73.
  • Voorn, B., van Genugten, M.L. and van Thiel, S. (2017). The Efficiency and Effectiveness of Municipally Owned Corporations: A Systematic Review. Local Government Studies, 43(5), 820-841, https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1319360.
  • Wang, J., Caminada, K., Goudswaard, K. and Wang, Ch. (2015). Decomposing Income Polarization and Tax - Benefit Changes Across 31 European Countries and Europe Wide, 2004-2012, Leiden University, Department of Economics.
  • Ziębicki, B. (2014). Efektywność organizacyjna podmiotów sektora publicznego. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie.
  • Zhou, J. and Hoever, I.J. (2014). Research on Workplace Creativity. A Review and Redirection, The Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 333-359, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091226.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171584074

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.