PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2020 | 28 | nr 1 | 2--31
Tytuł artykułu

Comparing Two Instruments of Transformational Leadership

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Purpose: To compare two transformational leadership instruments, Bass's Full Range Leadership Model and its instrument Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire with the Transformational Leadership Scale proposed by Rafferty and Griffin (2004), using empirical evidence from a single sample.

Methodology: The sample includes participants from different levels of the Estonian Defence Forces' military hierarchy (N = 2570). The structures of the Transformational Leadership Scale and Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire were examined with exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, while other methods were used to compare the two instruments.

Findings: The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire is statistically significantly better at predicting outcome variables like satisfaction with leader, effectiveness, and extra effort; however, the Transformational Leadership Scale did predict outcome variables at a sufficient level.

Research & Practical Limitations/Implications: The current research contributes to the validation of the Transformational Leadership Scale proposed by Rafferty and Griffin (2004). The results indicated that the Transformational Leadership Scale is a valuable research tool to study transformational leadership; however, some subscales require further development. Moreover, we may conclude that there is a difference between subsamples - e.g. between commanders and conscripts - that describe outcome variables using the Transformational Leadership Scale as a transformational leadership instrument.

Originality/Value: There is very limited research that compares different transformational leadership instruments. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
28
Numer
Strony
2--31
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Tallinn University, Estonia
  • Estonian Military Academy and the University of Tartu
Bibliografia
  • Alimo-Metcalfe, B. and Alban-Metcalfe, R.J. (2001). The development of a new Transformational Leadership Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(1), 1-27, http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317901167208.
  • Antonakis, J. and House, R.J. (2002). The Full-Range Leadership Theory: The Way Forward. In: B.J. Avolio and F.J. Yammarino (eds.), Transformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead, 10th Anniversary Edition (2013), 3-33. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Printing Limited, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1479-357120130000005006.
  • Antonakis, J. (2012). Transformational and Charismatic Leadership. In: D.V. Day and J. Antonakis (eds.), The Nature of Leadership. Los Angeles, US: Sage Publication Inc.
  • Antonakis, J. and House, R.J. (2014). Instrumental leadership: Measurement and extension of transformational-transactional leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(4), 746-771, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.005.
  • Avolio, B.J. and Bass, B.M. (2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Manual and sampler set (3rd ed.). Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
  • Bass, B.M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
  • Bass, B.M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19-31, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(90)90061-S.
  • Bass, B.M. (1997). Does the transactional-transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist, 52(2), 130-139, https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.2.130.
  • Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational Leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact.
  • Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Bass, B.M. and Avolio, B.J. (1997). Full range leadership development: manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
  • Bass, B.M., Avolio, B.J., Jung, D.I. and Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 207-218, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207.
  • Bass, B.M. and Riggio, R.E. (2006). Transformational Leadership (2nd ed.). Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Bennis, W.G. and Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Bentler, P.M. and Bonnett, D.G. (1980). Significance test and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588.
  • Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.
  • Browne, M.W. (1987). Robustness of statistical inference in factor analysis and related models. Biometrika, 74(2), 375-384, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/74.2.375.
  • Brown, M.W. and Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21(2), 230-28, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005.
  • Brown, A.T. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Burnham, K.P. and Anderson, D.R. (2002). Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (Sec Edition). New York: US Springer.
  • Burnham, K.P. and Anderson, D.R. (2004). Multimodel Inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in Model Selection. Sociological Methods Research, 33(2), 261-304, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644.
  • Carless, S.A. (1998). Assessing the discriminant validity of transformational leadership behavior as measured by the MLQ. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 71(4), 353-358, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1998.tb00681.x.
  • Careless, S.A., Wearing, A.J. and Mann, L. (2000). A short measure of transformational leadership. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14(3), 389-405, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022991115523.
  • Conger, J.A. and Kanungo, R.N. (1994). Charismatic leadership in organizations: perceived behavioral attributes and their measurement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(5), 439-452, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.4030150508.
  • Diedenhofen, B. and Musch, J. (2015). cocor: A Comprehensive Solution for the Statistical Comparison of Correlations. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0121945, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121945.
  • Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B.J. and Shamir, B. (2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 735-744, https://doi.org/10.5465/3069307.
  • Dumdum, U.R., Lowe, K.B. and Avolio, B.J. (2013). A meta-analysis of transformational and transactional leadership correlates of effectiveness and satisfaction: An update and extension. In: B.J. Avolio and F.J. Yammarino (eds.) Transformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead 10th Anniversary Edition (Monographs in Leadership and Management (Volume 5), 35-66. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Printing Limited, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1479-357120130000005008.
  • Edwards, G and Gill, E. (2012). Transformational leadership across hierarchical levels in UK manufacturing organizations. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 33(1), 25-50, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437731211193106.
  • Furr, R.M. and Bacharach, V.R. (2014). Psychometrics: An introduction. Los Angeles: Sage Publication Inc.
  • Goodwin, V.L., Wofford, J.C. and Whittington, J.L. (2001). A theoretical and empirical extension to the transformational leadership construct. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(7), 759-774, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.111.
  • Gill, R. (2011). Theory and Practice of Leadership. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Hair, J.F.Jr., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. and Anderson, R.E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Ed). Edinburg: Pearson Education Ltd.
  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. and Mullen, M. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
