The Removal of Sulphate Ions from Model Solutions and their Influence on Ion Exchange Resins

• Autorzy: Stefan Demcak , Magdalena Balintova , Marian Vrtodusic Holub
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

There is a growing tendency for industries around the globe to diminish the contents of pollutants in industrial wastewaters to an acceptable level. Conventional methods are unfavourable and economically unacceptable, especially for large volumes of wastewaters with a high content of undesirable compounds. In contrast, ion-exchange is a very powerful technology capable of removing contam-ination from water. This paper analyses a study of ion exchange in Amberlite MB20 and Purolite MB400 resins after sulphate removal from a model solution. For the characterisation of ion exchange in resins, infrared spectroscopy was used. The IR spectra of both ion exchange resins show a similar composition after adsorption. Experiments that are due to this same used matrix in producing. The efficiency of sulphate ion removal and pH changes were also measured. Amberlite MB20 has proven to be a suitable ion exchange resin due to its high efficiency (about 86%) for the removal of sulphates from solutions with initial concentrations of 100 and 500 mg.L-1, respectively. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Water pollution; Level of contamination; Sewage treatment

PL

Zanieczyszczenie wód; Poziom zanieczyszczenia; Oczyszczanie ścieków

• Czasopismo: Ekonomia i Środowisko
• Rocznik: 2020
• Numer: nr 2 (73)
• Strony: 59--70

Twórcy

autor

Stefan Demcak

• Technical University of Kosice, Slovakia

autor

Magdalena Balintova

• Technical University of Kosice, Slovakia

autor

Marian Vrtodusic Holub

• Technical University of Kosice, Slovakia

Bibliografia

• Akcil, A., Koldas, S., 2006. Acid Mine Drainage (AMD): causes, treatment and case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(12-13), 1139-1145, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.09.006.
• Al Zuhair, S. et al., 2008. Sulfate inhibition effect on sulfate reducing bacteria. Journal of Biochemical Technology, 1(2), 39-44.
• Balintova, M. et al., 2016. Study of Precipitates from Mine Water after Defrosting and Oxidation. Solid State Phenomena, 244, 234-239, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientiβic.net/SSP.244.234.
• Balintova, M. et al., 2012. Study of iron, copper and zinc removal from acidic solutions by sorption. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 28, 175-180.
• Chernysh, Y. et al., 2018. The influence of phosphogypsum addition on phosphorus release in biochemical treatment of sewage sludge. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(6), 1269, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061269.
• Dąbrowski, A. et al., 2004. Selective removal of the heavy metal ions from waters and industrial wastewaters by ion-exchange method. Chemosphere, 56(2), 91-106, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.03.006.
• Demcak, S. et al., 2017. Utilisation of poplar wood sawdust for heavy metals removal from model solutions. Nova Biotechnologica et Chimica, 16(1), 26-31, https://doi.org/10.1515/nbec-2017-0004.
• Dolla, A. et al., 2006. Oxygen defense in sulfate-reducing bacteria. Journal of Biotechnology, 126(1), 87-100, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.03.041.
• Feng, D. et al., 2000. Treatment of acid mine water by use of heavy metal precipitation and ion exchange. Minerals Engineering, 13(6), 623-642, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-6875(00)00045-5.
• Fernando, W.A.M. et al., 2018. Challenges and opportunities in the removal of sulphate ions in contaminated mine water: A review. Minerals Engineering, 117, 74-90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2017.12.004.
• Fu, F., Wang, Q., 2011. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(3), 407-418, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011.
• Ghosh, S. et al., 2015, FTIR spectroscopy in the characterisation of the mixture of nuclear grade cation and anion exchange resins. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 304(2), 917-923, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-014-3906-3.
• Guimarães, D., Leão, V.A., 2014. Batch and fixed-bed assessment of sulphate removal by the weak base ion exchange resin Amberlyst A21. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 280, 209-215, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.07.071.
• Holub, M. et al., 2014. Application of various methods for sulphates removal under acidic conditions. SGEM2014 Conference Proceedings, 2(5), 39-46.
• Hybska, H. et al., 2018. Study of the Regeneration Cleaning of Used Mineral Oils-Ecotoxicological Properties and Biodegradation. Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Quarterly, 31(4), 487-496, https://doi.org/10.15255/CABEQ.2017.1109.
• Johnson, D.B., Hallberg, K.B., 2005. Acid mine drainage remediation options: a review. Science of the Total Environment, 338(1-2), 3-14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sci-totenv.2004.09.002.
• Kerkez, Ö. et al., 2012. A comperative study for adsorption of methylene blue from aqueous solutions by two kinds of amberlite resin materials. Desalination and Water Treatment, 45(1-3), 206-214, https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.692057.
• Kovacova, Z. et al., 2019. Removal of copper, zinc and iron from water solutions by spruce sawdust adsorption. Economics and Environment, 3(70), 64-74, https://doi.org/10.34659/2019/3/35
• Lazar, L. et al., 2014. FTIR analysis of ion exchange resins with application in permanent hard water softening. Environmental Engineering & Management Journal, 13(9), 2145-2152.
• Lens, P.N.L. et al., 1998. Biotechnological treatment of sulfate-rich wastewaters. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 28(1), 41-88, https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389891254160.
• Luptakova, A. et al., 2012. Application of physical-chemical and biological-chemical methods for heavy metals removal from acid mine drainage. Process Biochemistry, 47(11), 1633-1639, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2012.02.025.
• Macingova, E., Luptakova, A., 2012. Recovery of metals from acid mine drainage. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 28, 115-120.
• Merdivan, M. et al., 2001. Sorption behaviour of uranium (VI) with N, N-dibutyl-N'-benzoylthiourea impregnated in Amberlite XAD-16. Talanta, 55(3), 639-645, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(01)00476-3.
• Muyzer, G., Stams, A.J., 2008. The ecology and biotechnology of sulphate-reducing bacteria. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 6(6), 441, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1892.
• Nguyen, N. et al., 2010. Adsorption of gold (III) from waste rinse water of semicon-ductor manufacturing industries using Amberlite XAD-7HP resin. Gold Bulletin, 43(3), 200-208, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03214987.
• Robertson, A. et al., 1993. Sulfate removal by GYPCIX process following lime treatment. Proceedings of the SUPERFUND XIV Conference, Washington, USA, October-December 1993.
• Robertson, A., Rohrs, R.G., 1995. Sulphate removal of acid mine drainage water after lime treatment. Proceedings of Sudbury 95, Conference on Mining and the Environment, Sudbury, Ontario, May-June 1995, 575-586.
• Runtti, H. et al., 2016. Sulphate removal over barium-modiβied blast-furnace-slag geopolymer. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 317, 373-384, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.06.001.
• Runtti, H. et al., 2018. How to tackle the stringent sulfate removal requirements in mine water treatment - A review of potential methods. Environmental Research, 167, 207-222, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.07.018.
• Sánchez-Andrea, I. et al., 2014. Sulfate reduction at low pH to remediate acid mine drainage. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 269, 98-109, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.032.
• Silva, A.J. et al., 2002. Sulphate removal from industrial wastewater using a packed-bed anaerobic reactor. Process Biochemistry, 37(9), 927-935, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(01)00297-7.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.34659/2020/2/16