PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2020 | nr 33 | 55--73
Tytuł artykułu

Gender Differences in Trust, Reactions to Trust Violation, and Trust Restoration

Autorzy
Warianty tytułu
Różnice między kobietami i mężczyznami w zaufaniu, reakcjach na naruszenie zaufania i odbudowie zaufania
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This study examined the impact of gender on the propensity to trust, responses to the violation of trust and apologies, and the pace of subsequent trust restoration. It was hypothesized that women would respond more positively to an apology but restore their trust at a slower pace than men. Results revealed no gender differences in level of trust immediately after an apology for trust violation, but there was a significant difference in the pace of trust restoration, with women returning to their pre-violation levels of trust later than men as hypothesized. There were also significant gender differences in levels of trust before trust violation and after an apology. (original abstract)
Przedmiotem badania był wpływ płci na skłonność do zaufania, reakcje na naruszenie zaufania i przeprosiny oraz tempo odbudowywania naruszonego zaufania. Postawiona została hipoteza, że kobiety będą reagowały pozytywniej na przeprosiny, ale będą odbudowywały zaufanie w wolniejszym tempie niż mężczyźni. Wyniki ujawniły brak różnic między płciami w poziomie zaufania ujawnianego w odpowiedzi na przeprosiny za naruszenie zaufania, ale znaczące różnice w tempie przywrócenia zaufania. Kobiety wracały do poziomu zaufania sprzed naruszenia później niż mężczyźni. Ponadto ujawniły się także różnice między płciami w poziomie zaufania przed jego naruszeniem oraz po przeprosinach. (abstrakt oryginalny)
Słowa kluczowe
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
55--73
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
  • Kozminski University, Warsaw, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Aksoy, Billur, Haley A. Harwell, Ada Kovaliukaite, and Catherine C. Eckel. (2018). Measuring trust: A reinvestigation. Southern Economic Journal, 84, 992-1000.
  • Alesina, Alberto, and Eliana La Ferrara. (2002). Who trusts others? Journal of Public Economics, 85, 207-34.
  • Ashraf, N., Bohnet, I. & Piankov, N. (2003). Is trust a bad investment, Working Paper Series. Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
  • Bauer P.C., Freitag M. (2018). Measuring trust. In E. Uslaner (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust, (pp. 15-23). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Bellemare, C. & Kroeger. S. (2003). On Representative Trust. Tilburg University CentER Discussion Paper, 2003-47.
  • Bellemare, C., & Kroeger, S. (2007). On representative social capital. European Economic Review, 51, 183-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2006.03.006.
  • Ben-Ner, A., & Halldorsson, F. (2010). Trusting and trustworthiness: What are they, how to measure them, and what affects them? Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(1), 64-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.10.001.
  • Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity and social history. Games and Economic Behaviour, 10, 122-142. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027.
  • Bies, R. J. & Tripp, T. M. (1996). Beyond Distrust: "Getting Even" and the Need for Revenge. In R. M. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in Organizations, (pp. 246-260). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Bottom, W.P., Gibson, K., Daniels, S.E., & Murnighan, J.K. (2002). When talk is not cheap: Substantive penance and expressions of intent in rebuilding cooperation. Organization Science, 13(5), 497-513.
  • Bowles, H. R., Babcock, L., & Lai, L. (2007). Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(1), 84-103.
  • Buchan, N.R., Croson, R.T., & Solnick, S. (2008). Trust and gender: an examination of behavior and beliefs in the Investment Game. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization, 68, 466-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2007.10.006.
  • Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioural game theory: Experiments on strategic interaction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Chaudhuri, A., & Gangadharan, L. (2002). Gender differences in trust and reciprocity. Working paper, Wellesley College. https://ideas.repec.org/p/mlb/wpaper/875.html.
  • Chaudhuri, A., & Gangadharan, L. (2007). An experimental analysis of trust and trustworthiness. Southern Economic Journal, 73, 959-985.
  • Chaudhuri, A., Paichayontvijit, & T., Shen L. F. (2013). Gender differences in trust and trustworthiness: Individuals, single sex and mixed sex groups. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, 181-194.
  • Cox, J. & Deck, C.A., (2006). When Are Women More Generous than Men? Economic Inquiry, 44(4): 587-598.
  • Croson, R., & Buchan, N.R. (1999). Gender and Culture: International Experimental Evidence from Trust Games. American Economic Review, 89(2): 386-391.
  • Cross, S.E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5-37.
  • Demaris, A. & Yang, R. (1994). Race relations and interpersonal mistrust. Sociological Spectrum, 14, 327-349.
