The Study of Multidimensional Collaborative Consumption Utility

• Autorzy: Agnieszka Małecka , Gregor Pfajfar

Warianty tytułu

Badanie wielowymiarowości użyteczności konsumpcji kolaboratywnej

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The limited amount of research on collaborative consumption and its' different results suggest that the individual motivations for consumers' engagement are likely to be more complex and quite dissimilar to the motivation for participation in other social sharing initiatives. Except few studies on local community or environmental benefits, key motivators generating perceived utility for participants engaging in collaborative consumption were mostly connected with intrinsic benefits. In fact, researchers suggest that drivers for collaborative consumption seem to be broad and wide-ranging, from individual to social or even political ones. This study is a quantitative research on the influence of foregoing factors as components of perceived utility on collaborative consumption propensity. (original abstract)

Ograniczona liczba opracowań na temat konsumpcji kolaboratywnej, a także odmienne wyniki badań sugerują, że motywacja indywidualna uczestnictwa w zjawisku może być bardziej skomplikowana i różna od motywacji uczestnictwa w innych przejawach współdzielenia. Poza kilkoma badaniami odnoszącymi się do korzyści lokalnych społeczności i korzyści środowiskowych główne motywy postrzeganej użyteczności zjawiska dotyczyły przede wszystkim korzyści indywidualnych. Tym niemniej dostępne opracowania sugerują, że uwarunkowania uczestnictwa w konsumpcji kolaboratywnej mogą przyjmować znacznie szerszy zasięg, obejmując czynniki indywidualne, społeczne, a nawet polityczne. W niniejszym artykule autorzy, w oparciu o badania ilościowe, podejmują próbę określenia zależności pomiędzy tymi czynnikami a postrzeganą użytecznością konsumpcji kolaboratywnej. (abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Collaborative consumption; Sharing economy; Research results

