PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2020 | nr 4 (212) | 399--410
Tytuł artykułu

Gift and the Coefficient of Sociability Relational Sociology and the Anti-Utilitarian Movement in the Social Sciences

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
At the beginning of the 1980s, Pierpaolo Donati initiated in Italy the relational turn in sociology, while in France Alain Caillé stipulated the anti-utilitarian movement in social sciences. The acronym MAUSS (from Mouvement Anti-Utilitariste en Sciences Sociales) simultaneously refers to the surname of Marcel Mauss, author of the pioneering work on the gift-Essai sur le don. This movement forms and spreads a new gift paradigm. The notion of the gift has shifted from a specific phenomenon researched in archaic societies towards a basic category for theorizing social order and taking a central position in research on modern transformations. The relational paradigm also focuses on the gift as a crucial aspect of social relations, and on its importance for the civil society. The article traces and discusses various interpretations of the concept of gift, along with the influence of the anti-utilitarian movement and the gift paradigm on relational sociology. (original abstract)
Słowa kluczowe
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
399--410
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • University of Warsaw
Bibliografia
  • Boccacin, L. 2016. Scambio symbolico, in: P. Terenzi, L. Boccacin, R. Prandini (eds.), Lessico della sociologia relazionale. Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 261-266.
  • Baudrillard, J. 1976. L'Echange symbolique et la mort. Paris: Gallimard.
  • Bramanti, D. 2016. Dono, in: P. Terenzi, L. Boccacin, R. Prandini (eds.), Lessico della sociologia relazionale. Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 69-73.
  • Caillé, A. 1996. Ni holisme ni individualisme méthodologiques. Marcel Mauss et le paradigme du don, Revue européenne des sciences sociales 34 (105): 181-224.
  • Caillé, A. 2000. Anthropologie du don. Le tiers paradigme. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.
  • Caillé, A. 2013. Anti-utilitiarianism and the Gift-paradigm, in: L. Bruni and S. Zamagni (eds.). Handbook on the Economics of Reciprocity and Social Enterprise. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 44-48.
  • Caillé, A. 2020. The Gift Paradigm: A Short Introduction to the Anti-Utiliarian Movement in the Social Sciences. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
  • Derrida, J. 1991. Donner les temps, vol. 1: La fausse monnai. Paris: editions Galilée.
  • Donati, P. 2003. Giving and social relations: The culture of free giving and its differentiation today, International Review of Sociology / Revue Internationale de Sociologie 13 (2): 243-272.
  • Donati, P. 2009a. Dono, in: L. Bruni, S. Zamagni (eds.), Dizionario di economia civile. Roma: Città Nuova, pp. 279-291.
  • Donati, P. 2009b. La società dell' umano. Genua-Milano: Marietti.
  • Donati, P. 2011a. Relational Sociology. A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences, London: Routledge.
  • Donati, P. 2011b. L'Amore come relazione sociale, Rivista Italiana di Sociologia 2 (4): 15-35.
  • Durkheim, É. 1912. Les forms élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Le Systéme totémique en Australie. Paris: Quadrige / PUF.
  • Durkheim, É. 1966. The Rules of Sociological Method. London: Macmillan.
  • Godbout, J. T., en collaboration avec A. Caillé. 2000. L'ésprit du don. Paris: La Découverte.
  • Godelier, M. 1999. The Enigma of the Gift. Chicago: Polity Press.
  • Hałas, E. 1991. Images of Man in Symbolic Interactionism and the Problem of Homo Aestimans, The Polish Sociological Bulletin 1: 51-61.
  • Hałas, E. 2019. Discovering the Relational Relevance of Reciprocity, in: E. Carrà and P. Terenzi (eds.), The Relational Gaze on a Changing Society. Berlin: Peter Lang, pp. 89-105.
  • Hobbes, T. 2005. Leviathan. Toronto: Broadview Press.
  • Malinowski, B. 1953. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Mauss, M. 2007. Essai sur le don. Forme et raison de l'échange dans les sociétés archaïques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  • Mead G. H. 1981. A Behavioristic Account of the Significant Symbol, in: A. J. Reck (ed.), Selected Writings of G.H. Mead. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 240-247.
  • Sahlins, M. 1972. Stone Age Economics. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
  • Simmel, G. 2004. The Philosophy of Money. London: Routledge.
  • Terenzi, P. 2016. Matrice teologica della società, in: P. Terenzi, L. Boccacin, R. Prandini (eds.), Lessico della sociologia relazionale. Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 165-168.
  • Znaniecki, F. 1934. The Method of Sociology. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171607295

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.