Relacje: wynagrodzenia - efektywność organizacji

• Autorzy: Magdalena Majowska , Piotr Ostrowski

Warianty tytułu

Relations Between Compensation and Organizational Performance

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

W artykule tym zwrócono uwagę na możliwości zwiększania efektywności organizacji poprzez zastosowanie odpowiednich praktyk wynagradzania. W pierwszej kolejności dokonano konceptualizacji i operacjonalizacji pojęcia efektywności. Następnie wskazano na istotny wpływ strategii i systemu wynagrodzeń na efektywność organizacji. W końcowej części przedstawiono niektóre mocne i słabe strony podejścia do wynagradzania za efektywność. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

This article underlines possibility of increasing the organizational performance through application of the relevant compensation practices. At first, the authors conceptualized and operationalized the efficiency concept, then indicated the significant impact of the compensation strategy and system on organizational performance. Finally, authors described some strengths and weaknesses of the pay for performance approach. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Efektywność organizacji; Wynagrodzenia; Operacjonalizacja

EN

Organisation effectiveness; Remuneration; Operationalization

• Czasopismo: Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: 11
• Numer: z. 10 Efektywność - wymiary, uwarunkowania, wyzwania
• Strony: 163--174

Twórcy

autor

Magdalena Majowska

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach

autor

Piotr Ostrowski

• Uniwersytet Warszawski

Bibliografia

• Barkema H.G., Gomez-Mejia L.R., Managerial compensation and firm performance: A general research framework, "Academy of Management Journal" 41/1998, s. 135-145.
• Barnard C., The Functions of the Executive, MA: Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1938.
• Barney J., Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, "Journal of Management" 17/1991, s. 99-120.
• Becker B., Gerhart B., The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospect, "Academy of Management Journal" 39/1996, s. 779-801.
• Becker B., Huselid M., High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications, [w:]: red. G.R. Ferris, Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1997.
• Bedeian A.G., Zammuto R.F., Organizations: Theory and design, Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press, 1991.
• Brown M., Sturman M., Simmering M., Compensation policy and organizational performance: the efficiency, operational, and financial implications of pay levels and pay structure, "Academy of Management Journal" 46/2003, s. 752-762.
• Cadsby C.B., Song F., Tapon F., Sorting and incentive effects of pay for performance: an experimental investigation, "Academy of Management Journal" 50(2)/2007, s. 387-405.
• Campbell J.P., Dunnette M.D., Lawler E.E., Weick K.E., Managerial behavior, performance and effectiveness, McGraw-Hill, New York 1970.
• Campbell J.P., Modeling the prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology, [w:] Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, red. L.M. Hough, vol. 2 (Second Edition), Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press, 1990.
• Carlson D.S., Upton N., Seaman S., The Impact of human resource practices and compensation design on performance: An analysis of family-owned SMEs, "Journal of Small Business Management" 44(4)/2006, s. 531-543.
• Cooper A.C., Gimeno-Gascon F.J., Woo C.Y., Initial human capital as predictors of new venture performance, "Journal of Business Venturing" 9/1994, s. 371-395.
• Delery J.E., Doty D.H., Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions, "Academy of Management Journal" 39/1996, s. 802-835.
• Eccles R.G., The performance measurement manifesto, "The Harvard Business Review on Measuring Corporate Performance" 1998, s. 25-45.
• Gerhart B., Milkovich G.T., Organizational differences in managerial compensation and financial performance, "Academy of Management Journal" 13/1990, s. 663-691.
• Gerhart B., Rynes S., Compensation: theory, evidence and strategic implications, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003.
• Gomez-Mejia L.R., Balkin D.B., Compensation, organizational strategy, and firm performance, Cincinnati: Southwestern, 1992.
• Huselid M.A., The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance, "Academy of Management Journal" 38/1995, s. 635-672.
• Hyondong K., Yaping G., The roles of tacit knowledge and OCB in the relationship between group-based pay and firm performance, "Human Resource Management Journal" 19(2)/2OO9, s. 120-139.
• Ireland RD., Kurako D.F., Covin J.G., Antecedents, elements, and consequences of corporate entrepreneurship strategy, "Academy of Management Best Conference Paper" ENT: L1/2003.
• Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P., Strategiczna Karta Wyników: Jak przełożyć strategię na działanie, PWN, Warszawa 2001.
• Kolegowicz K., Kulisa B., Nehring A., Aspekty ekonomiczno-prawne kosztów pracy w Polsce, Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Krakowie, Kraków 2004, s. 6-14.
• Kuratko D.F., Ireland R.D., Hornsby J.S., Improving firm performance through entrepreneurial actions: Acordia's corporate entrepreneurship strategy, "Academy of Management Executive" 15(4)/ 2001, s. 60-71.
• Lagace M., Pay-for-performance doesn't always pay off, "Harvard Business School", 2003, s. 1-3.
• Lawler E.E., Ledford Jr G.E., Skill-based pay, "Management Review" 76(2)^987, s. 46-52.
• Lawler E.E., Worley Ch. G., Winning support for organizational change: Designing employee reward systems that keep on working, "Ivey Business Journal", March/April 2006, s. 2-3.
• Lepak D.P., Snell S.A., The human resource architecture: toward a theory of human capital allocation and development, "Academy of Management Review" 24/1999, s. 31-48.
• Lewis B.J., The motivational tool that derives employee performance at GE, "Journal of Management in Engineering", January/February 2000, s. 7.
• Locke E.A., Latham G.P., What should we do about motivation theory? Six recommendations for the twenty-first century, "Academy of Management Review" 29/2004, s. 388-403.
• Roberts K., Kossek E., Ozeki C., Managing the global workforce: Challenges and strategies, "Academy of Management Executive" 12(4)/1998, s. 93-106.
• Siegel, P.A, Hambrick, D.C. Pay disparities within Top Management Groups: Evidence of harmful effects on performance of high-technology firms, "Organization Science" 16(3)/2005, s. 259-274.
• Snell S.A., Dean J.W., Strategic compensation for integrated manufacturing: The moderating effects of job and organizational inertia, "Academy of Management Journal" 37(5)/1994, s. 1109-1114.
• Stroh J.B., Agency theory and variable pay compensation strategies, "Academy of Management Journal" 39(3)/1996, s. 751-767.
• Strużyna J., Bratnicki M., Majowska M., Ingram T., Rozwój zarządzania zasobami ludzkimi, Akademia Ekonomiczna w Katowicach, 2008.
• Sturman M., Trevor C., Boudreau J., Gerhart B., Is it worth to win the talent war? Evaluating the utility of performance-based pay, "Personnel Psychology" 56/2003, s. 997-1035.
• Tosi H.L., Gomez-Mejia L.R., CEO compensation monitoring and firm performance, "Academy of Management Journal" 37/1994, s. 1002-1016.
• Vlachos I., The effect of human resource practices on organizational performance: Evidence from Greece, "The International Journal of Human Resource Management" 19(1)/2008, s. 74-97.
• Werner S., Ward S.G., Recent compensation research: An eclectic review, "Human Resource Management Review" 14/2004, s. 201-227.
• Wilderom C.P.M., Glunk U., Maslowski R., Organizational culture as a predictor of organizational performance, [w:] Ashkanasy N.M., Wilderom C.P.M., Peterson M.F., Organizational Culture & Climate, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc., London 2000.