PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2020 | 6 (20) | nr 1 | 3--21
Tytuł artykułu

Integration of Immigrants and the Role of Policy in the OECD Countries

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
With the increase in global spatial mobility the importance of migration policy (including integration policy) is increasing day by day, both in developed countries and new market economies. In the course of the research on migration policy various measures were constructed. Even though the particular measures relate to different areas of migration policy, they do not refer to the effectiveness of migration policy. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of the integration of immigrants into the labour market in the countries that belong to the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) and to analyse the relationships between these effects and the integration policy adopted by the individual countries. The TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution) method and the CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) method were used in the research. The results indicate that the highest effectiveness of migration policy in terms of integration of immigrants into the labour market was reported in the following OECD countries: Iceland, Switzerland and New Zealand. The results also suggest that the higher the level of integration policy restrictiveness in a given country, the worse the effects in terms of integration of immigrants into the labour market that were noticed by this country.(original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
Numer
Strony
3--21
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu
Bibliografia
  • Afful-Dadzie, E., Nabareseh, S., & Komínková Oplatková, Z. (2014). Fuzzy Vikor approach: Evaluating quality of Internet health information. Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, 2, 183-190. doi:10.15439/2014F203.
  • Bergh, A. (2013). Labour-market integration of immigrants in OECD-countries: What explanations fit the data?. (ECIPE Occasional Paper No. 4/2013), 1-12.
  • Bjerre, L., Helbling, M., Römer, F., & Zobel, M. (2016). The Immigration Policies in Comparison (IMPIC) dataset: Technical report (Discussion Paper No. VI 2016-201).
  • Boeri, T., Brücker, H., Gournichas, P.-O., & Cahuc, P. (2005). Why are Europeans so tough on migrants? Economic Policy, 20(44), 631-703. doi:10.1111/j.1468- 0327.2005.00148.x.
  • Castles, S. (2004). The factors that make and unmake migration policies. International Migration Review, 38(3), 852-884. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00222.x.
  • Cornelius, W. A., & Rosenblum, M. (2005). Immigration and politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 8, 99-119. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104854.
  • Czaika, M., & de Haas, H. (2013). Measuring migration policies: Some conceptual and methodological reflections. Migration and Citizenship, 1(2), 40-47. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Measuring-Migration-Policies Some-Conceptual-and-Haas-Czaika/c0269b7ee67c01b6dea412970f596ffad787d63d.
  • de Haas, H., & Czaika, M. (2013). The effectiveness of immigration policy. Population and Development Review, 39(3), 487-508. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00613.x.
  • de Haas, H., Natter, K., & Vezzoli, S. (2014). Compiling and coding migration policies. Insights from the DEMIG POLICY database (IMI Working Papers No. 87).
  • de Haas, H., Natter, K., & Vezzoli, S. (2015). Conceptualizing and measuring migration policy change. Comparative Migration Studies, 3(15), 1-21. doi:10.1186/s40878- 015-0016-5.
  • De Lombaerde, P., Dorucci, E., Genna, G., & Mongelli, F. P. (2008). Quantitative monitoring and comparison of regional integration processes: Steps towards good practice. In A. Kösler & M. Zimmek (Eds.), Elements of regional Integration. A multidimensional approach (pp. 149-179). Baden: Nomos Publishers.
  • Deng, H., Chung-Hsing, Y., & Willis, R. J. (2000). Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Computers & Operations Research, 27(10), 963-973. doi:10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00069-6.
  • Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770. doi:10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H.
  • Duszczyk, M. (2014). Ewolucja polskiej polityki migracyjnej w zakresie migracji zarobkowych po 1 maja 2004 r. Studia BAS, 4(40), 37-54. Retrieved from http://yadda. icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171340589.
  • Fasani, F., Frattini, T., & Minale, L. (2018). (The Struggle for) Refugee integration into the labour market: Evidence from Europe (IZA Discussion Paper Series No. 11333), 1-56.
  • Hatton, T. (2008). The rise and fall of asylum: What happened and why?. (ANU Discussion Paper No. 577), 1-48.
  • Huddleston, T., Bilgili, O., Joki, A.-L., & Vankova, Z. (2015). Migrant integration policy index 2015, with the vision of J. Niessen, the scientific review of A. Bardolet, F. Fàbregues, J.D. Ingleby and E. Sánchez-Montijano and the support of K. Skhlyan. Barcelona/Brussels: CIDOB, MPG.
  • Hung, Ch.-Ch., & Chen, L.-H. (2009). A fuzzy TOPSIS decision making model with entropy weight under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. (Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, I) Hong Kong: IMECS.
  • Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • International Migration Institute. (2018). DEMIG POLICY data downloads. Retrieved September 10, 2018 from https://www.migrationinstitute.org/data/demig-data/ demig-policy-1/download-the-data/demig-policy-data-downloads.
  • Irastorza, N., & Bevelander, P. (2017). The labour market participation of humanitarian migrants in Sweden: An overview. Intereconomics, (5), 270-277. doi:10.1007/ s10272-017-0689-0.
  • Kagan, D. (2019). The influence of Europeanization policies on immigrants' participation in Scandinavian higher education. Economics and Business Review, 5(1), 32-52. doi:10.18559/ebr.2019.1.3.
  • Kotikova, S., & Vavrek, R. (2019). Determining the size of technological gap between local firms and foreign direct investment at regional level. Journal of International Studies, 12(3), 48-63. doi:10.14254/2071-8330.2019/12-3/5.
  • Li, Z., Yang, T., Huang, Ch.-S., Xu, Ch.-Y., Shao, Q., Shi, P., ... Cui, T. (2018). An improved approach for water quality evaluation: TOPSIS-based informative weighting and ranking (TIWR) approach. Ecological Indicators, 89, 356-364.
  • Liebig, T. (2007). The labour market integration of immigrants in Denmark. (OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 50), 1-78.
  • Migrant Integration Policy Index. (2015). Methodology. Retrieved October 10, 2019 from http://www.mipex.eu/methodology.
  • OECD Statistics. (2016a). Foreign-born employment. Retrieved from https://data.oecd. org/migration/foreign-born-employment.htm
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171586274

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.