From Participatory Planning to Collaborative Communitydevelopment in the USA

• Autorzy: Mickey Lauria

Warianty tytułu

Od planowania partycypacyjnego do współpracującego rozwoju społeczności w Stanach Zjednoczonych

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The evolution of Participatory Planning for Community Development (PPCD) in the USA began in the 1960s with the Model Cities Program funding to neigh-borhood groups in large inner cities, through city planning staff assigned to specific city neighborhoods in the 70s, to the post-1970s, externally contracted planners (consulting firms) and/or pro bono university planning studio classes invited by neighborhood associations to help them with their planning efforts (usually in preparation for or in response to city-wide master planning efforts by the host city). PPCD changed during this evolution in three fashions: the planning stage in which participation was initiated, the nature of the participa-tory efforts, technological advances that have changed both the nature of par-ticipatory efforts, plan visualization, and democratic communication. This pa-per briefly recounts the history of these changes, presents examples of prod-ucts developed, and develops a heuristic model of the PPCD process.(fragment of text)

Początki Planowania Partycypacyjnego dla Rozwoju Społeczności (z ang. PPCD) w USA sięgają lat 60. XXwieku wraz z uruchomieniem funduszu Programu Miast Modelowych dla grup mieszkańców w śródmieściach dużych miast, poprzez działania urzędników-planistów skierowanych do określonych grup w latach 70., jak również poprzez działania zewnętrznych biur planistycznych (firm konsultingowych) i/lub prace projektowe na zajęciach z planowania na uniwersytetach, wykonywane pro bono na zaproszenie stowarzyszeń sąsiedzkich jako pomoc w ich wysiłkach dotyczących planowania przestrzennego (zazwyczaj były to przygotowania dla lub w odpowiedzi na wielkomiejskie zamierzenia planistyczne - masterplany - przygotowywane przez miasto). PPCD zmieniło się na trzy sposoby podczas tej ewolucji: w fazie planowania, w której partycypacja była inicjowana, w samej naturze wysiłków partycypacyjnych, w rozwoju technologicznym, który zmienił zarówno naturę działań partycypacyjnych, wizualizacji planów oraz komunikacji demokratycznej. Ten artykuł skrótowo opisuje historię tych zmian, prezentuje przykłady wypracowanych rezultatów i rozwija model heurystyczny procesu PPCD(abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Participative management; Social development; Social participation

PL

Zarządzanie partycypacyjne; Rozwój społeczny; Partycypacja społeczna

• Czasopismo: Przestrzeń, Ekonomia, Społeczeństwo
• Rocznik: 2016
• Numer: nr 10/2
• Strony: 15--30

