Koncepcje nowej muzeologii w kontekście zarządzania kulturą niematerialną i własnością intelektualną w instytucjach kultury

• Autorzy: Teodora Konach

Warianty tytułu

Concepts of New Museology in the Context of Intangible Culture and Intellectual Property Management in Cultural Institutions

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In the 1960s, researchers began their quest for a new role and development path of museums. At present, numerous theories and concepts, particularly from the New Museology trend, refer to the issues of identification, management, and protection of intangible cultural heritage in compliance with the provisions of the 2003 UNESCO Convention. This article aims to contextualize the intangible cultural heritage within the interdisciplinary studies on cultural heritage and to determine the models of presenting and interpreting such heritage in cultural institutions and other dedicated facilities. The analysis was premised on the comparative museology studies and the latest comparative techniques (Legrand 1999) as part of critical cultural & heritage studies. The paper also presents the preliminary results of the qualitative studies carried out in selected cultural institutions in Poland, Bulgaria, and Austria. Final deliberations point out the potential of the intangible cultural heritage as a way of interpreting tangible artifacts in the practice of museums and cultural institutions and show the legal and administrative ways of including the heritage into such institutions' activities. They also serve as a basis for further queries about the mission of museums and the new role of cultural institution personnel. (original abstract)

Jaka jest lub może być rola niematerialnego dziedzictwa kulturowego w instytucjach lub placówkach związanych z ochroną oraz promocją kultury i dziedzictwa? Ta problematyka pojawia się w ramach współczesnych akademickich dyskusji na temat tzw. "alternatywnego dyskursu muzeologicznego"4czy też w uznanej już i utrwalonej koncepcji "Nowej Muzeologii", ale przede wszystkim jest obecnie analizowana jako instrument dialogu i współpracy pomiędzy instytucją a wspólnotą, której służy - jako placówka oświatowa i kulturalna - lub też jako miejsce komunikacji ze społecznością, której dziedzictwo prezentuje. Podobne rozważania są niezwykle aktualne, gdy weźmie się pod uwagę fakt, że konwencja z 2003 roku jest pierwszym wiążącym dokumentem międzynarodowym, który wprowadza możliwość uznania podmiotu zbiorowego (wspólnot/społeczności) za właściciela praw. Do tej pory taka konstrukcja pojawiała się w dokumentach modelowych, głównie Światowej Organizacji Własności Intelektualnej (WIPO), które jednak nie były wiążące, z reguły przez wzgląd na sprzeciw państw rozwiniętych. Co więcej, konwencja z 2003 roku wprowadza wymóg ścisłej współpracy przy tworzeniu list oraz inwentarzy narodowych z przedstawicielami konkretnych wspólnot6. Tak więc konwencyjne mechanizmy ochrony i prezentacji kultury niematerialnej mogą się przyczynić do budowania partycypacji społecznej oraz ogólnej demokratyzacji procesów ochrony i interpretacji dziedzictwa. (fragment tekstu)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Museums; Cultural institutions; Cultural management; Intellectual property

PL

Muzea; Instytucje kultury; Zarządzanie kulturą; Własność intelektualna

• Czasopismo: Zarządzanie w Kulturze
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: 18
• Numer: z. 2
• Strony: 173--194

