Intellectual Property Rights, R&D Expenditures, and High-Tech Exports in the EU Transition Economies

• Autorzy: Yilmaz Bayar , Rita Remeikienė , Ligita Gasparėnienė
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Several countries have begun to follow export-led growth strategy along with the accelerating liberalization and globalization processes. One of the key goals behind this strategy is to enhance the share of high-tech exports with relatively much higher value added in exports. This study investigates the effect of intellectual property rights and R&D expenditures together with foreign direct investment inflows on high-tech exports of the EU transition economies over the 2000-2016 period through panel data analysis. The methods of this research include systematic and comparative literature analysis, and panel data analysis. The analyses reveal that intellectual property rights and R&D expenditures positively affect high-tech export, while FDI negatively affects high-tech export in the long run. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Intellectual property law; Research & Development (R+D); Direct investments; Export; High-tech; Panel data; Data analysis

PL

Prawo własności intelektualnej; Badania i rozwój (B+R); Inwestycje bezpośrednie; Eksport; Nowe technologie; Dane panelowe; Analiza danych

• Czasopismo: Journal of International Studies
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: 13
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 143--154

Twórcy

autor

Yilmaz Bayar

• Usak University Turkey

autor

Rita Remeikienė

• Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania

autor

Ligita Gasparėnienė

• Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania

Bibliografia

• Bakirci, F., Heupel, T., Kocagoz, O., & Ozen, U. (2017). German-Turkish perspectives on IT and innovation management: challenges and approaches. Wiesbaden: Springer.
• Belay, S. (2005). Determinants of levels of high technology exports. An empirical investigation. Advances in Competitiveness Research, 13(1), 64-79.
• Braunerhjelm, P., & Thulin, P., (2006). Can Countries Create Comparative Advantages? Centre of Excellence for Studies in Science and Innovation (CESIS), Electronic Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 61.
• Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification Tests in Econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253.
• Çetin, R. (2016). Yeni Sanayileşen Ülkelerde AR-GE Harcamaları ve Yüksek Teknoloji Ürünü İhracatı Arasındaki İlişkinin Panel Veri Analizi Yöntemi ile İncelenmesi. İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, 66, 30-43.
• Dumitrescu, E., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014
• Dzemydaitė, G., Dzemyda, I., & Jurgelevičius, A. (2012). Evaluation of the implementation of national export development strategy: case study of the Republic of Lithuania. Intellectual Economics, 6 (1/13), 776-797.
• Eberhardt, M., & Teal, F. (2010). Productivity analysis in global manufacturing production. Discussion Paper 515, Department of Economics, University of Oxford. http://www.economics.ox.ac.uk/research/WP/pdf/paper515.pdf.
• Falk, M. (2009). High-tech exports and economic growth in industrialized countries. Applied Economics Letters, 16 (10), 1025-1028. doi:10.1080/13504850701222228
• Fraser Institute (2019). Economic Freedom. Retrieved from: https://www.fraserinstitute.org/economicfreedom/dataset?geozone=world&year=2016&page=dataset&min-year=2&max-year=0&filter=0
• Gokmen, Y., & Turen, U. (2013). The determinants of high technology exports volume: a panel data analysis of EU 15 countries. International Journal of Management Economic and Social Sciences, 2(3), 217- 232.
• Guravsar Gocke, S., Karatepe, S., & Karagoz, M. (2010). The impact of R&D intensity on high tech exports. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/37174504/The_Impact_of_R_and_D_Intensity_on_High_Tech_Exports
• Hwang, H., Wu, J. Z., & Yu, E. S. H. (2016). Innovation, imitation and intellectual property rights in developing countries. Review of Development Economics, 20(1), 138-151.
• Im, K. S, Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53-74. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
• Ivus, O. (2008). Do stronger intellectual property rights raise high-tech exports to the developing world? Retrieved from: https://econ.ucalgary.ca/manageprofile/sites/econ.ucalgary.ca.manageprofile/files/unitis/publications/16234130/IPR_emp_Oct2008.pdf
• Kabaklarli, E., Duran, M. S., & Ucler, Y. T. (2018). High-tech technology exports and economic growth: panel data analysis for selected OECD countries. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 6(2), 47-60. doi:10.23762/FSO_VOL6NO2_18_4
• Kılıç, C., Bayar, Y., & Özekicioğlu, H., (2014). Araştırma Geliştirme Harcamalarının Yüksek teknoloji Ürün İhracatı Üzerindeki Etkisi: G-8 Ülkeleri İçin Bir Panel Veri Analizi. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 44, 115-130.
