Preferable Ways of Decision-Making in IT Teams

• Autorzy: Beata Krawczyk-Bryłka , Henryk Krawczyk
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Software development team collaboration requires various decisions regardingessential aspects of a project's progress. General and particular decision-making modelsare considered, and their main aspects such as team types, problem solving categories,and decision-making ways are analyzed. The research concerns representative groups of ITspecialists and their preferences in decision-making are investigated. Four possible caseswere tested: hierarchical choice (by leader) team members' choice (team consensus or voting)and external expert impact. It allows one to show some differences in the behaviors of bothtraditional and virtual teams.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Software management; Project teams; Decision making

PL

Zarządzanie oprogramowaniem; Grupy projektowe; Podejmowanie decyzji

• Czasopismo: Decision Making in Manufacturing and Services
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 13
• Numer: nr 1/2
• Strony: 37--51

Twórcy

autor

Beata Krawczyk-Bryłka

• Gdańsk University of Technology, Poland

autor

Henryk Krawczyk

• Gdansk University of Technology

Bibliografia

• Bourgault, M., Dronin, N., Homel, E., 2008. Decision-making with distributed project teams: an exploration of formalization and autonomy as determinants. Project Management Journal, 39(3), pp. 9-110.
• Cohen, B., 2013. PaaS: New Opportunities for cloud Application Development. IEEE Com- puter, 46(9), pp. 9-100.
• Cordes, S., 2016. Virtual team learning: The role of collaboration process and technol- ogy affordance in team decision making. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 8(4), pp. 602-627.
• Davidekova, M., Hvorecky, J., 2017. ICT Collaboration Tools for Virtual Teams in Terms of the SECI Model. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 7(1), pp. 95-116.
• Eseryel, Y., Wei, K., & Crowston, K., 2020 Decision-making processes in community-based Free/libre Open Source Software development teams with internal governance: An ex- tension to decision-making theory. Communication of the AIS (CAIS) (in press).
• Falkowski, G., Troutman, S., 2005. Remote Control: A Practitioner's Guide to Managing Virtual Teams. An IHRIM Press Book, USA.
• McNamara, K., Dennis, A.R., Cart, T.A., 2008. It's the Thought that Counts: The Mediating Effects of Information Processing in Virtual Team Decision Making. Information Systems Management, 25(1), pp. 20-32.
• Nemiro, J., Beyerlein, M., Bradley, L., Beyerlein, S. (eds.) 2008. The Handbook of High Performance Virtual Teams. John Wiley & Sons.
• Phillips, J., 2004. IT Project Management. On Track from start to Finish 2e. The McGraw-Hill Companies.
• Pollice, P., Augustine, L., Lowe, Ch., Madhur, J., 2004. Software Development for Small Teams: A RUP-Centric Approach. The Addison-Wesley Object Technology Series. Pearson Education, Inc.
• Schmidt, J.B., 2001. New Product Development Decision-Making Effectiveness: Compar- ing Individuals, Face-To-Face Teams, and Virtual Teams. Decision Sciences, 32(4), pp. 575-600.
• Shalloway, A., Beaver, G., Trott, J.R., 2009. Lean-Agile Software Development. Achieving Enterprise Agility. Addison-Wesley Professional. Pearson Education, Inc.
• Turban, E., Liang, T., Wu, S.P.J., 2011. A Framework for Adopting Collaboration 2.0 Tools for Virtual Group Decision Making. Group Decision Making, 20, pp. 137-154.
• Vasan, R., 2011. A Venture Perspective on Cloud Computing. IEEE Computer, 44(3), pp. 60-62.
• Zofi, Y., 2012. A Manager's Guide to Virtual Teams. Amacom, USA.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7494/dmms.2019.13.1-2.2788