COVID-19 and Digital Deprivation in Poland

• Autorzy: Marta Kuc-Czarnecka
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Research background: The problem of digital deprivation is already known, but the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted its negative consequences. A global change in the way of life, work and socialisation resulting from the epidemic has indicated that a basic level of digital integration is becoming necessary. During the lockdown, people were forced to use ICTs to adapt to a rapidly changing reality. Current experience with coronavirus pandemic shows that the transition to these extraordinary circumstances is not smooth. The inability to rapid conversion to the online world (due to a lack of skills or technical capabilities) significantly reduces professional mobility, hinders access to public services, and in the case of children, exposes them to the risk of remaining outside the remote education system.
Purpose of the article: This research paper is addressing new issues of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on deepening and increasing the severity of e-exclusion. The goal of the paper is to indicate territorial areas in Poland which are particularly vulnerable to digital deprivation due to infrastructural deficiencies.
Methods: Raster data regarding landform, combined with vector data regarding population density and type of buildings as well as the location of BTS stations are used in so-called modelling overland paths (GIS method) to indicate areas vulnerable to the infrastructural digital divide.
Findings & Value added: The research showed that 4% of Poles remain out-side the Internet coverage, and additional ten percent of them are out of the reach of the Internet, allowing efficient remote work or learning. The research indicated that digital 'accessibility gap' is underestimated. E-exclusion has become a pressing issue and requires urgent system solutions, in case of future lockdowns. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

COVID-19; Digital divide; Pandemic

PL

COVID-19; Wykluczenie cyfrowe; Pandemia

• Czasopismo: Oeconomia Copernicana
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: 11
• Numer: nr 3
• Strony: 415--431

