Nomothetic and Idiographic Approach in Management Sciences

• Autorzy: Marcin Nowak
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This article covers the philosophy of science, particularly the philosophy of management sciences. Ultimately, this study aims to determine the nature of management sciences based on a division into nomothetic and idiographic sciences. A secondary aim is to formulate prerequisites for the recognition of scientific laws and to verify their existence in the management sciences. The methods used for this study include analysis and logical construction. Results demonstrated that the management sciences are a special type of praxeological sciences that are both nomothetic and idiographic. The main conclusions of the article have direct implications for both the theory and practice of management. Treating management sciences as nomothetic significantly broadens the fields of research exploration, particularly in their implementation of the classic functions of science (i.e., description, explanation, and prediction). The implementation of these functions may lead to the creation of new organizational models and new methods focused on the description, explanation, and prediction of management processes. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Management sciences; Praxeology; Philosophy of management

PL

Nauki o zarządzaniu; Prakseologia; Filozofia zarządzania

• Czasopismo: Humanities and Social Sciences
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: 25 (XXV)
• Numer: nr 27 (1)
• Strony: 49--56

Twórcy

autor

Marcin Nowak

• Poznan University of Technology, Poland

Bibliografia

• Arystoteles (1975). Kategorie. Warszawa: PWN.
• Griffin, R.W. (2016). Fundamentals of Management, Eight Edition. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
• Koontz, H. (1961). The management theory jungle. "Academy of Management journal" No. 4(3).
• Laurie, N., Cherry, C. (2003). Wanted: Philosophy of Management. "Philosophy of Management. Formerly Reason in Practice", No. (1).
• Machlup, F. (2014). Methodology of economics and other social sciences. Academic press.
• Mises, L.V. (1998). Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. The Scholar's Edition. Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
• Mises, L.V. (2001). Theory and History. An Interpretation of Social and Economic Evolution, Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
• Newton, I. (1999). The Principia: mathematical principles of natural philosophy. "Univ of California Press".
• Nowak, M. (2015). Prakseologiczna ocena użyteczności metody DEA w diagnozie efektywności organizacji. "Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Poznańskiej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie" nr 66.
• Popper, K. (2005). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.
• Rickert, H. (1986). The Limits of Concept Formation in Natural Science: A Logical Introduction to the Historical Sciences (Abridged Edition). CUP Archive.
• Rothbard, M.N. (2009). Man, economy, and state. Ludwig von Mises Institute.
• Such, J., Szcześniak, M. (1999). Filozofia nauki. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu A. Mickiewicza w Poznaniu.
• Wundt, W. (1906). Logik, ed. 3, Stuttgart, 1.
• Windelband, W. (1980). History and Natural Sciences."History and Theory", No. 3(1).

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7862/rz.2020.hss.5