PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2020 | 13 | nr 2 | 53--69
Tytuł artykułu

Construction and Validation of Workplace Identity Scale (WIS)

Autorzy
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Workplace identity (WI) is a multi-dimensional and multi-layered construct that originated from the concept of Identity. It is an attitude towards self that helps individual employees to identify themselves as crucial members in the organisation by shaping their roles in the employment context. Empirical examination of the construct is now gaining traction. A scientifically validated tool is likely to provide further impetus to detailed examinations of the WI concept. The present study is intended to construct and validate a tool to measure WI. Using the data collected from a sample of 248 respondents and the well established methodologies, this study constructs and validates a scale to measure WI - the Workplace Identity Scale (WIS). Having five factors, this scale has exhibited significant validity and reliability. WIS is expected to fill the gap in literature and is likely to stimulate further empirical research about this alluring construct.(original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
13
Numer
Strony
53--69
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
  • Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, AlKharj, Saudi Arabia
Bibliografia
  • Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2004). Meta-theory: Lessons from social identity research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8 (2), 98-106. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0802_2.
  • Agostino, J. (2004). Workplace identity. Unpublished thesis Doctor of Business Administration, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia.
  • Albert, S., Ashforth, B. E., & Dutton, J. E. (2000). Organisational identity and identification: Charting new waters and building new bridges. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 13-17. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2000.2791600.
  • Alvesson, M. and Willmott, H. (2002). Producing the appropriate individual: identity regulation as organizational control. Organization, 15 (1), 5-28.
  • Amiot, C. E., de la Sablonnière, R., Terry, D. J., & Smith, J. R. (2007). Integration of social identities in the self: Toward a cognitive-developmental model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 364-388. doi: 10.1177/10888 683073 04091.
  • Anastasi, A. (1976). Psychological testing, 4th ed. New York: Macmillan.
  • Ashforth, B. E., & Kreiner, G. E. (1999). How can you do it? Dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity. The Academy of Management Review, 24 (3), 413-434.
  • Ashforth, B.E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organisation. The Academy of Management Review, 14 (1), 20-39.
  • Bajerjee, D. (2013). Workplace Identities of Women in the US Labor Market. Sociology Mind, 3(1), 19-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/sm.2013.31004
  • Bauman, Z. (2004). Identity, UK: Polity, Cambridge.
  • Bearden, W. O., Netemeyer, R. G. & Mobley, M .F. (1993). Handbook of Marketing Scales. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Bothma, F. C. (2011). The consequences of employees' WI. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg.
  • Bothma, F. C., & Roodt, G. (2013). Work-based identity and work engagement as potential antecedents of task performance and turnover intention: Unravelling a complex relationship. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 38(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v38i1.893
  • Bothma, F.C., Lloyd, S. & Khapova, S. (2015). Work Identity: Clarifying the Concept in Jansen, P. G. W. & Roodt G. (eds.), Conceptualising and Measuring Work Identity, Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9242-4_2
  • Boyle, G. J. (1991). Does item homogeneity indicate internal inconsistency or item redundancy in psychometric scales? Personality and Individual Differences, 12(3), 291-294.
  • Briggs, S. R., & Cheek, J. M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54, 106-148.
  • Brown, A. and Bimrose, J. (2018). Learning and Identity Development at Work. In: Milana M., Webb S., Holford J., Waller R., Jarvis P. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook on Adult and Lifelong Education and Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  • Buche, M. W. (2003). IT professional work Identity: Construct and outcomes. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
  • Buche, M. W. (2008). Influence of gender on IT professional work identity: Outcomes from a PLS study. Retrieved from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1355272
  • Burke, P. J. (1991). Identity processes and social stress. American Sociological Review, 56 (6), 836-849. doi: 10.2307/2096259.
  • Byrne, B.M. (1998). Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Caza, B. & Wilson, M. (2009). Me, Myself and I: The benefits of work identity complexity. Exploring positive identities and organizations: Building a theoretical and research foundation, 99-112, New York: Routledge.
  • Churchill, G. A. (1979). A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures for Marketing Constructs, Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64-73.
  • Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309-319.
  • Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
  • Cook, J. D., Hepworth, S. J., Wall, T. D. & Warr, P. B. (1981). The experience of work. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Cortini, M. (2016). Workplace identity as a mediator in the relationship between learning climate and job satisfaction during apprenticeship Suggestions for HR practitioners. Journal of Workplace Learning, 28 (2), 54-65. Doi: 10.1108/JWL-12-2015-0093
  • Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. C (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests, Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
  • Dew, J. & Xiao, J. J. (2011). The Financial Management Behavior Scale: Development and Validation. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 22 (1), 43-59.
  • Diamantopoulos, A. & Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Introducing LISREL. London: Sage Publications.
  • Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M. and Harquail, C. V. (1994), Organizational images and member identification, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39 (2), 239-263.
  • Dutton, J. E., Roberts L. M. & Bednar, J. (2010). Pathways for positive identity construction at work: Four types of positive identity and building of social resources. Academy of Management Review, 35 (2), 265-293.
  • Elsbach, K.D. (2006), Perceptual biases and misinterpretation of artifacts, in Rafaeli, A. and Pratt, M.G. (Eds), Artifacts and Organizations: Beyond Mere Symbolism, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
  • Fugate, M., Kinicki, A. J., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Employability: A psycho-social construct, its dimensions and applications. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 14-38. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2003.10.005.
  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity, Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Hegde, S. (2016), Challenges Posed by Alien Culture Diffusion for Employees of Call Centers in Mumbai. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 66, 81-95.
  • Hewitt, J. P. (1989). Dilemmas of the American self, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations, Journal of Management, 21(5), 967-988.
  • Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 104. doi: 10.1177/109442819800100106.
  • Hoelter, J, W. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices. Sociological Methods and Research, 11,325-344.
  • Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organisational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121-140.
  • Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J., & White, K. M. (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4), 255-269. doi: 10.2307/2787127.
  • Holt, D. T., Armenakis, A. A., Field, H. S., & Harris, S. G. (2007). Readiness for Organizational Change: The Systematic Development of a Scale. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43 (2), 232-255.
  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6 (1), 53-60.
  • Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrica, 39, 31-36.
  • Kaur, J., & Sharma, S. K. (2015). Internal marketing: Scale development and validation. Vision-The Journal of Business Perspective, 19 (3) 236-247.
  • Kelloway, E Kevin (1998). Using LISREL for Structural Equation Modeling: A Researcher's Guide, New York: Sage Publications.
  • Kim, J., & Mueller, C. W. (1978). Introduction to Factor Analysis: What is it and How to Do it, Beverly Hills CA: Sage.
  • Kirpal, S. (2004). Researching work identities in European context. Career Development International, 9(3), 199-221. doi: 10.1108/1362043 0410535823
  • Kline, P. (2002). An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.
  • Kristof, A. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurements and implications, Personnel Psychology, 49, 1-49.
  • Kularathna, M., & Adhikaram, A. (2011). Role of identity in creating work centrality among young Sri Lankan managers in the era of late capitalism. International Research Conference on Management and Finance, 1316-1327, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.
  • Kumar, K., & Beyerlein, M. (1991). Construction and Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Ingratiatory Behaviors in Organizational Settings, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76 (5), 619-627.
  • Lauver, K. J., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2001). Distinguishing between employees' perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 454-470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1807
  • Lenth, R. V. (2001). Some Practical Guidelines for Effective Sample Size Determination, The American Statistician, 55(3), 187-193.
  • Lissitz, R. W., & Green, S. B. (1975). Effect of the number of scale points on reliability: A Monte Carlo approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60,10-13.
  • Lloyd, S., Roodt, G., & Odendaal, A. (2011). Critical elements in defining work-based identity in post-apartheid South Africa. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 37(1), doi: 10.4102/sajip.v37i1.894.
  • Lodahl, T. M., & Kejner, M. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 24-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0021692,
  • Mael, F., & Ashforth, B.E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organisation. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 13, 103-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd Ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
  • Odeh, R. E., & Fox, M. (1991). Sample Size Choice: Charts for Experiments with Linear Models (2nd ed.), New York: Marcel Dekker.
  • Olkkonen, R., & Saastamoinen, K. (2000). SPSS Perusopas markkinatutkijoille (SPSS Basic Guide for Market Researchers) Publications of the Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, Series B-1, 2002.
  • Rapoport, T, (1989). Experimentation and control: A conceptual framework for the comparative analysis of socialization agencies. Human Relations, 42, 957-973.
  • Riemenschneider, C. K., Buche, M. W., & Armstrong, D. J. (2019). He Said, She Said: Communications Theory of Identity and The Challenges Men Face in The Information Systems Workplace, The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 50 (3), 85-115.