Twórcy

autor

Teodora Konach

Bibliografia

• Agnew J., Place and Politics: The Geographical Mediation of State and Society, London 1987.
• Aikawa N., An Historical Overview of the Preparation of the UNESCO International Convention for the Safeguarding for the Intangible Cultural Heritage, "Museum Internationalˮ 2004, vol. 56 (1-2), s. 137-149.
• Akagawa N., Smith L., Intangible Heritage, London 2008.
• Anderson B., Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London 2006.
• Anderson J., Bowrey C., The cultural politics of the IP commons: whose agendas are being advanced?, "Australian Intellectual Property Law Resourcesˮ 2006, 17, http://www.austlii.edu. au/au/other/AIPLRes/2006/17.html [odczyt: 20.06.2015].
• Atalay S., Decolonizing archaeology (special issue), "American Indian Quarterlyˮ 2006, vol. 30(1).
• Augé M., J.-P. Colleyn, The World of the Anthropologist, Oxford-New York 2006.
• Bell C., Napoleon V., 2008. Introduction, methodology and thematic overview [w:] C. Bell, V. Napoleon (red.), First nations cultural heritage and law: case studies, voices and perspectives, Vancouver 2008, s. 1-32.
• Bell C., Napoleon V., First nations cultural heritage and law: case studies, voices and perspectives, Vancouver 2008a.
• Bouchenaki M., Editorial, "Museum Internationalˮ 2004, vol. 56, Issue 1-2, s. 6-10.
• Boylan P., Ecomuseums and the new museology - some definitions, "Museums Journalˮ 1992, vol. 92(4), s. 29-30.
• Boylan P., The Intangible Heritage: A Challenge for Museums and Museum Professionals Training, "International Journal of Intangible Cultural Heritageˮ 2006, vol. 1, s. 54-65.
• Brodl S., "Grasping the intangible": die UNESCO-Konvention zur Erhaltung des immateriellen Kulturerbes und ihre Umsetzung in Österreich, Wien 2008.
• Brown M.F., Who owns native culture?, Cambridge, MA, 2003.
• Brown M.F., Heritage as property [w:] K. Verdery, C. Humphrey (red.), Property in question: value transformation in the global economy, Oxford 2004, s. 49-68.
• Brown M.F., Heritage trouble: recent work on the protection of intangible cultural property, "International Journal of Cultural Propertyˮ 2005, vol. 12, s. 40-61.
• Budhwa R., An alternate model for First Nations involvement in resource management archaeology, "Canadian Journal of Archaeologyˮ 2005, vol. 29, s. 20-45.
• Butler B.J., Return To Alexandria - An Ethnography of Cultural Heritage Revivalism and Museum Memory, Walnut Creek, CA, 2007.
• Buttimer A., Home, reach and the sense of place [w:] A. Buttimer, D. Seamon (red.), The Human Experience of Space and Place, London 1980, s. 166-187.
• Castellanet C., Jordan C.F., Participatory action research in natural resource management, New York 2002.
• Castells M., Materials for an Exploratory Theory of the Network Society, "British Journal of Sociologyˮ 2000, vol. 51(1), s. 5-24.
• Clifford J., Museums as Contact Zones. Rozdział siódmy, Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century, Cambridge 1987, s. 188-219.
• Cooke B., Kothari U., Participation: the new tyranny?, London 2001.
• Corsane G., Holleman W., Ecomuseums: a brief evaluation [w:] R. De Jong (red.), Museums and the Environment, Pretoria 1993.
• Corsane G.E., Davis P.S., Hawke S.K., Stefano M.L., Ecomuseology: A holistic and integrated model for ssafegurding 'spirit of place' in the North East of England. In 16th ICOMOS General Assembly and International Symposium: 'Finding the spirit of place - between the tangible and the intangible', 29 września - 4 października 2008, Quebec, Canada.
• Corsane G., Davis P., Elliott S., Maggi M., Murtas D., Rogers S., Ecomuseum Evaluation: Experiences in Piemonte and Liguria, Italy, "International Journal of Heritage Studiesˮ 2007, vol. 13(2), s. 101-106.
• Crooke E., Museum and Community [w:] Sh. Macdonald (red.), A companion to Museum Studies, Oxford 2008, s. 179-185.
• Davis P., Ecomuseum: A Sense of Place, London 1999.
• Davis P., Ecomuseums and sustainability in Italy, Japan and China: adaptation through imple-mentation [w:] S.J. Knell, S. MacLeod, S.E.R. Watson (red.), Museum Revolutions: How Museums Change and are Changed, London-New York 2007.
• De Jong R., Museums and the Environment, Pretoria 1993.
• De Miguel Asensio P.A., Transnational contracts concerning the commercial exploitation of intangible cultural heritage [w:] T. Scovazzi, B. Ubertazzi, L. Zagato (red.), Il patrimonio culturaleintangibile nelle sue diverse dimensioni, Milano 2012, s. 93-126.
