PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2019 | 13 | nr 1/2 | 53--71
Tytuł artykułu

The Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Making/Aiding Methodologyin the Evaluation and Redesign of Logistics Systems

Autorzy
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The paper presents the methodological background of Multiple Criteria DecisionMaking/Aiding (MCDM/A) and its practical application in logistics systems. It explainswhy MCDM/A methodology is important when dealing with different categories of decisionproblems that arise in those systems. The major features and basic notions of MCDM/Amethodology are presented, while different categories of MCDM/A methods are characterizedand classified. Two case studies demonstrate potential applications of MCDM/A methodologyin logistics. In the first case study multiple objective optimization of the distribution systemis carried out and compared with single objective optimization. The decision problem isformulated as multiple criteria mathematical programming problem and solved by an extendedversion of MS Excel Solver - Premium Solver Plus. The second case study focuses on multiplecriteria evaluation and the ranking of logistics infrastructure objects, i.e. a set of warehouses- distribution centres. The decision problem is formulated as a multiple criteria rankingproblem and solved with an application of the ELECTRE III/IV method.(original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
13
Numer
Strony
53--71
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
  • Poznan University of Technology, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Brans, J., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B., 1986. How to Select and How to Rank Projects: The PROMETHEE Method. European Journal of Operational Research, 24, pp. 228-238.
  • Coyle, J.J., Bardi, E.J., Langley Jr., J., 1996. The Management of Business Logistics. West Publishing Company, St. Paul.
  • Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.), 2005. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. State of the Art Surveys. Springer, New York.
  • Forger, G., 1998. Benchmark Your Warehouse for Future Success. Special Report. Modern Materials Handling, 10, pp. 39-41.
  • Hapke, M., Jaszkiewicz, A., Zak, J., 2002. The Design of the Physical Distribution System with the Application of the Multiple Objective Mathematical Programming. Case Study. In: Trzaskalik T., Michnik J. (eds.), Multiple Objective and Goal Programming. Recent Developments. Advances in Soft Computing. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 297-309.
  • Hillier, F.S., Lieberman, G.J., 2005. Introduction to Operations Research. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • Jacquet-Lagreze, E., Siskos, J., 1982. Assessing a Set of Additive Utility Functions for Multicriteria Decision-Making, the UTA Method. European Journal of Operational Research, 10, pp. 151-164.
  • Kieffer, A.W., Novack, R.A., 1998. An Empirical Analysis of Warehouse Measurement Systems in the Context of Supply Chain Implementation. Transportation Journal, 38(3), pp. 18-26.
  • Kisperska-Moron, D., 1999. Warehousing Conditions for Holding Inventory in Polish Supply Chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 59, pp. 123-128.
  • Kopczak, L.R., 1997. Logistics Partnerships and Supply Chain Restructuring: Survey Results from the VS Computer Industry. Production and Operations Management, 6(3), pp. 226-247.
  • Korpela, J., Lehmusvaara, A., 1999. A Customer Oriented Approach to Warehouse Network Evaluation and Design. International Journal of Production Economics, 59, pp. 135-146.
  • Landers, T.L., Cole, M.H., Walker, B., Kirk, R.W., 2000. The Virtual Warehousing Concept. Transportation Research, 36E(2), pp. 115-125.
  • McKinnon, A., 1989. Physical Distribution Systems. Routledge, New York.
  • Ross, D.F., 1996. Distribution. Planning and Control. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
  • Roubens, M., 1982. Preference Relations on Actions and Criteria in Multicriteria Decision Making. European Journal of Operational Research, 10, pp. 51-55.
  • Rouwenhorst, B., Reuter, B., Strockrahm, G.J., Van Houtum, G.J., Mantel, R.J., Zijm, W.H.M., 2000. Warehouse Design and Control: Framework and Literature Review. European Journal of Operational Research, 122, pp. 515-533.
  • Roy, B., 1990a. Decision-Aid and Decision Making. European Journal of Operational Research, 45, pp. 324-331.
  • Roy, B., 1990b. The Outranking Approach and the Foundations of ELECTRE Methods. In: Bana e Costa C.A. (ed.), Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 155-183.
  • Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • Steuer, R., 1986. Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Van den Berg, J.P., Zijm, W.H.M., 1999. Models for Warehouse Management: Classification and Examples. International Journal of Production Economics, 59, pp. 519-528.
  • Vincke, P., 1992. Multicriteria Decision-Aid. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
  • Wegryn, G.W., Siprelle, A.J., 2001. Combined Use of Optimization and Simulation Technologies to Design an Optimal Logistics Network. Proceedings of the Annual Conference: Council of Logistics Management, Kansas City, 21 September - 3 October, CD Proceedings.
  • Żak, J., 2002. The MCDA Methodology Applied to Solve Complex Transportation Decision Problems. Proceedings of the 9th Meeting of the EURO Working Group on Transportation: Intermodality, Sustainability and Intelligent Transportation Systems, Bari, 10-13 June, pp. 685-693.
  • Żak, J., 2005. Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji w transporcie drogowym. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Poznańskiej, Poznań.
  • Żak, J., 2010. Application of Operations Research Techniques to the Redesign of the Distri- bution Systems. In: Dangelmaier W., Blecken A., Deluis R., Klopfer S. (eds.), Advanced Manufacturing and Sustainable Logistics. Springer, Lecture Notes in Business Informa- tion Processing, 46, pp. 57-72.
  • Żak, J., Redmer, A., Jaszkiewicz, A., 2000. Location Analysis of the Infrastructure in the Transportation System. Single and Bi-criterion Optimization. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Transportation Planning Methodologies for Developing Countries, Bombay, December 5-7, CD Proceedings.
  • Żak, J., Sawicki, P., 2000. The Multi-objective Ranking of the Warehouse in the Physical Distribution System. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Transportation Planning and Implementation Methodologies for Developing Countries: Transportation Infrastructure, Bombay, December 5-7, CD Proceedings.
  • Żak, J., Wlodarczak, H., Kicinski, M., 2002. The MCDM Based Redesign of the Distribution System. Proceedings of the 9th Meeting of the EURO Working Group on Transportation: Intermodality, Sustainability and Intelligent Transportation Systems, Bari, 10-13 June, pp. 665-670.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171594979

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.