  • Derks, J., Lee, N.C., & Krabbendam, L. (2014). Adolescent trust and trustworthiness : Role of gender and social value orientation. Journal of Adolescence, 37(8), 1379-1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.09.014.
  • Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 265-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200401.
  • Deutsch, M. (1960). Trust, trustworthiness, and the F scale. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 138-140. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1037/h0046501.
  • Dunning, D., Fetchenhauer, D. & Schlösser, T. (2016). The psychology of respect: A case study of how behavioral norms regulate human action. In Advances in motivation science, vol. 3, In A. Elliot (Ed.), Advances in motivation science (Vol. 3, pp. 1-34). New York, NY: Elsevier.
  • Eagly, A.H. (1997). Sex differences in social behaviour: Comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology. American Psychologist, 50, 1380-1383. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1380.b.
  • Eagly, A.H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573.
  • Ermisch, J., Gambetta, D., Laurie, H., Siedler, T., & Uhrig, S.N. (2009). Measuring people's trust. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 172(4), 749-69.
  • Espín, A.M., Exadaktylos, F., & Neyse, L. (2016). Heterogeneous motives in the trust game: a tale of two roles. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 728. https://doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00728.
  • Evans, A.M., & Revelle, W. (2008). Survey and behavioral measurements of interpersonal trust. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1585-1593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.07.011.
  • Exline, J.J., DeShea, L., & Holeman, V.T. (2007). Is apology worth the risk? Predictors, outcomes, and ways to avoid regret. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 479-504. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2007.26.4.479.
  • Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., Schupp, J., von Rosenbladt, B. & Wagner, G.G. (2002). A nationwide laboratory examining trust and trustworthiness by integrating behavioural experiments into representative surveys, Schmollers Jahrbuch, 122, 519-542.
  • Freedman, G., Fetterolf, J., & Beer, J. S. (2019). Engaging in social rejection may be riskier for women. The Journal of social psychology 159(5), 575-591.
  • Gachter, S., Herrmann, B. & Thoni, C. (2004). Trust, voluntary cooperation, and socioeconomic background: survey and experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(4), 505-531.
  • Garbarino, E., & Slonim, R. (2009). The robustness of trust and reciprocity across a heterogeneous US population. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 69(3), 226-240.
  • Glaeser, E.L., Laibson, D.I., Scheinkman, J.A., & Soutter, C.L. (2000). Measuring trust. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 811-846.
  • Haselhuhn, M.P., Kennedy, J.A., Kray, L.J., Van Zant, A.B., & Schweitzer, M.E. (2015). Gender differences in trust dynamics: Women trust more than men following a trust violation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 104-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.007.
  • Haselhuhn, M., Schweitzer, M., & Wood, A. (2010). How Implicit Beliefs Influence Trust Recovery. Psychological Science, 21, 645-648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797610367752.
  • Holm, H. & Nystedt, P. (2008). Trust in surveys and games - a methodological contribution on the influence of money and location. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(4), 522-542.
  • Irwin, K. & Berigan, N. (2013). Trust, Culture, and Cooperation: A Social Dilemma Analysis of Pro-Environmental Behaviors. The Sociological Quarterly, 54, 424-449. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1111/tsq.12029.
  • Kawachi, I., 2018. Trust and population health. In E. M. Uslaner (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust (pp. 447-478). Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251-1288. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300555475.
  • Koranyi, N., & Rothermund, K. (2012). Automatic coping mechanisms in committed relationships: increased interpersonal trust as a response to stress. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 180-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.009.
  • Kraemer, H.C., Gardner, C., Brooks, J.O. III, & Yesavage, J.A. (1998). Advantages of excluding underpowered studies in meta-analysis: Inclusionist versus exclusionist viewpoints. Psychological Methods, 3(1), 23-31.
  • Kramer, K.L. (2010). Cooperative breeding and its significance to the demographic success of humans. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 417-436.
  • Kuźminska, A. (2016). Problems with measurement of Trust and Trustworthiness. What Best Predicts Trust Game Outcomes? Studia i Materiały, 2, 119-130. Doi:10.7172/1733- 9758.2016.22.9.
  • Lazzarini, S., Madalozzo, R., Artes, R. and de Oliveira Siqueira, J. (2004). Measuring trust: an experiment in Brazil. Ibmec working paper, WPE: 2004 - 1.
  • Lewicki, R. & Bunker, B. (1996).Trust in relationships: A model of trust development and decline.
  • In R. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp.114-139). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Lewicki, R.J., & Brinsfield, C. (2017). Trust Repair. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behaviour, 4(1), 287-313. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113147.
