Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2020 | 28 | nr 2 | 83--97
Tytuł artykułu

State Autonomy in Shaping Tax Policies : Facts and Myths Based on the Situation in OECD Countries

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Purpose: Capital flows, tax competition, multinational companies and tax havens weakens governments' ability to lead independent tax policy. This race to the bottom, especially in the case of CIT rate, seems to work. Aim of the text is to show that the governments are not as powerless as it is often claimed. Despite common opinion, nation-states retain a relatively significant autonomy in creating their own fiscal policies, including tax instruments. Size of funds kept in tax havens have not been growing for few years and international cooperation of tax authorities is more and more efficient in dealing with the tax fraud.

Methodology: The study uses desk research method for theoretical reasoning to verify the research hypothesis. Moreover, the study seeks answering if the application of EU tax policies determines national tax policy. To that end, the authors utilize time series and cause-effect analysis, as well as quantitative research for the systematization of statistical information and regression analysis for the examination of statistical dependencies. Tax competition or the functioning of tax havens naturally limits the realization of the fundamental functions of fiscal policies, although the taxation remains one of the most crucial instruments of macroeconomic and income policy of national authorities.

Findings: The most important data on public revenues structure in different OECD countries indicate that taxation remains one of the most crucial instruments of macroeconomic and income policy of national authorities. We also show that impact of FDI on hosting economy is not as positive as it is said to be. There is no relation between FDI and R&D spending and level of wages in hosting country is even affected in the negative way by the FDI inflow. Irrespective of the regulatory details introduced at the EU level - the basic factor affecting jets coordination in the field of cooperation between tax services brings effects both in terms of the current collection of tax liabilities and the creation of regulations that hinder tax avoidance and under statement assessment.

Originality/value: The study focuses on an analysis of tax policy. The view that taxation of international corporations is fraught with difficulties finds support in the undeniable reality of tax competition. Moreover, a large and growing share of profits is transferred to low-tax places. The prospects for taxing international companies with positive rates seem unoptimistic. Therefore, it is essential to check how the national economy is affected by the FDI inflow in OECD countries. (original abstract)
Opis fizyczny
  • Kozminski University
  • University of Warsaw, Poland
  • Andrews, D. (1994). Capital Mobility and State Autonomy: Toward a Structural Theory of International Monetary Relations. International Studies Quarterly, 38, 193-218.
  • Admati, A.R. and Skeptical, A. (2017). View of Financialized Corporate Governance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(3), 131-150.
  • Alstadsæter, A., Johannesen, N., and Zucman, G. (2017). Who Owns the Wealth in Tax Havens? Macro Evidence and Implications for Global Inequality. NBER Working Paper No. 23805.
  • Auerbach, A. and Bradford, D. (2004). Generalized cash flow taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 957-980.
  • Beebeejaun, A. (2018). The Efficiency of Transfer Pricing Rules as a Corrective Mechanism of Income Tax Avoidance. Journal of Civil and Legal Sciences, 7(237).
  • Bretschger, L. and Hettich, F. (2002). Globalization, capital mobility and tax competition: theory and evidence for OECD countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 18.
  • Cerny, P.G. (1995). Globalisation and the Changing Logic of Collective Action. International Organization, 49(4), 595-625.
  • Cheibub, J.A. (1998). Political Regimes and the Extractive Capacity of Governments: Taxation in Democracy and Dictatorships. World Politics, 50(3), 349-376.
  • Garrett, G. and Mitchell, D. (2001). Globalization, government spending and taxation in the OECD. European Journal of Political Research, 39(2), 145-177.
  • Gilpin, R. (2000). The Challenge of Global Capitalism: The World Economy in the 21st Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • International Monetary Fund (2019). IMF Fiscal Monitor, April 2019.
  • Kahle, K.M. and Stulz, R.M. (2017). Is the US Public Corporation in Trouble? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(3), 67-88.
  • Kleven H.J. (2014). How Can Scandinavians Tax So Much? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(4), 77-98.
  • King, S.D. (2010). Losing Control. The Emerging Threats to Western Prosperity. New Haven-London: Yale University Press.
  • Kolodko, G.W. (2016). How to Destroy a Country. The Economics and the Politics of the Greek Crisis. Rivista di Politica Economica, 2(IV-VI), 37-61.
  • Krugman, P. (2009). How Did Economist Get It So Wrong? The New York Times. 2 September 2009.
  • Kudrle, R.T. (2008). The OECD's Harmful Tax Competition Initiative and the Tax Havens: from Bombshell to Damp squib. Global Economy Journal, 8(1).
  • Legrain, Ph. (2010). Aftershock: Reshaping the World Economy After the Crisis. London: Little Brown.
  • Massey, C. and Thaler, R.H. (2012). The Loser's Curse: Decision Making & Market Efficiency in the National Football League Draft. or
  • Oxfam (2019). Off the hook: how the EU is about to whitewash the world's worst tax havens.
  • Rajan R. (2010). Fault Lines: How Hidden Fractures Still Threaten the World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University.
  • Remeur, C. (2017). Understanding the Rationale for Compiling 'Tax Haven' Lists. European Parliament Research Service Briefing.
  • Shaxson, N. (2016). Will the OECD Tax Haven Blacklist be Another White Wash?
  • Shaxson, N. and Christensen, J. (2016). Tax Competitiveness - a Dangerous Obsession. In: Th. Pogge and K. Mehta (eds.), Global Tax Fairness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sheppard, L.A. (2017). The United States as Tax Haven.
  • Stiglitz, J.E. (2018). The Euro: How a Common Currency Threatens the Future of Europe. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Tanzi, V. (2000). Globalization, Technological Developments, and the Work of Fiscal Termites. IMF Working Paper No. 00/181.
  • The Economist (2020a). Building up the pillars of state. The Economist, March 28th.
  • The Economist (2020b). Best in show. The Economist, March 28th.
  • Torslov, L., Wier, L. and Zucman, G. (2018). The Missing Profits of Nations. NBER working paper No. 24701.
  • Wright, T. and Zucman, G. (2018). The Exorbitant Tax Privilege. NBER working paper No. 24983.
  • Zingales, L. (2017). Towards a Political Theory of the Firm. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(3), 113-130.
  • Zucman, G. (2014). Taxing Across Boarder: Tracking Personal Wealth and Corporate Profits. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(4), 121-148.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.