PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2020 | vol. 20, iss. 1 | 25--44
Tytuł artykułu

Carbon Leakage Along with the Green Paradox Against Carbon Abatement? A Review Based on Carbon Tax

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Research background: Insufficient global cooperation in carbon pricing against global warming has the risk of global carbon emissions rise because of carbon leakage. The effect of a carbon tax on the present supply of fossil fuels is also valuable in regard to global carbon emissions. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to gain more insights into the effects of carbon leakage along with the green paradox on global carbon emissions by reviewing the relevant literature. Research methodology: We provide the problem linked to carbon leakage and the green paradox in the introduction. Then, the effects of carbon leakage and the green paradox on global carbon emissions are elaborated separately. Finally the mutual effects of carbon leakage and the green paradox are reviewed comprehensively. Results: It is seen that various factors like interest rates, fossil fuel extraction costs, the fossil fuel reserves to be discovered in the future and carbon tax incidence are equally important determinants in regard to global carbon emissions. Novelty: This study provides an insight into the mutual effects of carbon leakage and the green paradox on global carbon emissions by reviewing the primary literature in the field. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Strony
25--44
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
  • Istanbul University, Turkey
autor
  • Istanbul University, Turkey
Bibliografia
  • Arce, M.D.G. (2004). Asymmetric Leadership and International Public Goods. Public Finance Review, 32, 528-558. DOI: 10.1177/1091142104265876.
  • Barrett, S. (1999). Montreal versus Kyoto: International Cooperation and Global Environment. In: I. Kaul, I. Grunberg, M.A. Stern (eds.), Global Public Goods, International Cooperation in the 21st Century (pp. 192-219). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Cairns, R.D. (2014). The Green Paradox of the Economics of Exhaustible Resources. Energy Policy, 65, 78-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.047.
  • Cline, W.R. (1991). Scientific Basis for the Greenhouse Effect. The Economic Journal, 101 (407), 904-919. DOI: 10.2307/2233863.
  • Coulomb, R., Henriet, F. (2018). The Grey Paradox:How fossil-fuel owners can benefit from carbon taxation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 87, 206-223. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2017.07.001.
  • Criqui, P., Jaccard, M., Sterner, T. (2019). Carbon Taxation: A Tale of Three Countries. Sustainability, 11 (2), 1-21. DOI: 10.3390/su11226280.
  • Dinan, T.M. (2009). Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions with a Tax or a Cap: Implications for Efficiency and Cost Effectiveness. National Tax Journal, 62 (3), 535-553.
  • Droege, S. (2011). Using Border Measures to Address Carbon Flows. Climate Policy, 11, 1191-1201. DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2011.592671.
  • Eckersley, R. (2010). The Politics of Carbon Leakage and the Fairness of Border Measures. Ethics and International Affairs, 24 (4), 367-393. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-7093.2010.00277.x.
  • Edenhofer, O., Kalkuhl, M. (2011). When Do Increasing Carbon Taxes Accelerate Global Warming? A Note on the Green Paradox. Energy Policy, 39, 2208-2212. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.020.
  • Eichner, T., Pethig, R. (2011). Carbon Leakage, The Green Paradox, and Perfect Future Markets. International Economic Review, 52 (3), 767-805.
  • Fischer, C., Salant, S.W. (2017). Balancing the Carbon Budget for Oil. European Economic Review, 99, 191-215. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.04.003.
  • Fölster, S., Nyström, S. (2010). Climate Policy to Defeat the Green Paradox. Ambio, 39, 223- 235. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-010-0030-7.
  • Gerlagh, R. (2011). Too Much Oil. CESifo Economic Studies, 57 (1), 79-102. DOI: 10.1093/cesifo/ifq004.
  • Herber, B.P., Raga, J.T. (1995). An International Carbon Tax to Combat Global Warming: An Economic and Political Analysis of the European Union Proposal. American Journal of Economics & Sociology, 54 (3), 257-268. DOI: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1995.tb03422.x.
  • Hoel, M. (2011). The Supply Side of CO2 with Country Heterogeneity. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 113 (4), 846-865.
  • Kuik, O., Gerlagh, R. (2003). Trade Liberalization and Carbon Leakage. The Energy Journal, 24 (3), 97-120.
  • Österle, I. (2015). The Green Paradox and the importance of endogenous resource exploration. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 60, 60-78. DOI: 0.1111/1467-8489.12103.
  • Ritter, H., Schopf, M. (2014). Unilateral Climate Policy: Harmful or Even Disastrous? Environmental Resource Economics, 58, 155-178.
  • Sandler, T. (2003). Assessing the Optimal Provision of Public Goods: in Search of the Holy Grail. In: I. Kaul, P. Conceiçao, K. Le G. Goulven, R.U. Mendoza (eds.), Providing Global Public Goods, in Managing Globalization (pp. 131-151). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Sinn, H.W. (2008). Public Policies Against Global Warming: A Supply Side Approach. International Tax and Public Finance, 15 (4), 360-394. DOI: 10.1007/s10797-008-9082-z.
  • Smith, J.L. (2012). Issues in Extractive Resource Taxation: A Review of Research Methods and Models. IMF Working Papers, 12/287.
  • Smulders, S., Tsur, Y., Zemel, A. (2012). Announcing Climate Policy: Can a Green Paradox Arise Without Scarcity? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 64, 364-376.
  • van der Meijden, G., van der Ploeg, F., Withagen, C. (2015). International Capital Markets, Oil Producers and the Green Paradox. European Economic Review, 76, 275-297.
  • van der Ploeg, F., Withagen, C. (2015). Global Warming and the Green Paradox: A Review of Adverse Effects of Climate Policies. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 9 (2), 285-303. DOI: 10.1093/reep/rev008.
  • van der Ploeg, F. (2016). Second-best carbon taxation in the global economy: The Green Paradox and carbon leakage revisited. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 78, 85-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2016.02.006.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171598757

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.