Twórcy

autor

Marta Kuc-Czarnecka

• Gdansk University of Technology, Poland

Bibliografia

• Alfano, V., & Ercolano, S. (2020). The efficacy of lockdown against COVID-19: a cross-country panel analysis. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00596-3.
• Balcerzak, A. P. (2017). Digital economy in Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary. Measurement with TOPSIS based on entropy measure for objective weighting. In: T. Loster & T. Pavelka (Eds.). The 11th international days of statistics and economics. Conference proceedings. September 8-10. Prague: Libuse Macakova, Melandrium.
• Balcerzak, A. P., & Pietrzak, M. B. (2017a). Digital economy in Visegrad coutnries. Multiple-criteria decision analysis at regional level in the years 2012 and 2015. Journal of Competitiveness, 9(2). doi: 10.7441/joc.2017.02.01.
• Balcerzak, A. P., & Pietrzak, M. B. (2017b). Digital economy in Polish regions. Proposal of measurement via TOPSIS with generalized distance measure GDM. In: M. Papież & S. Śmiech (Eds.). The 11th professor Aleksander Zelias international conference on modelling and forecasting of socio-economic phenomena. Conference proceedings. Cracow: Foundation of the Cracow University of Economics.
• Bilan, Y., Rubanov, P., Vasylieva, T., & Lyeonov, S. (2019). The influence of industry 4.0 on financial services: determinants of alternative finance development. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(1). doi: 10.17512/pjms.2019.19.1.06.
• Bruno, G., Esposito, E., Genovese, A., & Gwebu, L.K. (2010). A critical analysis of current indexes for digital divide measurement. Information Society: An Internationa Journal, 27(1). doi: 10.1080/01972243.2010.534364.
• Budziewicz-Guźlecka, A., & Drab-Kurowska, A. (2020). Problems of infrastructure markets with particular emphasis on the postal market in the context of digital exclusion. Sustainaibility, 12(11). doi: 10.3390/su12114719.
• Cai, G. (2002). A GIS approach to the spatial assessment of telecommunications infrastructure. Networks and Spatial Economics, 2. doi: 10.1023/A:1014515329951.
• Chief Inspectorate of Environmental Protection, CORINE Land Cover (CLC 2018).
• Copernicus Land Monitoring Service, EU-DEM v1.0. Retrieved formhttps://land.copernicus.eu/imagery-in-situ/eu-dem/eu-dem-v1-0-and-derived-products/eu-dem-v1.0 (12.06.2020).
• de Haas, M., Faber, R., & Hamersma, M. (2020). How COVID-19 and the Dutch' intelligent lockdown' change activities, work and travel behaviour: evidence from longitudinal data in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 6. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100150.
• Dingel, J. I., & Neiman, B. (2020). How many jobs can be done at home? Becker Friedman institute. White Paper, 16. Retrieved form https://bfi.uchicago.edu/working-paper/how-many-jobs-can-bedone-at-home/ (25.06.2020).
• Dubey, S., Biswas, P., Ghosh, R., Chatterjee, S., Dubey, M. J., Chatterjee, S., Lahiri, D., & Lavie, C. J. (2020). Psychosocial impact of COVID-19. Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx. 2020.05.035.
• Elhai, J. D., Yang, H., McKay, D., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2020). COVID-19 anxiety symptoms associated with problematic smartphone use severity in Chinese adults. Journal of Affective Disorders, 274. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.08.
• Fry, C. (2010). GIS in telecommunications. In: P. A. Longley, M. Goodchild, D. J. Maguire & D. W. Rhind. Geographic information systems & science. Wiley.
• Gladkova, A., & Ragnedda, M. (2020). Exploring digital inequalities in Russia: an interregional comparative analysis. Online Information Review, 44(4). doi: 10.1108/OIR-04-2019-012.
• Goedhart, N. S., Broerse, J. E. W., Kattouw, R., & Dedding, C. (2019). Just having a computer doesn't make sense: the digital divide from the perspective of mothers with a low socio-economic position. New Media and Society, 21(11-12), doi: 10.1177/1461444819846059.
• Gonçalves, A. B. (2010). An extension of GIS-based least-cost path modelling to the location of wide paths. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(7). doi: 10.1080/13658810903401016.
• GUS (2019). Information society in Poland. Results of statistical surveys in the years 2015-2019. Szczecin. Statistical Office in Szczecin. Centre for Science, Technology, Innovation and Information Society Statistics.
• Helsper, E. J. (2017). The social relativity of digital exclusion: applying relative deprivation theory to digital inequalities. Communication Theory, 27(3). doi: 10.1111/comt.12110.
• Hidalgo, A., Gabaly, S., Morales-Alonso, G., & Urueña, A. (2020). The digital divide in light of sustainable development: an approach through advanced machine learning techniques. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119754.
• Huxhold, O., Hees, E., & Webster, N. J. (2020). Towards bridging the grey digital divide: changes in internet access and its predictors from 2002 to 2014 in Germany. European Journal of Ageing. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10433-020-00552-z.
• Johansson, S., Gulliksen, J., & Gustavsson, C. (2020). Disability digital divide: the use of the Internet, smartphones, computers and tablets among people with disabilities in Sweden. Universal Access in the Information Society. doi: 10.1007/s10209-020-00714-x.
• Kennedy, M. (2009). Introducing geographic information systems with ArcGIS. New Jersey: Wiley.
• Korzeb, Z., & Niedziółka, P. (2020). Resistance of commercial banks to the crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic: the case of Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 15(2). doi: 10.24136/eq.2020.010.
• Kufel, T. (2020). ARIMA-based forecasting of the dynamics of confirmed Covid-19 cases for selected European countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 15(2). doi: 10.24136/eq.2020.009.
• Liu, C. (2017). International competitiveness and the fourth industrial revolution. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(4). doi: 10.15678/EBER.2017.050405.
• Loktieva, I. (2016). Approaches to empirical analysis of social exclusion: international comparison. Economics and Sociology, 9(2). doi: 10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-2/10.
• Moroz, M. (2017). The level of development of the digital economy in Poland and selected European countries: a comparative analysis. Foundations of Management, 9. doi: 10.1515/fman-2017-0014.
• Nizamuddin, R., Afidh, P. F., Ardiansyah, Sofyan, H., & Anisah, N. (2020). Spatial analysis for calculating closest distance of operators' location to Base Transceiver Station (BTS) in Banda Aceh city. In IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, 796. The 9th AIC 2019 on Sciences & Engineering (9thAIC-SE) 18-20 September 2019, Banda Aceh.
• OECD (2001). Information and communication technologies and rural development. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264193079-en.
• Office of Electronic Communications. Retrieved from https://bip.uke.gov.pl/pozwolenia-radiowe/wykaz-pozwolen-radiowych-tresci/stacje-gsm-umts-lteoraz-cdma,12.html

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24136/oc.2020.017