Twórcy

autor

Mickey Lauria

• Clemson University, USA

Bibliografia

• 1. Arnstein S., 1969, A ladder of citizen participation, "Journal of the Ameri-can Institute of Planners" 35, 4: 216-24.
• 2. Connerly Ch. E., Wilson B., 1997, The Roots and Origins of African American Planning in Birmingham, Alabama. In Thomas, June Manning and Marsha Ritzdorf, eds. Urban Planning and the African American Community: In the Shadows, pp. 201-219. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• 3. Davidoff P., 1965, Advocacy and pluralism in planning, "Journal of the American Institute of Planners" 31, 4: 331-338.
• 4. Elwood S., 2008, Volunteered geographic information: future research di-rections motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS, "GeoJournal" 72, 3-4: 173-183.
• 5. Elwood S., Leitner H., 2003, GIS and Spatial Knowledge Production for Neighborhood Revitalization: Negotiating State Priorities and Neighbor-hood Visions, "Journal of Urban Affairs" 25 2:139-157.
• 6. Fainstein S. S., 1994, The City Builders: property, politics, and planning in London and New York. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
• 7. Fainstein S. S., 2001 (2nd Ed), The City Builders: property, politics, and plan-ning in London and New York, 1980-2000, Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
• 8. Fainstein S. S., 1991, Promoting Economic Development Urban Planning in the United States and Great Britain, "Journal of the American Planning Association" 57,1: 22-33.
• 9. Fisher R., 1994, Let the People Decide: Neighborhood Organizing in Ameri-ca. New York: Twayne Publishers.
• 10. Foley J., Lauria M., 2000, Plans, Planning and Tragic Choices, "Planning Theory and Practice" 1, 2: 219-233.
• 11. Forester J., 1989, Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• 12. Hallman H. W., 1974, Neighborhood Government in a Metropolitan Setting, "Sage Library of Social Research", Volume 12. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
• 13. Harper T. L., Stein S. M., 2005, Dialogical Planning in a Fragmented Society: Critically Liberal, Pragmatic, Incremental. New Brunswick, NJ: CUPR/Transaction Press.
• 14. Heiman M., 1990, From not in my backyard!' to not in anybody's backyard!' grassroots challenge to hazardous waste facility siting, "Journal of the American Planning Association" 56, 3: 359-362.
• 15. Heiman M., 1995, Science by the people!: Grassroots environmental moni-toring and the debate over scientific expertise, Paper presented at the 91st Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, March 14-19, 1995, Chicago, IL.
• 16. Henig J. R., 1982, Neighborhood Mobilization: Redevelopment and Response, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
• 17. Higgins M., Aitken-Rose E., Dixon J., 2009, The Pedagogy of the Planning Studio: A View from Down Unde, "Journal for Education in the Built Envi-ronment" 4:1, 8-30.
• 18. Klosterman R. E., 1981, Contemporary planning theory education: Results of a course survey. "Journal of Planning Education and Research" 1, 1: 1-11.
• 19. Klosterman R. E., 1992, Planning theory education in the 1980s: Results of a second course survey. "Journal of Planning Education and Research" 11, 4:130-40.
• 20. Klosterman R. E., 2000, Planning theory education in the 1990s: Results of a course survey, Atlanta, GA: Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning.
• 21. Klosterman R. E., 2011, Panning theory education: A thirty-year review, "Journal of Planning Education and Research" 31, 3: 319-331.
• 22. Lauria M., 1982, Selective Urban Redevelopment: A Political Economic Per-spective, "Urban Geography" 3, 3: 224-239.
• 23. Lauria M., Soll M. J., 1996, Communication, Power, and Misinformation in a Site Selection Process, "Journal of Planning Education and Research" 15, 3:199-211.
• 24. Mandarano L., Meenar M., Steins Ch., 2010, Building Social Capital in the Digital Age of Civic Engagement, "Journal of Planning Literature" 25, 2: 123-135.
• 25. Peng Zhong-Ren, 2001, Internet GIS for public participation, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28:889-905.
• 26. Peterman W., 1999, Neighborhood Planning and Community-Based Devel-opment: The Potential and Limits of Grassroots Action, Sage.
• 27. Powers M. N., 2017, Self-Regulated Design Learning, NY, NY: Routledge.
• 28. Roakes S., Norris-Tirrell D., 2000, Community service learning in planning education, "Journal of Planning Education and Research" 20, 1: 100-110.
• 29. Shannon J., Skobba K., Tinsley K., Corwin J., 2016, Smart Maps for Small Cities: Participatory GIS and Affordable Housing in Georgia, Presented at Planning, Design, and the Built Environment Colloquium, Clemson Univer-sity, South Carolina.
• 30. Sieber R., 2006, Public Participation and Geographic Information Systems: A Literature Review and Framework, "Annals of the American Association of Geographers" 9, 3: 491-507.
• 31. Stern E., Gudes O., Svoray T., 2009, Web-based and traditional public par-ticipation in comprehensive planning: A comparative study, Environment and Planning, B: Planning and Design 36: 1067-1085.
• 32. Stone C. N., Stoker R. P., (eds.), 2015., Urban Neighborhoods in a New Era: Revitalization Politics in the Post-Industrial City, Chicago, IL: The Universi-ty of Chicago Press.
• 33. Talen E., 1999, Constructing neighbourhoods from the bottom up: The case for resident-generated GIS. Environment and Planning B: Planning and De-sign 26: 533-554.