• De Varine H., L'initiative communautaire: recherche et experimentation, Paris 1991.
• Denzin N.K., Lincoln Y.S, Smith L.T., Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2008.
• Eriksen T.H., Between Universalism and Relativism: A Critique of the UNESCO Concept of Culture [w:] J.K. Cowan, H.-B. Dembour (red.), Culture And Rights: Anthropological Perspective, Cambridge 2001, s. 127-148.
• Ferris N., Between colonial and indigenous archaeologies: legal and extra-legal ownership of the archaeological past in North America, "Canadian Journal of Archaeologyˮ 2003, vol. 27, s. 54-190.
• Freire P., Cultural action for freedom, Harmondsworth 1972.
• Fuller N., The Museum as a Vehicle for Community Empowerment: The Ak-Chin Indian Community Ecomuseums Project [w:] I. Karp, Ch. M. Kreamer, S. Lavine (red.), Museums and communities: the politics of public culture, Washington 1992, s. 327-365.
• Hafstein V. Tr., The Politics of Origin: Collective Creation Revisited, "Journal of American Folklore" 2004, vol. 117(465), s. 300-315.
• Hafstein V. Tr., Bendix R., Culture and Property. An Introduction, "Ethnologia Europaeaˮ 2009, vol. 39(2), s. 5.
• Hall S., Introduction [w:] S. Hall (red.), Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, London 1997, s. 1-11.
• Hall S., Culture, Community and Nation [w:] D. Boswell, J. Evans (red.), Representing the Nation: A Reader, London 1999, s. 152-169.
• Hamilakis Y., From ethics to politics [w:] Y. Hamilakis, P. Duke (red.), Archaeology and capitalism: from ethics to politics, Walnut Creek, CA, 2007, s. 15-40.
• Hazucha B., Community as a Holder of Intangible Cultural Heritage (A Broader Public Policy Perspective) [w:] T. Kono (red.), Intangible Cultural Heritage and Intellectual Property (Communities, Cultural Diversity and Sustainable Development), Antwerp 2009.
• Hendrix J., Reclaiming Culture, Oxford 2005.
• Hilty R.M., Rationales for the Legal Protection of Intangible Goods and Cultural Heritage, "International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Lawˮ 2009, vol. 40, s. 883-911.
• Hooper-Greenhill E., Museums and the Interpretation of Visual Culture, London-New York 2000.
• Israel B., Schulz A.J., Parker E.A., Review of community-based Research: Assessing Partnership Approaches to Improve Public Health, "Ann. Rev. Public Healthˮ 1998, vol. 19, s. 173-202.
• Janke T., Indigenous Intangible Cultural Heritage and Ownership of Copyright [w:] T. Kono (red.), Intangible Cultural Heritage and Intellectual Property (Communities, Cultural Diversity and Sustainable Development), Antwerp 2009.
• Johnson V., Getting over terra nullius; Australian Registrars Committee Conference. Melbourne, Australia, 2001, http://www.eniar.org/news/art13.html [odczyt: 21.06.2015].
• Kaplan F.E.S., Making and Remaking National Identities [w:] Sh. Macdonal (red.), A Companion to Museum Studies, Oxford 2006, s. 152-169.
• Karp I., Kreamer Ch., Levine S., Museum and Communities: The politics and Public Culture, Washington, DC, 1992.
• Kearney A., Intangible Cultural Heritage (Global Awareness and Local Interest) [w:] L. Smith, N. Akagawa (red.), Intangible Cultural Heritage, London 2009.
• Kirshenblatt-Gimblett B., Intangible Heritage as Metacultural Production, "Museum Internationalˮ 2004, vol. 56, 221-222, s. 52-65.
• Konach T., Problematyka prawnej ochrony dziedzictwa niematerialnego na przykładzie przejawów folkloru, "Zarządzanie w Kulturzeˮ 2014, t.15, z.1, s. 29-38.
• Konach T., Intangible cultural heritage projects - National policies and strategies. The creation of intangible cultural heritage inventories, "ENCATC Journal of Cultural and Policyˮ 2015, vol. 5(1), s. 67-79.
• Kono T., Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage (Unresolved Issues and Unaswered Questions) [w:] T. Kono (red.), Intangible Cultural Heritage and Intellectual Property (Communities, Cultural Diversity and Sustainable Development), Antwerp 2009.
• Kono T., Geographical Indication and Intangible Cultural Heritage [w:] B. Ubertazzi, E. Muñiz Espada (red.), Le indicazioni di qualità degli alimenti, Milan 2009a.
• Kreps Ch., Liberation Culture: Cross-Cultural Perspectives in Museums, Curation and Heritage Preservation, London-New York 2003.
• Kreps Ch., Indigenous Curation as Intangible Heritage: Thoughts on the Relevance of the 2003 UNESCO Convention, "Theorizing Cultural Heritageˮ 2005, vol. 1(2), s. 3-8.
