Kontakt z beneficjentem jako czynnik sukcesu wolontariatu pracowniczego

• Autorzy: Barbara Józefowicz , Iwona Escher , Aldona Glińska-Neweś

Warianty tytułu

Contact With Beneficiaries as a Success Factor of Corporate Volunteering

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Celem artykułu jest określenie, w jaki sposób intensywność kontaktu wolontariuszy z beneficjentami realizowanych projektów wpływa na efekty, jakie wolontariat pracowniczy przynosi organizacji. Podstawą rozważań jest badanie jakościowe przeprowadzone w 11 przedsiębiorstwach realizujących programy wolontariatu pracowniczego. Wyniki badania sugerują, że im intensywniejszy jest kontakt nawiązywany przez pracowników-wolontariuszy z beneficjentami wolontariatu, tym szerszy wachlarz kompetencji jest przez nich rozwijany. Z kolei projekty wolontariackie, w których kontakt z beneficjentem jest niewielki, sprzyjają wzmacnianiu integracji pracowników oraz ich identyfikacji z organizacją. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The aim of the article is to identify how the intensity of a volunteer contact with beneficiaries of implemented volunteer projects influences the effects that corporate volunteering brings to the organization. The analyses are based on the qualitative research conducted in 11 companies implementing corporate volunteer programs. The results of the study suggest that the more intense the contact between the volunteer-employees and the beneficiaries of volunteering is, the wider the range of competences they develop. On the other hand, volunteer projects in which contact with the beneficiary is weak contribute to strengthening the integration of employees and their identification with the organization. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu; Wolontariat; Kompetencje

EN

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR); Volunteering; Competences

• Czasopismo: Studia i Materiały / Wydział Zarządzania. Uniwersytet Warszawski
• Rocznik: 2019
• Numer: nr 2
• Strony: 5--13

