Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2019 | vol. 15, iss. 3 | 490--498
Tytuł artykułu

Economic Growth, Environmental Degradation and Business Cycles in Eswatini

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
This study investigates the impact of the business cycle on the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) for the Eswatini Kingdom over the period 1970-2014. To this end, we employ the nonlinear autoregressive distributive lag (NARDL) model to capture the long-run and short-run cointegration effects between economic activity and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions over different phases of the business cycle. Our findings reveal that economic activity only degrades the environment during upswing of the economic cycle whilst this relationship is insignificant during downswing of the cycle. We specifically compute a value of $3.57 worth of output been gained at the cost of a metric unit of emissions during economic expansionary phases. Altogether, these results insinuate much needed government intervention in the market for emissions via environmental tax reforms (ETR) which should be designed with countercyclical bias towards upswing the business cycle. (original abstract)
Opis fizyczny
  • Nelson Mandela University, South Africa
  • Ang, J. (2007). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and output in France. Energy Policy, 35(10), 4772-4778.
  • Apergis, N., C. Christou, & R. Gupta. (2017). Are there environmental Kuznets curves for US state-level CO2 emissions? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69(C), 551-558.
  • Auffhammer, M. (2018). Quantifying economic damages from climate change. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(4), 33-52.
  • Azomahou, T., F. Laisney, & P. Van Nguyen. (2006). Economic development and CO2 emissions: A nonparametric panel approach. Journal of Public Economics, 90(6-7), 1347-1363.
  • Banerjee, A., J. Dolado, & R. Mestre. (1998). Error-correction mechanism test for cointegration in a single-equation framework. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 19(3), 267-283.
  • Beckerman, W. (1992). Economic growth and the environment: Whose growth? Whose environment? World Development, 20(4), 481-496.
  • Bella, G., C. Massidda, & P. Mattana. (2014). The relationship between among CO2 emissions, electricity power consumption and GDP in OECD countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 36(6),970-985.
  • Carson, R. (2010). The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Seeking empirical regularity and theoretical structure. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 4(1),3-23.
  • Coondoo, D., & D. Soumyananda. (2008). Carbon dioxide emission and income: A temporal analysis of cross-country distributional patterns. Ecological Economics, 65(2),375-385.
  • de Bruyn, S., J. van den Bergh, & J. Opschoor. (1998). Economic growth and emissions: reconsidering the empirical basis of environmental Kuznets curves. Ecological Economics, 25(2),161-175.
  • Galeotti, M., Lanza A. & Pauli F. (2006). Reassessing the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A robustness exercise. Ecological Economics, 57(1),152-163.
  • Grossman, G. & Krueger A. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2),353-377.
  • He, J. & Richard P. (2010). Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 in Canada. Ecological Economics, 69(5), 1083-1093.
  • Hervieux, M. & Mahieu P. (2014). A detailed systematic review of the recent literature on environmental Kuznets curve dealing with CO2. HAL Working Paper Series No. hal-01010243, June.
  • Iwata H., Okada K., & Samreth S. (2011). A note on the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2: A pooled mean group approach. Applied Energy, 88(5), 1986-1996.
  • Jean, A. & Duane C. (1999). A dynamic approach to the Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 28(2), 267-277.
  • Kaika, D. & Zervas E. (2013). The environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) theory-part A: Concepts, causes and the CO2 emissions case. Energy Policy, 62(C), 1392-1402.
  • Khobai, H. & Le Roux P. (2017). The relationship between energy consumption, economic growth and carbon dioxide emission: The case of South Africa. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(3), 102-109.
  • Kohler, M. (2013). CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade: A South African perspective. Energy Policy, 63, 1042-1050.
  • Lean, H. & Smyth R. (2010). CO2 emissions, electricity consumption and output in ASEAN. Applied Energy, 87(6), 1858-1864.
  • Lee, C., & Lee J. (2009). Income and CO2 emissions: Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests. Energy Policy, 37(2), 413-423.
  • List, J. & Gallet C. (1999). The environmental Kuznets curve: does one size fit all? Ecological Economics, 31(3), 409-423.
  • Mardani, A., Streimikiene D., Cavallaro F., Loganathan N., & Khoshnoudi M. (2019). Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and economic growth: A systematic review of two decades or research from 1995 to 2017. Science of Total Environment, 649, 31-49.
  • Menyah, K. & Y. Wolde-Rufael. (2010). Energy consumption, pollutant emissions and economic growth in South Africa. Energy Economics, 32, 1374-1382.
  • Pesaran, H., Shin Y., & Smith R. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
  • Piaggio, M. & Padilla E. (2012). CO2 emissions and economic activity: Heterogeneity across and non-stationary series. Energy Policy, 46(C), 370-381.
  • Rafindadi, A. (2016). Does the need for economic growth influence energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Nigeria? Evidence from the innovation accounting test. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62,1209-1225.
  • Roberts, J., & Grimes P. (1997). Carbon intensity and economic development 1962-91: a brief exploration of the Environmental Kuznets curve. World Devotement, 25(2), 191-198.
  • Rothman, D. (1998). Environmental Kuznets curves-real progress or passing the buck? A case for consumption-based approaches. Ecological Economics, 25(2), 177-194.
  • Sarkodie, S., & Strezov V. (2019). A review of Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis using bibliometric and meta-analysis. Science of The Total Environment, 649, 128-145.
  • Shahbaz, M., Tiwari A., & Nasir M. (2013). The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa. Energy Policy, 61, 1452-1459.
  • Shin, Y., Yu B., & Greenwood-Nimmo M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. Festsschrift in honor of Peter Schmidt: Econometric Methods and Applications, eds. By R. Sickels and W. Horace, Springer, 281-314.
  • Sofien, T., & Anis O. (2017). Literature survey on the relationships between energy, environment and economic growth. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69(C), 1129-1146.
  • Stern, D., Common M., & Barbier E. (1996). Economic growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable economy. World Development, 24(7), 11511160.
  • Sun, J. (1999). The nature of CO2 emission Kuznets curve. Energy Policy, 27(12), 691-694.
  • Xepapadeas, A., & Amri E. (1998). Some empirical indicators of the relationship between environmental quality and economic development. Environmental and Resource Economics 11(1), 93-106.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.