• Kurin R., Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage in the 2003 UNESCO Convention: a Critical Appraisal, "Museum Internationalˮ 2004, vol. 56(1-2), s. 66-77.
• Legrand P., Le droit comparé, Paris 1999.
• Lewinski S., International Copyright Law and Policy, UK 2008.
• Londres-Fonseca M.C.L. da, Intangible Cultural Heritage and Museum Exhibitions, "ICOM UK Newsˮ 2002, vol. 63, s. 8-9.
• Lynott M.J., Wylie A., Ethics in American archaeology: challenges for the 90s (II wyd.), Washington, DC, 2000.
• Macdonald Sh., A Companion to Museum Studies, Oxford 2006.
• Malraux A., La musée imaginaire, Paris 1965.
• Marrie H., The UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage and the Protection and Maintenance of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Indigenous Peoples [w:] L. Smith, N. Akagawa (red.), Intangible Cultural Heritage, London 2009.
• Matsura K., Preface, "Museum Internationalˮ 2004, vol. 221-222, s. 4-5.
• Minkler M., Wallerstein N., Community based participatory research for health, San Francisco, CA, 2003.
• Nas J.M., Masterpieces of Oral and Intangible Culture: Reflections on the UNESCO World Heritage List, "Current Anthropologyˮ 2002, vol. 43(1), s. 139-148.
• Nicholas G.P., Hollowell J., Ethical challenges to a postcolonial archaeology [w:] Y. Hamilakis, P. Duke (red.), Archaeology and capitalism: from ethics to politics, Walnut Creek, CA, 2007, s. 59-82.
• Otieno-Odedek J., The Way Ahead-What Future for Geographical Indications?, Worldwide Symposium on Geographical Indications, jointly organised by the Ministry of Productive Activities of Italy and WIPO, Parma, Włochy 2005, 27-29 czerwca.
• Penny G.H., Objects of Culture: Ethnology and Ethnographic Museums in Imperial Germany, London 2002.
• Pinna G., Intangible Heritage and Museums. International Museum Day 2004 "Museums and Intangible Culture", "ICOM Newsˮ 2003, vol. 56(4), s. 3.
• Poulot D., Musée et muséologie, Paris 2005.
• Präet M., Natural Heritage-Three perspectives on Intangible Cultural Heritage, "ICOM Newsˮ 2004, vol. 57(1), s. 11.
• Primo J.S., To Think Museology Today. Sociomuseology Study Centre [w:] Museologia: Teoria e Prática, Lizbona 1999.
• Rapoport R., Three dilemmas in action research, "Human Relationsˮ 1990, vol. 23(6), s. 499-514.
• Relph E., Place and Placelessness, London 1976.
• Rivière G.H., La Muséologie selon George-Henri Rivière: Cours de Muséologie/Textes et Témoinagnages, Paris 1989.
• Rowlands M., Heritage and Cultural Property [w:] V. Burchli (red.), The Material Culture Reader, Oxford-New York 2002, s. 105-114.
• Saito H., Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Japan [w:] Sub-regional Experts Meeting in Asia on Intangible Cultural Heritage: Safeguarding and Inventory Making Methodologies, Bankog/Tajlandia 2005, 13-15 grudnia, s. 1-14.
• Santova M., Construire un inventaire: L'example bulgare, Symposium Le patrimoine culturel immaterial de l'Europe: inventer son inventaire, Institut National du Patrimoine, Paris, 30 novembre 2007.
• Santova М., Torsen M., Anderson J., Intellectual Property and the Safeguarding of (3-7 May 2010, Ramnicu Valchea, Romania), "Balgarski folklorˮ nr 3-4, s. 189-191.
• Santova М., Pravata na choveka i nematerialnoto kulturno nasledstvo [The Rights of Man and the Intangible Cultural Heritage], "Balgarski folklorˮ 2010a, nr 3-4, s. 150-159.
• Santova M., Bratanova R., Zhivi choveshki sakrovishta - Bulgaria [Living Human Treasures - Bulgaria], Sofia 2004.
• Santova M., To capture the elusive. Intangible Cultural Heritage, Sofia 2014.
• Santova M., Development of National Inventories and Cultural Policies: the Bulgarian Perspective, "The IOV Journal of Intangible Cultural Heritageˮ 2015, s. 34-49.
• Skounti A., The Authentic Illusion: Humanity's intangible cultural heritage, the Moroccan experience [w:] L. Smith, N. Akagawa (red.), Intangible Heritage, London 2009.
• Skounti A., De la patrimonialisation. Comment et quand les choses deviennent-elles des patrimoines, "Hesperis-Tamudaˮ 2010, vol. XLV, s. 19-43.
• Smith L., Archaeological theory and the politics of cultural heritage, London 2004.
• Smith L.T., Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples, New York 2000.
• Smith C., Wobst H.M., Indigenous peoples and archaeology: the politics of practice, London 2005.
