Internal and External Sources of Knowledge in Manufacturing and Service Enterprises a Comparative Analysis of European Union Countries

• Autorzy: Joanna Wyszkowska-Kuna

Warianty tytułu

Wewnętrzne i zewnętrzne źródła wiedzy w przedsiębiorstwach przetwórczych i usługowych. Analiza porównawcza krajów Unii Europejskiej

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Along with the development of economies based on knowledge, the importance of knowledge input in production processes has been increasing. Enterprises may acquire knowledge input by developing their internal knowledge base and/or purchasing knowledge from external entities. Their internal knowledge base may be developed mainly by employing highly qualified specialists and their own research. The aim of the paper is to examine the importance of all these knowledge sources in manufacturing and services enterprises, as well as to compare their changing role with productivity performance in EU countries. It is based on data from the World Input-Output Database, Eurostat, OECD and EU KLEMS. Thanks to the availability of relevant data, the analysed period covers the years 1995-2018. The study demonstrates that knowledge base, developed through both internal and external sources, played a significantly more important role in the EU-15 than in the EU-12, with a tendency to decrease these disparities (most visible with respect to KIBS input). The growing importance of an external knowledge base was more visible and stable in the EU-12 countries. R&D expenditures were an exception. The recent financial crisis heavily affected only external R&D expenditures. (original abstract)

Znaczenie wkładu wiedzy w procesy produkcyjne wzrasta wraz z rozwojem gospodarek opartych na wiedzy. Przedsiębiorstwa mogą nabywać wiedzę poprzez rozwój własnej wewnętrznej bazy wiedzy i/lub przez nabycie wiedzy od zewnętrznych podmiotów. Wewnętrzna baza wiedzy może być rozwijana głównie poprzez zatrudnianie wysoko wykwalifikowanych pracowników oraz prowadzenie własnych badań. Celem pracy jest zbadanie znaczenia tych źródeł wiedzy w przedsiębiorstwach przetwórczych i usługowych, a ponadto porównanie zmieniającej się ich roli ze zmianami w produktywności w krajach UE. Badanie oparte jest na danych pochodzących z World Input-Output Database, Eurostat, OECD i EU KLEMS. Z uwagi na dostępność danych, analizowany okres obejmuje lata 1995-2018. Badanie wykazało, że rozwój bazy wiedzy, zarówno przy udziale źródeł wewnętrznych jak i zewnętrznych, odgrywa dużo większą rolę w krajach UE-15 niż UE-12, z tendencją do zmniejszania się tych dysproporcji (najwyraźniejszą w przypadku wkładu KIBS). Wzrost znaczenia zewnętrznych źródeł wiedzy był bardziej widoczny i stabilny w krajach UE-12 niż UE-15. Wyjątkiem były wydatki na działalność B&R. Wydatki na zewnętrzne B&R były jedynym źródłem wiedzy, które zostało mocno dotknięte przez ostatni kryzys finansowy. (abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

R&D in the enterprise; Knowledge; Services; Manufacturing

PL

Sfera B+R w przedsiębiorstwie; Wiedza; Usługi; Przetwórstwo przemysłowe

• Czasopismo: Comparative Economic Research
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: 23
• Numer: nr 3
• Strony: 21--39

