PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2020 | 5 | nr 1 | 222--241
Tytuł artykułu

Concurrence 'hybride ' , innovation et régulation : un modèle de duopole

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
'Hybrid ' Competition, Innovation Outcomes and Regulation: a Duopoly Model
Języki publikacji
FR
Abstrakty
Cet article présente un modèle de duopole dans lequel une firme et une communauté se concurrencent en produisant des produits/services numériques tout en ayant la possibilité de partager leurs innovations pour développer leurs propres activités. Nous montrons que la firme bénéficie toujours d ' un changement de régime 'ouvert ' ou 'fermé ' d ' innovation. Notre analyse numérique souligne que, si un 'basculement fermé ' est favorable au bien-être social et à l ' innovation agrégée, celui-ci n ' est pas systématiquement profitable à la firme. Ces observations exposent clairement une défaillance de marché potentielle, tout en nuançant les vertus du paradigme d ' innovation ouverte en matière de maximisation des profits.(abstrakt oryginalny)
EN
This paper presents a duopoly model in which a commercial organization and a community compete by providing digital products while being able to share their innovation outputs to develop their own activities. The commercial organization always benefits from either a 'closed ' or an 'open ' institutional regime shift. Our numerical analysis evidences that the 'closed ' shift provides the best levels of innovation and welfare whereas it is not found to be profit-improving when product differentiation is small. This result partially qualifies the conventional idea according to which public policies may be designed to defend commercial interests rather than public ones.(original abstract)
Twórcy
  • Université de Rennes, France
  • Université Côte d 'Azur
Bibliografia
  • Belleflamme, P., & Peitz, M. (2010). Digital piracy: Theory. (CORE Discussion Paper No. 2010/60).
  • Bonaccorsi, A., Giannangeli, S., & Rossi, C. (2006). Entry strategies under competing standards: Hybrid business models in the open source software industry. Management Science, 52(7), 1085-1098.
  • Chellappa, R. K., & Shivendu, S. (2005). Managing piracy: Pricing and sampling strategies for digital experience goods in vertically segmented markets. Information Systems Research, 16(4), 400-417.
  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
  • D'Aspremont, C., & Jacquemin, A. (1988). Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. American Economic Review, 78, 1133-1137.
  • D'Aspremont, C., & Jacquemin, A. (1990). Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers: Erratum. American Economic Review, 80, 641-642.
  • David, P. A. (1998). Common agency contracting and the emergence of 'open science' institutions. American Economic Review, 88(2), 15-21.
  • David, P. A. (2004). Understanding the emergence of 'open science' institutions: Functionalist economics in historical context. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(4), 571-589.
  • Economides, N., & Katsamakas, E. (2006). Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry. Management Science, 52(7), 1057-1071.
  • Fershtman, C., & Kamien, M. L. (1992). Cross-licensing of complementary technologies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 10(3), 329-348.
  • Flowers, S. (2008). Harnessing the hackers: The emergence and exploitation of outlaw innovation. Research Policy, 37(2), 177-193.
  • Grand, S., Krogh, G. von, Leonard, D., & Swap, W. (2004). Resource allocation beyond firm boundaries: A multi-level model for open source innovation. Long Range Planning, 37(6), 591-610.
  • Hui, K. L., & Png, I. (2003). Piracy and the legitimate demand for recorded music. Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy, 2(1), 1-11.
  • Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Nelson, R. R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 77(3), 297-306.
  • Nelson, R. R. (2004). The market economy, and the scientific commons. Research Policy, 33(3), 455-471.
  • Pastor, M., & Sandonis, J. (2002). Research joint ventures vs. cross licensing agreements: An agency approach. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20(2), 215-249.
  • Peitz, M., & Waelbroeck, P. (2006). Piracy of digital products: A critical review of the theoretical literature. Information Economics and Policy, 18(4), 449-476.
  • Rossi, M. A. (2006). Decoding the free/open source software puzzle. In J. Bitzer, P. J. H. Schroder (Eds.), The economics of open source software development (pp. 15-55). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Schulz, C., & Wagner, S. (2008). Outlaw community innovations. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12(3), 399-418.
  • Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1998). Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York: William Morrow and Co.
  • Varian, H. R. (2000). Buying, sharing and renting information goods. Journal of Industrial Economics, 48(4), 473-488.
  • von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791-805.
  • von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171595671

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.