PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2020 | 12 | nr 3 | 67--98
Tytuł artykułu

Organizational Identification at a Multinational Company

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Objective: The present case study investigates to what extent employees working at the Dutch site of an American multinational biotechnology organization identify with this company. According to prior research, organizational identification leads to higher commitment to the organization. Gaining more insight into which factors drive or impede organizational identification can help organizations increase their employees' identification and thus, commitment. Two hypotheses were tested. First, organizational identification was expected to be higher among international employees than Dutch employees. Second, a correlation was expected between organizational identification and organizational commitment.
Methodology: A questionnaire was conducted among 296 employees of the company site. The scale of Edwards and Peccei (2007) was used to measure the construct of organizational identification. Mowday et al.'s (1979) Organizational Commitment Questionnaire was used to measure the construct of organizational commitment. All data was statistically analyzed with the software SPSS; an independent samples t-test was performed to test the first hypothesis and a Pearson correlation coefficient was computed to test the second hypothesis.
Findings: Both hypotheses were confirmed. A significant difference was found between international employees (M = 5.25, SD = 1.05, n = 81) and Dutch employees (M = 4.96, SD = 1.12, n = 215) regarding organizational identification (t(293) = -2.03, p = .04, d = 0.27). Moreover, a significant positive correlation exists between organizational identification and organizational commitment (r(295) = .81, p < .001).
Value Added: Most prior research regarding organizational identification has focused on topdown processes, stressing the roles managers play in developing organizational identification among employees. Scholars have devoted little attention to what factors drive or impede organizational identification in cross-cultural workplaces. Taking on a bottom-up perspective, this study concentrates on the impact of employees' social identities, mainly considering expatriate membership, on the extent of their organizational identification.
Recommendations: In order to increase organizational identification, multinational organizations could: 1) facilitate identity synergy by acknowledging the full portfolio of identities employees seek to enact within organizations, and 2) increase peer identification among employees by initiating group activities that facilitate peer-to-peer interactions, create a sense of community and strongly bond individuals to the organization. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
12
Numer
Strony
67--98
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Utrecht University, Netherlands
  • Utrecht University, Netherlands
Bibliografia
  • Aryee, S., & Tan, K. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of career commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40(3), 288-305.
  • Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of management, 34(3), 325-374.
  • Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of management review, 14(1), 20-39.
  • Bhatti, K. K., Nawab, S., & Akbar, A. (2011). Effect of direct participation on organizational commitment. International journal of business and social science, 2(9).
  • Bochove, M. van, & Engbersen, G. (2015). Beyond cosmopolitanism and expat bubbles: challenging dominant representations of knowledge workers and trailing spouses. Population, Space and Place, 21(4), 295-309.
  • Chattopadhyay, P. (1999). Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: The influence of demographic dissimilarity on organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management journal, 42(3), 273-287.
  • Dasgupta, M. (2015). Exploring the relevance of case study research. Vision, 19(2), 147-160.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies (pp. 95-123). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative science quarterly, 39(2), 239-263.
  • Edwards, M. R. (2005). Organizational identification: A conceptual and operational review. International journal of management reviews, 7(4), 207-230.
  • Edwards, M. R., & Peccei, R. (2007). Organizational identification: Development and testing of a conceptually grounded measure. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 16(1), 25-57.
  • Fechter, A. M. (2007). Living in a bubble. In: Going first class?: New Approaches to Privileged Travel and Movement. New York: Berghahn Books.
  • Fombelle, P. W., Jarvis, C. B., Ward, J., & Ostrom, L. (2012). Leveraging customers' multiple identities: identity synergy as a driver of organizational identification. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(4), 587-604.
  • Gautam, T., Dick, R. Van, & Wagner, U. (2004). Organizational identification and organizational commitment: Distinct aspects of two related concepts. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(3), 301-315.
  • Hannerz, U. (1990). Cosmopolitans and locals in world culture. Theory, culture & society, 7(2-3), 237-251.
  • He, H., & Brown, A. D. (2013). Organizational identity and organizational identification: A review of the literature and suggestions for future research. Group & Organization Management, 38(1), 3-35.
  • Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2001). Social identity processes in organizations. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
  • Holliday, A. (2016). Difference and awareness in cultural travel: negotiating blocks and threads. Language and Intercultural Communication, 16(3), 318-331.
  • Kanning, U. P., & Hill, A. (2013). Validation of the Organizational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ) in six languages. Journal of business and media psychology, 4(2), 11-20.
  • Kaplan, M., & Kaplan, A. (2018). The relationship between organizational commitment and work performance: A case of industrial enterprises. Journal of Economic and Social Development (JESD), 5(1), 46-50.
  • Kemmelmeier, M. (2016). Cultural differences in survey responding: Issues and insights in the study of response biases. International Journal of Psychology, 51(6), 439-444.
  • Knippenberg, D. van, Knippenberg, B. Van, Monden, L., & Lima, F. de. (2002). Organizational identification after a merger: A social identity perspective. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 233-252.
  • Knippenberg, D. van, & Schie, E. C. van (2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 73(2), 137-147.
  • Knippenberg, D. van, & Sleebos, E. (2006). Organizational identification versus organizational commitment: self-definition, social exchange, and job attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(5), 571-584.
  • Kochenov, D. (2011). Double nationality in the EU: an argument for tolerance. European Law Journal, 17(3), 323-343.
  • Kreiner, G. E., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(1), 1-27.
  • Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123.
  • Mael, F. A., & Tetrick, L. E. (1992). Identifying organizational identification. Educational and psychological measurement, 52(4), 813-824.
  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human resource management review, 1(1), 61-89.
  • Miller, V. D., Allen, M., Casey, M. K., & Johnson, J. R. (2000). Reconsidering the organizational identification questionnaire. Management communication quarterly, 13(4), 626-658
  • Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of vocational behavior, 14(2), 224-247.
  • Mukherjee, D., Hanlon, S. C., Kedia, B. L., & Srivastava, P. (2012). Organizational identification among global virtual team members. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 19(4), 526-545.
  • Nyhan, R. C. (1999). Increasing affective organizational commitment in public organizations: The key role of interpersonal trust. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19(3), 58-70.
  • Pratt, M. G. (2001). Social Identity Dynamics in Modern Organizations: An Organizational Psychology. Social identity processes in organizational contexts, 13.
  • Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of vocational behavior, 66(2), 358-384.
  • Sonderen, E. van, Sanderman, R., & Coyne, J. C. (2013). Ineffectiveness of reverse wording of questionnaire items: Let's learn from cows in the rain. PloS one, 8(7).
  • Steers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative science quarterly, 22(1), 46-56.
  • Tajfel, H. E. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
  • Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative science quarterly, 37(4), 549-579.
  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171603785

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.