  • Hoyle, R.H. (2011). Structural Equation Modelling for Social and Personality Psychology. Los Angeles, US: Sage Publication Ltd.
  • Hu, L. and Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
  • James, L.R., Mulaik, S.A., and Brett, J.M. (1982). Causal analysis: Assumptions, models and data. Beverly Hills: Sage.
  • Judge, T.A., Erez, A., Bono, J.E., and Thoresen, C.J. (2003). The Core Self-Evaluations Scale (CSES): Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56(2), 303-331, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00152.x.
  • Judge, T.A. and Piccolo, R.F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755-768, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755.
  • Jöreskog, K.G. and Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80 for Windows [Computer Software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
  • Jöreskog, K.G., Sörbom, D., Du Toit, S.H.C. and Du Toit, M. (2001). LISREL 8: New Statistical Features (Third Printing with Revisions). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
  • Kane, T.D. and Tremble, T.R. (2000). Transformational Leadership Effects at Different Levels of the Army. Military Psychology, 12(2), 137-160, http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327876MP1202_4.
  • Kanste, O., Miettunen, J. and Kyngäs, H. (2007). Psychometric properties of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire among nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 57(2), 201-212, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04100.x.
  • Kark, R. and Shamir, B. (2002). The influence of transformational leadership on followers' relational versus collective self-concept. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2002(1), D1-D6, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/apbpp.2002.7517557.
  • Kasemaa, A. (2015). Transformational Leadership in the Estonian Defense Forces. Journal of Corporate Responsibility and Leadership, 2(1), 23-35, http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/JCRL.2015.002.
  • Kelly, K. and Lai, K. (2011). Accuracy in Parameter Estimation for the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation: Sample Size Planning for Narrow Confidence Intervals. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(1), 1-32, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.543027.
  • Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (3rd Ed). London & New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Kouzes, J.M. and Posner, B.Z. (1987). The leadership challenge: How to get extraordinary thing done in organizations. San Francisco, US: Jossey-Bass.
  • Larsson, G. (2006). The Developmental Leadership Questionnaire (DLQ): Some psychometric properties. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47(4), 253-262, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00515.x.
  • Lowe, K.B., Avolio, B.J. and Dumdum, U.R. (2013). Addendum: Don't you love it when a plan comes together? Update on meta-analytic findings for transformational and transactional leadership. In Transformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead 10th Anniversary Edition, Monographs in Leadership and Management, 71-75. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Printing Limited, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1479-357120130000005009.
  • Meerits, A., Suviste, R. and Kasemaa, A. (2015). The factor structure of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire in Estonian Military Context. In: M. Vadi, V. Täks, L. Pukkonen (eds.), VII international Conference Proceedings: Management Theory and Practice: Synergy in Organizations, Variety of Management: Management in Various Contexts, 86-94), Tartu University.
  • Nissinen, V. (2001). Military Leadership: a critical constructivist Approach to conceptualizing, modelling and measuring military leadership in the Finnish Defense Forces. Helsinki: Finnish National Defense College, Department of Management and Leadership.
  • Northouse, P.G. (2010). Leadership: Theory and Practice (5th ed.). London: Sage Publications, Ltd.
  • Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Moorman, R.H. and Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on follower's trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107-142, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7.
  • Rafferty, A.E. and Griffin, M.A. (2004). Dimensions of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical extensions. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(3), 329-354, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.02.009.
  • Rafferty, A.E. and Griffin, M.A. (2006). Perceptions of organizational change: A stress and coping perspective. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1154-1162, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1154.
  • Rafferty, A.E. and Griffin, M.A. (2006a). Refining individualized consideration: Distinguishing developmental leadership from supportive leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79(1), 37-61, http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317905X36731.
  • Rowold, J. and Heinitz, K. (2007). Transformational and charismatic leadership: Assessing the convergent, divergent and criterion validity of the MLQ and the CKS. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(2), 121-133, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.01.003.
  • Sackett, P. S. and Lievens, F. (2008). Personnel selection. Annual Review Psychology, 59, 16.1-16.32, http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093716.
  • Satorra, A. and Bentler, P.M. (2001). A Scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507-514, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192.
  • Schriesheim, C.A., Wu, J.B. and Scandura, T.A. (2009). A meso measure? Examination of the levels of analysis of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ). The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 604-616, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.005.
  • Strauss, K., Griffin, M.A. and Rafferty, A.E. (2009). Proactivity Directed toward the Team and Organization: The Role of Leadership, Commitment and Role-breadth Self-Efficacy. British Journal of Management, 20(3), 279-271, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00590.x.
  • Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using Multivariate statistics 5th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Tejeda, M.J., Scandura, T.A. and Pillai, R. (2001). The MLQ revisited: Psychometric properties and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(1), 31-52, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00063-7.
  • Van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P. and Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(4), 486-492, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740.
  • Wang, G., Oh, I.-S., Courtright, S.H. and Colbert, A.E. (2011). Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group & Organization Measurement, 36(2), 223-270, https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601111401017.
  • Wong, L., Bliese, P. and McGurk, D. (2003). Military leadership: A context specific review. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 657-692, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.08.001.
  • Weakliem, D.L. (2004). Introduction to the Special Issue on Model Selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(2), 167-187, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268642.
  • Widaman, K.F. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait-multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(1), 1-26, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014662168500900101.
  • Yukl, G.A. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285-305, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00013-2.
  • Yukl, G.A. (2013). Leadership in Organizations. Boston, US: Pearson Education Inc.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171590115

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.