Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2020 | nr 27 | 39--62
Tytuł artykułu

Money for Nothing? Financing the 2016 and 2020 U.S. Presidential Nomination Campaigns

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
The aim of the paper is to analyze the relationship between campaign money and winning the 2016 and 2020 presidential nominations in the United States. While in the last two decades of the twentieth century candidates who raised most money almost always became major party nominees, the record is mixed for presidential cycles 2004-2012. By comparing various dimensions of campaign finance, including activities of candidates' campaign committees and outside groups, the Author demonstrates that while successful fundraising, resulting in dozens of millions of dollars at the disposal of candidates, seems necessary to run a competitive campaign, raising the most money is no longer pre-requisite for becoming major party presidential nominee. (original abstract)
Opis fizyczny
  • Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Poland
  • Adkins, R. E., & Dowdle, A. J. (2000). Break Out the Mint Juleps? Is New Hampshire the "Primary" Culprit Limiting Presidential Nomination Forecasts?. American Politics Quarterly, 28(2), 251-269.
  • Adkins, R. E., & Dowdle, A. J. (2002). The Money Primary: What Influences the Outcome of Pre-Primary Presidential Nomination Fundraising?. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 32(2), 256-275.
  • Adkins, R. E., & Dowdle, A. J. (2005). Do Early Birds Get the Worm? Improving Timeliness of Presidential Nomination Forecasts. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 35(4), 646-660.
  • Brams, S. J. (2008). The Presidential Election Game. Wellesley: A. K. Peters.
  • Brown, C. W., Jr., Powell, L. W., & Wilcox, C. (1995). Serious Money: Fundraising and Contributing in Presidential Nomination Campaigns. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bycoffee, A. (2016). The Endorsement Primary. (21/07/2017).
  • Center for Responsive Politics. (2016). Also-Rans: 2016 Presidential Race. (23/08/2010).
  • Center for Responsive Politics. (2020a). Top Donors to Outside Spending Groups, 2010-2020. (23/08/2020).
  • Center for Responsive Politics. (2020b). Expenditures Breakdown, Tom Steyer, 2020 cycle. (23.08.2020).
  • Center for Responsive Politics. (2020c). Expenditures Breakdown, Michel Bloomberg, 2020 cycle. (23/08/2020).
  • Cohen, M., David, K., Noel, H., & Zaller, J. (2008). The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations before and after Reform. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Confessore, N., & Yourish, K. (2016), $2Billion Worth of Free Media for Donald Trump. The New York Times, 15.03.
  • Damore, D.F. (1997). A Dynamic Model of Candidate Fundraising: The Case of Presidential Nomination Campaigns. Political Research Quarterly, 50(2), 343-364.
  • Democratic Party of the United States (2019). Call for the 2020 Democratic National Convention. (21/08/2020).
  • FEC (1996). Presidential Receipts through Deember 31, 1995. (15/06/2020).
  • FEC (2016a). Presidential Campaign Finance Summaries. (15/06/2020).
  • FEC (2016b). Presidential Pre-Nomination Campaign Disbursements May 31, 2016. (15/06/2020).
  • FEC (2016c). Donald Trump for President, Inc. Committee fillings, 2015-2016. (15/06/2020).
  • FEC (2016d). Priorities USA Action, Independent Expenditures, 2015-2016.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.