  • Lount, R.B., Zhong, C.B., Sivanathan, N., & Murnighan, J.K. (2008). Getting off on the wrong foot: The timing of a breach and the restoration of trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(12), 1601-1612.
  • Miller, A.S. & Mitamura, T. (2003). Are surveys on trust trustworthy?, Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(1), 62-70.
  • Naef, M., & Schupp, J. (2009). Measuring trust: Experiments and surveys in contrast and combination (IZA Discussion Paper No. 4087). Retrieved from EconStor website: http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/handle/10419/35525.
  • Ohtsubo, Y., Matsunaga, M., Tanaka, H., Suzuki, K., Kobayashi, F., Shibata, E., et al. (2018). Costly apologies communicate conciliatory intention: an fMRI study on forgiveness in response to costly apologies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39, 249-256. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.01.004.
  • Oishi, S., S. Kesebir & Diener, E. (2011). Income Inequality and Happiness. Psychological Science, 22, 1095-100.
  • Rahn, W.M., & Transue, J.E. (1998). Social trust and value change: The decline of social capital in American youth, 1976-1995. Political Psychology, 19, 545-565.
  • Rau, H.A. (2011). Trust and trustworthiness: A survey of gender differences. In S. McGeown (Ed.). Psychology of Gender Differences, (pp. 205-224). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
  • Robinson, S.L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 574-599. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2307/2393868.
  • Rosenberg, M. (1956). Misanthropy and political ideology. American Sociological Review, 21, 690-695.
  • Rotter, J.B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651-665. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j .1467-6494.1967.tb01454.x.
  • Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393-404. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.926617.
  • Sapienza, P., Toldra-Simats, A., & Zingales, L. (2013). Understanding Trust. Economic Journal, 123(573), 1313-1332.
  • Schniter, E., Sheremeta, R. M., & Shields, T. W. (2013). Limitations to signaling trust with all or nothing investments (Working Paper No. 13-24). Economic Science Institute, Chapman University. Retrieved from: https://ideas. repec.org/p/chu/wpaper/13-24.html.
  • Schumann, K., & Ross, M. (2010). Why women apologize more than men: Gender differences in thresholds for offensive behaviour. Psychological Science, 21, 1649-1655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610384150.
  • Schwieren, C. & Sutter, M. (2008). Trust in Cooperation or Ability? An Experimental Study on Gender Differences. Economics Letters, 99(3), 494-97.
  • Simpson, J.A. (2007). Foundations of interpersonal trust. In A.W. Kruglanski & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 587-607). New York: Guilford.
  • Slonim, R., & Guillen, P. (2010). Gender selection discrimination: Evidence from a trust game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76(2), 385-405.
  • Snijders, C., & Keren, G. (1999). Determinants of trust. In D. Budescu, I. Erev, and R Zwick (Eds.), Games and human behavior: essays in honor of Amnon Rapoport, (pp. 355-385). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Snijders, C., & Keren, G. (2001). Do you trust? Whom do you trust? When do you trust? In S.R. Thye (Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 18, pp. 129-160). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0882-6145(01)18006-9.
  • Stavrova, O., & Ehlebracht, D. (2016). Cynical beliefs about human nature and income: Longitudinal and cross-cultural analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 116-132.
  • Terrell, F. & Barrett, R.K., (1979). Interpersonal trust among college students as a function of race, ex, and socioeconomic status. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48, 1194.
  • Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.). Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136-179). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • Uslaner, E.M. (2018). The study of trust. In E.M. Uslaner (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Van den Akker, O., M van Vugt, M., van Assen, M. & Wicherts. J.M. (2018). Sex differences in trust and trustworthiness-a meta-analysis of the trust game and the gift-exchange game. PsyArXiv, https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5zbja.
  • Vyrastekova, J. & Garikipati, S. (2005). Beliefs and trust: an experiment. Working paper.
  • Yamagishi, T. & Yamagishi, M, (1994). Trust and Commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 9-66.
  • Yamagishi, T. (2011). Trust: The evolutionary game of mind and society. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Yamagishi, T., Akutsu, S., Cho, K., Inoue, Y., Li, Y., & Matsumoto, Y. (2015). Two-component model of general trust: predicting behavioral trust from attitudinal trust. Social Cognition, 33(5), 436-458.
  • Yamagishi, T., Kikuchi, M. & Kosugi, M. (1999). Trust, gullibility, and social intelligence, Asian Journal of Social Psychology 2(1), 145-161.
  • Zak, P.J., & Knack, S. (2001). Trust and Growth. Economic Journal, 111(4), 295-321.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171599725

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.