Twórcy

autor

Barbara Józefowicz

• Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu

autor

Iwona Escher

• Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu

autor

Aldona Glińska-Neweś

• Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu

Bibliografia

• Avolio, B.J. i Hannah, S.T. (2008). Developmental readiness: Accelerating leader development. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 60(4), 331-347. https://doi.org/10.1037/1065-9293.60.4.331.
• Backhaus, K.B., Stone, B.A. i Heiner, K. (2002). Exploring the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Employer Attractiveness. Business and Society, 41(3), 292-318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650302041003003.
• Bartel, C.A. (2001). Social comparisons in boundary-spanning work: Effects of community outreach on members' organizational identity and identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 379-413. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094869.
• Bellé, N. (2013). Leading to make a difference: A field experiment on the performance effects of transformational leadership, perceived social impact, and public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 109-136. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut033.
• Booth, J.E., Park, K.W. i Glomb, T.M. (2009). Employer-supported volunteering benefits: Gift exchange among employers, employees, and volunteer organizations. Human Resource Management,48(2), 227-249. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20277.
• Carmeli, A., Gilat, G. i Waldman, D.A. (2007). The role of perceived organizational performance in organizational identification, adjustment and job performance. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 972-92. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00691.x.
• Chaudhary, R. i Akhouri, A. (2019). CSR perceptions and employee creativity: examining serial mediation effects of meaningfulness and work engagement. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(1), 61-74. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-01-2018-0018.
• Cooperrider, D. i Fry, R. (2012). Mirror Flourishing and the Positive Psychology of Sustainability. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 46, 3-12. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2012.su.00002.
• Devereux, P. (2008). International volunteering for development and sustainability: Outdated paternalism or a radical response to globalisation? Development in Practice, 18(3), 357-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520802030409.
• Do Paco, A. i Cláudia Nave, A. (2013). Corporate volunteering: A case study centred on the motivations, satisfaction and happiness of company employees. Employee Relations, 35(5), 547-559.
• Glavas, A. (2012). Employee Engagement and Sustainability: A Model for Implementing Meaningfulness at and in Work. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 46, 13-29. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2012.su.00003.
• Glavas, A. i Piderit, S.K. (2009). How does doing good matter? Effects of corporate citizenship on employees. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 36, 51-70. http://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2009.wi.00007.
• Glavas, A. i Kelly, K. (2014). The effects of perceived corporate social responsibility on employee attitudes, Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(2), 165-202. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20143206.
• Grant, A.M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 393-417. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351328.
• Grant, A.M. (2012a). Giving time, time after time: Work design and sustained employee participation in corporate volunteering. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 589-615. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0280.
• Grant, A.M. (2012b). Leading with meaning: Beneficiary contact, prosocial impact, and the performance effects of transformational leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 458-476. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0588.
• Grant, A.M., Dutton, J.E. i Rosso, B. (2008). Giving commitment: Employee support programs and the prosocial sensemaking process. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 898-918. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.34789652.
• Grant, A.M. (2008). Does Intrinsic Motivation Fuel the Prosocial Fire? Motivational Synergy in Predicting Persistence, Performance, and Productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.48.
• Gratton, L. i Ghoshal, S. (2003). Managing personal human capital: New ethos for the 'Volunteer' Employee. European Management Journal, 21(1), 1-10.
• Greening, D.W. i Turban, D.B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business and Society, 39, 254-80. http://doi.org/10.1177/000765030003900302.
• Gutek, B.A., Bhappu, A.D., Liao-Troth, M.A. i Cherry, B. (1999). Distinguishing between service relationships and encounters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(2), 218-233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.218.
• Haski-Leventhal, D., Kach, A. i Pournader, M. (2019). Employee Need Satisfaction and Positive Workplace Outcomes: The Role of Corporate Volunteering. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(3), 593-615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764019829829.
• Jones, D.A. (2010). Does serving the community also serve the company? Using organizational identification and social exchange theories to understand employee responses to a volunteerism programme. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 857-78. http://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X477495.
• Kahn, W.A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
• Keyes, C.L.M. (2009). Toward a science of mental health. W S.J. Lopez i C.R. Snyder (red.). Oxford handbook of positive psychology (ss. 89-95). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Lavine, M. (2012). Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and work meaningfulness, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 46(2), 53-70.
• Lin, C., Lyau, N., Tsai, Y., Chen, W. i Chiu, C. (2010). Modeling corporate citizenship and its relationship with organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 357-72. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0364-x.
• Llopis, O. i D'Este, P. (2016). Beneficiary contact and innovation: The relation between contact with patients and medical innovation under different institutional logics. Research Policy, 45(8), 1512-1523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.004.
• May, D.R., Gilson, R.L. i Harter, L.M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11-37. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317904322915892.
• Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. i Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage: London.
• Mirvis, P. (2012). Employee engagement and CSR: Transactional, relational, developmental approaches. California Management Review, 54, 93-117. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2012.54.4.93.
• Morrow-Howell, N., Hinterlong, J., Rozario, P.A. i Tang, F. (2003). Effects of volunteering on the well-being of older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58(3), S137-S145. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/58.3.S137.
• Muthuri, J.N., Matten, D. i Moon, J. (2009). Employee volunteering and social capital: Contributions to corporate social responsibility. British Journal of Management, 20(1), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00551.x.
• Rodell, J.B. (2013). Finding meaning through volunteering: Why do employees volunteer and what does it mean for their jobs? Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1274-1294. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0611.
• Rok, B. (2004). Odpowiedzialny biznes w nieodpowiedzialnym Świecie. Warszawa: Forum Odpowiedzialnego Biznesu.
• Spreitzer, G., Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S. i Grant, A. (2005). A Socially Embedded Model of Thriving at Work. Organization Science, 16(5), 537-49. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0153.
• Valéau, P., Mignonac, K., Vandenberghe, C. i Gatignon Turnau, A. (2013). A study of the relationships between volunteers' commitments to organizations and beneficiaries and turnover intentions. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 45(2), 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027620.
• Wachowiak, P. (2013). Wrażliwość społeczna przedsiębiorstwa. Analiza i pomiar. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
• Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 215-240. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.215 .

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7172/1733-9758.2019.31.1