• Smith L., Uses of heritage, London 2006.
• Spalding J., The Poetic Museum: Reviving Historic Collections, Munich 2002.
• Telesetsky A., Traditional Knowledge: Protecting Communal Rights through a Sui Generis System [w:] J.A.R. Nafziger, T. Scovazzi (red.), Le patrimoine culturel de l'humanité, Leiden 2008.
• Torsen M., Anderson J., Intellectual Property and the Safeguarding of Traditional Cultures (Legal Issues and Practical Options for Museums, Library and Archives), WIPO 2010, s. 67-82.
• Vergo P., The New Museology, London 1989.
• Wadsworth Y., What is participatory action research? Action Research International, Paper 2, 1998, http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/ari/p-ywadsworth98.html [odczyt: 21.08.2016].
• Watkins J.E., Indigenous archaeology: American Indian values and scientific practice, Walnut 2000.
• Watson Sh., Museums and their Communities, New York 2007.
• Wendland W.B., Intangible Cultural Heritage and Intellectual property: Challenges and Future Prospects, "Museum Internationalˮ 2004, vol. 56(1-2), s. 97-107.
• Wendland W.B., Managing Intellectual Property Options When Documenting, Recording and Digitizing Intangible Cultural Heritage [w:] T. Kono (red.), Intangible Cultural Heritage and Intellectual Property (Communities, Cultural Diversity and Sustainable Development), Antwerp 2009.
• Whyte W.F., Participatory action research, Newbury Park, CA, 1991.
• Zimmerman L.J., Regaining our nerve: ethics, values, and the transformation of archaeology [w:] M.J. Lynott, A. Wylie (red.), Ethics in American archaeology: challenges for the 1990s (II ed). Washington, DC, 2000, s. 64-67.
• Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 15 April 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, 33 ILM 1197 (1994).
• Konwencja berneńska o ochronie dzieł literackich i artystycznych z dnia 9 września 1886 r., przejrzana w Berlinie dnia 13 listopada 1908 r. i w Rzymie dnia 2 czerwca 1928 r. (ratyfikowana zgodnie z ustawą z dnia 5 marca 1934 r.). Dz.U.1935.84.515.
• European Network of Ecomuseums. 2004. Declaration of Intent of the Long Net Workshop. Maj 2004. Trento, Włochy, http://www.localworlds.eu/PAPERS/intents.pdf [odczyt: 15.09.2016].
• Kit of the Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage, http://www.unesco.org/ culture/ich/en/kit [odczyt: 2.10.2016].
• Konwencja UNESCO w sprawie ochrony niematerialnego dziedzictwa kulturowego, sporządzona w Paryżu dnia 17 października 2003 r., Dz.U.2011.172.1018.
• Konwencja UNESCO w sprawie ochrony światowego dziedzictwa kulturalnego i naturalnego sporządzona dnia 16 listopada 1972 r., Dz.U.1976.32.190.
• Operational Directives for the Implementation of the UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of 2003, adopted by the General Assembly of the States Parties to the Convention at its second ordinary session in 2008 and amended at its third session in 2010.
• Powszechna konwencja o prawie autorskim zrewidowana w Paryżu dnia 24 lipca 1971 r. Dz.U.1978.8.28.
• Recommendation on the Safeguarding of Traditional Culture and Folklore/Recommandation sur la sauvegarde de la culture traditionnelle et populaire z dnia 15 listopada 1989 r., http://portal. unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13141&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html [odczyt:15.09.2016].
• Shanghai Charter, 7th Regional Assembly of the Asia Pacific Organisation International Council of Museums (ICOM) Shanghaï, China, 20-25 October 2002, http://archives.icom.museum/ shanghai_charter.html [odczyt: 16.09.2016].
• Tunis Model Law on Copyright for the Developing Countries. 1976. http://portal.unesco.org/culture/ en/files/31318/11866635053tunis_model_law_en.web.pdf/tunis_model_law_en- web.pdf [odczyt: 17.09.2016].
• United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, adopted by General Assembly Resolution 61/295 on 13 September 2007, http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/ DRIPS_en.pdf [odczyt: 13.09.2016].
• WIPO Model Provisions for National Laws on the Protection of Expressions of Folklore Against Illicit Exploitation and Other Prejudicial Actions. 1982, www.wipo.int/tk/en/documents/ pdf/1982-folklore-model- provisions.pdf [odczyt: 17.09.2016].
• WIPO/GRTKF/IC/4/4 - Technical co-operation on the legal protection of expression of folklore.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.4467/20843976ZK.17.011.7103