PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2020 | 12 | nr 1 | 71--84
Tytuł artykułu

Proactive Planning of Project Team Members' Competences

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Among the many factors that cause project delays or cancellations are disruptions, that is, unforeseen events occurring during the implementation of a project, which postpone or interrupt the performance of project activities. Examples of disruptions include employee absenteeism, addition of new activities, and others. One way to deal with this type of events is to predict potential disruptions and prepare redundant resources to be used should a disruption occur (proactive approach). The focus of the present paper are human resources, in particular redundant project team competence frameworks, which allow to continue work on a project in the event of a disruption. Previous studies on planning competence frameworks regard insensitivity (robustness) to one type of disruption, caused by employee absenteeism (an absence of one, two, or three employees). The goal of this article is to present a proactive procedure that allows to seek competence frameworks robust to two types of disruptions: absence of one employee and addition of new activities not included in the project plan. Examples are provided to illustrate how the proposed approach can be used in practice. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
12
Numer
Strony
71--84
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
  • Koszalin University of Technology, Poland
  • Kielce University of Technology, Kielce, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Antczak, A., Sypniewska, B.A., 2017. The Notion of Competence. In: Cross-Cultural Personal Selling. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
  • Antosz, K., 2018. Maintenance - Identification and Analysis of the Competency Gap. Maintenance and Reliability, 20(3), pp.484-494.
  • Appelbaum, E., 2000. Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off. Cornell University Press.
  • Armstrong. M., Taylor. S.. 2014. Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. Kogan Page, 13th edition, 2014.
  • Becker, B., Huselid, M., 2006. Strategic Human Resources Management: Where Do We Go from Here? Journal of Management, 32(6), pp.898-925.
  • Bocewicz, G., Bzdyra, K., Banaszak, Z., 2016. Robust Scheduling Subject to Multi-project Environment Constraints. In: Szewczyk R., Zieliński C., Kaliczyńska M. (eds.) Challenges in Automation, Robotics and Measurement Techniques. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 440, Springer, pp.115-126.
  • Bocewicz, G., Wikarek, J., Sitek, P., Banaszak, Z., 2020. Robust Competence Allocation for Multi-project Scheduling. In: Świątek, J., Bor- zemski, L., Wilimowska, Z. (eds.) Information Systems Architecture and Technology: Proceedings of 40th Anniversary International Conference on Information Systems Architecture and Technology - ISAT 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 1051, Springer, pp.16-30.
  • Bombiak, E., 2017. Human Resources Risk as an Aspect of Human Resources Management in Turbulent Environments. In: Pinzaru F., Zbuchea A., Bratianu C., Vatamanescu E.M., Mitan A. (eds.) Shift! Major challenges of today's economy. Bucharest: Tritonic Publishing House, pp.121-132.
  • Cheng, M.I., Dainty, A.R.J., Moore, D.R., 2003. The Differing Faces of Managerial Competency in Britain and America. Journal of Management Development, 22(6), pp.527-537.
  • Drucker, P. 1993. Post-capitalist Society. New York: Harper Business.
  • Gangani, N., McLean, G., Braden, R., 2006. A Competency-Based Human Resources Development Strategy. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 19(1), pp.127-139.
  • Grabara, J.K., Kot, S., Pigoń, Ł., 2016. Recruitment Process Optimization: Chosen Findings from Practice in Poland. Journal of International Studies, 9(3), pp.217-228.
  • Ingels, J., Maenhout, B., 2019. Optimised Buffer Allocation to Construct Stable Personnel Shift Rosters. Omega, 82, pp.102-117.
  • Kalmi, P., Kauhanen, A., 2008. Workplace Innovations and Employee Outcomes: Evidence from Finland. Industrial Relations, 47(3), pp.430-459.
  • Klimek, M., Łebkowski, P., 2011. Resource Allocation for Robust Project Scheduling. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Technical Sciences, 59(1), pp.51-55.
  • Kupczyk, T., 2014. Competencies of Management Staff in the Knowledge-based Economy, Wroclaw: University of Business in Wroclaw.
  • Kupczyk, T., Stor, M., 2015. Differences in Competency Management - Comparative Analysis between Polish, Spanish, and Austrian Business Practices. Journal of Intercultural Management, 7(2), pp.49-74.
  • Kupczyk T., Stor M., 2017. Competency Management. Theory, Research and Business Practice. Wroclaw: University of Business in Wroclaw.
  • Kuruba, M., 2019. Role Competency Matrix. A Step-By-Step Guide to an Objective Competency Management System. Singapore: Springer.
  • Marques, G., Gourc, D., Lauras, M., 2011. Multicriteria Performance Analysis for Decision Making in Project Management. International Journal of Project Management, 29(8), pp.1057-1069.
  • Mingus, N., 2002. Alpha Teach Yourself Project Management in 24 Hours. Penguin.
  • Nielsen, I., Wójcik, R., Bocewicz, G., Banaszak, Z., 2014. Towards Constraint Programming Driven Methodology for Online Multi-project Planning and Control. Information Systems Architecture and Technology, Wroclaw University of Technology, pp.65-74.
  • Oberlander, G.D., 2000. Project Management for Engineering and Construction. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  • Perrenoud, P., 1997. Construire des competences des 1'ecole. Pratiques et enjeux pedagogiques, Paris: ESF editeur.
  • Pocztowski, A., Miś, A., 2000. Managerial Competency Modeling in Terms of Human Capital in Organization. In: Shaping the Human Capital of the Company. Ed. B. Kożuch. Białystok: University of Bialystok.
  • Romainville, M., 1996. L'irresistible ascension du terme competence en education, Enjeux, No. 37/38.
  • Sampson, D., Fytros, D., 2008. Competence Models in Technology-enhanced Competence-based Learning. In: Adelsberger, H.H., Kinshuk, Pawlowski J.M., Sampson D. (Eds.), Handbook on information Technologies for Education and Training. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp.155-177.
  • Sitek, P., 2014. A Hybrid CP/MP Approach to Supply Chain Modelling, Pptimization and Analysis. Proceedings of the 2014 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems. Series: ACSIS-Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, Vol. 2, pp.1345-1352.
  • Sitek, T., Ziółkowski, A., 2014. Project-Factor-Decision - Decisive Factors in It Projects and Their Impact on Its Success. Information Systems in Management, 3(2), pp.145-155.
  • Stor, M., 2014. Reconceptualizing Strategic International Human Resources Management in Pursuing Sustainable Competitive Advantage of MNCs. Human Resource Management, 6(10), pp.11-31
  • Szwarc, E., Bocewicz, G., Bach-Dąbrowska, I., 2019a. Planning of Teacher Staff Competence Framework Robust to Unexpected Personnel Absence. Manufacturing Modelling, Management and Control (MIM 2019), Berlin (in print).
  • Szwarc, E., Bocewicz, G., Banaszak, Z., Wikarek, J., 2019b. Competence Allocation Planning Robust to Unexpected Staff Absenteeism. Maintenance and Reliability, 21(3), pp.440-450. doi: 10.17531/ein.2019.3.10.
  • Teodorescu, T., 2006. Competence Versus Competency. What Is the Difference? Performance Improvement, 45(10), pp.27-30.
  • Vaagen, H., Kaut, M., Wallace, S.W., 2017. The Impact of Design Uncertainty in Engineer- to-Order Project Planning. European Journal of Operational Research, 261(3), pp.1098-1109.
  • Zhu, G., Bard, J.F., Yu, G., 2005. Disruption Management for Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling. Journal of Operational Research Society, 56, pp.365-381.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171589785

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.