KLEMS Growth Accounting Implemented in Poland

• Autorzy: Dariusz Kotlewski , Mirosław Błażej
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the article is to present the main body of the KLEMS growth accounting recently implemented in Poland. The works on the KLEMS productivity accounting in Poland started in 2013 and focused on areas such as the development of methodology and the availability and assessment of data. These efforts enabled preparing KLEMS data sets pertaining to the Polish economy and moreover proved that unavailable data can be effectively estimated. Additionally, interesting but complex and debatable results were obtained, such as labour hoarding together with remunerations' freezing around the 2009 crisis, accompanied by a natural drop in the capital contribution growth and an increase in the MFP contribution, which most probably indicated effective reorganizations in the economy. In the years 2012-2014, increasing labour and capital contributions did not fully translate into gross value added growth, which led to negative MFP growths, as these are calculated residually. This, however, changed completely in the last two years of the time span covered by the research, namely in 2015-2016. An industry-level analysis became also possible, showing that the Polish economy was developing dynamically and undergoing intensive modernisation, which was obtained, however, with a debatable contribution of the State. To study the debatable features of the Polish economy in a greater detail, a further decomposition of the labour factor growth into four sub-factor contributions instead of two sub-factor contributions was performed. This additional analysis confirmed that labour hoarding phenomenon specific for Poland contributed to a softer impact of the 2007-09 financial crisis on this country's economy. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Value added; KLEMS productivity accounts; Production factors

PL

Wartość dodana; Rachunek produktywności KLEMS; Czynniki produkcji

• Czasopismo: Statistics in Transition
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: 21
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 95--122

Twórcy

autor

Dariusz Kotlewski

• Warsaw School of Economics (SGH); Statistics Poland

autor

Mirosław Błażej

• Statistics Poland

Bibliografia

• ANZ, R.W., (1981). The Relationship between Return and Market Value of Common Stock, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 9 (1), pp. 3-18.
• BERK, J., GREEN, R., NAIK, V., (1999). Optimal investment, growth options, and security returns, Journal of Finance, Vol. 54, pp. 1553-1607.
• BERNARDO, A., CHOWDRY, B., GOYAL, A., (2007). Growth options, beta, and the cost of capital, Financial Management, Vol. 36, 5-17.
• BHANDARI, L. CH., (1988). Debt/Equity Ratio and Expected Common Stock Returns: Empirical Evidence, Journal of Finance, Vol. 43, 2, pp. 507-528.
• CARHART, M. M., (1995). Survivor bias and persistence in mutual fund performance. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago.
• COCHRANE, J., (2001). Asset Pricing. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
• CZAPKIEWICZ, A., WÓJTOWICZ, T., (2014). The four-factor asset pricing model on the Polish stock market, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 27, 1, pp. 771-783.
• EFRON, B., TIBSHIRANI, R. J., (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap, Chapman and Hall CRC, New York.
• FAMA, E. F., (1996). Multifactor Portfolio Efficiency and Multifactor Asset Pricing, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 31, 4, pp. 441-465.
• FAMA, E. F., French, K. R., (1992). The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns, Journal of Finance, Vol. 47, 2, pp. 427-465.
• FAMA, E. F., FRENCH, K. R., (1993). Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stock and Bonds, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 33, 1, pp. 3-56.
• FAMA, E. F., FRENCH K. R., (1995). Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earnings and Returns, Journal of Finance, Vol. 50, 1, pp. 131-155.
• FAMA, E. F., FRENCH K. R., (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model, Journal of financial Economics, Vol. 116, pp. 1-22.
• FERSON, W., LOCKE, D. H., (1998). Estimating the cost of capital through time: An Analysis of the Sources of Error, Management Science, 44, 4, pp. 485-500.
• GIBBONS, M. R., ROSS, S. A., SHANKEN, J., (1989). A Test of the Efficiency of a Given Portfolio, Econometrica, Vol. 57, 5, pp. 1121-1152.
• GRAHAM, J. R. HARVEY, C. R., (2001). The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 60, pp. 187-243.
• JEGADEESH, N., TITMAN, S., (1993). Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency, Journal of Finance, Vol. 48, 1, pp. 65-91.
• JAGANNATHAN, R., WANG, Z., (1996). The Conditional CAPM and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns, Journal of Finance, Vol. 51, 1, pp. 3-53.
• KAN R., ZHANG C., (1999). Two-Pass Tests of Asset Pricing Models with Useless Factors, Journal of Finance, Vol. 54, 1, pp. 203-235.
• LAHIRI, S., (2003). Resampling Methods for Dependent Data. Springer-Verlag Inc., New York.
• LAKONISHOK, J., SHAPIRO, A.C., (1986). Systematic Risk, Total Risk, and Size as Determinants of Stock Market Returns, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 10, 1, pp. 115-132.
• LAKONISHOK, J., SHLEIFER, A., VISHNY, R., (1994). Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk, Journal of Finance, Vol. 49, pp. 1541-1578.
• LETTAU, M., LUDVIGSON, S., (2001). Resurrecting the (C) CAPM: A Cross-Sectional Test when Risk Premia Are Time-Varying, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 109, 6, pp. 1238-1287.
• LINTNER, J., (1965). The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 47, 1, pp. 13- 37.
• REINGANUM, M. R., (1981). A New Empirical Perspective on the CAPM, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 16, 4, pp. 439-462.
• ROSENBERG, B., REID, K., LANSTEIN, R., (1985). Persuasive Evidence of Market Inefficiency, Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 11, pp. 3, 9-16.
• SHANKEN, J., (1985). Multivariate Tests of the Zero-Beta CAPM, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 14, pp. 327-348.
• SHANKEN, J., (1992). On the Estimation of Beta-Pricing Models, The Review of Financial, Vol. 5, 1, pp. 1-33.
• SHARPE, W. F., (1964). Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk, Journal of Finance, Vol. 19, 3, pp. 425-442.
• URBAŃSKI, S., (2011). Modelowanie równowagi na rynku kapitałowym - weryfikacja empiryczna na przykładzie akcji notowanych na Giełdzie Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie. [Pricing modelling on capital market - empirical verification on the example of stocks listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange], Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, Katowice, Poland.
• URBAŃSKI, S., (2012). Multifactor Explanations of Returns on the Warsaw Stock Exchange in Light of the ICAPM, Economic Systems, Vol. 36, pp. 552-570.
• URBAŃSKI, S., JAWOR, P., URBAŃSKI, K., (2014). The Impact of Penny Stocks on the Pricing of Companies Listed on The Warsaw Stock Exchange in Light of the CAPM, Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Vol. 14, 2, pp. 163-178.
• URBAŃSKI, S., (2015). The Impact of Speculation on the Pricing of Companies Listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange in Light of the ICAPM, Managerial Economics, Vol. 16, 1, pp. 91- 111.
• URBAŃSKI, S., (2017). Comparison of modified and classic Fama-French model for the Polish market, Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Vol. 17, 1, pp. 80-96.
• WELCH, I., (2008). The Consensus Estimate for the Equity Premium by Academic Financial Economists in December 2007, Unpublished manuscript, Brown University, Providence, United States.
• ZHI, D., GUO, R. J., JAGANNATHAN, R., (2012). CAPM for estimating the cost of equity capital: Interpreting the empirical evidence, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 103, 1, pp. 204-220.
• ZARZECKI, D., BYRKA-KITA, K., WIŚNIEWSKI, T., KISIELEWSKA, M.,, (2004-2005). Test of the Capital Asset Pricing Model: Polish and Developed Markets Experiences, Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Vol. 3-4, 11-12, pp. 63-85.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.21307/stattrans-2020-006