Risk Management System References in Construction

• Autorzy: Volodymyr Tkachenko , Maryna Klymchuk , Iryna Tkachenko , Tetiana Ilina
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article examines the basic methods of risk management in construction: risk aversion, localization, dissipation, compensation. The methods are adapted to the specificity of construction companies, taking into account the main directions of their development. For the purpose of effective risk management, formalized functional structuring of risk management in construction is proposed, which will enable the implementation of management functions at two levels - executive and coordinating, with the help of a special structural component in the enterprise management system or a specialized unit in the organizational structure. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Construction; Construction economics; Risk management; Risk management methods

PL

Budownictwo; Ekonomika budownictwa; Zarządzanie ryzykiem; Metody zarządzania ryzykiem

• Czasopismo: Research Papers in Economics and Finance
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: 4
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 21--29

Twórcy

autor

Volodymyr Tkachenko

• Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, Ukraine

autor

Maryna Klymchuk

• Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, Ukraine

autor

Iryna Tkachenko

• Academy of the State Penitentiary Service, Chernigiv, Ukraine

autor

Tetiana Ilina

• Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, Ukraine

Bibliografia

• Chernyshev, D., Ivakhnenko, I., Klymchuk, M. (2018). The organization of biosphere compatibility construction: justification of the predictors of building development and the implementation prospects. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7 (3.2), 584-586.
• Gerasimova, M.V., Avdeyeva, L.A. (2015). Methodological Approach to Estimating the Total Risk of a Construction Enterprise, Internet Magazine Science, 7(3), 134-142.
• Huddleston, J. R. (1986). Distribution of development costs under tax increment financing. Journal of the American Planning Association, 52(2), 194-198.
• Mero?o-Cerdán, A.L., López-Nicolás & Molina-Castillo, F.J. (2018) Risk aversion, innovation and performance in family firms. Econ. Innov. New Technol., 27, 189-203.
• Visser, J.K.& Malan, H.T. (2019) Identification of risk associated with process automation systems. Int. J. Econ. Manag. Eng., 13, 1044-1051.
• Kloman H. Felix (2000). Integrated risk assesment. Currnet views of risk management. GARP Aricles, http:// www. garp.com.
• Klymchuk, M. & Shegda ?. (2016). Conceptual principles of the socially responsibile enterprise marketing management. Economics and education, N1, 58 - 61.
• Mishra, A.K., Kumar, A., Joshi, P.K.& D'souza, A. (2018) Production risk, risk preference and contract farming: Impact on food security in India. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy, 40, 353-378.
• Palepu, K.G., Healy, P.M., Bernard, V.L. (2003). Business Analysis and Valuation Using Financial Statements. Text and Cases. South-Western College Pub, 2 edition.
• Ratushniak, O.G. (2010). Management of ecological and economic risks of innovative energy-saving projects in construction. Project management and production development, 3(35), 90-94.
• Tkachenko, V., Klymchuk, M., Ivakhnenko, I., Ploska H. (2018). Compensatory financing of energy saving projects in construction: modification of TIF. Research Papers in Economics and Finance, 3(1), 47-51.

Identyfikatory

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18559/ref.2020.1.2