Postmortal Issues of Smolensk Tragedy Against the Obligations of Art. 2 of European Convention on Human Rights

• Autorzy: Agnieszka Wedeł-Domaradzka
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The main aim of the study is to analyze posthumous problems that concern the victims of the Smolensk disaster in the context of positive obligations of the state. The first element of the analysis will concern the standards of dealing with the bodies of disaster victims as soon as they occur. The second aspect will include the obligation to notify of death along with other obligations and information on victims. Then, issues related to the transport of corpses and the opening of coffins will be described, and finally the regulations regarding uninterrupted burial. The analysis of the above issue presented in the work will be carried out taking into account regional human rights protection standards and the ECtHR's judicial practice. Both soft and hard law standards will be included in the analysis. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Human rights; Plane accidents; Disaster; International law

PL

Prawa człowieka; Wypadki lotnicze; Katastrofa; Prawo międzynarodowe

• Czasopismo: Law and Administration in Post-Soviet Europe
• Rocznik: 2020
• Numer: vol. 7, iss. 1
• Strony: 1--10

Twórcy

autor

Agnieszka Wedeł-Domaradzka

• Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy

Bibliografia

• Arskaya v. Ukraine, case no 45076/05, ECtHR decision from 5th December 2013.
• Budayeva and others v. Russia complaint no 15339/02, 21166/02, 20058/02, 11673/02, 15343/02, ECtHR decision from 20th March 2008.
• Carabuela v. Romania, case no 45661/99, ECtHR decision from 13th July 2010.
• Elli Poluhas Dodsbo v. Sweden, complaint no 61564/00, decision from 17th January 2006.
• Esmukhambetov and others v. Russia complaint no 23445/03, decision from 29th March 2011.
• Imakayeva v. Russia, complaint no 7615/02, ECtHR decision from 9th November 2006.
• LCB v. Great Britain, case no 14/1997/798/1001, ECtHR decison from 9th June 1998.
• McCann and others v. the United Kingdom, case no18984/91, ECtHR decision from 27th September 1995.
• Nencheva and others v. Bulgaria, complaint no 48609/06, ECtHR decision from 18th June 2013.
• Pannullo and Forte v. France, complaint no 37794/97, decision from 30th October 2001.
• Papapetrou and others v. Greece, case no 17380/09, ECtHR decision from 12th July 2011.
• Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, case no 46477/99, ECtHR decision from 14th March 2002.
• Pretty v. the United Kingdom, complaint no 2346/02, decision from 29th April 2002.
• Railean v. Moldavia, case no 23401/04, ECtHR decision 5th January 2010.
• Solska and Rybicka v. Poland, complaint no 30491/17 and 31083/17, ECtHR decision from 20th September 2018.
• Tangiyeva v. Russia, complaint no 57935/00, ECtHR decision from 20th November 2007.
• Tepe v. Turkey, complaint no 27244/95, ECtHR decision from 9th May 2003.
• Trapeznikova v. Russia, complaint no 21539/02, ECtHR decision from 11th December 2008.
• Zubayrayev v. Russia, complaint no 67797/01, ECtHR decision from 10th January 2008.
• Conway H., The Law and the Dead, Nowy Jork 2016.
• Czubik P., Consulary Activity Regarding Transfrontier Transfer of Dead Bodies-Analysis of Basic Regulations Against Action Taken after the Smolensk Catastrophe Concerning the Prohibition of Opening Coffins, "Polski Rocznik Praw Człowieka i Prawa Humanitarnego" nr 5.
• Gryglewski R. W., Mummification of Human Body in History, Customs and Medical Science, Kraków 2005.
• H-J. Kim, D. van Alphen, M. Tidball-Binz, Geneva, 2016.
• Human Rights. International Documents, ed. B. Gronowska, T. Jasudowicz, C. Mik, Toruń 1993.
• Jasudowicz T. in: Legal Aspect of Smolensk Tragedy.Texts and Materials, Toruń 2018.
• Management of Dead Bodies after Disasters: A Field Manual for First Responders, ed. S. Cordner, R. Coninx.
• Olyan S. M., Theorizing Circumstantially Dependent Rites in and out of War Contexts, in: Warfare, Ritual, and Symbol in Biblical and Modern Contexts, ed. B.E. Kelle, F. Ritchel Ames, J.L. Wright, Atlanta 2014.
• Schabas W.A., The European Convention on Human Rights A Commentary, Oxford 2015.
• Synowiec-Piłat M., Thanatopraxis in Poland as the Harbinger of a New Attitude towards Bodies of the Dead., Prace Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu, nr 814, Nauki Humanistyczne 4, 1998.
• Wojtanowska N., Legal Aspects of Smolensk Catastrophe-Selected Issues, Materials of III Smolensk Conference, konferencjasmolenska.pl/materialy3/19wojtanowska.pdf.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/lape-2020-0001