Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2019 | 2 | 523--535
Tytuł artykułu

Circular Economy in Companies: an Analysis of Selected Indicators from a Managerial Perspective

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
The circular economy (CE) concept is now gaining increasing attention and it is being widely explored as a promising path to sustainable development. CE implementation requires extensive activities needed for the transition from the linear to the circular model and suitable tools to support decision-makers in setting adequate goals and monitoring the effects of undertaken actions. Considering the need for research on effective CE performance evaluation, this article presents a comprehensive analysis and comparison of CE indicators available at the micro level. Based on a systematic literature review, 19 such CE indicators were identified. The indicators were assessed and compared using the Delphi methodology. The suitability of each metric for a comprehensive evaluation of CE performance was analyzed taking account of the criteria related to analytical opportunities and potential application of CE indicators, together with the criteria related to organizational and operational issues of practical application of CE indicators. The usefulness of CE indicators for practical implementation in companies was determined from a managerial perspective, with particular emphasis on supporting the decision-making process. The comparison of CE indicators presented in this article is intended to facilitate the choice of a specific metric depending on the company's needs and on the possibilities of its application. (original abstract)
Opis fizyczny
  • Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice
  • Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice
  • Angioletti, C.M., Despeisse, M. and Rocca, R. (2017). Product Circularity Assessment Methodology. APMS. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 514, pp. 411-418.
  • Baran, J., Janik, A., Ryszko, A. and Szafraniec, M. (2016). Selected environmental methods and tools supporting eco-innovation implementation within national smart specialisations in Poland, 3rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2016, SGEM2016 Conference Proceedings, 2(3), pp. 1029-1036.
  • Capellini, M. (2017). Measure the circularity of a public lighting system (online). Marco Capellini, Sustainable Design & Consulting. Available at: (Accessed 22 JUN 2019).
  • Cayzer, S., Griffiths, P. and Beghetto V. (2017). Design of indicators for measuring product performance in the circular economy, International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 10(4-5), pp. 289-298.
  • Cullen, J.M. (2017). Circular Economy: Theoretical Benchmark or Perpetual Motion Machine? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21, pp. 483-486.
  • C2C (2016). The cradle to cradle certified product standard. Version 3.1. (online). MBDC in collaboration with EPEA. Available at: (Accessed 30 JUN 2019).
  • Elia, V., Grazia Gnoni, M. and Tornese, F. (2017). Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: a critical analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), pp. 2741-2751.
  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2012). Towards the Circular Economy. Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, UK.
  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation and Granta Design (2015). Circularity Indicators. An approach to measuring circularity. Methodology (online). Ellen MacArthur Foundation and Granta Design. Available at: (Accessed 16 JUN 2019).
  • Evans, J., and Bocken, N. (2013). Circular Economy Toolkit. Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing. Available online: (Accessed 1 JUL 2019).
  • Franklin-Johnson, E., Figge, F. and Canning, L. (2016). Resource duration as a managerial indicator for Circular Economy performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, pp. 589-598.
  • Graedel, T. E., Allwood, J., Birat, J.-P., Buchert, M., Hagelűken, Ch., Reck, B. K., Sibley, S. F. and Sonnemann, G. (2011). What do we know about metal recycling rates? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 15 (3), pp.355-366.
  • Haupt, M., Vadenbo, C. and Hellweg S. (2016). Do We Have the Right Performance Indicators for the Circular Economy? Insight into the Swiss Waste Management System. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21 (3), pp.615-627.
  • Heshmati, A. (2015). A Review of the Circular Economy and its Implementation. Discussion Paper No. 9611. Bonn, The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
  • Huysman, S., De Schaepmeester, J., Ragaert, K., Dewulf, J. and De Meester, S. (2017). Performance indicators for a circular economy: a case study on post-industrial plastic waste. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 120, pp. 46-54.
  • Janik, A. and Ryszko, A. (2017). Measuring product material circularity - a case of automotive industry. 17th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2017, SGEM2017 Vienna GREEN Conference Proceedings, 17(43), pp. 123-130.
  • Kingfisher, (2014). The Business Opportunity of Closed Loop Innovation. Closed Loop Innovation Booklet, Westminster, UK.
  • Kirchherr, J., Reike, D. and Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions.Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 127, pp.221-232.
  • Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A. and Seppälä, J. (2018). Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations. Ecological Economics, 143, pp. 37-46.
  • Linder, M., Sarasini, S. and van Loon, P. (2017). A Metric for Quantifying Product-Level Circularity. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21, pp. 545-558.
  • Parchomenko, A., Nelen, D., Gillabel, J. and Rechberger H. (2019). Measuring the circular economy - A Multiple Correspondence Analysis of 63 metrics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, pp. 200-216.
  • Park, J.Y. and Chertow, M.R. (2014). Establishing and testing the "reuse potential" indicator for managing wastes as resources. Journal of Environmental Management, 137, pp. 45-53.
  • Potting, J., Hekkert, M., Worrell, E. and Hanemaaijer, A. (2017). Circular economy: measuring innovation in the product chain. PBL Netherlands EAA, Hague.
  • ResCoM. (2017a). Resource Conservative Manufacturing - transforming waste into high value resource through closed-loop product systems. Project, co-funded by the European Commission. Available online: pathfinder/(Accessed 30 JUN 2019).
  • ResCoM. (2017b). Resource Conservative Manufacturing - transforming waste into high value resource through closed-loop product systems. Project, co-funded by the European Commission. Available online:
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.