Twórcy

autor

Joanna Wyszkowska-Kuna

• University of Lodz, Poland

Bibliografia

• Abramovsky, L., Griffith, R., Sako, M. (2004), Offshoring of business services and its impact on the UK economy, IFS Briefing Note BN51, AIM Briefing Note. https://doi .org/10.1920/bn.ifs.2004.0051
• Baker, D. (2007), The impact of business-services use on client industries: evidence from input output data, [in:] L. Rubalcaba, H. Kox (eds), Business Services in European Economic Growth, Palgrave MacMillan, New York, pp. 97-115. https://doi.org/10 .1057/9780230228795_6
• Baldwin, R.E. (2014), Trade and Industrialisation after Globalisation's Second Unbundling: How Building and Joining a Supply Chain are Different and Why it Matters, [in:] R.C. Feenstra, A.M. Taylor (eds), Globalisation in an Age of Crisis: Multilateral Economic Cooperation in the Twenty First Century, University of Chicago Press/NBER, Chicago, IL, pp. 165-212. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226030890.003.0006
• Basit, S.A., Medase, K. (2019), The diversity of knowledge sources and its impact on firm-level innovation. Evidence from Germany, "European Journal of Innovation Management", 22 (4), pp. 681-714. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2018-0232
• Berchicci, L. (2013), Towards an open R&D system: internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance, "Research Policy", 42 (1), pp. 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.017
• Bostani, M., Daraio, C., Grosskopf, S., Roucco, G., Weber, W.L. (2020), Sources and uses of knowledge in a dynamic network technology, "International Transactions in Operational Research", 27, pp. 1821-1844. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12741
• Cotic Svetina, A., Prodan, I. (2008), How Internal and External Sources of Knowledge Contribute to Firms' Innovation Performance, "Managing Global Transitions", 6 (3), pp. 277-299.
• Dean, A., Kretschmer, M. (2007), Can ideas be capital? Factors of production in the post-industrial economy: a review and critique, "Academy of Management Review", 32 (2), pp. 573-594. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351866
• Di Cagno, D., Meliciani, V. (2005), Do inter-sectoral flows of services matter for productivity growth? An input/output analysis of OECD countries, "Economics of Innovation and New Technology", 14 (3), pp. 149-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438 59042000226239
• Divanna, J.A., Rogers, J. (2005), People - the new asset on the balance sheet, Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230509573
• EU-KLEMS (2017), Growth and Productivity Accounts: Statistical Module, ESA 2010 and ISIC Rev 4 Industry Classification, European Commission, Luxembourg.
• European System of Accounts - ESA 2010 (2013), European Commission, Luxembourg.
• Eurostat (2020a), Labour market: Employment by occupation and economic activity, European Commission, Luxembourg.
• Eurostat (2020b), Business expenditures on R&D (BERD) by NACE Rev. 2, European Commission, Luxembourg (5th March 2020).
• Eurostat (2020c), Eurostat indicators of High-tech industry and Knowledge-intensive services, Annex 3 - High-tech aggregation by NACE Rev. 2, European Commission, Luxembourg.
• Gabcanova, I. (2011), The Employees - The Most Important Asset in the Organisations, "Human Resources Management & Ergonomics", V(1).
• Garavelli, A.C., Petruzzelli, A.M., Natalicchio, A., Vanhaverbeke, W. (2013), Benefiting from Markets for Ideas - An Investigation Across Different Typologies, "International Journal of Innovation Management", 17 (6), 1340017. https://doi.org/10.1142 /S1363919613400173
• Gassmann, O. (2006), Opening Up the Innovation Process: Towards an Agenda, "R&D Management", 36 (3), pp. 223-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00437.x
• Howells, J. (1999), Research and Technology Outsourcing and Innovation Systems: An Exploratory Analysis, "Industry and Innovation", 6 (1), pp. 111-129. https://doi .org/10.1080/13662719900000007
• Jones, R.W., Kierzkowski, H. (1990), The role of services in production and international trade: a theoretical framework [in:] R.W. Jones, A. Krueger (eds), The Political Economy of International Trade, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 31-48.
• Kamuriwo, D.S., Baden-Fuller, C. (2016), Knowledge Integration Using Product R&D Outsourcing in Biotechnology, "Research Policy", 45 (5),pp. 1031-1045. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.02.009
• Keeble, D., Wilkinson, F. (eds) (2000), High-technology clusters, networking and collective learning in Europe, Ashgate, Aldershot.
• Li, X., Gagliardi, D., Miles, I. (2019), Innovation in R&D service firms: evidence from the UK, "Technology Analysis & Strategic Management", 31 (6), pp. 732-748. https:// doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1549729
• Martinez-Noya, A., Garcia-Canal, E., Guillen, M.F. (2012), International R&D Service Outsourcing by Technology-Intensive Firms: Whether and Where?, "Journal of International Management", 18 (1), pp. 18-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2011 .06.004
• Massini, S., Miozzo, M. (2010), Outsourcing and Offshoring of Business Services: Challenges to Theory, Management and Geography of Innovation, "Manchester Business School Research Paper", 604. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1683467
• Mu, J., Peng, G., Love, E. (2008), Interfirm networks, social capital, and knowledge flow, "Journal of Knowledge Management", 12 (4), pp. 86-100. https://doi.org/10.11 08/13673270810884273
• Nonaka, I. (1991), The knowledge-creating company, "Harvard Business Review", 69 (6), pp. 96-104.
• Nonaka, I. (1994), A dynamic theory of organisational knowledge creation, "Organization Science", 5 (1): pp. 14-37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
• O'Mahony, M., Timmer, M.P. (2009), Output, Input and Productivity Measures at the Industry Level: the EU KLEMS Database, "Economic Journal", 119 (538), F374-F403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02280.x
• Santamaria, L., Nieto, M.J., Barge-Gil, A. (2009), Beyond formal R&D: Taking advantage of other sources of innovation in low- and medium-technology industries, "Research Policy", 38 (3), pp. 507-517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.004
• Schnabl, E., Zenker, A. (2013), Statistical Classification of Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (KIBS) with NACE Rev.2, evoREG Research Note

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.18778/1508-2008.23.18