  • Roodt, G. (1997). Theoretical and empirical linkages between work-related commitment foci. S A Journal of Industrial Psychology, 23(2), 6-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v23i2.624
  • Rosenthal, R. (1976). Experimenter Effects in Behavioral Research. New York: John Wiley.
  • Rummel, R. J. (1970). Applied factor analysis, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  • Sandhya, S., & Sulphey, M. M. (2019). An assessment of contribution of employee engagement, psychological contract and psychological empowerment towards turnover intentions of IT employees. International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment, 5 (1), 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEWE.2019.097186
  • Sandhya, S. & Sulphey, M. M. (2020). Influence of Empowerment, Psychological Contract and Employee engagement on Voluntary Turnover Intentions, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-04-2019-0189
  • Schriesheim, C. A. & Eisenbach, R. J. (1991). Item wording effects on EFA results: An experimental investigation, Pp. 396-398 in Proceedings of the 1990 Southern Management Association annual meetings.
  • Schwab, D. P. (1980). Construct validity in organization behavior, in B. M, Staw & L. L, Cummings (Eds,), Research in organizational behavior, Vol, 2, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Serafini, T. E., Maitland, S. B., & Adams, G. R. (2006). The functions of identity scale: Revisions, validation and model testing. Poster presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, San Francisco, California.
  • Sharma, S. (1996). Applied Multivariate Techniques, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Staples, C. L., Schwalbe, M. L., & Gecas, V. (1984). Social class, occupational conditions, and efficacy-based self-esteem. Sociological Perspectives, 27, 85-109. doi: 10.2307/1389238.
  • Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modelling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42 (5), 893-98.
  • Stets, J. E. (2005). Examining emotions in identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 39-74. doi: 10.1177/019027250506800104.
  • Stets, J. E., & Harrod, M. M. (2004). Verification across multiple identities: The role of status. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67(2), 155-171. doi: 10.1177/019027250406700203.
  • Stone, E. (1978). Research methods in organizational behavior, Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
  • Sulphey, M. M. & Alkahtani, N. S. (2017). Organizational ambidexterity as a prelude to corporate sustainability, Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 7 (2), 335-347. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2017.7.2(13).
  • Sulphey, M. M. & Faridi, M. R. (2020). Consumer Ethnocentrism: Validation of CETSCALE and Measurement among Saudi Citizens, International Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing, (forthcoming)
  • Sulphey, M. M. (2014). Construction & Validation of Employee Wellness Questionnaire, Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 49(4), 690-700.
  • Sulphey, M. M. (2015). Construction and Validation of Learning Organization Questionnaire (LOQ). JAMI, 4(1), 35-44.
  • Sulphey, M.M. (2019). The concept of workplace identity, its evolution, antecedents and development.International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment, 5(2), 151-168. http://doi.org/10.1504/IJEWE.2019.10019877.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics, (4th ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
  • Tossell, C., Kortum, P., Shepard, C. Rahmati, A. and Zhong, L. (2015). Exploring Smartphone Addiction: Insights from Long-Term Telemetric Behavioral Measures, IJIM, 9(2), 37-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v9i2.4300
  • Turner, J. C. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York: Basil Blackwell.
  • Van Laar, C., Meeussen, L., Veldman, J., Van Grootel, S., Sterk, N., & Jacobs, C. (2019). Coping with Stigma in the Workplace: Understanding the Role of Threat Regulation, Supportive Factors, and Potential Hidden Costs. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1879. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01879
  • Van Staden, A. (2005). A psycho-educational model to facilitate the self-development and mental health of the pre-professional classical dancer as individual and performer. Unpublished dissertation, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg.
  • Viswanathan, M. (1993). Measurement of individual differences in preference for numerical information
  • Walsh, K. (2000). Delivering expertise: Identity and relationship building in professional services. Doctoral Dissertation, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.
  • Walsh, K., & Gordon, J. R. (2008). Creating an individual work identity. Human Resource Management Review, 18 (1), 46-61.
  • Wayne, J. H., Randel, A. E., & Stevens, J. (2006). The role of identity and work-family support in work-family enrichment and its work-related consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 445-461.
  • Worth, N. (2016). Who we are at work: millennial women, everyday inequalities and insecure work? Gender Place & Culture, 23(9), 1302-1314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2016.1160037
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171594297

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.