• Kizilkaya, O., Ay, A., & Sofuoğlu, E. (2016). The determinants of high technology product export in brict countries: an econometric approach. Global Journal on Humanities & Social Sciences, 4, 112-117.
• Lall, S. (2000). The technological structure and performance of developing country manufactured exports: 1995- 1998. Oxford Development Studies, 28(3), 337-369.
• Lin, J., & Linkoln, W. (2018). Intellectual property rights affect the pattern of trade. Retrieved from: https://voxeu.org/article/intellectual-property-rights-affect-pattern-trade
• Liu, W. H., & Lin, Y. C. (2005). Foreign patent rights and high-tech exports: evidence from Taiwan. Applied Economics, 37 (13), 1543-1555. doi: 10.1080/00036840500173155
• Mark, N. C., Ogaki, M., & Sul, D., (2005). Dynamic Seemingly Unrelated Cointegrating Regressions. Review of Economic Studies, 72(3), 797-820.
• McCoskey, S., & Kao, C., (1998). A Residual-based Test of the Null of Cointegration in Panel Data. Econometric Reviews, 17(1), 57-84. doi:10.1080/07474939808800403
• Mehrara, M., Seijani, S., & Karsalari, A.R. (2017). Determinants of high-tech export in developing countries based on Bayesian model averaging. Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci, 35(1), 199-215. doi:10.18045/zbefri.2017.1.199
• Mitic, B., & Ivic, M. (2016). The impact of foreign direct investment on export performance: case of European transition economies. Independent Journal of Management and Production, 7(3), 771-785. doi: 10.14807/ijmp.v7i3.44
• Mrad, F. (2017). The effects of intellectual property rights protection in the technology transfer context on economic growth: the case of developing countries. Journal of Innovation Economics and Management, 2(23), 33-57.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. University of Cambridge, Working Paper, CWPE 0435.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
• Pesaran, M. H., (2006). Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure, Econometrica, 74(4), 967-1012. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00692.x
• Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A., & Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross-section independence. Econometrics Journal, 11, 105-127.
• Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142, 50-93.
• Posner, M.V. (1961). International Trade and Technical Progress. Oxford Economic Papers, 13, 323-341,
• Sandu, S., & Ciocanel, B. (2014). Impact of R&D and innovation on high-tech export. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 80-90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00450-X
• Srholec, M. (2005). High-tech exports from developing countries: a symptom of technology spurts or statistical illusion? Review of World Economics, 143(2), 227-255. doi: 10.1007/s10290-007-0106-z
• Taplin, R., & Novak, A. Z. (2010). Intellectual property, innovation and management in emerging economies. London: Routledge.
• Tebaldi, E. (2011). The determinants of high-technology exports: A panel data analysis. Atlantic Economic Journal, 39(4), 343-353. doi: 10.1007/s11293-011
• United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2019). World Investment Report: Annex Tables. Retrieved from: https://unctad.org/en/pages/diae/world investment report/annex-tables.aspx (10.01.2019)
• Ustabas, A., & Ersin, O. O. (2016). The effects of R&D and high technology exports on economic growth: A comparative cointegration analysis for Turkey and South Korea. Retrieved from: https://avekon.org/papers/1475.pdf
• Vasa, L. (2012). The European Paradox and the Innovation Activity of the Hungarian SME Sector. Conference Proceedings Chapters, in: Kiril Todorov & Atanas Damyanov (ed.), European Entrepreneurship as an Engine for PostCrisis Development - Challenges and Opportunities. Proceedings of the International Conference, 8-10, 1(127), 131-148.
• Vernon, R. (1966). International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 190-207.
• Westerlund, J., & Edgerton, D. (2007). A panel bootstrap cointegration test. Economics Letters 97(3), 185-190. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2007.03.003
• World Bank (2019a). High-technology exports (% of manufactured exports). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TX.VAL.TECH.MF.ZS
• World Bank (2019b). Research and development expenditure (% of GDP). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
• World Bank (2019c). Foreign direct investment, net inflows (% of GDP). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS
• Xing, Y. (2012). The People's Republic of China's high tech exports: myth and reality. ADBI Working Paper no. 5055, Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/156212/adbi-wp357.pdf

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-1/9