PL

Konsumpcja kolaboratywna; Ekonomia współdzielenia; Wyniki badań

• Czasopismo: Marketing i Rynek
• Rocznik: 2020
• Numer: nr 8
• Strony: 12--20

Twórcy

autor

Agnieszka Małecka

• University of Economics in Katowice, Poland

autor

Gregor Pfajfar

• University of Ljubljana, Slovenia

Bibliografia

• Albinsson, P. A. & Perera, B. Y. (2012). Alternative marketplaces in the 21st century: building community through sharing events. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11, 303-315. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1389
• Arena, R. (2000). 11 JB. Say and the French liberal school of the nineteenth century. Reflections on the Classical Canon in Economics: Essays in Honour of Samuel Hollander.
• Arsel, Z. & Dobscha, S. (2011). Hybrid pro-social exchange systems: The case of Freecycle. ACR North American Advances.
• Bainbridge, J. (2013). Understanding collaborative consumption. Marketing Magazine, September 6. http://www.marketingmagazine.co.uk/article/1208887/understanding-collaborativeconsumption.
• Barbarossa, C. & De Pelsmacker, P. (2016). Positive and negative antecedents of purchasing eco-friendly products: A comparison between green and non-green consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(2), 229-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2425-z
• Bardhi, F. & Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 881-898. https://doi.org/10.1086/666376
• Barnes, S. J. & Mattsson, J. (2016). Understanding current and future issues in collaborative consumption: A four-stage Delphi study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 200-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.006
• Belk, R. (2007). Why not share rather than own?. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1), 126-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716206298483
• Belk, R. (2009). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 715-734. https://doi.org/10.1086/612649
• Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595-1600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.10.001
• Benoit, S., Baker, T. L., Bolton, R. N., Gruber, T. & Kandampully, J. (2017). A triadic framework for collaborative consumption (CC): Motives, activities and resources & capabilities of actors. Journal of Business Research, 79, 219-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.05.004
• Bogacz-Wojtanowska, E. (2013). Zdolności organizacyjne a współdziałanie organizacji pozarządowych. Kraków: Instytut Spraw Publicznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
• Botsman, R. & Rogers, R. (2010). What's mine is yours. The rise of collaborative consumption. HARPER BUSINESS.
• Botsman, R. & Rogers, R. (2011). What's mine is yours: how collaborative consumption is changing the way we live.
• Bucher, E., Fieseler, C. & Lutz, C. (2016). What's mine is yours (for a nominal fee) - Exploring the spectrum of utilitarian to altruistic motives for Internet-mediated sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 316-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.002
• Buczynski, B. (2013). Sharing is good: How to save money, time and resources through collaborative consumption. New Society Publishers.
• Catulli, M., Lindley, J. K., Reed, N. B., Green, A., Hyseni, H. & Kiri, S. (2013). What is Mine is NOT Yours: Further insight on what access-based consumption says about consumers. In Consumer Culture Theory (pp. 185-208). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0885-2111(2013)0000015012
• Cohen, B. & Kietzmann, J. (2014). Ride on! Mobility business models for the sharing economy. Organization & Environment, 27(3), 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614546199
• Corciolani, M., & Dalli, D. (2014). Gift-giving, sharing and commodity exchange at Bookcrossing.com: new insights from a qualitative analysis. Management Decision, 52(4), 755-776. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2012-0241
• Dalli, D., & Corciolani, M. (2008). Collective forms of resistance: The transformative power of moderate communities. International Journal of Market Research, 50(6), 757-775. https://doi.org/10.2501/S1470785308200195
• Ertz, M., Durif, F. & Arcand, M. (2016). Collaborative consumption or the rise of the two-sided consumer. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(6).
• Felson, M. & Spaeth, J. L. (1978). Community structure and collaborative consumption: A routine activity approach. American Behavioral Scientist, 21(4), 614-624. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427802100411
• Gansky, L. (2012). The mesh. Why the future of business is sharing. Pbk. ed. New York, NY: Portfolio.
• Glimcher, P. W. & Fehr, E. (Eds.). (2009). Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain. Academic Press.
• Grégoire, Y., Laufer, D. & Tripp, T. M. (2010). A comprehensive model of customer direct and indirect revenge: Understanding the effects of perceived greed and customer power. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(6), 738-758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-009-0186-5
• Guiot, D. & Roux, D. (2010). A second-hand shoppers' motivation scale: Antecedents, consequences, and implications for retailers. Journal of Retailing, 86(4), 355-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2010.08.002
• Habibi, M. R., Kim, A. & Laroche, M. (2016). From sharing to exchange: An extended framework of dual modes of collaborative nonownership consumption. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 1(2), 277-294. https://doi.org/10.1086/684685
• Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M. & Ukkonen, A. (2016). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2047-2059. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23552
• Hartl, B., Hofmann, E. & Kirchler, E. (2016). Do we need rules for 'what's mine is yours'? Governance in collaborative consumption communities. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2756-2763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.011
• Harvey, J., Smith, A. & Golightly, D. (2017). Giving and sharing in the computer-mediated economy. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 16(4), 363-371. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1499
• Hawlitschek, F., Teubner, T. & Gimpel, H. (2018). Consumer motives for peer-to-peer sharing. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.326
• Helm, A. E., Moulard, J. G. & Richins, M. (2015). Consumer cynicism: Developing a scale to measure underlying attitudes influencing marketplace shaping and withdrawal behaviours. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(5), 515-524. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12191
• Hsu, C. L. & Lin, J. C. C. (2008). Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Information & Management, 45(1), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.11.001
• Jaeggi, A. V. & Gurven, M. (2013). Natural cooperators: food sharing in humans and other primates. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 22(4), 186-195. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21364
• John, N. A. (2013). The social logics of sharing. The Communication Review, 16(3), 113-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2013.807119
• Laamanen, M., Wahlen, S. & Campana, M. (2015). Mobilising collaborative consumption lifestyles: A comparative frame analysis of time banking. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(5), 459-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2013.807119
• Lamberton, C. (2015). Consumer Sharing: Collaborative Consumption, from Theoretical Roots to New Opportunities. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2726285
• Lawson, S. J., Gleim, M. R., Perren, R. & Hwang, J. (2016). Freedom from ownership: An exploration of access-based consumption. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2615-2623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.021
• Lindblom, A. & Lindblom, T. (2018). Applying the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior to Predict Collaborative Consumption Intentions. In Collaborative Value Co-creation in the Platform Economy (pp. 167-182). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8956-5_9
• Małecka, A. (2019). Altruistyczny wymiar konsumpcji kolaboratywnej - czy naprawdę istnieje?: na przykładzie wspólnego użytkowania sprzętu medycznego. Marketing i Rynek, (5), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.33226/1231-7853.2019.5.3
• Marciniak S. (ed.). (2013). Makro- i mikroekonomia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Mattessich, P. W., Murray-Close, M. & Monsey, B. R. (2001). The Wilder Collaboration Factors Inventory: assessing your collaboration's strengths and weaknesses. Wilder Pub. Center.
• Möhlmann, M. (2015). Collaborative consumption: determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14(3), 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1512
• Owyang, J., Samuel, A. & Grenville, A. (2014). Sharing is the new buying: How to win in the collaborative economy. Vision Critical/Crowd Companies.
• Ozanne, L. K. & Ballantine, P. W. (2010). Sharing as a form of anti-consumption? An examination of toy library users. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 485-498. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.334
• Ozanne, L. K. & Ozanne, J. L. (2011). A child's right to play: the social construction of civic virtues in toy libraries. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30(2), 264-278. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.30.2.264
• Pawlicz, A. (2019). Ekonomia współdzielenia na rynku usług hotelarskich. Niedoskonałości. Pośrednicy. Regulacje. Szczecin: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego.
• Perren, R. & Grauerholz, L. (2015). Collaborative consumption. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 4, 139-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.64143-0
• Piscicelli, L., Cooper, T. & Fisher, T. (2015). The role of values in collaborative consumption: insights from a product-service system for lending and borrowing in the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.032
• Reeb, R. N., Folger, S. F., Langsner, S., Ryan, C. & Crouse, J. (2010). Self-efficacy in service-learning community action research: Theory, research, and practice. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46(3-4), 459-471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9342-9
• Roos, D. & Hahn, R. (2017). Does shared consumption affect consumers' values, attitudes, and norms? A panel study. Journal of Business Research, 77, 113-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.04.011
• Rubin, P. H. (2009). Altruism and self interest in medical decision making. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 37(3), 401-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00401.x
• Scaraboto, D. (2015). Selling, sharing, and everything in between: The hybrid economies of collaborative networks. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(1), 152-176. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv004
• Szymczak, M. (2002). Słownik języka polskiego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Trenz, M., Frey, A. & Veit, D. (2018). Disentangling the facets of sharing: a categorization of what we know and don't know about the sharing economy. Internet Research, 28(4), 888-925. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-11-2017-0441
• Watt, J. (1997). Using the Internet for quantitative survey research. Quirk's Marketing Research Review, 248, 1-5.
• Willer, R., Flynn, F. J. & Zak, S. (2012). Structure, identity, and solidarity: A comparative field study of generalized and direct exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(1), 119-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839212448626
• Zimmermann, V. (2016). Der Konsument in der digital-kollaborativen Wirtschaft: Eine empirische Untersuchung der Anbieterseite auf C2C-Plattformen. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16652-6

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.33226/1231-7853.2020.8.2